GADHAFI HAD BEEN OPPOSED TO THE INFLUENCE OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD FOR DECADES. DID SPENCER OF JIHADWATCH NOT UNDERSTAND THAT? OR WHAT WAS THERE NOT TO UNDERSTAND?
SPENCER AND GELLER REFUSED CONTINUALLY, DURING 6 LONG MONTHS OF NATO/SHARIA WAR, TO DEFEND GADHAFI
THIS IS A GROSS BETRAYAL AND HAS GOT AN HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE ANTI JIHAD MOVEMENT, AND FOR ISRAEL WHICH IS AT THE FRONT OF THIS ANTI JIHAD MOVEMENT, AND IS FIGHTING FOR ITS LIFE AGAINST NATO AND THE JIHAD
The fall of Muammar Gadhafi in Tripoli last night is the start of a new era of Islamofascist dominance in the world, and Islamofascism which is now backed openly by NATO
There is in fact a pro Islamofascist President sitting in the White House, Obama, but unfortunately it is not just Obama, the list of pro Sharia politicians in America extends from George Bush, Carter, Clinton, now Perry and of course McCain. You have to add snakes like Joseph Lieberman to the mix.
Gadhafi came to power on the basis of a rebellion against the reactionary and despotic medieval kingship of Libya. Of course he did not have many answers but he did try to advance the interests of the poor Libyans, especially was progressive towards the role of women, tried to overcome tribal divisions, was especially sympathetic towards black Africa (which earned him the hatred of the racist Muslims). For confirmation of the latter look at the numbers of blacks from countries like Nigeria and Congo who were forced to flee by the NATO intervention.
Nothing was perfect but then neither was the despot Haile Selassie perfect in the 1930s. Despite being a religious despot Leon Trotsky did not hesitate for a second in defending Selassie unconditionally against the Mussolini invasion, and the defence of a poor country against Nazi Imperialism.
That is something that Robert Spencer of Jihadwatch could never and can never understand.
Not once during this terrible NATO intervention in Libya, on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood essentially, was Robert Spencer and the other reactionaries who comment on that site ever called once to defend Muammar Gadhafi against NATO and the fascist Muslim Brotherhood
I mean NOT ONCE!
And the fraudster known as Pamela Geller was really no different to Spencer. They seem to be cut from the same material.
Now they are silent (AS I WRITE) on the overthrow of Gadhafi. And of course it is too late anyway. No use in saying anything now. The damage is done.
Spencer would not defend Gadhafi during all of those months of NATO bombing of the Gadhafi forces in support of the Muslim Brotherhood of Qaradawi
But towards the end when Gadhafi made some statement about a Jihad against NATO (after the NATO air attack which killed scores of civilians and which NATO claimed was a rocket gone “wrong”) there was Spencer and his ugly brand of so called anti-Jihad politics ready to pounce on Gadhafi
What an ugly brand of politics is contained in this “anti-Jihadist” Spencer.
By the way we on 4international defend Spencer and Geller when they are attacked by Muslims. What we are saying here is that they betrayed the anti-Jihadist struggle by refusing to defend Gadhafi in a REAL WAR, not words but a war that was actually happening
I am going to now produce the entry that was made by Spencer at that time (You should remember that Spencer kept asking, as did Geller, why are we there, meaning why is US Imperialism there) but this entry shows that Spencer was part of the NATO war machine against Gadhafi, which in itself was part of the Jihad, and was part of the overall war against Israel as well.
Gadhafi calls for global jihad as NATO bombs Libyan civilians
Unfortunately for him, however, it looks as if the global jihad has already opted to replace his regime. “Gadhafi calls for ‘global jihad’ as NATO bombs Libyan civilians,” from the International Business Times, June 19:
You can see how Spencer is sneering at Gadhafi
And then there is this comment from one of the Jihadwatch regulars, “Kepha” which I now reproduce
Kepha | June 20, 2011 2:57 AM | Reply
And that leaves Spencer just about nowhere as far as principled politics are concerned.
We will deal with the website 4international in a separate article, and you will see that the similarities to this are close.
I maintain very strongly that the defeat of Mubarak, the defeat now of Gadhafi, will greatly strengthen NATO as it seeks to establish a Soros inspired New World Order, and that Sharia Islam is and will be at the centre of this New World Order
Israel is the ultimate target of this war.
Israel is just as much a target of this war as was and are the Serbs.
There is where 4international separates from all of these so called leaders, such as Atlas Shrugs, Jihadwatch and Israpundit, but there are a thousand others.
They all represent in one way or another NATO, and the western Imperialist system. Spencer and Geller in fact use their anti Jihadism as a cover for their support or NATO and for US and EU Imperialism.
That is the big, big lesson of the war against Gadhafi and the refusal of these frauds to defend Gadhafi against NATO
We warned and warned again that in such a war you cannot sit on the fence.
Sitting on the fence was what Pamela Geller and Spencer did during the whole long 6 month course of this war. Their arses must be seriously sore by now.
So did the political rabbit Belman of Israpundit and a thousand other political rabbits who spout about being oh so Jewish etc., in fact their historical role is to betray the Jews, and their allowing Gadhafi to be crushed is the biggest betrayal of all time
What will happen now to Gadhafi and his sons is totally secondary, and in fact these brave fighters said as much at the beginning of this NATO/Sharia war on them, 6 months ago. Saif, who Spencer has been sneering at, stated in the clearest manner that they would not submit:
We were born here. We lived here. We die here
What a contrast they made to the sneers of Spencer, Geller and Belman, plus a thousand other of these so called Jewish “leaders”.
As regards the “left” fascists, they in the main all weighed in on the side of NATO against Gadhafi. That is for another article.
But the only political tendency in the planet who based our position on the historical position of the real 4th international in defence of Haile Selassie against the Nazi Invasion was ourselves.
And we did not start doing this recently. We did this from the very start of this NATO/Sharia war.
And that has got great historical significance, and will continue to have even more as time goes on.
We are small, we are ineffectual, but we got this right, and we were not afraid to say so.
As for these others, who claim to be friends of the Jews, by their refusal to defend Muammar Gadhafi and his historical and brave struggle, I class them here and now as enemies of the Jewish people
There is a huge difference between words, and appearances, and presentation on the one hand, to actual deeds on the other.
And in deeds they all supported the putting down of Muammar Gadhafi, by the combined forces of NATO and Sharia Islam
That is a heavy charge to lay against Geller and Spencer, as well as Belman and the others, but it is true and we will not withdraw.