Truly a dangerous individual is this “Joe McCarthy in a skirt” Pamela Geller

Pamela Geller is a servant of US Imperialism and so she is at present totally silent on the Ukrainian issue. This means she supports Fascists. Silence here equals support. She also projects herself as an opponent of Islamic Jihad and in certain ways she is. But how can those two things go together, that is a servant of US Imperialism, and also against Islamic Jihad, remembering that Islamic Jihad is promoted by all branches of US and EU Imperialism? This is a big question for Jews who also face the Jihad of the “Palestinians”. This needs to be discussed.

The following will help us to see through this “conundrum:

Pamela Geller has opened up a big campaign against the NY Mayor Bill de Blasio. Geller calls him a “Communist”. Is that true or false? Can Geller be serious here?

Bill de Blasio from what I can learn is part of that Stalinist cum pro Islam and Antisemitic “Left”, by this I mean what is called the “Left”

The question that Geller must be forced to address is if de Blasio is Stalinist how is he Communist.

In other words is Stalinism the same as Communism?

Or is Trotskyism the same as Stalinism?

Or is what Lenin fought for the same as what Lenin and the Bolsheviks fought for.

Those are actually very basic questions and they are also questions which ARE answerable. It involves a Project in political life which is doable.

Geller and Spencer are “tricky” and an example of this is the way they use the “Sandanistas” to attack de Blasio, but there are a couple of issues here which they do not raise never mind answer. The first issue was the role of Reagan and of US Imperialism in Central America against the South American people. It is very telling that Geller and Spencer are hiding this. The second issue that these “tricky duo” do not raise is were the Sandanistas Communists or Stalinists, and if the Sandanistas were allied with the East German Stalinists does that not mean that the Sandanista Leadership was in essence a Stalinist leadership? Whatever the answer it is very clear that in Spencer and in Geller we are dealing with subterfuge which is indeed dangerous for us all, and also for Jews. As I said, “tricky”!

There are two main problems, Geller and 4international

1. Problem of Geller is that she labels people like Bill de Blasio as being a Communist. Geller thus is a big confuser of issues. She may sound good to some people but that is based on ignorance and offers no education. Geller and Spencer confuse, do not enlighten!

2. Problem of Geller for 4international is that she confuses and muddies, but in order to tackle this the 4international needs to engage in a “Project”. By this I mean that this understanding of what Geller is at, which is deliberately confusing Stalinism with Trotskyism, has to be struggled for. I am very sad to say thaat this kind of knowledge does not grow on tres and all that a Young person today has to do is reach up and grab a fruit (of knowledge). No sadly no!

Geller engages in anti-Jihad activity. But so do we on 4international. Islam is a Nazi ideology as expressed in the Muftí and Hitler coming together in the Holocaust against the Jews.

But Geller is also in that Hitler camp, because she is an anti-communist, like Diana West, another “Joe McCarthy in skirts”.

Her McCarthyism is leading her to support Fascists against Russia in a new World War.

Truly a dangerous individual is this “Joe McCarthy in a skirt” Pamela Geller

Dangerous especially to the Jews

LEADERS LIKE PAMELA GELLER MUST NOW ATTACK THE JEWISH TRAITORS INSIDE ZIONISM

What is Zionism? What is meant by Zionism?

 

Zionism is really nothing more or less than the nationalism of the Jewish people.

 

Every single people or nation in the world has its nationalism, to take a few examples out of hundreds the Irish nationalism, the French nationalism, the Kurdish nationalism and so on.

 

Zionism is really the nationalism of the Jewish people. It is really the attachment of this people to the area which surrounds the original town and now city of Jerusalem and to which Jerusalem is the centre and national focal point.

 

When Irish people think of and are attracted to the Aran islands and life there, or Ben Bulben, or New Grange, or the GPO in Dublin’s O’Connell Street, then that is not a lot different to Jewish people loving the Temple Mount, the Dead Sea, or the City of Jerusalem as a whole.

 

The only reason this is contested in the particular case of the Jews and THEIR Homeland is because of a phenomenon called Antisemitism.

 

Antisemitism is indeed a phenomenon which was never caused in any way by the Jewish people, it is just that they have been the recipients of this hatred

 

The Trotskyist Socialist Movement as represented by http://www.4international.me stand totally behind the Jewish people in their struggle to renew Jewish nationalism, which is Zionism.

 

We in http://www.4international.me are indeed Zionists in this respect. What else could we be? What other way to describe us?

 

We stand totally behind the Jews in their return to their Homeland. The Jews should never have surrendered the name of Palestine so easily and allow this antisemitic monster to raise its head.

 

What has been called the Arab Spring has thrown all political movements into great crisis. What has so far been and what is the Arab Spring? We on http://www.4international.me believe that the Arab Spring is nothing more than the gathering clouds of dictatorship of the same level as that experienced by the world under the Nazi and Mussolini Dictatorships, carried on into the present era.

 

This has taken a new turn in the coming to power of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt with Morsi as just elected and announced President, and with the Egyptian Army deciding not to stop the Muslim Brotherhood, not actually ever wanting to tangle with the Muslim Brotherhood, and so allowing the Muslim brotherhood to take power of the state, state power, in this case, which is a state power taken by the Muslim Brotherhood through a Parliamentary Election, but remember this is exactly the same way that Hitler and the Nazis took power in 1933 in Germany.

 

Whatever Morsi will say about being for peace and as he plays a game working with US and EU Imperialism, he is telling lies. The real aim of the Muslim Brotherhood is written into the Constitution of Hamas, which is the Arab Palestinian wing of the Muslim rotherhood.

 

In that Constitution also known as the Hamas Charter there is an open call for the killing of all Jews on earth, just as there was in Mein Kamph.

 

The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt will likewise set out to kill all minorities and non Muslims in Egypt. Directly in the firing line of the Muslim Brotherhood here in Egypt will be first and foremost the Copts, who are Christian Arabs, going back to the time of the birth of Christianity, and some 600 years before Islam.

 

There is also a great crisis within Jewish or Zionist leaders. Just this past week gone, a few days ago, Pamela Geller and her organizational website was stopped holding an event and rally which had been publicised for months by a Jewish organization. They simply cancelled the event at the last minute under pressure from CAIR, which is the American Branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, and also under pressure from rich Jewish donors to the campaigns of this Jewish organization.

 

So a woman, Pamela Geller, a Zionist and a Jewish campaigner, who fights against the take over of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and calls it for exactly what it is, is attackled by a Jewish organization in America.

 

This is common.

 

I have seen Geller attacked continually by British Jews on Harry’s Place.

 

I also have experienced this. I have been prevented from speaking by journalists at a radio station in Spain called Talk Radio Europe. This station is actually owned by a Jewish Spanish man. The reasons for blocking me are roughly the same as that of against Pamela Geller.

 

Thus there is a great crisis in general inside the Jewish leaders of Zionism.

 

For many years I have commented on Israpundit which is controled by a Jewish person called Ted Belman. In recent weeks I have had my comments totally removed by Belman the editor.

 

At the top of his blog Israpundit Belman is calling for an Arab Spring for Jordan. This is another great betrayal.

 

Apart from Geller I never saw one clear call by any Jewish leader for Jews to defend Mubarak against the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

Geller must now know the truth of what we have been saying and what we say now. You cannot move forward a single inch without the most intense and ruthless struggle against these Jewish traitors of the Jewish people.

 

The growing censoring of my remarks on Israpundit by Belman is not one little bit different to the dreadful betrayal of Geller by her fellow Jews in California last week.

 

I know that Geller thinks this is serious. But we on http://www.4international.me think it is far more serious.

 

This is why we will be fighting for clarity on the issue of Jewish Leaders and Trotskyism by making a deep study of the pivotal book published in 1971 by Joseph Nedava, called “Trotsky and the Jews”, more details will be found on this site and on Facebook.

 

(postscript)

 

It is easy now to defend Mubarak against the Muslim Brotherhood. It is much harder to defend Assad, as it was Gadhafi, against the Muslim Brotherhood, but that must be done.

 

ISRAEL IS IN GREAT DANGER BECAUSE ANTISEMITISM IS NOT A LOGICAL THOUGHT SYSTEM

by Felix Quigley

23 December, 2009

It is very important to puncture the idea that the Arabs have been motivated by anti imperialism. What they were motivated by was good, old fashioned anti Jew hatred.

Leon Trotsky was asked what was his political position towards the 1929 Arab attacks against the Jews?:

He answered that he had not yet studied the issue adequately and that he was in the process of doing so. That he did not know what elements were involved, anti British feeling in other words anti imperialism, (I paraphrase) or whether it was the hatred of the Arab, Islam [using specifically the word “Mohammedans”] for Jews, in other words anti-Semitism.

Francisco Gil White made a very thorough study of this and his study cuts the ground from under the anti imperialist part of the answer of Trotsky.

That the Arabs are anti imperialist is a dominant theme inside the revisionist Left now and for a long time past. It is a strange concept because it is blatantly obvious that the ruling capitalist class governments of every country under the sun are up to their necks in collaboration with the Arab rulers.

So when the revisionist Left come forward and also support the Arabs they are singing from the same hymn sheet as their own governments. Some Left!

The most that you can say about the Arab regimes is that they are also imperialist and that they are competing with other imperialist powers on a world stage. And this fits the bill because we know that Islam conquered half the known world and was a bloody and an imperialist force. Yet the US with EU is the dominant force. One does not negate the other.

In order to make Islam or Arabs in to anti imperial forces the revisionist Left really have to invent this in their own heads. Make it fit their own schema, and this is what Nathan Weinstock was doing, thus Gil White was correct to tackle Nathan Weinstock head on

[Begin quote from Francisco Gil White here]

As you may recall from Part 1, even anti-Zionist historian Nathan Weinstock recognizes that the ‘Palestinian movement’ in British Mandate ‘Palestine’ was not exactly admirable. It was, he says, “deformed by racism.” Racism against whom? The British? That should be the first hypothesis for a movement that Weinstock calls “the Palestinian anti-colonialist movement,” because the British were the occupying imperialist/colonialist power in charge. But no, as Weinstock himself concedes, this movement was racist against the Jews (Zionist or not, mind you). Weinstock’s admission that the ‘Palestinian’ movement’s flag was anti-Jewish racism is important because it comes from someone who would like to defend the justice of this movement.

Precisely in order to defend this movement, Nathan Weinstock would like you to think that the violent racism of so-called ‘Palestinian’ Arabs was “understandable” because, he claims, the Zionist Jews and the British were “clearly” allied with each other against the Arabs (see Part 1). This representation is absurd. As Weinstock himself admits,

1) the British imperialists were helping the Arabs kill Jews (see Part 1 for Weinstock’s admission; British support for anti-Jewish terrorist violence is documented below);

and as Weinstock also admits,

2) the Arab feudal lords in ‘Palestine’ incited racist violence against the Jews in order to create a climate to intimidate fellow Arabs who might want to get along with the mostly socialist Jews, the better to further exploit the downtrodden Arab commoners (see Part 3)

Therefore, it is amazing that Weinstock, who says he is an anti-imperialist Marxist, should not defend the interpretation that the British ruling class and the Arab ruling class were allied against ordinary Arabs and Jews. After all, as I also show in Part 3, the Zionist Jews had no role in oppressing the Arabs; on the contrary, the Zionist Jews were indirectly and directly helping to end the oppression which the Arab (effendi) feudal lords made the ordinary (fellahin) peasant Arabs to suffer.

Nathan Weinstock would also like you to think that this allegedly ‘Palestinian’ movement was an expression of a Palestinian Arab “national consciousness.” But this is quite impossible. As I show in Part 1, the ideology of this movement was just plain old anti-Jewish racism, of the traditional sort in the Muslim world, and quite comparable — notwithstanding Weinstock’s loud protestations to the contrary — to the traditional European anti-Jewish racism that produced the Shoah (Holocaust). Moreover, as I show in Part 2, ‘Palestine’ as such never existed, and neither was there ever any such thing as an ‘Arab Palestinian’ population with a ‘Palestinian identity,’ much less Weinstock’s alleged “national consciousness.” Most of the so-called ‘Palestinian Arabs,’ as I also show in Part 2, were immigrants from elsewhere attracted by the economic boom that the Zionist Jews created when they transformed a desolate land into an oasis (few people are even aware of this).

So, although Nathan Weinstock may refer to the racist movement that killed innocent Jews in British Mandate ‘Palestine’ as the “Palestinian anti-colonialist movement,” the well-documented facts suggest that this movement had absolutely nothing to do with fighting colonialism. On the contrary, the aristocratic Arab leaders of repeated terrorist violence against ordinary Arabs and Jews were directly sponsored and assisted by the colonialist British Mandate government and the colonialist British military, as I will document below in some detail. It was this British sponsorship and assistance that initially set in motion the so-called ‘Palestinian movement.’ Later, the Nazis would also sponsor it. And after that, the United States.

Anybody who chooses to defend the ‘Palestinian movement’ should do so in full awareness of the facts documented below.

[End quote from Gil White here]

The above is from an article titled “How did the Palestinian movement emerge? The British sponsored it. Then the German Nazis, and the US”

Find it on the following url

http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov4.htm  

Gil White does then an outstanding job in showing how German and Italian Nazi propaganda against the Jews flooded the Middle East and all Arab countries. There was machinery in place and a structure that enabled this.

Gil White tells of how the German Government of Hitler was flooded with congratulations when and because it had passed the Nuremburg Laws, congratulations coming from all parts of the Arab world.

A question related to this must be answered. Why did the Nazi propaganda against Jews receive such a ready hearing in the Arab countries? Is there something connected to being an Arab that enabled the Nazi propaganda to be effective?

This brings to the question of Islam, the ideology which drives the Arab movement. John Bostom and Robert Spencer in their knowledge of the Koran have done important work which helps to answer this question. [We will examine their work later]

The study of this 1930s period and how the Arab world mobilized against the Jews is of great importance to the present. Instead of there being a Fascist movement as there was Hitler and Mussolini, there is today another Fascist movement, which is strangely enough concentrated outside Israel in the combined and united efforts of the revisionist “Left”, really a Fascist Nazi type movement in its anti-Semitic ideology, linked up with the openly Fascist anti-Semitic Islam which is operating like a rash in all countries, especially in countries in Europe, where the invective against Jews is strongest. You can see this Fascist movement of the revisionist “left” as they attempt to isolate and destroy the Jewish Homeland with their urgings for boycott, also in the caravans and boat sailings to break the “siege” of Gaza. They help and hand over money to a Jew killing and Jew hating movement in Hamas in Gaza, while Fatah’s exactly the same, although some very stupid Israeli Jews seek to work with Fatah. Meanwhile state governments such as that of Bush and Obama have been in alliance with Arabs and Islam against the Jewish Homeland. The aim is to bring the Jewish Homeland down. There can be no other aim because these are not stupid people.

Over the past 20 years the Iranian regime has made many threats to destroy Israel. Yet we hear people who argue in the west that Iran does not pose any threat to Israel. Just last week Iran has perfected a very advanced rocket which can reach Israel. There is no outcry. It seems that public opinion has been conditioned by many events and much propaganda to be totally blasé at the thought of Israel being struck by a Nuclear Bomb.

The world thus is not obsessed with the thought of Israel being hit by a Nuclear Bomb and the deaths of millions, which actually would include many Arabs as well. The world is obsessed with the war which Israel fought against Hamas, a war that was forced on to Israel, which it tried to avoid for many years. Even an imbecile should be able to see that.

Very alarming is the position of the trade unions, who on this issue are part of this Fascist force we mentioned above, even though Fascism will scrap all union organization. As we shall see later anti-Semitism is blind in its fury! The Fascist and Nazi British Trade Union Congress passes a resolution to isolate Israel, at this time! British unions are a strange ideological concoction but…There are shades here of the pact which Stalin made with Hitler in 1939.

Some reading I have been doing centres on references to a German Nazi called Rudolf Hoss

I will jot some points down now and edit them on Monday…

Rudolf Hoss, the Commandant of the largest concentration camp in Poland, was in 1942 called to a meeting with Himmler and was told that the Fuhrer had given the order for “a final solution of the Jewish Question”

“We the SS must carry out that order. If it is not carried out now the Jews will later on destroy the German people”

[Page 702, Hitler, by John Toland]

The parallel is clear

Everybody seems to discard the lies that Iran has been caught out in spreading. The Iran Government was caught out hiding the secret plant in Qom. They have also been caught out contradicting each other. Yet there are many people who believe Iran when it says it is looking for peaceful nuclear targets. They are expecting Iran to be telling the truth and not expecting Iran to be liars. The only answer for this psychosis is that people have been already indoctrinated in to a great hatred for Israel.

Back to Toland

“The decision taken the Fuhrer made it known to those entrusted with the Final Solution that the killings should be done as humanely as possible”

[Page 703, Hitler by John Toland]

The horror of this statement is explained by Toland, and it is alarming.

Toland explains that Hitler was under the influence of Christian antisemitism, and felt that he was doing their work in eliminating this “menace” to humanity, the Jews.

It is very similar to the speeches of Ahmadinejad re Zionists, the same thing really

Toland quotes Hitler directly

“I am now as before a catholic, and will always remain so”

Toland

“…he carried within him its teaching that the Jew was the killer of God”

“…The extermination therefore could be done without a twinge of conscience since he was merely acting as the avenging hand of God so long as it was done impersonally without cruelty

There is an almost exact parallel from the Hitler of 1941 to the Ahmadinejad and the Revolutionary Guards of today. The religion is different but the concept is the same.

Hitler was operating in the midst of incredible losses in the Russian Front.

Up to February 20, 1942…199,448 dead, 708,351 wounded, 112, 627 frostbite!

These pages by Toland are very important because it is shown that no matter that the Germans were being threshed by the Russians, and this had a serious effect on Hitler, his health, his manner, his appearance, yet he did not ever lose sight of the extermination of the Jews

“My prophesy shall be fulfilled that this war will not destroy Aryan humanity but it will destroy the Jew. Whatever the battle may bring in its course or however long ity may last, that will be its final course”

Toland Page 709

Toland perceptively adds to this the following

“The elimination of Jewry overrode victory itself”

In conclusion I believe that something very similar is happening around the personage of Ahmadinejad and the crazy chaos inducing Mahdi returning bullshit of the Shia religion of Islam that is driving Ahmadinejad on to create a great massacre of the Jews, the meaning of his drive for Nuclear arms, in order to do just that.

It is well to remember at this time that Hitler emerged right out of the Christian ethos and that the ground for the Holocaust was laid long before.

“NUKE NUKE ISRAEL” THE ANTISEMITES SHOUTED ON THOSE MARCHES

We on 4international believe that a large antisemitic movement has just taken to the streets last weekend over Gaza. This comes at a time of deteriorating crisis in the capitalist system. There is no direct link between economics and politics, we are not determinists, but there is nevertheless a link. It was the Wall Street Crash of 1929 that allowed the previously small Nazi Party gain enough support among the embittered German middle class and lumpen proletariat to take power. These trends are afoot today.

In Belfast the Sinn Fein Lord Mayor of Belfast marches with trade union leaders in support of a totally antisemitic organization, Hamas, without seemingly turning a hair. Are they brain dead or are they just filled with hate for Israel?

This is an excellent analysis of this antisemitic phenomenon which is NOT going to go away but which is going to intensify as the crisis develops. For one thing Iran is in severe economic crisis, it is in fact an economic basket case, and this crisis will drive these Fascists in the most unpredictable of fashion.

DEBKAfile is talking about the end of 2009 for their compeltion of 3 Nuclear Bombs. Is this the future? The article by Netanyahu is wonderful because it expresses the teror which has been wrought by the Arab Fascist missiles into Israel. It is a sure sign of an antisemite, in my opinion, to try to belittle those 6000 missiles. Or else they completely do not understand or know not a scrap of history and do not know that this is happening to the Jews, do not realize the significance of that. I do wonder do these people think at all?

[start report by Yid with Lid here]

Is Anti-Zionism Anti-Semitism?

Jews are sometimes accused of having a major league chip on our shoulders. People think that we scream Anti-Semitism for EVERY OFFENSE and there are some Jews that react like that. Critics of Israel claim that they are only “Anti-Zionist” not Anti-Semitic, they say that any claims of Anti-Semitism are trumped up just to deflect attention from the real issues. There is only ONE problem with that argument it is totally wrong.  The facts show that hatred of Israel is just a politically correct way displaying hatred of Jews.

Even the US State Department recognizes that the two go hand in hand:

The collective effect of unremitting criticism of Israel, coupled with a failure to pay attention to regimes that are demonstrably guilty of grave violations, has the effect of reinforcing the notion that the Jewish state is one of the sources, if not the greatest source, of abuse of the rights of others, and thus intentionally or not encourages anti-Semitism

Nothing has brought this out into the open more than the recent Anti-Israel demonstrations throughout the world, even here in the United States:

Yes, it’s anti-Semitism  
by Jeff Jacoby


CRITICIZING ISRAEL doesn’t make you anti-Semitic: If it’s been said once, it’s been said a thousand times. Yet somehow that message doesn’t seem to have reached the hundreds of anti-Israel demonstrators in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., who turned out last week to protest Israel’s military operation in Gaza. As their signs and chants made clear, it isn’t only the Jewish state’s policies they oppose. Their animus goes further.

Demonstrators chanted “Nuke, nuke Israel!” and carried placards accusing Israel of “ethnic cleansing” and bearing such messages as: “Did Israel take notes during the Holocaust? Happy Hanukkah.” To the dozen or so supporters of Israel gathered across the street, one demonstrator shouted: “Murderers! Go back to the ovens! You need a big oven.”

The Arab-Israeli conflict induces strong passions, and the line that separates legitimate disapproval of Israel from anti-Semitism may not always be obvious. But it’s safe to assume the line has been crossed when you hear someone urging Jews “back to the ovens.”

The Danish website Snaphanen posted a photo the other day of a pamphlet being distributed in Copenhagen’s City Hall Square. On one side it proclaimed: “Never Peace With Israel!” and “Kill Israel’s People!” On the other side: “Kill Jewish people evry where in ther world!” The leaflet’s spelling left something to be desired, but its message of genocidal anti-Semitism couldn’t have been clearer.
Likewise the message in Amsterdam on Saturday, where the crowd at an anti-Israel rally repeatedly chanted, “Hamas! Hamas! Jews to the gas.” And the message in Belgium, where pro-Hamas demonstrators torched Israeli flags, burned a public menorah, and painted swastikas on Jewish-owned shops.

Only marginally less vile is the message that has been trumpeted at demonstrations from Boston to Los Angeles to Vancouver: “Palestine will be free/ From the river to the sea” — a restatement in rhyme of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s call for Israel to be “wiped from the map.”

Let’s say it for the thousand-and-first time: Every negative comment about Israel is not an expression of bigotry. Israel is no more immune to criticism than any other country. But it takes willful blindness not to see that anti-Zionism today — opposition to the existence of Israel, rejection of the idea that the Jewish people are entitled to a state — is merely the old wine of anti-Semitism in its newest bottle.

The hatred of Jews has always been protean, readily revising itself to reflect the idiom of its age. At times, it targeted Jews for their religion, demonizing them as Christ-killers or enemies of the true faith. At other times, Jews have been damned as disloyal fifth columns to be suppressed or expelled, or as a racial malignancy to be physically exterminated.

In our day, Jew-hatred expresses itself overwhelmingly in national terms: It is the Jewish state that the haters are obsessed with. “What anti-Semitism once did to Jews as people, it now does to Jews as a people,” the British commentator Melanie Phillips has written. “First it wanted the Jewish religion, and then the Jews themselves, to disappear; now it wants the Jewish state to disappear.”

The claim that anti-Zionism isn’t bigotry would be preposterous in any other context. Imagine someone vehemently asserting that Ireland has no right to exist, that Irish nationalism is racism, and that those who murder Irishmen are actually victims deserving the world’s sympathy. Who would take his fulminations for anything but anti-Irish bigotry? Or believe him if he said that he harbors no prejudice against the Irish?

By the same token, those who demonize and delegitimize Israel, who say the world would be better off without it, who hold it to standards of perfection no other country is held to, who extol or commiserate with its mortal enemies, who liken it to Nazi Germany and apartheid South Africa, who make it the scapegoat not only for crimes it hasn’t committed, but for those of which it is a victim — yes, such people are anti-Semitic, whether they acknowledge it or not.

Criticize Israel? Certainly. But those who so loudly denounce Israel in its war against Hamas are siding with some of the most virulent Jew-haters on earth. They may tell themselves that that doesn’t make them anti-Semites. But it does. “When people criticize Zionists,” Martin Luther King said in 1968, “they mean Jews. You are talking anti-Semitism.”

http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2009/01/is-anti-zionism-anti-semitism.html