NOW ISRAEL MUST STRIKE INDEPENDENTLY AGAINST SYRIA AND HIZBULLAH

READ THE FOLLOWING NEWS FROM DEBKA CAREFULLY

 

I THINK IT IS A GREAT AFFIRMATION OF OUR POSITION ON SYRIA, EGYPT AND LIBYA OVER A LONG TIME

 

TO REMIND THE READER WHAT WE SAID

 

1. ISRAEL MUST DEFEND ASSAD AGAINST OBAMA, CAMERON, SARKOZY IN ALLIANCE WITH THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

 

BUT WE ALSO SAID

 

2. IF ASSAD OR OTHERS THREATEN ISRAEL THEN ISRAEL MUST PULVERIZE ASSAD.

 

We said that Israel was above all an independent force and power. Israel can take whatever position it likes or decides upon

 

It is clear that Israel did not do number one above and could not because its leaders are NOT independent.

 

And the time has come for Israel to do the second, strike INDEPENDENTLY against Syria which with Hizbullah is directly threatening Israel

 

{Debka today}

 

DEBKAfileExclusive Report June 2, 2012, 7:44 PM (GMT+02:00)

Tags:  Turkey   Hizballah   Israel   Iran   Israel   Scuds   Syrian rebels 
Scud D ground-to-ground missile

Two radical developments arising from the Syrian conflict are revealed by debkafile: In an astonishing about face, Turkey has just turned away from its 14-month support for the anti-Assad revolt alongside the West and made common cause with Russia, i.e. Bashar Assad.  Further exacerbating fears of a “proxy war” involving Israel, Iran and Syria, the Lebanese Hizballah is getting ready to bring its Scud D missiles, which can reach any point in Israel, and other advanced weapons, including anti-air missiles, out of secret storage in Syria and transfer them across the border to Lebanon. Two years ago, Israel issued an ultimatum through Washington that the Scuds would be destroyed if they were moved over to Hizballah’s launching pads in Lebanon.
The Lebanese Shiite group has since kept its most advanced hardware stashed at the Syrian Al Hame and Al Zabadani military bases near Damascus.

 

Now that Syrian rebel attacks are closing in on Syrian military targets, Tehran and Hizballah leaders are working on plans to get them across into Lebanon without exposing them to Israeli attack.
One plan is to enlist the Palestinian Jihad Islami in the Gaza Strip and exploit a clash over the Scuds’ transfer as a trigger for an all round military offensive against Israel. It would be timed for the moment the Western-Arab intervention in Syria against President Assad crosses the line between covert and overt military action and begins an operation to establish safe zones as bases for rebel operation.
Washington, London and Paris began rushing forward contingency plans for this eventuality upon discovering that Ankara had secretly notified leaders of the rebel Free Syrian Army Thursday, May 31 that it had withdrawn permission for them to launch operations against the Assad regime from Turkish soil.
It was then realized that Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan and his Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu had stabbed Western-Arab Syrian policy in the back and moved over to help prop Assad up at the very moment his regime was on the point of buckling under international after-shocks from the systematic massacres of his own people.  
That day, Erdogan’s betrayal was confirmed when Davutoglu announced over Turkish NTV: “We have never advised either the Syrian National Council or the Syrian administration to conduct an armed fight, and we will never do so.” He added: “The Syrian people will be the driving force that eventually topples the Syrian regime. Assad will leave as a result of the people’s will.”

 

This was precisely the view voiced this week by Russian President Vladimir Putin, when he spoke out against violent rebellion, military intervention and sanctions to topple the Syrian ruler.
For the time being, the pro-Assad Moscow-Tehran front, bolstered now by Ankara, has got the better of Western and Arab policies for Syria.  Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Bashar Assad and Hassan Nasrallah have drawn encouragement for advancing to their next step: to confront the United States and Israel with another accomplished fact, the deployment of Scuds aimed at Israel from Lebanon.

 
Failing to curtail their transfer across the Syrian-Lebanese border in compliance with its 2010 ultimatum will seriously shake Israel’s deterrent capabilities and undercut its military credibility against its enemies, including Iran.
If on the other hand, the Obama administration again holds Israel back from military action, this time to destroy the long-range Scuds, Bashar Assad, Hizballah and Tehran will be awarded a winning hand – and not only in Syria.   

 

http://www.debka.com/article/22053/Turkey-ditches-Syrian-rebels-Will-Israel-attack-Hizballah-s-Scuds-

DEFEND ASSAD AGAINST THIS CHILD MASSACRE CONSPIRACY! AND HAVE ISRAEL STRIKE IRAN TO DESTROY THEIR NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST BOMB PLANS!

I SUSPECT VERY STRONGLY THAT THE MASSACRE OF CHILDREN BEING REPORTED BY THE BBC THIS MORNING IN SYRIA IS PHONY, A SET-UP.

 

I take that as given. Every piece of news that comes across on the BBC my first presumption is always that it is false. This is the correct position for a socialist revolutionary to take.

 

On www.4international.me we stand in the most uncopmpromising way in defence of the Jews, in defence of Israel, that Israel must urgently strike the Iranian fascist regime and with Nuclear weapons if it is seen as necessary to defend Israel.

 

But we cannot forgive Jewish leaders who have not defended Gaghbo, Ben Ali, Mubarak and Gadhafi with everything that the Jews have got.

 

None of those leaders can be said to be friendly to Israel. That is not the point. The point being that they were also opposed to the Sharia Law in their countries, and as the policy of the US and Europe has become clearer to ujs, they were therefore opposed to the Sharia/US Alliance.

 

In political life you do not have to be a friend of somebody to defend them.

 

The whole history of the last two decades of the life of Trotsky was that he sought to make every alliance against Hitler and Mussolini.

 

But the present Sharia in alliance with Obama and the EU leaders is a worse threat to the world than even the Nazis were.

 

That is why I cannot forgive the take by debka on this so-called massacre, and I cannot forgive Belman of Israpundit for not standing on his hind legs like a real man and warniong about how similar this looks to the conspiraciers against the Serbs.

 

I follow with 2 items, first my challenge to Belman on Israpundit this morning and secondly the atrocious debka take on the massacre. And on Assad.

 

1. MY CHALLENGE TO ISRAPUNDIT AND TED BELMAN THIS VERY MORNING

 

 

It is not at all that the Jews are gullible. It is that the Jewish leaders, especially in America, have been conditioned by their own (American) ruling class with its great powers of persuasion (for example Ted Belman of this Israpundit conditioned through his years as a LAWYER, to follow whatever garbage the elites throw at the population through the Media.

I was not there. I cannot say what happened.

However I have listened to the BBC and the reporting on this “massacre” follows the pattern of the reporting of the Srebrenica “massacre”.

Except that they have become more bold since 1995 because then they did not report a massacre until 2 months after the event.

The Irish times has reported on Srebrenica many hundreds of times since 1995 but in the first 2 months there was no mention at all of a massacre.

Now they can put this type of news story in circulation very fast and nobody bats an eyelid.

I can handle all of that but what I cannot handle is Jewish leaders like Belman who toe the line like any other gullible Media dimwit.

The reason they can put it out so fast is largely due to people like Belman and it is worse in his case because he has had a chance to understand how the Media in Yugoslavia worked.

An alternative theory, with the merest tiny bit of reflection, and I am no expert at all, but the whole point is I do not need great expertise, I just need to reflect back on Yugoslavia, on Qana, on Jenin, on El Dura etc..

1. Who benefits? Assad does not benefit at all because he is interested in keeping the shaky Russians on board with him.
2. Clearly benefit are those who call for HUMANITARIAN Intervention such as the CIA, the sections around Obama like Rice who are for Humanitarian Interventions everywhere, Joe Lieberman…and Ted Belman? But why the latter?

An alternative theory thinking only of the practicals of this specific massacre story:

We know that Al Qaeda is there and we know their ruthlessness.

We know the CIA and SAS are there and they would do anything for political global strategy.

We know that Al Jazeera and Kuwait are there and we saw just how ruthless they were in Libya in murdering not a hundred but tens of thousands of black Africans.

We have experience of the Qana affair where the same Islamists raided the nearby morgues in order to locate the very bodies that they later had actors dig or pull out of the rubble, in the case on one child pulled out time after time. THESE TYPES WOULD DO ANYTHING. THAT IS THE WHOLE ESSENCE OF THE EXPOSURES BY SPENCER ON JIHADWATCH AND BY PAMELA ON ATLAS SHRUGS.
And again on the BbC this morning these Antisemites focus on CHILDREN.

A lady from Save the Children (note a lady to give the maternal touch) was calling for humanitarian intervention.

And Belman, a Jewish leader through Israpundit in America and Israel, and a man who networks with Eidelberg et al, falls for all of this.

This makes me think that the issue is Assad and Jewish leadership opportunism devoid of principle, you know sell your granny fro a penny.

Assad is in league with Hizbullah, Hamas and Iran. So Belman is quite incapable of calling for a defence of Assad from the forces of Empire/Sharia.
Belman cannot act because he leaves out a fact I raised a year ago which is: defence of Assad does not mean lowering the guard against Assad by Israel.

Nothing to stop defending Assad. Nothing to stop Israel from striking against Assad if it needs to. But that entails seeing Israel as an independent force in the world.

THAT BELMAN AND HIS ILK IN THE Jewish ELITE CANNOT EVER DO

They have always and will always see Israel as an adjunct to the US which has brainwashed them.
Nor does defence of Gaghbo, Ben Ali, Gadhafi or Mubarak ever stop Israel from hitting Iran with a Nuclear Weapon to save the Jews.

Only the www.4international.me can take these positions and only that organization can become the defender of the Jews in the long term consistent sense.

 

http://www.israpundit.com/archives/46250/comment-page-1#comment-165533

 

2. THE NOTORIOUS DEBKA TAKE ON THIS “MASSACRE” THIS MORNING

 

Assad’s latest massacre at al-Houla

The wanton slaughter by Syrian forces of 92 confirmed victims, 32 of them children under ten, at the Homs village of Al-Houla Friday, May 25, was the most horrifying atrocity in the Middle East this week, but not the only one: In Sanaa, six days ago, al Qaeda’s suicide bombers, having penetrated Yemeni military ranks, detonated two tons of explosives at a parade rehearsal killing more than 100 soldiers and civilians and injuring 400.
Yet, according to the New York Times, after 15 months of bloodshed, President Barack Obama is working on the Yemenbi model for a plan to push Bashar Assad out of office, while “leaving remnants of his government in place. The Yemeni model replaced President Ali Abdullah in Sanaa with his vice president Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi.
Whereas US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton condemned Assad and his “cronies” for the al-Houla massacre, the “Yemen plan” would leave in place those very “cronies,” including Assad’s close relatives, who are responsible for massacres not only in al-Houla, but also in Homs, Hama, Idlib and Deraa, to name a few.
According to the NYT, when Obama tested the idea with Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev at the Group-of-8 summit in Camp David last Saturday, May 19, the Russian prime minister raised the example of “Mubarak in a cage,” referring to Mubarak’s court appearance at his trial. Obama then “countered with Yemen, and the indication was, yes, this was something we could talk about.”
This scrap of dialogue lifted the veil from a key aspect of Obama’s broader Middle East program and the role he has assigned Moscow for carrying it through. This role was first revealed exclusively by DEBKA-Net-Weekly 542 of May 25 which reported that the US president is acting to bring the Russians into a partnership for securing deals on the Iranian nuclear program and the Syrian crisis.
So far, his venture has had two results:

1.  The Iranian nuclear impasse and the outcome of the Syrian civil war have been more tightly integrated than ever before.
2.  Any deal reached by the US, Russia and Iran on the two issues would have to entail a carving-up of Middle East influence among those three powers.
As for Israel’s role in the ongoing bargaining, we also disclosed in debkafile of May 19 that Israel’s Binyamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak had agreed to stand back for Barack Obama to put his interim deal with Iran to the test. Despite their reservations, they decided to go along with it after receiving assurances from the White House that Iranian violations would result in the immediate termination of negotiations and bring military action forward as the sole remaining option for stopping a nuclear Iran.

The US president promised to put his accord with Israel before the G-8 summit. And he did.
But for now there is no deal although Israel, in effect, gave Obama six months’ grace to explore his diplomatic initiative with Vladimir Putin and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei before turning back to the military option.
But as the days pass, major hurdles are piling up in the path of what some observers hail as Obama’s “Grand Bargain,” and others his “Grand Failure:” The Six-power talks with Iran have failed to persuade the ayatollahs to give up uranium enrichment up to weapons-grade; the world wants actions not words to halt the brutal massacres in Syria; rising bloodshed in Yemen continues to cripple the country. Obama’s hopes of a crisis-free six months for electioneering in peace look more and more like pipe-dreams.
The bargaining with Tehran is likely to stay stalled because Iran’s leaders take Obama’s deal with Israel as a six-month respite from a military threat. So why should they hurry in May or even June to reach a compromise with America on its demand to stop 20 percent uranium enrichment?
Bashar Assad and his army chiefs likewise feel US hands are tied by Obama’s hopes of a breakthrough with Iran and they can safely carry on with their “unspeakable crimes” for the next six months under the Iranian-Russian umbrella. Words however strong will not discourage him from sending tanks to crush every last opponent and their children.

And Israel, seeing the US president lurching from one bargaining position to another to keep his initiative afloat, shifts uncertainly in and out of its unwritten commitment to withhold military action against Iran until November.

None of the parties involved in granting Obama his six-month grace period, whether Vladimir Putin, Ali Khamenei, Binyamin Netanyahu or Bashar Assad, can be sure that he will in fact be returned to the Whie House in November. And even if he is, how much will be left of his Grand Bargain.

 

http://www.debka.com/article/22034/The-Al-Houla-atrocity-The-outcome-of-nuclear-diplomacy-with-Iran-

ISRAEL BREAKS WITH OBAMA OVER IRAN AND IT IS THE SAME ISSUE AS DEFENCE OF MLADIC

Netanyahu, Barak refuse to see US official

 

with negative report on Baghdad talks

DEBKAfileExclusive Report May 26, 2012, 10:25 AM (GMT+02:00)

State's Wendy Sherman, senior US delegate to world power talks with Iran
State’s Wendy Sherman, senior US delegate to world power talks with Iran

The rupture between the US and Israel over Iran’s nuclear program widened further Friday, May 25  when Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak decided not to be available to hear the briefing brought to Jerusalem from Baghdad by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman who headed the US delegation to the Six Power talks. The report she delivered to National Security Adviser Yaakov Amidror and Foreign Ministry Director-General Rafi Barak was that no progress had been achieved in Baghdad due to Iran’s refusal to budge on its “right” to enrich uranium at low (3.5-5 percent) or high (20 percent) levels or shut down the Fordo nuclear plant near Qom.
Although the participants agreed to reconvene in Moscow in three weeks, the Iranian delegation stressed there would be no progress until the US and the other five world powers (Britain, France, Russia, Germany and China) recognized Iran’s absolute “right” as a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty to enrich uranium.

Meanwhile, every day spent on diplomacy is thoroughly exploited by Iran to zip ahead with its nuclear plans. The Vienna-based UN nuclear watchdog (IAEA)’s quarterly report released Friday reveals that since February Iran almost doubled its stockpile of more highly enriched uranium which is close to weapons grade from 73.4 to 145 kilograms.
The centrifuges at the Fordo facility, built into the side of a mountain, rose to over 500 from 300 in the last report.

Using the IAEA figures, debkafile calculates that if Fordo goes on producing 23.9 kilograms of 20-percent enriched uranium per month, Iran will by the end of December have accumulated 336 kilograms of near-weapons quality uranium.
The IAEA also reported that Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched to less than 5 per cent grew to 6,232 kilograms from 5,451 reported in February.

Its inspectors recorded “the presence of particles” of 27 per cent-enriched uranium at Fordo. Iran maintained the particles were a result of “technical reasons beyond the operator’s control.”

The IAEA report was released a day after talks between Tehran and the six powers ended without progress.
Iran’s senior delegate Saeed Jalili declared that his government would never accept the Washington-ruled distinction between two categories of nations – one permitted and the other forbidden to enrich uranium. He claimed this was against international treaties.

Friday, the Washington Post quoted Mohammad Hoseyn Moussavian of Princeton University as revealing that in 2004, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said, “I would resign if for any reason Iran is deprived of its rights to enrichment.”

 
Moussavian is presented as an Iranian academic visiting Princeton to lecture and write a book on the Iranian nuclear issue. debkafile reveals that he was the contact man in one of the direct, back-channel negotiations taking place in Paris between the White House and Khamenei. His words therefore were intended to carry weight as a reminder to Obama that the supreme leader, like the US president, intended to come out of their dialogue strengthened – not undermined. And therefore, for both their sakes, Washington must endorse Iran’s “right to enrichment.”
Tehran presented a second ultimatum for the nuclear talks to continue: phased sanctions relief, starting with the postponement of the European Union’s oil embargo scheduled for July 1 until the end of negotiations and the reconnection of Iranian banks to the SWIFT international money transfer system.

 
The gap between Israel and the Obama administration widened in the course of Washington’s direct, secret give-and-take with Tehran. In early April, Defense Minister Barak reported that Israel offered some compromise on the enrichment issue. debkafile disclosed at the time that Israel had informed Washington of its approval of a “1,000 formula.” Iran would be permitted to activate 1,000 centrifuges for enrichment and keep 1,000 kilograms of 3.5-per cent enriched uranium. 

The Netanyahu government backtracked when this concession was used by US officials as a lever for further accommodations with Iran.
The direct US-Iran channel and the second round of Six Power talks with Iran have clearly left the standoff over Iran’s nuclear solidly in place: Iran stands by its right to enrich uranium up to weapons grade, the US stands by diplomacy, however hopeless, for resolving the controversy, while Israel demands a time limit for negotiations. Its military option was put back on the table for so long as Iran’s enrichment centrifuges continue spinning at top speed

 

 

www.4international.me is totally on the side of the Jews and Israel in this issue of Iranian Nuclear Bombs.

 

We say that the Iranian regime is as much antisemitic as was Hitler.

 

In fact there is a direct line. The man who led the Bosnian Muslims against Milosevic and Mladic was called Izetbegovic. His history goes back to the Holocaust. He was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Bosnia during the years of the Holocaust. We do not know how many members of the Muslim Brotherhood there were in Bosnia during the Holocaust, but we do know the name of one, that was Hajj Amin el Husseini, who was the chief organizer of the Holocaust in the Balkans. In other words joint membership of the pro-Hitler Muslim Brotherhood. They may have been the only two in Bosnia.

 

Move forward just a little, to the early 1990s, and Iran was working with the US State Department and the US Army and Air Force to airlift Nazi Arab Muslims into Bosnia to fight the Serbs. They carried out many beheadings, thus anticipating what happened to Daniel Pearl.

 

This was Jihad against the Serbs, with the direct help of the US ruling classes.

 

Now there is a Jihad against Israel and it takes the form of the Iranian Nuclear Bomb.

 

You can see an antisemite immediately. He or she will offer no interest in what Iran is getting up to in Fordo inside that mountain.

 

This apparent “naivety” and sometimes even impatience with the issue being raised has at its root Antisemitism.

 

Some of the worst offenders in this regard are those who claim to talk about defence of the Serbs re Srebrenica, like Harman and Peterson, while they are defending the Nazi Iranian regime and its bomb building AGAINST JEWS.

 

Of course, this is Antisemitic and Nazi because this bomb building in Iran has got only the one target and that target is Israel.

 

So what is the future?/ What to do?

 

The answer is that no step can be taken without putting into place the alternative leadership which has to be www.4international.me.

 

It is necessary to defend Mladic unconditionally. The Serbs had a full right to use whatever methods it decided to use. In the war against the Nazis by the freedom fighters opposed to the Nazis (The resistance) nobody has ever, i mean ever, criticised the methods of The Resistance to Hitler.

 

Same with the Serbs today. Same with the Jews of Israel today.

 

We on www.4international.me defend unconditionally each and every method od struggle which the Jews use in order to survive against these enemies.

 

 

ISRAEL HAS TAKEN ENOUGH BULLSHIT LIES FROM OBAMA ABOUT IRAN…IT WILL STRIKE

May 23, 2012…this is a fateful day for the world.

 

The world in which I live is inhabited by really strange people (The Media) who are desparately trying to keep the ordinary folk from understanding what is happening (Reality)

 

Well the reality is that Israel is going to go to war with Iran and the reality also is that www.4international.me stands in the warlike and just tradition of Leon Trotsky and we will be the only ones on the left who will stand unconditionally with Israel.

 

Obama is sympathetic to Iran and to Islam. Some European leaders (Sarkozy was) were worried about Iran and the Nuclear Bomb, but Europe is in crisis and these leaders cannot focus. Also in everything the Europeans are deep down Antisemitic and they blame Jews subconsciously for Iran. So they hesitate in front of Iran.

 

Israel cannot hesitate. If it hesitates in front of Iran then Israel will be wiped out. Dirty Nuclear bombs can be let off. Iran will have the material and they will have the weapons to deliver (Arab suicide killers)

 

This is why in the end Israel and its leaders can take only so much bull shit from Obama. Obama does lie and if your whole people are threatened, especially the Jews, the lies after a time do not work.

 

And this is why when Ehud Barak spoke the following (In Hebrew but so there was no mistake had an English translation on hand) then this means that war on Iran from Israel is just so inevitable.

 

HIS WORDS WERE :

 

“There is no need to tell us what to do, and we have no reason to panic. Israel is very, very strong, but we do know that the Iranians are accomplished chess players and will try to achieve nuclear capabilities. Our position has not changed. The world must stop Iran from becoming nuclear. All options remain on the table.”

 

see full analysis of the background on http://www.debka.com/article/22024/Israel-revives-military-option-after-Obama-rejects-its-nuclear-demands-of-Iran

 

All options on the table means we will not wait until Obama is reelected in Nopvember.

THE CENTRIFUGES ARE SPINNING AS WE SPEAK…NETANYAHU WARNS

 

WE MUST REMEMBER THAT IN IRAN WE ARE DEALING WITH A TRUE FASCIST MOVEMENT

 

It is based on antisemitism, hatred of Jews. Along with that it is based on the Islam programme of conquering the world for Islam.

 

When Islam emerged it was not a Fascist movement because we insist that Fascism is a word to be used only in the context of Fascism as a modern and contemporary phenomenon.

 

Leon Trotsky wrote most about Fascism, analysing it from every angle, and insisted that Fascism was a method of rule which is connected to the historical decline of the Capitalist system.

 

Robert Spencer has produced a brilliant and timely book which insists that Islam as a method of thought and practice was patched together as a system AFTER the Arab conquests. It was quite specific to those conquests.

 

But everything changes and adapts to new circumstances.

 

Iran and Islam must be connected consciously to the present terminal decline in world capitalism

 

There are forces now emerging within capitalism itself which feel threatened by this new form of Iranian/Hamas/Hizbullah fascism. It depends on Israel to act and on the Jews to act to defend themselves.

 

The key, and the difficult part for Israel and the Jews, is that they must act on many fronts. Israel is threatened on all of these fronts.

 

  1. Obama who is essentially antisemitic and who also puts his electioneering before the safety of millions of Jews
  2. The Power’s programme of “Responsible to Protect” which is also the source of the New Fascism

 

The following notes by Debka make it clear that there ARE forces in the world feeling seriously threatened by Iran Fascism. But Israel must act and we on the outside must stand up and be counted in defence of the Jews once more:

 

 

 

DEBKAfileExclusive Report April 26, 2012, 5:30 PM (GMT+02:00)

Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz meets top US soldier Gen. Martin Dempsey in Washington

Israel Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu acted Thursday, April 26, to correct the damaging impression of divided and uncertain perceptions of the Iranian nuclear threat left by statements delivered in the last two days by himself and Defense Minster Ehud Barak.
Israel’s chief of staff Gen. Benny Gantz rallied to the task with an unambiguous comment that “other countries have readied their armed forces for a potential strike against Iran’s nuclear sites to keep Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The military force is ready. Not only our forces but other forces as well,” he said without elaborating.

“We all hope it will not be necessary to use this force, but we are absolutely sure of its existence.”
debkafile reports from Washington that Gen. Gantz’s words were seen in US official circles as the strongest affirmation yet from Jerusalem that Israel has partners for a direct attack on Iran’s nuclear sites.
It was also an attempt by the chief of staff to erase the question mark he placed in a previous comment over Iran’s resolve to attain a nuclear weapon.  

Wednesday, April 25, debkafile reported widespread criticism on the Israeli street and in military circles of the mixed and conflicting messages coming from top officials with regard to the Iranian peril. Netanyahu also responded to the criticism in person by declaring in a TV interview, “Iran hasn’t stopped its program …the centrifuges are spinning as we speak.”

DIRTY NUCLEAR BOMB IN THE HANDS OF HIZBULLAH WILL CAUSE GREAT KILLING OF THE JEWS ONCE AGAIN

Antisemitism in countries in Europe and the antisemitism of Obama provides the cover for a great killing of the Jews in Israel.

This is a most serious warning to the world. It now emerges from this debka article that we have been concentrating on the wrong thing. We have been thinking of a rocket attacking Israel with a nuclear bomb on board.

But what debka has made clear here is that iran has the enriched uranium on hand, and that the trigger facility is on hand also. Hence Hizbullah on the border with Israel, essentially protected by UN forces, can explode dirty bombs against Israel.

But that would harm Arabs also, some antisemites may argue. The answer to that is the concept of suicide bombing. That specific concept makes that thought irrelevant.

Jew hatred is what drove Hitler and Jew hatred is what drove Hajj Amin el Husseini.

As Israeli leaders wrangle over Iran, a new US spy agency will deal with Tehran
DEBKAfileExclusive Report April 25, 2012, 5:38 PM (GMT+02:00)

Some fear they’ve missed the boat.

Israeli leaders were harshly criticized on the eve of Israel’s 64th Independence Day for too much speechifying and no real action against a nuclear Iran, whereas the US in contrast finally made a move by establishing a new Pentagon spy agency for gathering intelligence inside Iran. April 24 and 25, when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak addressed memorial ceremonies for the fallen, they reiterated the same old “Israel will not permit Iran to acquire nuclear arms” – a remark which the Israeli street has stopped taking seriously. Many members of military and intelligence circles are quoted by debkafile as believing that Israel may have waited too long and, along with the US, lost the initiative.
Jerusalem and Washington are still at odds on Iran, but the theme of their dispute has shifted. It is no longer about Iran’s timeline for building a bomb, but what kind. They agree that Tehran will not possess advanced nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles capable of penetrating the US and Israeli missile defenses any time soon. Israel is now worried about more primitive devices like the ones in the North Korean and Pakistani arsenals which Israeli believes are in the final stages of constructions.
The question in Israeli intelligence circles is this: Why is the impending North Korean nuclear test considered by the US, Japan and South Korea a major menace while no one seems to care about devices identical to the one Pyongyang plans to explode on the way to operational capability.

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Strategic Affairs Moshe Ya’alon said publicly earlier this month that by the end of 2012, Iran would have a dirty bomb.
His disclosure drew no reactions, although it was a warning. A dirty bomb combines radioactive material with conventional explosives. Its chief danger is the spread of radioactive contamination. Cruder and cheaper to producer than a nuclear bomb, counter-terror agencies have long appreciated that it is easily transferred to terrorists. Ya’alon’s warning therefore means that Iran may soon be able to transfer dirty bombs to the Lebanese Hizballah units sitting on Israel’s northern border and the Palesinian Hamas and Jihad Islami in Gaza.
The Weekly Standard edition for publication on April 30 wrote the following sentence: “The supreme leader and his guards can have a nuclear weapon in their hands in as little as 43 days, provided Iran’s nuclear scientists have mastered the manufacture of a nuclear trigger – technically much less difficult than enrichment.”

The UN nuclear watchdog in Vienna and US intelligence officials have reported tests on nuclear materials conducted in recent weeks at the Parchin site near Tehran, to which access has been denied UN inspectors.

In Washington, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced was the formation of a new Pentagon spy agency called the Defense Clandestine Service. Defense Department sources said the new organization would expand the military’s intelligence and secret war efforts outside war zones in areas insufficiently covered until now, indicating deep penetration inside hostile territory, primarily Iran.

Other sources point out that by creating a new in-house Pentagon spy agency, Panetta and President Obama demonstrated their opinion of the quality of intelligence they were receiving from the CIA, of which the defense secretary was director until recently.

Iran already had enough uranium enriched to 20 percent to make one nuclear bomb – and before long, enough for two nuclear devices

Thanks to Israpundit

IDF intelligence chief: Israel’s next war will see heavy casualties

Israel Matzav

In his final briefing to the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, outgoing military intelligence chief Amos Yadlin warned that Israel’s next war would take longer, be fought on more fronts and would cause more casualties (God forbid) than its two previous wars – Operation Cast Lead and the Second Lebanon War .

Syria, particularly, posed a greated military obstacle to Israel than at any time in the past three decades, Yadlin said, having amassed advanced Russian-built antiaircraft missiles that seriously limited the operational freedom of the Israel Air Force.

While Syria had failed to acquire Russian S-300 missiles, seen by Israel as the greatest potential threat to its aircraft, Damascus had improved its defense systems enough to push the military balance with Israel “back to the 1970s”, Yadlin said. 

In 1973, Israel came close to defeat by a suprise Syrian attack before eventually emerging victorious in the Yom Kippur War.

Yadlin also hinted at Israel’s involvement in attacking a Syrian nuclear facility in September 2007. That strike has been widely attributed to Israel, but the government has never officially taken responsibility for the operation.

The veteran soldier, who turns 60 next year, told the committee that during his position as MI chief he had contended with two enemy nuclear programs – apparently a reference to Iran and Syria.

“I’ve seen three defense ministers, two chiefs of staff and two prime ministers come and go, I’ve been through two wars and I’ve contended with two nuclear programs of enemy states,” Yadlin said, summing up the last years of his career.

“I headed a group of thousands of people working 24 hours a day to collect information that the enemy was not volunteering, information that had to be extracted from difficult places,” he added.

Yadlin also warned of a growing threat from the Iranian nuclear program, saying Iran now had enough highly enriched uranium to build a bomb.

That’s not all Iran has. Yadlin also told the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that Israel had detected two new nuclear facilities in Iran (read the headline – the text doesn’t seem to have much to do with it).

But perhaps the most frightening part of Yadlin’s briefing was his assessment of a future conflict.

“The next conflict, even if it is limited in scale,” warned the former IAF general, “will be much bigger, much broader, and with many more casualties than we saw in Operation Cast Lead or the Second Lebanon War.”

Such a conflict, predicted the 59-year old Yadlin, will be played out on two or more fronts; moreover, Israel’s enemies “believe that the only way to overcome Israel’s deterrence is through longrange missile fire and improving air defense capabilities.”

Pulling no punches, Yadlin warned that the cutting-edge anti-aircraft system that Syria has purchased from Russia could send the IDF and IAF’s capabilities “back to their status in the 1970s Suez years,” according to a source present at the meeting.

“With the S-300, we are talking about relatively cheap missiles – but no less deadly,” Yadlin cautioned during his foreboding address to the committee. In addition, he said, the Russians are upgrading older Syrian weapons systems to make them far more advanced.

In outlining how the weapons deal benefited Damascus, the MI chief said the Syrians are conducting “intense efforts to acquire extremely advanced weapons – so advanced that everything just off of the production line in Russia ends up in Syria.”

Yadlin also disclosed that Israel had detected the Iranians laying the groundwork for two new nuclear sites – but did not reveal their locations.

“Iran is the greatest threat to Israel and to the well-being of the entire region,” he said.

And in an ominous note, Yadlin informed the committee that Iran already had enough uranium enriched to 20 percent to make one nuclear bomb – and before long, enough for two nuclear devices.

“Iran’s progression towards a bomb is slower than they had hoped for,” advised the general. “They are running into quite a few problems. But Iran is also taking radical action regarding the transfer of money, technology, weapons and intelligence.”

Yadlin pointed out that with 3,000 to 4,000 centrifuges in operation, Iran could very easily make the leap from civilian-grade enriched uranium to the higher enrichment required for building a nuclear explosive device.

If Yadlin told the Knesset anything about the likelihood that the Obama administration would support Israel in the event of a future war, it hasn’t been reported. Still, his assessment is quite depressing even without that detail.

HAPPENING ALL THE TIME NOW…ANOTHER THIEF’S HAND AMPUTATED

from Jihadwatch

Iran: Another convicted thief’s hand amputated

“As for the thief, both male and female, cut off their hands. It is the reward of their own deeds, an exemplary punishment from Allah. Allah is Mighty, Wise.” — Qur’an 5:38

“The Center for Security Policy wants Americans to think that stoning and amputations are around the corner, but the report can’t quite explain why stonings are so rare and the streets of Saudi Arabia and Iran are not filled with one-armed thieves.” — Sabria Jawhar, Huffington Post, October 19

Two more this week in Iran, Sabria.

Sharia Alert from the Islamic Republic of Iran: “Thief hand cut off ‘before inmates,'” from the UKPA, October 24:

Authorities in Iran have amputated the hand of a convicted thief in front of other prisoners, state radio is reporting.The report did not identify the 32-year-old convict, whose hand was reportedly cut off in the central city of Yazad, or provide details of his crime.

Iran’s judiciary uses a strict interpretation of Islamic law in handing down such sentences. Cutting off the hands of thieves has been rare in the past, but the amputation was the second this month.

A week ago, a judge ordered the same punishment for a man who stole from a sweet shop

TIME TO TOPPLE NETANYAHU…USE ALL METHODS TO DESTROY THE PA AND THE IRAN MULLAHS

DEBKAfile has referred to the position of the US towards Iran.

It writes today:

Obama has resolved to deal with the nuclear impasse with Iran by going after the Islamic republic on two tracks: UN and unilateral sanctions for biting deep into the financial resources Iran has earmarked for its nuclear program, and a secret cyber war which the US is conducting jointly with Israel for crippling its nuclear facilities.

It adds to this:

debkafile’s sources disclose that Israel has had special elite units carrying out such assignments for some time. Three years ago, for instance, cyber raiders played a role in the destruction of the plutonium reactor North Korea was building at A-Zur in northern Syria.
On Monday, too, the Christian Science Monitor and several American technical journals carried revelations about a new virus called Stuxnet capable of attacking and severely damaging the servers of large projects, such as power stations and nuclear reactors.

All the leaked reports agreed on three points:

1.  Stuxnet is the most advanced and dangerous piece of Malware every devised.
2.  The experts don’t believe any private or individual hackers are capable of producing this virus, only a high-tech state such as America or Israel.
3.  Although Stuxnet was identified four months ago, the only servers known to have been affected and seriously damaged are located in Iran.
Some computer security specialists report lively speculation that the virus was invented specifically to target part of the Iranian nuclear infrastructure, either the Bushehr nuclear plant activated last month or the centrifuge facility in Natanz.
debkafile’s sources add: Since August, American and UN nuclear watchdog sources have been reporting a slowdown in Iran’s enrichment processing due to technical problems which have knocked out a large number of centrifuges and which its nuclear technicians have been unable to repair. It is estimated that at Natanz alone, 3,000 centrifuges have been idled.
None of the reports indicate whether other parts of Iran’s nuclear program have been affected by Stuxnet or the scale of the damage it may have caused. 

The world is poised therefore on a knife-edge.

It is possible that this method could work since they are right, these processes rely totally on computer power and if this fails they cannot proceed.

For me the important thing is this:

The Jews were forced to endure the worst attacks on their people over 2000 years and that culminated in the horrors of the Holocaust

America lost 3000 in horrible conditions on 9-11. the Jews lost 6 million and one half of their entire people, and the intention of antisemitism was total destruction of the Jews.

yet here 60 years later the Jews are again under attack and danger of annihilation by Ahmadinejad.

Will the Iranian Mullahs get the bomb, will they be stopped? these are the questions which are being used to torment the Jews once more.

yet if these countries in Europe and America took on Iran in full scale war then it would last maybe hours and the people of Iran itself would rise up and replace the Mullahs with a democracy of the people.

Why NOT military action against the Mullahs and use computer germ warfare as well.

My response to an article on Israpundit is that Netanyahu should be removed at once from the position of PM

http://www.israpundit.com/archives/28257

This is one of the key paragraphs

On the 14 June 2009, shortly after forming his government, Netanyahu spoke to the world in what has notoriously became known as his Bar-Ilan speech. Here the prime minister accepted the PLO charter and tore up the platform of the Likud and the entire camp he nominally leads. He accepted the fallacy of a “Palestinian people”- even though this Arab propaganda lie was created and still remains in place to delegitimize Israel and to create a 23rd Arab state in place of her. He accepted the lie and stated his intention to build a 23rd Arab state in the heart of the Land of Israel. He then tried to placate his supporters by saying such an entity will be “de-militarised” as if he would be able to dictate the national affairs of a separate sovereign country once created.

This is the second paragraph that damns Bibi

But Barak is not to blame, for his party secured little more than 10 percent of the vote and only half of his small party actually supports him in the Knesset (the rest being termed “rebels” by the Hebrew media). Bibi bears full responsibility as the prime minister and it seems he preferred to disproportionately give Labour 5 ministries and bestow Barak with power and privilege rather than give half a ministry to the National Union party and those loyal to the land of Israel.

So the cry must go out on all blogs and in all quarters to remove Bibi from the position of Prime Minister, give him a job in publicising the decisions of a patriotic government but watch him carefully.

As regards Iran other people will do the job better. In order to survive Israel will have to go to war with the Mullahs. America will not support Israel.

WE MUST GRASP THAT AS THE STALINIST RUSSIA LOAD FUEL INTO THE FASCIST IRANIAN NUCLEAR BUSHEHR REACTOR THINGS FOR HUMANS WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AGAIN

The Fascist leader Ahmadinejad speaking at Columbia University (Wikipedia)

4INTERNATIONAL BEGAIN ITS CAMPAIGN ON THIS FATEFUL DAY, AUGUST 21 2010, TO DEFEND THE JEWISH HOMELAND AS THE FASCIST SCUM OF AHMADINEJAD IS AIDED BY THE STALINIST REMNANTS OF RUSSIA TO LOAD FUEL INTO THE BUSHEHR PLANT, TO PRODUCE PLUTONIUM FOR THE FASCISTS

IT REPRESENTS SURELY A REPEAT OF THE DEAL WHICH STALIN MADE WITH HITLER AND WHICH SEALED THE FATE OF MILLIONS IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR

NUCLEAR WAR IN THE WORLD WILL SURELY FOLLOW THE ACTIONS OF THIS MOMENTOUS DAY

I SENT THE FOLLOWING COMMENT TO THE FORUM OF THE SPANISH RADIO STATION TALK RADIO EUROPE TO BEGIN OUR CAMPAIGN TO DEFEND THE JEWISH HOMELAND AGAINST THE FASCIST SCUMBAGS OF IRANIAN RULER AND DICTATOR AHMADINEJAD

The Flotillas are being organized by the modern antisemites of Europe and are directed against the existence of the state of Israel. This is all part of the campaign to deligitimize and to destroy Israel.

I fear this discussion is not really keeping up with the times, and with reality, said reality being that today August 21 the Stalinist remnants which is today´s Russia is joining with the rabid Fascists, the political scum of Ahmadinejad, which is stoning Iranian women to death for adultery, in putting in motion the Bushehr nuclear plant.

I notice those women  who ring up the Gilmour Show never ever mention THOSE women!

Do not believe the lies of the scum followers of the fascists of Khomeini, those of Ahmadinejad, this nuclear plant has got only the one aim, and that is to create the enriched plutonium for nuclear bombs.

This is happening today. Today is thus a very fateful day in the life of the world, and signals the advent of nuclear war, because it is quite impossible for Israel, following the Holocaust by the German Nazis, which was supported by the so called “Palestinians”, in the shape of Hajj Amin el Husseini, the acknowledged leader of the Arabs in Palestine, to not defend itself from these Ahmadinejad Fascist scumbags.
This is a time for really principled people to take a principled stand. I believe that there is a strong connection between the threatened execution of the brave and oppressed Iranian woman Sakineh Mohammad Ashtiani, and the horrific threats made by the loathsome Ahmadinejad against Israel, which he calls the Zionist filth, the Zionist disease etc.

But there is only the one filth and that is the fascist Ahmadinejad and all those who support him!

How to answer this? Well for a start certain people should stop lying and should explain what is the nature of the Ahmadinejad regime in Iran and the bitter Hitler like antisemitism of that regime.  No?”

(This article will be continued by examining the nature of the Ahmadinejad Fascist threat to Israel)

 

BEFORE MOVING ON TO DISCUSS THE REALITY OF THE AHMADINEJAD DICTATORSHIP AND ITS HATRED OF ISRAEL, WHICH IS CODE FOR HATRED OF JEWS, CLEARLY SO, LET US DEAL WITH THE CURRENT SITUATION

THIS IS THE EXTRACT FROM THE ISRAEL nATIONAL NEWS (ARUTZ SHEVA) REPORT OF TODAY

 

Iranian MP Hossein Sobhaninia has claimed the fueling of the plant “cannot be linked to Iran’s nuclear enrichment program; Iran is well aware of its responsibilities.” His colleague, Iranian MP Mohammad Karim Shahrzad added a warning, however, according to a report broadcast by the country’s English-language Press TV news network: “The time frame for enrichment activity is a domestic matter,” he said. “It is an issue in which the United States is not entitled to interfere.”

By Friday, Bolton, a former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, has warned it will be too late to attack, because such a move would cause radioactive fallout that could reach as far as the Persian Gulf.

Earlier this week, Bolton said in an interview that he believes Israel may have already “lost the opportunity” to prevent Iran from establishing a functional nuclear reactor.

Iranian Army Brigadier-General Ali Shadermani meanwhile has vowed to close the Straits of Hormuz if it appears that the United States might attack the country. “The country’s armed forces… are in the highest state of alert,” he told the Mehr news agency on Wednesday.

Shadermani also threatened to attack American troops stationed in Afghanistan and Iraq. “With the slightest move against Iran, we will paralyze those troops stationed in those bases and won’t allow them to make any move,” he warned. 

The third element in the plan would be aimed at the Jewish State, he said: The Iranian army would, “disturb peace and tranquility in Israel, which is known as the closest ally of the United States,” reported Hamsayeh.net. Shadermani added pointedly, “The U.S. and Israel well know that we can do it.”

Israel and other Western nations believe that Iran is intent on building a nuclear weapon of mass destruction. Spent nuclear fuel rods contain material that can be used to build a nuclear bomb – and even if other nuclear plants in the country are shut down, Bushehr could conceivably be used to continue such a project in future.

At present, Russia’s agreement with Iran stipulates that the Islamic Republic will return its spent fuel rods abroad to Moscow. However, there is no guarantee that Tehran will keep its word.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/news.aspx/139191

There are many, many things to say about the above extract. First of all the Obama policy of sanctions is finished, totally exposed for the fraud that it is. It is many years now since the Scottish and British politician Robin Cook stated that sanctions would work. The Iranian Fascists have been laughing ever since.

And note that if Obama is exposed on this he is also exposed at home on the issue of the building by Islam of the Mosque on Ground Zero (The building was actually hit by plane debris)

It is regrettable but the fact is that in dealing with determined Fascists and Antisemites, as is Ahmadinejad clearly, only the physical force used against intent to destroy Jews will work. Thus it was with Hitler and the Nazis, thus it is with Ahmadinejad et al. Antisemitism is a VERY and all consuming force. It was so with Hitler and Himmler who even when they were defeated totally by mid 1944 were urging Eichmann to kill more and more Jews. Thus it is with Ahmadinejad and his Mullah backers. Reason is always trumped by antisemitism, Jew hatred, which today is Israel hatred.

The second point in the above is that Obama also lies. Obama and Clinton have reconciled, and this is putting it lightly, to Iran actually getting the Nuclear Bomb. They play dice with the lives of millions of Jews.

The third point is that Israel is forced to attack Iran with all that is within its power to attack. 4international has always said this. It is not as the antisemites say that Israel is war hungry. the very opposite…Israel would wish for a quiet life, a life in which Jews are unmolested by antisemitism. That wishful life is just not on offer. THAT IS THE REALITY. THAT IS THE REAL WORLD IN WHICH WE LIVE.

Bolton despite his good and supportive statement is wrong. It is not too late to attack this Bushehr nuclear plant and it will never be too late. Remember that Jews MUST defend themselves, Jews and Israel did not create this plant, Jews did not ask that Ahmadinejad threaten Israel on scores of occasions with death. And above all REMEMBER THAT JEWS HAVE NEVER BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR ONE MICRO ATOM OF ANTISEMITISM.

It will NEVER be too late for Israel to fight to stop the nuclear Iranian threat. That is where Bolton is wrong. The smug and antisemitic world will have to understand this and THEY will be responsible for the consequences.

AUGUST 22, THE HISTORICAL DAY WHICH FOLLOWS THE OPENING YESTERDAY OF THE HOLOCAUST INTENDING BUSHEHR NUCLEAR PLANT BY RUSSIA AND IRAN, THE INTENT BEING THE DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL

IF YOU CANNOT SEE AND UNDERSTAND THAT STAND ASIDE.

THE NETANYAHU WEAKLING GOVERNMENT AND THE AMERICAN OBAMA AND CLINTON LIARS HAVE MADE LITTLE OF THIS HISTORICAL BUSHEHR EVENT. LIARS TELL LIES. THEY UNDERSTAND ITS GREAT DANGER VERY WELL.

These are the vital issues concerning the starting up of the Bushehr Nuclear plant by Iranian Fascists led by Ahmadinejad

  1. Netanyahu is tied in every way with the American regime led by Obama. He is showing that he is incapable of breaking this deadly bond and acting independently. Hence Netanyahu has said not a single word about this momentous development which we on 4international has predicted will lead to nuclear proliferation and nuclear war in which we all are in great danger BUT ISRAEL IS IN IMMEDIATE DANGER
  2. Obama is proving to be a total fool on the world stage if you leave aside that he is extremely partial to the overall Islamic jihad (meaning the Muslim overall intent to promote Sharia Government in every country which it possibly can). The State Department has said that the opening of the Bushehr Reactor by Russia and Iran means nothing and does not increase the danger of Nuclear war and danger to Israel. This is a lie and they know it very well. The spent fuel is supposed to be returned to Russia etc but this is total baloney, because the Iranian Fascists have found innumerable ways in the past to deceive, remember the factory in the centre of a mountain near Qom, remember the treatment of prisoner 42 year old woman Ashtiani, when they say they are going to stone her for adultery, then because this met with much international opposition, they force her to make a televised broadcast FROM WITHIN PRISON to the whole world making her say she is a murderer etc. THIS IRANIAN FASCIST REGIME REALLY IS PURE EVIL
  3. Meanwhile this incredibly weak and confusing Israeli leader Netanyahu goes along with Obama and Clinton in heading for a Peace Conference with the Nazi PLO to be held at the beginning of September IN AMERICA. Abbas is the man who masterminded the Olympic Massacre of Israeli athletes, and is one of the originators of Islamic violence against Jews. Moreover he has no power because he does not control Gaza, and he does not even control his own fiefdom which is controlled by forces close to Hamas and Syria. But Netanyahu does not only start this whole reactionary rubbish about talking about “Peace” once again when the enemy is intent on war, he does so as part of an  exercise in making little of the opening of the Bushehr threat
  4. The conclusion from all of this is that once more the Jewish people of the world, and the Jewish people now concentrated inside Israel, a really tiny slice of land, are marching towards extreme danger and in the face of the most horrible of enemies are doing so under leaders who are very problematic

 

We now see more clearly what the Flotillas etc were all about. They are part of the softening up process by world antisemites so that Israel can be set up for a future nuclear bomb attack

And these antisemites just do not know what they are doing, because the Jews are unlike they were in 1933 to 1945, when the Jews had no centre and no arms even to defend themselves against the genocide of their people. Now Israel has got very powerful Nuclear Weapons, the memory of that Holocaust is still imprinted on their people, and they will be forced in the end to defend themselves against the antisemitic Nazis

And they indeed are Nazis. Those on board that boat from Turkey were wanting to die, in order to carry out their mission of vilifying Israel. All of these statements over many years which Iranian leaders have spouted and which in essence claimed that Israel was a disease is the mark of pure Nazism-

This IS the issue.

Every person has to face up to these truths now.

THE PAST OF AHMADINEJAD AND WHY IT IS CERTAIN HE WILL TRY TO KILL 6 MILLIONS OF JEWS

1. HIS ROLE DURING THE IRAN IRAQ WAR

THIS IS THE FIRST OF TWO ARTICLES WHICH PEOPLE SHOULD READ ON THIS ISSUE

Ahmadinejad, the Trainer of Youthful Basij Martyrs

Ahmadinejad’s un-holy war  

By N. Shuldig  

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is the youthful president of Iran. Besides being an outspoken critic of the Bush Administration, he has refused to stop the Iran’s nuclear development program. He has been widely quoted for his statements that Israel must be wiped off the map and for describing the Holocaust as a myth.

Do not make the mistake of thinking that he is just a typical fanatic Islamic extremist idiot. He is not a fool, but a cunning and highly intelligent person who earned a PhD in traffic and transport engineering and planning from Tehran’s University of Science and Technology, where he was also a lecturer. Prior to being the president of Iran, he was the mayor of Teheran, where he was able to reverse prior moderate policies replacing them with religious based laws.

But what is lesser known and perhaps the most worrisome aspect of Ahmadinejad is his role is the Basij. The Basij (pronounced Baseej), is an Islamic paramilitary force that was founded in 1979 by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini to provide volunteers for “human wave” attacks in the Iran-Iraq War.

During this war, Iran severely lacked material resources to fight against the much better trained and equipped Iraqi army. Iraq had mined much of the areas that Iran needed to take. Iran had precious few armed vehicles and tanks to utilize and deploy. Rather than endanger their meager weapons and armor to destruction in face of Iraq counter attack, a new concept was created, the Basij, a special group of martyrs to be that would sacrifice their bodies by walking through the mine field, sparing the army from damage.

Tens of thousands of children were recruited for this special Basij project. Teenage boys as young as 12 were conscripted to serve as martyrs. They were trained to march straight into the enemy fire or through the enemy mine fields which they did wave after wave.

The Iranian propaganda machine depicted the basij as a brave martyr whose future in heaven was guaranteed. In addition, his family would enjoy economic and social amenities that were difficult for impoverish families to ignore. It should be mentioned that coercive measures were also employed on the young martyrs to be, not every one was altruistic.

Whereas the Western mind will recoil at such horrors of using young children as cannon fodder, the Arab mind understands and accepts the dogma of Khomeini that life in this world is worthless, but death is the beginning of genuine life. The martyr is assured that he will inherit the highest of the true worlds. Death in battle became an opportunity to realize the greatest divine fulfillment. Parents who gave of their children were publicly praised.

The Basiji still exists. Today it is estimated to be approximately 10 million dedicated “soldiers” who are willing to give their life for their twisted beliefs. They are not just children, but also college students who have become the “Revolutionary Guard” of Iran. Those suicidal killings of perhaps a hundred thousand children are not an embarrassment to Iran; rather it is a point of pride, that so many young were willing to give their lives for the betterment of Islam.

During the war Ahmadinejad served as one of the Basiji instructors who trained children. He came to power as the candidate of the Basiji. His platform was to eradicate corruption and eliminate Western influences was really to eliminate moderate and Western thinking individuals from having any influence in Iran.

If the killing of a hundred thousand of his own people is a source of pride, the killing of five million Jews in Israel will be an even greater source of pride, even if it means killing ten million Arabs. To the Basij, his own life is worthless and death as a martyr, meaning killing a Jew, will enable him to reach the loftiest pleasures in the ‘real’ world. It does not matter to him, if when killing his enemy, the Jew or American, he accidentally kills another Arab. Why, he reasons, by killing the enemy of Islam, he has accorded his co-religionist who was accidentally killed the merit to enter into the gates of the loftiest heaven.

Do not think that Ahmadinejad will be moderate in using nuclear weapons. To him, this is the greatest ‘blessing’ that could come into his hands – the destruction of Israel, even if he and his people are subjected to nuclear reprisal even greater that what he unleashed on his enemies. In his perverted mind, his own death has value only in that it enables him to reach the great and wondrous world of pure bliss and this he desires for all of his people.

~~~~~~~

from the Febuary 2007 Edition of the Jewish Magazine

 http://www.jewishmag.com/111mag/ahmadinejad/ahmadinejad.htm

THE RUSSIANS ARE JOINED WITH THE IRANIAN JIHAD AGAINST ISRAEL…AND THEMSELVES

By Jim Stephens

May 19, 2010

The Russian Government of Putin and Medvedev are doing what Stalin did with Hitler, they are joining forces with Fascists

DEBKAfile researches make this very clear

Iranian teams train on S-300 interceptors at Russian bases
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report May 19, 2010

S-300 effective against air or missile attack

While joining the US in backing a softened UN Security Council sanctions package against Iran, Tuesday, May 18, Moscow is reported by debkafile’s military sources as surreptitiously training Iranian Revolutionary Guards crews at Russian bases to operate the advanced S-300 interceptor-missile systems, which are capable of fending off a potential US or Israel attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

UN sources disclose that the new sanctions motion – in its present diluted form – does not expressly forbid the consignment of this weapon to Iran.

Moscow is withholding them from Tehran for now, keeping the promise prime minister Vladimir Putin gave President Barack Obama. But if and when the weapons are delivered, Iran will have trained crews ready to operate them.
In their push to develop military ties with Iran and its allies, the Russians earlier this month also agreed to sell Syria MiG-29 fighter jets, Pantsyr short-range air defense systems and armored vehicles in a major arms transaction.

Washington and Jerusalem have known about the presence of IRGC S-300 missile crews at Russian training bases since early May. But when Israeli president Shimon Peres raised the issue during his talks with President Dmitry Medvedev in Moscow on May 9, he was told sharply that neither Israel nor any other government is entitled to tell Russia to whom it may give military assistance.
And when US diplomats in New York and Moscow were instructed to ask their opposite numbers whether the training program augured the shipment of the interceptors to Iran, notwithstanding Putin’s promise, they were greeted with deafening silence.
On May 11, the White House was worried enough to send the president’s nuclear adviser to tell reporters: “The United States has made clear to Russia that delivering a promised advance air defense system to Iran would have serious implications on US-Russian relations.”
This was the sternest admonition for Moscow to be heard ever from an Obama spokesman. This time, the Russians responded with equal abrasiveness. Foreign minister Sergey Lavrov, who was with President Medvedev in Ankara at the time, shot back: Moscow needs “no advice from across the ocean” about the sale of the S-300.
These less-than-diplomatic exchanges aside, the fact remains that Moscow’s consent to start training Iranian missile crews has strengthened Tehran’s hopes of the interceptors’ early delivery. The Iranians are even more encouraged by the success of the Russian-Chinese bid to delete from the UN sanctions draft any substantial expansion of the standing international arms embargo that might apply to the sophisticated S-300 anti-missile, anti-air system.

http://www.debka.com/article/8792/

What this means is the following

 

1.The Obama and EU so called “strategy” of sanctions against Iran in order to rein it back from the Nuclear Bomb is in tatters.

2. The Russians and Chinese represent not “socialism” but Stalinism, in so far as the Russian rulers represent anything except reactionary nationalism with a large dollop of anti-Semitism thrown in.

3. The other side to this, and there is another side, is that the US has been encircling Russia and stirring up Jihad against China, as well as stirring up reactionary Tibetan Buddhism (the monks who oppressed the people of Tibet)

4. And an extension of (3) is that the Russians see with their own eyes the creation of Kosovo, the support for Tudjman, and the backing of Islam in the shape of Izetbegovic. Above all they see the attack on Georgia province South Ossetia in which a section of the Israeli state joined in with Saakashvili, which they see correctly as an extension of NATO AGAINST Russia.

5. Nobody said politics is simple. For every action there is a reaction. This includes the Israeli alliance with the US Governments, which in actual fact are the most dangerous of all the enemies of Israel.

Yet having said all of that the Russian regime of Putin is backing the Jihad against Israel conducted by the Arabs, Islamists and above all by the “Palestinians”.

This is why all of the antisemites on the Fascist and fake left of today are backing Russia at present.

What to do?

There is no easy way out. There is NO alternative except to build our movement, 4international, because in certain definite ways it is Stalinism still that the Jewish people of Israel are fighting

Medvedev shoots back that “Moscow needs no advice” about the selling of this weapon to Iran.

Medvedev is a reactionary fool. He is in fact joining in with the Iranian Jihad against Israel and in doing this he is also joining in with the Jihad in general, and specifically against his own people, the Russians.

But how can this be made known to Russians?

There is no simple answer. Part of it is

  • Fight against the betrayal of the present Left traitors to socialism
  • Build the alternative party of Trotskyism

THE WORLD JUST HAS TO THIS TIME TAKE THE THREAT AGAINST THE JEWS SERIOUSLY

By Jim Stephens

May 12, 2010

Yesterday we on 4international made a reference to a powerful new rocket which Iran has just developed out of a consignment of Ukrainian Cruise missiles which it got some years ago.

This development is absolutely crucial to understand. Debkafile which carried the report made the central point that Iran can now hit Israel with a pay load, whatever that payload may be, for example with a nuclear bomb, without moving outside of the Iranian border.

It takes only a further moment of thought to follow this through to the great inherent danger to Israel and that is that this can be let off from say within a mountain fortress. This is not in any way far fetched because it is common knowledge that Iran has been building all of its nuclear centres within mountains.

That is the technology.

Iran has now got that ability, to strike against Israel, from anywhere within Iran.

So, a first strike nuclear against Israel IS possible.

Therefore please cast aside (for the moment) all speculation that we hear very often from essentially antisemites that “Iran would not dare” or that “they would be most stupid to do so because they would be signing their own death warrant” or any such permutation.

The end result of that anti-Semitic thinking is that it is OK for Jews in the year of 2010 some 65 years after the Holocaust to live in such danger.

We on 4international think it is not OK and in this we are quite alone on the Left of today. We are proud to stand with Jews and we will grow, be assured of that.

So the technology is there and it is explained and totally understandable to man´s intellect. But look also at the psychology, that is the psychology of the Mullahs who hold the power in Iran.

It is this psychology that future articles will turn to.

This psychology is rooted inside suicidal self sacrifice, which is an idea that trumps the above thought, that “Iran would not dare”!

And further articles also will turn to examine the real effect of the Iranian and Afghanistan wars, that Iran has been helped by the actions of the United States and European Governments.

The material world exists outside of the individual brain (or consciousness. As an addition to the above:

During the years from 1930 to 1945 the nearly whole `population of my country, Ireland, was kept in just about complete ignorance as to what the Nazis were doing to the Jews.

It seems to me as I read the Media etc that we are again in that kind of situation.

There are many articles on this theme (of the coming war on Israel) on the net

Try this

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/05/the_new_middle_east_peril.html

On the issue of Anne Frank, this young girl and her sister Margot were moved from their home town of Frankfurt Germany, to Amsterdam in Holland, but events were overcoming individual initiative. The Nazis invaded Holland and when in June and July 1942 the Nazis began moving the Jews to a centre close to the German border, Otto the father of Anne took the family into hiding in an attic.

The central lesson…do not let this happen again…the individual cannot fight alone

There are many articles on Anne Frank on the net. Try this:

http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005210

ONCE AGAIN 4INTERNATIONAL RETURNS TO THE DANGER TO ISRAEL FROM IRAN

by Jim Stephens

11 May, 2010

Once more we return to this most serious danger to Israel and to the many millions of Jews who live there and in the Diaspora.

I find this DEBKAfile report most alarming. Please read this on the following url

http://www.debka.com/article/8776/

The report is based on the knowledge of a leading Israeli expert in these matters whose name is Yair Shamir.

It concerns a cruise missile weapon called the KH-SS. It appears that some years ago Iran acquired a number of these weapons from Ukraine. That is the first alarming thing it seems to me.

The second alarming thing is that Iran is able to take such weapons and upgrade them.

In this case from just a slight perusal of the article by myself this means that Iran has been able to attach a nuclear warhead, if it has such, to this weapon.

The third alarming point is that this weapon can hit Israel after being fired from Iran itself. It does not have to be taken outside of Iran.

What this means to me is that Israel is placed on a deadly defensive posture. It has to wait until such a weapon is fired, perhaps from deep within a mountain, and then take its chances on knocking it out of the sky.

As an Irish person I ask is this right that Jews in 2010 have to sit in their Jewish Homeland and wait?…

A RELENTLESSLY NUCLEARIZING IRAN…WHAT TO DO?

by Jim Stephens

April 16, 2010

It is more than likely that Obama does indeed “get it”. We on 4international have likened Obama to the mentality of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, the same anti rational hatred of Israel.

We hope to study this issue in as much detail as possible.

This article came to us from Myths and facts, which is excellent

[Begin article here]

In the matter of Iranian nuclearization, U.S. President Barack Obama still doesn’t get it. Economic sanctions will never work. In Tehran’s national decision-making circles, absolutely nothing can compare to the immense power and status that would presumably come with membership in the Nuclear Club. Indeed, if President Ahmadinejad and his clerical masters truly believe in the Shiite apocalypse, an inevitable final battle against “unbelievers,” they would likely be willing to accept even corollary military sanctions.

From the standpoint of the United States, a nuclear Iran would pose an unprecedented risk of mass-destruction terrorism. For much smaller Israel, of course, the security risk would be existential.

Legal issues are linked here to various strategic considerations. Supported by international law, specifically by the incontestable right of anticipatory self-defense, Prime Minister Netanyahu understands that any preemptive destruction of Iran’s nuclear infrastructures would involve enormous operational and political difficulties. True, Israel has deployed elements of the “Arrow” system of ballistic missile defense, but even the Arrow could not achieve a sufficiently high probability of intercept to protect civilian populations. Further, now that Mr. Obama has backed away from America’s previously-planned missile shield deployment in Poland and the Czech Republic, Israel has no good reason to place its security hopes in any combined systems of active defense.

Even a single incoming nuclear missile that would manage to penetrate Arrow defenses could kill very large numbers of Israelis. Iran, moreover, could decide to share its developing nuclear assets with assorted terror groups, sworn enemies of Israel that would launch using automobiles and ships rather than missiles. These very same groups might seek “soft” targets in selected American or European cities – schools; universities; hospitals; hotels; sports stadiums; subways; etc.

While Obama and the “international community” still fiddles, Iran is plainly augmenting its incendiary intent toward Israel with a corresponding military capacity. Left to violate non-proliferation treaty (NPT) rules with impunity, Iran’s leaders might ultimately be undeterred by any threats of an Israeli and/or American retaliation. Such a possible failure of nuclear deterrence could be the result of a presumed lack of threat credibility, or even of a genuine Iranian disregard for expected harms. In the worst-case scenario, Iran, animated by certain Shiite visions of inevitable conflict, could become the individual suicide bomber writ large. Such a dire prospect is improbable, but it is not unimaginable.

Iran’s illegal nuclearization has already started a perilous domino effect, especially among certain Sunni Arab states in the region. Not long ago, both Saudi Arabia and Egypt revealed possible plans to develop their own respective nuclear capabilities. But strategic stability in a proliferating Middle East could never resemble US-USSR deterrence during the Cold War. Here, the critical assumption of rationality, which always makes national survival the very highest decisional preference, simply might not hold.

If, somehow, Iran does become fully nuclear, Israel will have to promptly reassess its core policy of nuclear ambiguity, and also certain related questions of targeting. These urgent issues were discussed candidly in my own “Project Daniel” final report, first delivered by hand to then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on January 16, 2003.

Israel’s security from mass-destruction attacks will depend in part upon its intended targets in Iran, and on the precise extent to which these targets have been expressly identified. For Israel’s survival, it is not enough to merely have The Bomb. Rather, the adequacy of Israel’s nuclear deterrence and preemption policies will depend largely upon (1) the presumed destructiveness of these nuclear weapons; and, (2) on where these weapons are thought to be targeted.

Mr. Obama’s “Road Map” notwithstanding, a nuclear war in the Middle East is not out of the question. Soon, Israel will need to choose prudently between “assured destruction” strategies, and “nuclear war-fighting” strategies. Assured destruction strategies are sometimes called “counter-value” strategies or “mutual assured destruction” (MAD). Drawn from the Cold War, these are strategies of deterrence in which a country primarily targets its strategic weapons on the other side’s civilian populations, and/or on its supporting civilian infrastructures.

Nuclear war-fighting measures, on the other hand, are called “counterforce” strategies. These are systems of deterrence wherein a country primarily targets its strategic nuclear weapons on the other side’s major weapon systems, and on that state’s supporting military assets.

There are distinctly serious survival consequences for choosing one strategy over the other. Israel could also opt for some sort of “mixed” strategy. Still, for Israel, any policy that might encourage nuclear war fighting should be rejected. This advice was an integral part of the once-confidential Project Daniel final report.

In choosing between the two basic strategic alternatives, Israel should always opt for nuclear deterrence based upon assured destruction. This seemingly insensitive recommendation might elicit opposition amid certain publics, but it is, in fact, more humane. A counterforce targeting doctrine would be less persuasive as a nuclear deterrent, especially to states whose leaders could willingly sacrifice entire armies as “martyrs.”

If Israel were to opt for nuclear deterrence based upon counterforce capabilities, its enemies could also feel especially threatened. This condition could then enlarge the prospect of a nuclear aggression against Israel, and of a follow-on nuclear exchange.

Israel’s decisions on counter-value versus counterforce doctrines will depend, in part, on prior investigations of enemy country inclinations to strike first; and on enemy country inclinations to strike all-at-once, or in stages. Should Israeli strategic planners assume that an enemy state in process of “going nuclear” is apt to strike first, and to strike with all of its nuclear weapons right away, Israeli counterforce-targeted warheads – used in retaliation – would hit only empty launchers. In such circumstances, Israel’s only plausible application of counterforce doctrine would be to strike first itself, an option that Israel clearly and completely rejects. From the standpoint of intra-war deterrence, a counter-value strategy would prove vastly more appropriate to a fast peace.

Should Israeli planners assume that an enemy country “going nuclear” is apt to strike first, and to strike in a limited fashion, holding some measure of nuclear firepower in reserve, Israeli counterforce-targeted warheads could have some damage-limiting benefits. Here, counterforce operations could appear to serve both an Israeli non-nuclear preemption, or, should Israel decide not to preempt, an Israeli retaliatory strike. Nonetheless, the benefits to Israel of maintaining any counterforce targeting options are generally outweighed by the reasonably expected costs.

To protect itself against a relentlessly nuclearizing Iran, Israel’s best course may still be to seize the conventional preemption option as soon as possible. (After all, a fully nuclear Iran that would actually welcome apocalyptic endings could bring incomparably higher costs to Israel.) Together with such a permissible option, Israel would have to reject any hint of a counterforce targeting doctrine. But if, as now seems clear, Iran is allowed to continue with its illegal nuclear weapons development, Mr. Netanyahu’s correct response should be to quickly end Israel’s historic policy of nuclear ambiguity.

Such a doctrinal termination could permit Israel to enhance its nuclear deterrence posture, but only in regard to a fully rational Iranian adversary. If, after all, Iran’s leaders were to resemble the suicide bomber in macrocosm, they might not be deterred by any expected level of Israeli retaliation.

No country can be required to participate in its own annihilation. Without a prompt and major change in President Obama’s persistently naive attitude toward Iran, a law-enforcing expression of anticipatory self-defense may still offer Israel its only remaining survival option. This will sound unconvincing to many, but rational decision-making – in all fields of human endeavor – is based upon informed comparisons of expected costs and expected benefits.

Does President Obama really believe that both we and the Israelis can somehow live with a nuclear Iran? If he does, he should be reminded that a nuclear balance-of-terror in the Middle East could never replicate the earlier stability of U.S.-Soviet mutual deterrence.

This would not be your father’s Cold War.  , Professor of Political Science at Purdue, was educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971). Born in Zurich, Switzerland, at the end of World War II, he is the author of many major books, monographs and articles dealing with international law, strategic theory, Israeli nuclear policy, and regional nuclear war. In Israel, where he served as Chair of Project Daniel, his work is known to selected military and intelligence communities.


Disclaimer:
This article is the author’s personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of Myths and Facts. 

PROFESSOR LOUIS RENE BERES 

In the matter of Iranian nuclearization, U.S. President Barack Obama still doesn’t get it. Economic sanctions will never work. In Tehran’s national decision-making circles, absolutely nothing can compare to the immense power and status that would presumably come with membership in the Nuclear Club. Indeed, if President Ahmadinejad and his clerical masters truly believe in the Shiite apocalypse, an inevitable final battle against “unbelievers,” they would likely be willing to accept even corollary military sanctions.

From the standpoint of the United States, a nuclear Iran would pose an unprecedented risk of mass-destruction terrorism. For much smaller Israel, of course, the security risk would be existential.

Legal issues are linked here to various strategic considerations. Supported by international law, specifically by the incontestable right of anticipatory self-defense, Prime Minister Netanyahu understands that any preemptive destruction of Iran’s nuclear infrastructures would involve enormous operational and political difficulties. True, Israel has deployed elements of the “Arrow” system of ballistic missile defense, but even the Arrow could not achieve a sufficiently high probability of intercept to protect civilian populations. Further, now that Mr. Obama has backed away from America’s previously-planned missile shield deployment in Poland and the Czech Republic, Israel has no good reason to place its security hopes in any combined systems of active defense.

Even a single incoming nuclear missile that would manage to penetrate Arrow defenses could kill very large numbers of Israelis. Iran, moreover, could decide to share its developing nuclear assets with assorted terror groups, sworn enemies of Israel that would launch using automobiles and ships rather than missiles. These very same groups might seek “soft” targets in selected American or European cities – schools; universities; hospitals; hotels; sports stadiums; subways; etc.

While Obama and the “international community” still fiddles, Iran is plainly augmenting its incendiary intent toward Israel with a corresponding military capacity. Left to violate non-proliferation treaty (NPT) rules with impunity, Iran’s leaders might ultimately be undeterred by any threats of an Israeli and/or American retaliation. Such a possible failure of nuclear deterrence could be the result of a presumed lack of threat credibility, or even of a genuine Iranian disregard for expected harms. In the worst-case scenario, Iran, animated by certain Shiite visions of inevitable conflict, could become the individual suicide bomber writ large. Such a dire prospect is improbable, but it is not unimaginable.

Iran’s illegal nuclearization has already started a perilous domino effect, especially among certain Sunni Arab states in the region. Not long ago, both Saudi Arabia and Egypt revealed possible plans to develop their own respective nuclear capabilities. But strategic stability in a proliferating Middle East could never resemble US-USSR deterrence during the Cold War. Here, the critical assumption of rationality, which always makes national survival the very highest decisional preference, simply might not hold.

If, somehow, Iran does become fully nuclear, Israel will have to promptly reassess its core policy of nuclear ambiguity, and also certain related questions of targeting. These urgent issues were discussed candidly in my own “Project Daniel” final report, first delivered by hand to then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on January 16, 2003.

Israel’s security from mass-destruction attacks will depend in part upon its intended targets in Iran, and on the precise extent to which these targets have been expressly identified. For Israel’s survival, it is not enough to merely have The Bomb. Rather, the adequacy of Israel’s nuclear deterrence and preemption policies will depend largely upon (1) the presumed destructiveness of these nuclear weapons; and, (2) on where these weapons are thought to be targeted.

Mr. Obama’s “Road Map” notwithstanding, a nuclear war in the Middle East is not out of the question. Soon, Israel will need to choose prudently between “assured destruction” strategies, and “nuclear war-fighting” strategies. Assured destruction strategies are sometimes called “counter-value” strategies or “mutual assured destruction” (MAD). Drawn from the Cold War, these are strategies of deterrence in which a country primarily targets its strategic weapons on the other side’s civilian populations, and/or on its supporting civilian infrastructures.

Nuclear war-fighting measures, on the other hand, are called “counterforce” strategies. These are systems of deterrence wherein a country primarily targets its strategic nuclear weapons on the other side’s major weapon systems, and on that state’s supporting military assets.

There are distinctly serious survival consequences for choosing one strategy over the other. Israel could also opt for some sort of “mixed” strategy. Still, for Israel, any policy that might encourage nuclear war fighting should be rejected. This advice was an integral part of the once-confidential Project Daniel final report.

In choosing between the two basic strategic alternatives, Israel should always opt for nuclear deterrence based upon assured destruction. This seemingly insensitive recommendation might elicit opposition amid certain publics, but it is, in fact, more humane. A counterforce targeting doctrine would be less persuasive as a nuclear deterrent, especially to states whose leaders could willingly sacrifice entire armies as “martyrs.”

If Israel were to opt for nuclear deterrence based upon counterforce capabilities, its enemies could also feel especially threatened. This condition could then enlarge the prospect of a nuclear aggression against Israel, and of a follow-on nuclear exchange.

Israel’s decisions on counter-value versus counterforce doctrines will depend, in part, on prior investigations of enemy country inclinations to strike first; and on enemy country inclinations to strike all-at-once, or in stages. Should Israeli strategic planners assume that an enemy state in process of “going nuclear” is apt to strike first, and to strike with all of its nuclear weapons right away, Israeli counterforce-targeted warheads – used in retaliation – would hit only empty launchers. In such circumstances, Israel’s only plausible application of counterforce doctrine would be to strike first itself, an option that Israel clearly and completely rejects. From the standpoint of intra-war deterrence, a counter-value strategy would prove vastly more appropriate to a fast peace.

Should Israeli planners assume that an enemy country “going nuclear” is apt to strike first, and to strike in a limited fashion, holding some measure of nuclear firepower in reserve, Israeli counterforce-targeted warheads could have some damage-limiting benefits. Here, counterforce operations could appear to serve both an Israeli non-nuclear preemption, or, should Israel decide not to preempt, an Israeli retaliatory strike. Nonetheless, the benefits to Israel of maintaining any counterforce targeting options are generally outweighed by the reasonably expected costs.

To protect itself against a relentlessly nuclearizing Iran, Israel’s best course may still be to seize the conventional preemption option as soon as possible. (After all, a fully nuclear Iran that would actually welcome apocalyptic endings could bring incomparably higher costs to Israel.) Together with such a permissible option, Israel would have to reject any hint of a counterforce targeting doctrine. But if, as now seems clear, Iran is allowed to continue with its illegal nuclear weapons development, Mr. Netanyahu’s correct response should be to quickly end Israel’s historic policy of nuclear ambiguity.

Such a doctrinal termination could permit Israel to enhance its nuclear deterrence posture, but only in regard to a fully rational Iranian adversary. If, after all, Iran’s leaders were to resemble the suicide bomber in macrocosm, they might not be deterred by any expected level of Israeli retaliation.

No country can be required to participate in its own annihilation. Without a prompt and major change in President Obama’s persistently naive attitude toward Iran, a law-enforcing expression of anticipatory self-defense may still offer Israel its only remaining survival option. This will sound unconvincing to many, but rational decision-making – in all fields of human endeavor – is based upon informed comparisons of expected costs and expected benefits.

Does President Obama really believe that both we and the Israelis can somehow live with a nuclear Iran? If he does, he should be reminded that a nuclear balance-of-terror in the Middle East could never replicate the earlier stability of U.S.-Soviet mutual deterrence.

This would not be your father’s Cold War.


PROFESSOR LOUIS RENE BERES, Professor of Political Science at Purdue, was educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971). Born in Zurich, Switzerland, at the end of World War II, he is the author of many major books, monographs and articles dealing with international law, strategic theory, Israeli nuclear policy, and regional nuclear war. In Israel, where he served as Chair of Project Daniel, his work is known to selected military and intelligence communities.
Disclaimer:
This article is the author’s personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of Myths and Facts.

WE DO NOT WISH TO SHOCK BUT THERE IS GREAT DANGER TO LIVES OF MILLIONS OF ISRAELI JEWS

by Jim Stephens

April 16, 2010

This is a very important article, sent to my email by the excellent “Myths and Facts”

I feel a major,major issue in today´s world is the absence of a truly revolutionary party on the left, which is fighting against antisemitism. This fact is based on our analysis of what antisemitism is today, it is more and more hatred of Israel.

We said in our recent article

[begin quote here]

If one understands that thinking is a reflection of the real material world, then the body of thought on a particular subject has a physical reality, which we can call theory.

There is an accumulated body of thought towards the Jews as a people, anti-Semitism, which has a real physical presence and reality in the world of today.

The Pharaohs of Egypt thought they had a “Jewish problem” and that they would solve it by making slaves of the Jews. The Romans would solve the “Jewish problem” by mass execution and dispersal, also renaming the country Judea, tearing down the temple etc. The Christians who Rome adopted and made into their pin-up clearly had a “jewish problem” and their answer was to pin the death of Jesus onto the Jews instead of on their sponsors the Romans, a very slick bit of replacement theorizing. Islam had a problem with everything non Islam and made the Christians and Jews into dhimmis.

And behind this lies the Protocols of Zion, that the Jews control the world, or seek to, and if given half a chance will do so.

That the Jews are an evil race, like the witches of Salem, and what do you do with evil, you destroy evil.

Thus the Nazis felt that they were performing a service to humanity by killing the 6 million, and the logic of their feelings of “service” was to kill ALL of the Jews.

This has morphed into a new thing in our time, the recent past. Now to perform a service to humanity you have to solve the “Palestinian” issue. But before going into the manic world of Obama any look at any Arab country will show that the destruction of Israel, or the formation of a Palestine state, will solve nothing at all

http://4international.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/people-cannot-escape-reality-jews-are-in-horrible-danger-from-iran-nuclear-bomb/

DIRE DISORIENTATION OF THE LEFT

There are a whole series of betrayals inside the Left that have led to the present dire situation where in order to construct a socialist leadership there has to be a party devoted to fighting against the dogma of “the Palestine State” and rather specifically that.

The actual record of Leon trotsky in the 1930s in support of the Jews has been terribly falsified and in this we can say that a critical factor was the actual elimination of Trotsky by the thug, Ramon Mercader, in the service of Joseph Stalin.

Yesterday I had a strange experience. I happened to look up the significant site of David North, www.wsws.org,  and was fairly amazed to find that the issue of Iran, the nuclear bomb, and the danger to Jews of a new Holocaust was not there, though there was much else there. Very, very peculiar that mind set.

A SLIGHT DIFFERENCE WITH THE WRITER BELOW

The characterization of Obama as stated in the first sentence may be very wrong. Perhaps Obama does indeed “get it”. In our article quoted above we see Obama more along the lines of the Palestine Solidarity campaign, we can see little difference, there is the same anti rational attitude running deep in all their bones.

That is not a small difference. But there is much in the article that we agree with.

We stated that this is a revolutionary issue, because we do not see how it can be resolved, and we are talking about Jewish existence here, inside the confines of normal bourgeois diplomacy.

We see these western politicians of America and Europe standing with their hands in their pockets as Jews are massacred, perhaps in millions again, and we do not seek to shock.

Below is a sober assessment:

 

In the matter of Iranian nuclearization, U.S. President Barack Obama still doesn’t get it. Economic sanctions will never work. In Tehran’s national decision-making circles, absolutely nothing can compare to the immense power and status that would presumably come with membership in the Nuclear Club. Indeed, if President Ahmadinejad and his clerical masters truly believe in the Shiite apocalypse, an inevitable final battle against “unbelievers,” they would likely be willing to accept even corollary military sanctions.

From the standpoint of the United States, a nuclear Iran would pose an unprecedented risk of mass-destruction terrorism. For much smaller Israel, of course, the security risk would be existential.

Legal issues are linked here to various strategic considerations. Supported by international law, specifically by the incontestable right of anticipatory self-defense, Prime Minister Netanyahu understands that any preemptive destruction of Iran’s nuclear infrastructures would involve enormous operational and political difficulties. True, Israel has deployed elements of the “Arrow” system of ballistic missile defense, but even the Arrow could not achieve a sufficiently high probability of intercept to protect civilian populations. Further, now that Mr. Obama has backed away from America’s previously-planned missile shield deployment in Poland and the Czech Republic, Israel has no good reason to place its security hopes in any combined systems of active defense.

Even a single incoming nuclear missile that would manage to penetrate Arrow defenses could kill very large numbers of Israelis. Iran, moreover, could decide to share its developing nuclear assets with assorted terror groups, sworn enemies of Israel that would launch using automobiles and ships rather than missiles. These very same groups might seek “soft” targets in selected American or European cities – schools; universities; hospitals; hotels; sports stadiums; subways; etc.

While Obama and the “international community” still fiddles, Iran is plainly augmenting its incendiary intent toward Israel with a corresponding military capacity. Left to violate non-proliferation treaty (NPT) rules with impunity, Iran’s leaders might ultimately be undeterred by any threats of an Israeli and/or American retaliation. Such a possible failure of nuclear deterrence could be the result of a presumed lack of threat credibility, or even of a genuine Iranian disregard for expected harms. In the worst-case scenario, Iran, animated by certain Shiite visions of inevitable conflict, could become the individual suicide bomber writ large. Such a dire prospect is improbable, but it is not unimaginable.

Iran’s illegal nuclearization has already started a perilous domino effect, especially among certain Sunni Arab states in the region. Not long ago, both Saudi Arabia and Egypt revealed possible plans to develop their own respective nuclear capabilities. But strategic stability in a proliferating Middle East could never resemble US-USSR deterrence during the Cold War. Here, the critical assumption of rationality, which always makes national survival the very highest decisional preference, simply might not hold.

If, somehow, Iran does become fully nuclear, Israel will have to promptly reassess its core policy of nuclear ambiguity, and also certain related questions of targeting. These urgent issues were discussed candidly in my own “Project Daniel” final report, first delivered by hand to then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on January 16, 2003.

Israel’s security from mass-destruction attacks will depend in part upon its intended targets in Iran, and on the precise extent to which these targets have been expressly identified. For Israel’s survival, it is not enough to merely have The Bomb. Rather, the adequacy of Israel’s nuclear deterrence and preemption policies will depend largely upon (1) the presumed destructiveness of these nuclear weapons; and, (2) on where these weapons are thought to be targeted.

Mr. Obama’s “Road Map” notwithstanding, a nuclear war in the Middle East is not out of the question. Soon, Israel will need to choose prudently between “assured destruction” strategies, and “nuclear war-fighting” strategies. Assured destruction strategies are sometimes called “counter-value” strategies or “mutual assured destruction” (MAD). Drawn from the Cold War, these are strategies of deterrence in which a country primarily targets its strategic weapons on the other side’s civilian populations, and/or on its supporting civilian infrastructures.

Nuclear war-fighting measures, on the other hand, are called “counterforce” strategies. These are systems of deterrence wherein a country primarily targets its strategic nuclear weapons on the other side’s major weapon systems, and on that state’s supporting military assets.

There are distinctly serious survival consequences for choosing one strategy over the other. Israel could also opt for some sort of “mixed” strategy. Still, for Israel, any policy that might encourage nuclear war fighting should be rejected. This advice was an integral part of the once-confidential Project Daniel final report.

In choosing between the two basic strategic alternatives, Israel should always opt for nuclear deterrence based upon assured destruction. This seemingly insensitive recommendation might elicit opposition amid certain publics, but it is, in fact, more humane. A counterforce targeting doctrine would be less persuasive as a nuclear deterrent, especially to states whose leaders could willingly sacrifice entire armies as “martyrs.”

If Israel were to opt for nuclear deterrence based upon counterforce capabilities, its enemies could also feel especially threatened. This condition could then enlarge the prospect of a nuclear aggression against Israel, and of a follow-on nuclear exchange.

Israel’s decisions on counter-value versus counterforce doctrines will depend, in part, on prior investigations of enemy country inclinations to strike first; and on enemy country inclinations to strike all-at-once, or in stages. Should Israeli strategic planners assume that an enemy state in process of “going nuclear” is apt to strike first, and to strike with all of its nuclear weapons right away, Israeli counterforce-targeted warheads – used in retaliation – would hit only empty launchers. In such circumstances, Israel’s only plausible application of counterforce doctrine would be to strike first itself, an option that Israel clearly and completely rejects. From the standpoint of intra-war deterrence, a counter-value strategy would prove vastly more appropriate to a fast peace.

Should Israeli planners assume that an enemy country “going nuclear” is apt to strike first, and to strike in a limited fashion, holding some measure of nuclear firepower in reserve, Israeli counterforce-targeted warheads could have some damage-limiting benefits. Here, counterforce operations could appear to serve both an Israeli non-nuclear preemption, or, should Israel decide not to preempt, an Israeli retaliatory strike. Nonetheless, the benefits to Israel of maintaining any counterforce targeting options are generally outweighed by the reasonably expected costs.

To protect itself against a relentlessly nuclearizing Iran, Israel’s best course may still be to seize the conventional preemption option as soon as possible. (After all, a fully nuclear Iran that would actually welcome apocalyptic endings could bring incomparably higher costs to Israel.) Together with such a permissible option, Israel would have to reject any hint of a counterforce targeting doctrine. But if, as now seems clear, Iran is allowed to continue with its illegal nuclear weapons development, Mr. Netanyahu’s correct response should be to quickly end Israel’s historic policy of nuclear ambiguity.

Such a doctrinal termination could permit Israel to enhance its nuclear deterrence posture, but only in regard to a fully rational Iranian adversary. If, after all, Iran’s leaders were to resemble the suicide bomber in macrocosm, they might not be deterred by any expected level of Israeli retaliation.

No country can be required to participate in its own annihilation. Without a prompt and major change in President Obama’s persistently naive attitude toward Iran, a law-enforcing expression of anticipatory self-defense may still offer Israel its only remaining survival option. This will sound unconvincing to many, but rational decision-making – in all fields of human endeavor – is based upon informed comparisons of expected costs and expected benefits.

Does President Obama really believe that both we and the Israelis can somehow live with a nuclear Iran? If he does, he should be reminded that a nuclear balance-of-terror in the Middle East could never replicate the earlier stability of U.S.-Soviet mutual deterrence.

This would not be your father’s Cold War.  , Professor of Political Science at Purdue, was educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971). Born in Zurich, Switzerland, at the end of World War II, he is the author of many major books, monographs and articles dealing with international law, strategic theory, Israeli nuclear policy, and regional nuclear war. In Israel, where he served as Chair of Project Daniel, his work is known to selected military and intelligence communities.


Disclaimer:
This article is the author’s personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of Myths and Facts. 

PROFESSOR LOUIS RENE BERES

PEOPLE CANNOT ESCAPE REALITY…JEWS ARE IN HORRIBLE DANGER FROM IRAN NUCLEAR BOMB

by Jim Stephens

April 14, 2010

UNDERSTAND WHO AND WHAT WE ARE, UNDERSTAND WHERE WE ARE

 

The human race had its origins in Africa, descended as Darwin opined from a particular type of ape. The research by the Leakey family and by Don Johannson, the latter finding the remains of the creature who they called “Lucy”, and the most recent research concerning the finding of “Ardi”, by among others, Tim White, gives an insight into the origins of the human species which is of great value to humans today. This shows the real, scientifically proved origins of humans and dismisses the most stupid and crazy conspiracy theorists, along with the equally stupid “Mystic Megs” who litter discussions of origins today. Man as a species is a developed animal, is part of the animal world, is an animal with a large brain, all of which is totally understandable and within our reason. We no longer need “Mystic Megs”! That is who and what we are. To understand where we are in a society sense one has to understand capitalism historically, that capitalism did have an origin, it did not always exist, and there is nothing which says that it always has to exist, if humans can devise a better system to put in its place. Every new tragedy that is happening to the animal world, an outstanding example being the recent news that only a couple of thousands of tigers remain in the wild, and that some thousands of tigers held in captivity by China will never be able to exist in the wild on their own, having lost the ability to hunt, shows the great danger to human life and to all animal and vegetable life on this planet. Man has come a long way since Lucy and Ardi but it will be touch and go whether capitalism will allow life to continue. Rather all the evidence shows that capitalism will destroy the planet if not replaced by a benevolent and intelligent socialist planning. But this requires the socialist revolution and the socialist revolution requires above all the revolutionary socialist party, which is the party of Trotskyism, the continuator of Marxism and Leninism. This is not a romantic idea. Whether one likes this idea or not the evidence affirms that this is real. (1)

THE BRITISH ELECTION IS ALMOST MEANINGLESS, BRITAIN IS NOW NO MORE THAN A TINY AND INSIGNIFICANT COUNTRY, AND IN ALL TRUTH THE GREAT LAND OF SHAKESPEARE IS A ROTTING CESS PIT

The only high point of British culture was the Cromwellian Revolution. Cromwell´s Puritan Army, the New Model Army, was a unity of thought and practice, which carried through the English Revolution, deposed and beheaded the reactionary King. It was this that allowed the English bourgeoisie to develop the productive forces and to usher in the industrial revolution, which despite the huge social costs was a great step in the productivity of mankind. The land of the British being the first industrial capitalist nation is now one of the poorest, it no longer produces any of the necessities of mankind, its people are embittered, its government has run the country into debt, no longer paying its way in the world. The forces of the reactionary religion called Islam seeing a country bankrupt also see a country ready for the picking. Most of the now sullen English are unable to surmount the political correctness engendered by their own rulers and surrender the country to the new Islamic imperialists. Result the English have lost their soul. They have no future whatsoever.

BUT ALL OF THE ABOVE DOES NOT STOP THE “BRITS” HAVING FANTASTIC AIRS ABOUT THEMSELVES. ONE ASPECT OF THIS IS THE BRITISH HATRED OF ISRAEL

 

Of course the English do not fully understand that they are a busted flush. Their consciousness is lagging behind reality.

The reality is that the heads of the English are still filled with memories of Empire, when the English bestrode the world, when they were able to order around (as one example) a billion human beings in India.

These memories die hard and are useful to keep the mass population of England from committing mass suicide, or carrying through the socialist revolution.

So the English elite are experts in this business of filling these English skulls with all kinds of bilge, anything to stop anybody understanding the horrible reality they are immersed in.

So the English have been taught to hate Israel because generally speaking the Jews have created a cohesive nation, and they are successful, often spectacularly so.

It is said that anti-Semitism in its modern form is the hatred of Israel whereas previously it was hatred of Jews. It has become unfashionable to hate Jews because memories of the Holocaust sometimes do penetrate even dim British heads. And it has therefore been spectacularly easy to create this Israel hatred in the British brains. This is not the full answer but is part of the answer as to why the British today are small in every department but big in the department of anti-Semitism!

WHAT IS ISRAEL? THE GREATNESS OF ISRAEL. WHY ISRAEL IS HATED BY ALL COUNTRIES (BAR A FEW MELANESIAN ISLANDS!)

The noted writer HG Wells in his Short History of the World devoted a full chapter to the Jews or Hebrews. His opinion was that after the return from Babylon exile the Jews were what he called “the finished article”. They were a human group, conscious of themselves as a people, with a book, their Bible, which was the first written statement of a national self consciousness.

We can talk of Nobel Prize winners etc, but this is the greatness of the Jews, that they are a people who have somehow preserved their nationality and their self consciousness as a people. This nationality is bound up with the idea that they held for so many millennia that they were representing their “God” on earth, and that they could be a light to humanity. This sense of being a people was thus bound up with a sense of responsibility. The idea of setting an example was fundamental and this is why Judaism has never been imperialist or even proselytizing in approach. Their written down self consciousness, the Bible, was and is central.

THE WORLD IS SAYING “SOLVE THE PALESTINIAN ISSUE AND THERE IS UNIVERSAL PEACE IN THE WORLD”. WHY THIS IS SUCH ANTI RATIONAL RUBBISH!

 

The Palestinian theme is like a new age “Mystic meg” imposition onto reality. There are those writers like Francisco Gil White, Jared Israel and Joseph Alexander Norland who have went in to a study of the issue fairly supportive of the “Palestinian” claims but who came out fully convinced that it is a con, one of the worst of modern times. In all three cases the method was the same. These people investigated using primary sources what really happened, rather than take the partial information transmitted by antisemites which in effect was adding up to anti-Semitic lying. On any issue in which there is great conflict, and uncertainty of historical truth, it is not permissible to broadcast only one side of the equation. Yet this is what has been done by the Media and by many academics. This is roted in a modern disease, that is that there has to be a victim, and that in investigating the issue it is necessary to take sides with the “victim”. This has been called emoting and emoting journalism- It is anti-scientific and leads to lies.

FIRST LOOK AT THE MAP TO UNDERSTAND WHY IT IS GIBBERISH

 

The “Palestinian” religion is gibberish of course. To explode that it is all gibberish one only has to look at a map of the world. As a country and as a physical presence when one looks at a map of the world it is very difficult to actually see Israel. So the huge consternation about Israel seems on the surface a baffling proposition. When one narrows down the search for the physical presence of Israel to Arab land, to the 22 or so countries which make up that entity, then the roots of the problem will emerge, if it and only if it is allied to an understanding of the basic tenets of Islam. Not only is Israel a small speck on the world map, it is also tiny in respect to the extensive acreage of the Arab world. Change the picture to the Islamic world which includes Iran, Indonesia etc it is an even worse equation. That should be enough to cause questions to arise in most brains. It is amazing how this does not happen, hardly ever. So to understand it is usually necessary to dig deeper.

THE BODY OF “THEORY” THAT IS ANTISEMITISM

 

If one understands that thinking is a reflection of the real material world, then the body of thought on a particular subject has a physical reality, which we can call theory.

There is an accumulated body of thought towards the Jews as a people, anti-Semitism, which has a real physical presence and reality in the world of today.

The Pharaohs of Egypt thought they had a “Jewish problem” and that they would solve it by making slaves of the Jews. The Romans would solve the “Jewish problem” by mass execution and dispersal, also renaming the country from Judea to “Palaestina” (Palestine), tearing down the temple etc. The Christians who Rome adopted and made into their pin-up clearly had a “jewish problem” and their answer was to pin the death of Jesus onto the Jews instead of on their sponsors the Romans, a very slick bit of replacement theorizing. Islam had a problem with everything non Islam and made the Christians and Jews into dhimmis.

And behind this lies the Protocols of Zion, that the Jews control the world, or seek to, and if given half a chance will do so.

That the Jews are an evil race, like the witches of Salem, and what do you do with evil, you destroy evil.

Thus the Nazis felt that they were performing a service to humanity by killing the 6 million, and the logic of their feelings of “service” was to kill ALL of the Jews.

This has morphed into a new thing in our time, the recent past. Now to perform a service to humanity you have to solve the “Palestinian” issue. But before going into the manic world of Obama any look at any Arab country will show that the destruction of Israel, or the formation of a Palestine state, will solve nothing at all

LOOK AT THE POLITICS OF ANY ARAB COUNTRY- I MEAN ANY ARAB COUNTRY. ARE THEY PEACEFUL? ARE THEY FUNCTIONAL IN ANY SENSE OF THAT TERM?

The opposite. The Arab world in general is totally dysfunctional and this, of course, is not caused in the slightest degree by the presence of tiny Israel. Egypt is not untypical where it has 30 per cent of the population illiterate and about a half living below a dollar a day. Egypt is noted for its repression of the totally inoffensive and extremely poor Christian Copts

TAKE BEAUTIFUL BY THE SEA LEBANON. IS LEBANON FUNCTIONAL? IS LEBANON AT PEACE WITHIN ITSELF?

 

On the BBC this morning was the most amazingly sounding story. Lebanon, which once was a very cultured state, has been so disturbed by Hizbullah and by Islam, that the authorities do not allow football fans attend football matches. No this is long past April 1! It appears that such are the lethal divisions inside Lebanon that the authorities in Lebanon fear that football crowd rivalry in stadia will quickly grow over into violence on the outside. Inside Lebanon the main target of Islam is against the Lebanese Christians just as Palestinian Arab Muslims are driving or have driven Arab Christians out of towns and cities like Bethlehem. Yet the myth is alive and well, and is promoted by Obama, Hilary Clinton, by Biden and by those traitor Jews who are on the Obama governing team, that Israel is the cause of all problems in the Middle East. It is pure anti-Semitism, the same kind of lies that were promoted by Hitler in Mein Kamph. Let us call this whole tendency of blaming Israel, blaming therefore Jews because they speak slightly in code, by its proper name. It is pure evil, and is just as evil as anything that the Nazis under Hitler came up with. Furthermore it is not evil for its own sake, always there is the terminal crisis in capitalism, and the Jews (Israel) are used consciously as a scapegoat. Obama hates Israel and hates Jews, and he consciously uses Israel as a scapegoat. He does not hide this. He travels to the Cairo Conference last year and makes a deal with Islam on the very basis of making the Jews the scapegoat in the world situation.

IS IT NOT CURIOUS? THE MOST POWERFUL MAN IN THE WORLD BARACK OBAMA WITH POSSESSIONS AND EMPIRE WITHOUT HISTORICAL PARALLEL! BUT WHY DID OBAMA GET SO MENTALLY AGITATED OVER 1500 HOUSES BEING BUILT BY JEWS IN JERUSALEM?

It was not actually a decision to build, it was the second stage of approval, in other words a bureaucratic process. It was not in an Arab area of Jerusalem, it was in an area in which Jews predominate, and this area itself was surrounded by other areas in which Jews predominate. Obama, Clinton, Biden and the Jew hating Jews whom they have surrounded themselves with were beside themselves with rage

THE EUROPEANS! WHY DID THEY GET SO AGITATED OVER JEWS WANTING TO BUILD HOMES IN JERUSALEM? LITTLE TINY CATHOLIC IRELAND WITH THEMSELVES UP TO THEIR EYEBALLS IN DEBT? IS IT NOT AN AMAZING AND ANTI-RATIONAL PHENOMENON?

The Europeans joined in behind Obama. Some kind of trigger was touched and you had politicians even in Ireland letting off steam on the issue, a major issue on every news programme. Such is the crisis in the building trade there must be some 1500 homes lying unfinished in some or most Irish towns in Ireland. Yet they are totally agitated about what the Jews are doing in tiny Israel, in the tiny Homeland that the Jews after 3000 years have achieved a refuge.

THE REAL NEW WORLD ORDER AND THE AMAZING SPOOKS OF THE CONSPIRACY WORLD…CONSPIRACY THEORY IS THE SYPHILIS OF OUR TIMES.

It is not that there is not a conspiracy. All ruling classes engage in conspiracy. All oppressed in order to fight the oppressors engage in conspiracy. Secrecy is a great weapon and necessary in all wars.

But none of the issues we discuss here will ever even be alluded to by the conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones. Could it be that these modern conspiracy theorists are actually (whether they mean to or not) working to hide the real conspiracy of the very real New World Order.

This brings us to the power of the US Imperialists, allied with the EU Imperialists, inside the very real force of NATO, allied also with antisemites and anti-communists like George Soros. Leading to the advent of Barack Obama—

THE MEANING OF OBAMA FOR THE WORLD

Jewish people whom I have met on the Net do not understand fully the significance of Obama. He is not only a problem for Jews and for the world he is a major problem for all humans.

This is because it is the capitalist system which is in crisis; it is the US which is the leader of the world capitalist system; thus these issues are being directed through Obama.

It is a feature of Jewish blogs on the Net is that they tend to be self centred and so miss the overall crisis in the capitalist system. It is useful in this regard, in understanding the role that Obama is playing, to study the capitalist crisis of the 1930s and to study just about everything concerning the Nazis, especially how Hitler took power quite legally, almost stealthily, without departing from the parliamentary system (parliamentary democracy)

THE MEANING OF OBAMA FOR JEWS

The great meaning of Obama for Jews is located in much work already done concerning the very murky origins of this man.

Of great note here is where was he born and who is his parent on the male side?

As has been written if I wanted to put my hand on my birth certificate it would take me 2 phone calls and half an hour outside. Yet try as they might this has proved impossible in the case of Obama.

It is proved totally that Obama was brought up as a child in the Muslim faith. He attended classes in Islam in Indonesia

In America his political influences are people like Rashid Khalidi, the equivalent of the worst of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, people who shout down in Ireland the ambassador to Ireland from Israel, and who are totally obsessed in their Israel hatred. (2)

A major influence was the jew haters of the Stalinist Communist Party of America.

It is quite possible that the young Obama left Islam and became a Christian. But then he sat in the Jew and Israel hating Church of Pastor Wright. He also has connection with other anti-Semitic black politicians in America.

That is why real Jewish people are concerned and have been concerned from the beginning by this man Obama.

But it does not stop there. What has to be factored in is the crisis in capitalism, the New World Order of capitalism, the drive of US capitalism to compete with Russia, China and India, and hence the close alliance with Islam which was put in practice in Yugoslavia in the 1990s.

This is what is driving Obama against the Jews and his Muslim past and Muslim sympathy makes him a possible very vicious operator against the Jews. (3)

 HOW REAL IS THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW HOLOCAUST OF THE JEWS?

Very real! This time there does not have to be trains hurtling in secrecy through wooded mountains in central Europe. There are 2 factors

  1. Jews are collected together in great numbers in the Jewish Homeland. Some argue “but that would kill Arabs as well”, however, the concepts behind suicide killing” trumps that objection
  2. Evil and anti-Semitic minds have turned to the huge potential for killing (of Jews) contained inside nuclear technology. Another approach to solving the Jewish problem!

 

TO UNDERSTAND THE THREAT OF A NEW HOLOCAUST WE MUST UNDERSTAND HISTORY

 

Basically this means understand the pervasiveness of anti-Semitism, and to bear in mind how we began, that anti-Semitism is a body of thought and constitutes a real material and physical presence in the world.

Jews are most sensitive to this issue and they study the phenomenon the most.

But it was an Irish political academic, Conor Cruise O’brien who put it most memorably

“Antisemitism is a light sleeper”

THE US IMPERIALISTS HAVE ALREADY WORKED CLOSELY WITH ISLAM IN BOSNIA AND KOSOVO

The key factor in the new Holocaust of the Jews is Iran.

Even the BBC is now admitting that Obama is instructing Netanyahu and Israel to not strike against the Iranian Nuclear building.

But the reality is: Obama and the American and European ruling elites are prepared to do the same that they did in the Holocaust. They are prepared to stand aside with hands in their pockets while Jews are massacred, as happened under Hitler, and as can happen when Iran has got nuclear bomb technology.

After all to Obama, to Brown or Cameron, it is only Jews, while Milliband has left being a real Jew far behind him, he is now a complete little Britisher, oh so well respected in British society, what an achievement for a “little” obedient Jew, to become a Foreign secretary of Britain.

The whole history of the 1930s and 40s is that Churchill and the English rulers could care less that 6 million Jews were being exterminated. It was purely accidental that all of the Jews of Arabia and of Palestine were not also massacred, the accident being that the Desert rats defeated Rommel, and stopped the plans of Hajj Amin el Husseini extending the Holocaust to Palestine. Thus a neat solution by the “fair-minded Brits” to the Jewish “problem”.

And this essentially is why all of these antisemites, Obama, the Brits, the Germans, the Chinese, and the list is endless, are quite content to talk about meaningless sanctions while Iran gets ready and finishes its Islam destiny, just as Hitler felt it was HIS destiny also to solve the “Jewish Problem” on behalf of humanity.

Or in other words anti-Semitism is at the root of capitalism in terminal crisis and there is no way to verbiage around that reality.

In short the Jews of Israel are in a horrible danger.

TO UNDERSTAND OBAMA AND THE POSSIBLE NEW HOLOCAUST WE MUST UNDERSTAND HISTORY, OUR VERY RECENT HISTORY, THE HISTORY OF THE 90s, THE HISTORY OF THE DESTRUCTION OF YUGOSLAVIA. A LESSON IN ANTI SERB CRUELTY WHICH CAN BECOME NOW ANTI JEW CRUELTY. THE MUSLIM NASIR ORIC CAN BECOME A GREAT TEACHER OF THE JEWS OF THE CRUELTY WHICH LIES IN WAIT FOR THEM. A WARNING!

In general Jews have made a big mistake in relation to Yugoslavia. With some exceptions such as Peter North, Nathan Pearlstein, Jared Israel and Julia Gorin they have passed too lightly over the horrors directed against the Serbs and especially the close alliance formed against the Serbs by world capitalism and Islam. There has been a real resistance on the Jewish blogs to this. But note we are talking here about Jewish blogs in America and Canada which themselves are much influenced by the ideology of American ruling class ideology. But many of the Jews of Israel were a different matter, being supportive of the Serbs, Israel even supporting the Serbs with arms against Izetbegovic.

THE COMPARISION BETWEEN OBAMA AND HITLER IS NOT AT ALL FAR FETCHED

 

I recently met with a man of 25 years. I admit that this man (product of “Great” Britain!) was a particularly self centred and ignorant individual. Anyway in the course of a desultory conversation the word “holocaust” came up and this pathetic excuse for a human being had never heard of “The Holocaust”. How awful and how pathetic. His responsibility but it also points to the ignorance in the present British and European educational school set up.

Antisemitism has always bred on ignorance and there is a lot of it about.

“Once at the helm, Hitler moved swiftly to eliminate rivals and opponents”.

 

Those words were written by Norman Davies (Europe a History page 970)

I think the analogy with Israel is appropriate. On an international scale the New World Order seeks an alliance with Islam, which does not need explanation when one understands the essence of Islam.

The extreme hatred of the New World Order represented by Obama towards Netanyahu is really at a deeper level the wish of the New World order to clear the decks in preparation for that firm alliance of American capitalism, European capitalism, with Islam. There is a precedent: Hitler was a real lover of Islam and he had the head of Islam in his team, that is Hajj Amin el Husseini, close relative and mentor to Arafat, thus also to Hamas and Abbas.

THE KEY FACTOR ABOUT OBAMA IS THAT HE IS A PRESIDENT IN TRANSITION

 

All concepts of conspiracy theories relating to Obama, such as those of the utter reactionary Steve Jones, all lead away from the crisis in capitalism, away from the danger of anti-Semitism, and become in turn antisemitic in the extreme. From the world ruled by “Free Masons” to ruled by “Jews” is always a short step.

The main thing about Barack Obama lies outside of him, that is the world historical crisis in capitalism.

To understand Obama it is necessary to study the crisis in capitalism.

The central feature about Obama is that his Muslim and Left fascist past leads him into alliance with Islam, with the Arabs in their aim to destroy the Jews.

HOW AMERICA CAN BE THE SAVIOUR OF THE JEWS. HOW AMERICA CAN ALSO BE THE DEATH KNELL OF THE JEWS.

The situation can be termed dialectical. There has always been opposites in America and there is thus a conflict of opposites contained within a unity, unity being the abstract term “America”. Unions were formed in America only through great and bloody struggle. The memories of great union battles not that long ago fought remain.

There is in America a strong loyalty to Israel among a goodly part of the ordinary people. There is a strong anti-Semitic tendency inside the ruling elites, the power elites, who want Jews to be in their place. It is not long ago that Jews were barred from universities and golf courses.

This is not a simple situation, there are many complex factors and it is changing due to the crisis. But the main thing is that there is now a bitter enemy of Jews in the form of Obama and there is an anti-Semitic Media which is also loyal to Obama, the teleprompter wizard. One way or another leadership will be the key issue.

THE ABOVE DIALECTIC CONCERNING AMERICA, SAVIOUR OR DEATH KNELL, CENTRES ON HOW TO FIGHT OBAMA

 

AMERICAN TECHNIQUE POINTS TO SOCIALISM BUT ALSO AND SIMULTANEOUSLY TO FASCIST DEGRADATION

A classic example here is the Obama health Bill. Health care for man and animals is only possible on the basis of a new culture, a great development of productivity.

In fact the economy of Obama and in Britain of Brown or Cameron is going in entirely the opposite direction.

Free health care is possible but only on the basis of a great development of the productive forces, and production according to a plan, not for profit.

The Health Bill of Obama has been labelled as being socialist but this is simply mischievous. It will only deepen the crisis with American capitalism just as the National Health Service in capitalist Britain continually deepens the crisis in British capitalism.

In this period there will be many attacks on socialism, on communism and on Trotskyism.

There is only one way to fight these attacks, and that is through the education of a cadre leadership based on an uncompromising search for historical truth.

For example, Stalin did not represent communism in any way, rather Stalin represented the pressure of the world capitalist class on the weakened workers state in Soviet Russia.

There is no OTHER way to reach historical truth outside of a revolutionary Trotskyist Party.

But where is it? I am afraid that it has to be created. The depth of the betrayal of groups like the Workers revolutionary Party, of Matgamma´s Group.of WSWS, of SWP etc has really to be understood and factored in, to go forward.

Against that absolute dearth of revolutionary leadership it is also a fact that the enemy is really weak, that the working class internationally is not defeated, that the youth in Iran are fighting, that the great jewish people of Israel have not and will not surrender their safety to Obama, that Karadzic is fighting, that there are Serb traitors in Serb Government but they in turn are hated.

We are in a revolutionary period. But it is necessary for new folk to learn in order to understand reality.

To finish where we began: Man is a creature of nature who has developed a wonderful brain. other animals have quite wonderful brains also. But we humans are responsible.

We have a special responsibility. If capitalism is not replaced by a socialist system then all of nature is in danger in front of rampant and decadent capitalism.

Repeat: there is no way out under capitalism.

 Notes

(1)

For a primitive cousin who likely stood at only about 120 centimeters and weighed about 50 kilograms, Ardi is likely to make a big impact in the field of paleoanthropology. For instance, Ardi’s physical form also has implications for many other ancient animals, including the controversial six-million- to seven-million-year-old Sahelanthropus tchadensis, discovered in Chad in 2001. The similarities in skull size and shape among these two species now has prompted the researchers of one of the new papers (led by Gen Suwa, a professor at the University of Tokyo) to conclude that S. tchadensis was, indeed, an early hominid, rather than a female ape as others have suggested.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=ardi-hominid-human-ancestor

(2)

JERUSALEM – The board of a nonprofit organization on which Sen. Barack Obama served as a paid director alongside a confessed domestic terrorist granted funding to a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a “catastrophe” and supports intense immigration reform, including providing drivers licenses and education to illegal aliens.

The co-founder of the Arab group in question, Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi, also has held a fundraiser for Obama. Khalidi is a harsh critic of Israel, has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror and reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti-Western terrorism and was labeled by the State Department as a terror group.

In 2001, the Woods Fund, a Chicago-based nonprofit that describes itself as a group helping the disadvantaged, provided a $40,000 grant to the Arab American Action Network, or AAAN, for which Khalidi’s wife, Mona, serves as president. The Fund provided a second grant to the AAAN for $35,000 in 2002.

Obama was a director of the Woods Fund board from 1999 to Dec. 11, 2002, according to the Fund’s website. According to tax filings, Obama received compensation of $6,000 per year for his service in 1999 and 2001.

Obama served on the Wood’s Fund board alongside William C. Ayers, a member of the Weathermen terrorist group which sought to overthrow of the U.S. government and took responsibility for bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1971.

Ayers, who still serves on the Woods Fund board, contributed $200 to Obama’s senatorial campaign fund and has served on panels with Obama at numerous public speaking engagements. Ayers admitted to involvement in the bombings of U.S. governmental buildings in the 1970s. He is a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

The $40,000 grant from Obama’s Woods Fund to the AAAN constituted about a fifth of the Arab group’s reported grants for 2001, according to tax filings obtained by WND. The $35,000 Woods Fund grant in 2002 also constituted about one-fifth of AAAN’s reported grants for that year.

The AAAN, headquartered in the heart of Chicago’s Palestinian immigrant community, describes itself as working to “empower Chicago-area Arab immigrants and Arab Americans through the combined strategies of community organizing, advocacy, education and social services, leadership development, and forging productive relationships with other communities.”

http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/4821

(3)

We now come to the key issue and absent a class based, and Marxist approach to these issues, it is not that easy to grasp this key issue.

Let us put it simply and as clearly as possible. The small book which Lenin wrote at the end of 1901, beginning of 1902, called “What is to be done?” makes hard reading probably at any time, especially so today. But the essence is simple and its meaning is even today, I should say especially today, vibrant. One point Lenin makes is that the dominant ideas in any society are the ideas of the ruling class.

That simple idea brings us into the heart of the issue facing Jews.

Jews did find a sanctuary in America as did the Irish and many more. Much of what they thought of as American freedom and opportunity was powered by the American bourgeois national revolution itself. That much is obvious.

But big sections of American Jewish society took on board also the ideas of the American rulers.

And that really is the rub. During the 1990s according to Jared Israel of Emperors New Clothes (www.tenc.net) there were Jewish leaders in America who took out full pages ads in the national American Press to state that the Serbs towards the Bosnian Muslims were just like the Nazis towards the Jews.

These American Jewish leaders had become just like their American ruling Imperial leaders. (Or like the British trade union bureaucratic leaders who sold out the historical General Strike of 1926, over tea and biscuits in Downing Street!)

Now the price is paid and the price is being asked off ordinary Jews, and especially off ordinary Jews in Israel first of all, but the turn of American ordinary Jewish people will come soon enough, and after the Jews…everybody.

But it is not just American Jewish leaders. It goes deeper, much deeper unfortunately.

The point is that Herzl even as he was a most progressive Jewish nationalist, and even though Jewish bourgeois nationalism is very progressive, there was a weakness in Herzl, in that his main and only strategy was to enlist the help of the world´s bourgeois powers, and as time went on under other leaders this became more and more the case.

Then a strange twist to this dependence on world powers:

There came into Israeli society and especially into the Labourite Mapai leadership ideas which are profoundly anti revolutionary, the ideas of Social Democracy, and the ideas of Stalinism.

And the so called “left” really became the most counter revolutionary element inside Israeli society.

But why call them “Left” unless you consciously want to discredit socialism, communism, Leninism, Trotskyism?

They were just as much scoundrels as was Stalin when he sent Mercader to murder Leon Trotsky in Mexico in 1940.

Its influence was deep and people will recall that the General Dayan offered the Temple Mount to the forces of Islam on the very evening of the day that the forces of Judaism had defeated Islam in battle (the end of the 67 War), and after overcoming their astonishment, those who Leon Trotsky called “the reactionary mohammedans” gratefully accepted, then went to war right away against the Jews. Jews are now barred from PRAYING on the site of their most holy shrine, which surely IS the Temple.

Many of the Jews I have met on blogs are shall I say contemptuous of learning about these things, that there is such a thing as “Labourism” (think British Labour, think Spain´s PSOE and Zapatero), as Leninism, as Stalinism, as Trotskyism.

To these kind of people this is almost beneath them to study such things.

But they can never ever understand the history of Israel since 1948 and even before without that! And they are powerless today!

It is now a dangerous situation for Jews but it is also a potentially empowering situation. This is because many of these old mistruths are being opened up for investigation.

Consider the following from today´s news

Ronald Lauder of The World Jewish Congress has written a letter to the Obama regime.

Now Lauder is the very type of man who I have been talking about, who has all his life imbibed the ideas of the dominant class in American society, the ideas of the American ruling class.

(Now if you do not think that there are classes in America please return to your pleasant slumber)

This is what Lauder wrote (thanks to DEBKAfile)

Lauder then asks if it is true that America is no longer committed to a final status agreement that provides Israel with defensible borders. He goes on to ask if friction with Israel is part of the Administration’s desire to improve relations with the Muslim world and warns that appeasement does not work.
Israel is not only America’s closest ally in the Middle East, Lauder stresses. It is the one most committed to this administration’s declared aim of ensuring Iran does not get nuclear weapons. This is the single biggest threat that confronts the world today.

And Lauder is followed by the very similar (from an ideological slant) Ed Koch
Former New York Mayor Ed Koch condemned the Obama administration’s attitude toward Israel in the strongest terms: “I weep today because my president, Barack Obama, in a few weeks has changed the relationship between the US and Israel from that of closest of allies to one in which there is an absence of trust.” He goes on to say: “…our closest ally… has been demeaned and slandered, held responsible …for our problems in Afghanistan and Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East.”

Ed Koch says he suspects the plan is “to so weaken the resolve of the of the Jewish state and its leaders so that it will be much easier to impose on Israel an American plan to resolve the Israel-Palestinian conflict, leaving Israel’s needs for security and defensible borders in the lurch.”

He is most bothered by what he calls “the shameful silence and lack of action by community leaders – Jew and Christian” and asks: Where are the Jews who marched in defense of fellow American citizens in 1963 and heard Martin Luther King’s memorable speech. “We have stood up for everyone else. When will we stand up for our brothers and sisters in the Jewish state of Israel?” Ed Koch asks

[end extract from DEBKAfile]

http://www.debka.com/article/8716/

And we can say surely that both Lauder and Koch are at the dead end of the Jewish alliance with American Imperialist leaders.

As we have spelled out in this essay it was always a fraud in any case. The British leaders, whether Churchill or Bevin, were always the worst enemies of the Jews. American leaders too. That is why they kept their hands firmly in the pockets of their expensive trousers as the 6 million were murdered by the Nazis.

And these American leaders would not have lost a moment of sleep if ALL the Jews had been wiped out by the Nazis, including by Hajj Amin el Husseini.

And it is no accident that the movement mentored by El Husseini and his close colelagues Arafat and Abbas are today, and have been for many decades now, the special baby of the US and EU Establishments.

For example, it was a by product of events that the Desert Rats managed to defeat Rommel in the Desert, and thus saved the Jews in Palestine and Israel to be. The British, especially the British “Tommy”, cared nothing for the Jews and whether they were ALL murdered, with only a few honourable exceptions out of a whole army.

And as to the American leaders.

It was the case with every American President, I mean EVERY American President since, and the work has been done to prove this. (By especially Francisco Gil White and by Joseph Alexander Norland)

I think there is a difference though with Mr Obama and it is a very significant difference, but it is a difference of degree and not of substance

1. Obama as we have described does indeed hate Jews, in the way that say a member of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign who operate in Ireland, seeming to spend most of their time standing on the road outside the Israeli Jewish Embassy in Dublin, that sort of hate. This is what his ties with Khalidi tells us.

2. The crisis, the terminal crisis in the world capitalist system. Soon it MUST come to physical war against Russia, India and China. THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT THE ALLIANCE WITH ISLAM IS FOR. It is all about the survival of American capitalist power, both in America and abroad, the two are inseparable.

Finally

Lauder and Koch are not stupid. They see what is happening. But unless they become Trotskyists they can do nothing but moan and plead.

But we are in a different period. Judaism was not able to withstand the ravages of Hitler and El Husseini from 1929 to 1945.

It is time to look again at the revolutionary theory of Lenin, and of Trotsky, and to understand the relevance of the fight of Trotsky against social democracy and stalinism.

We must stand with Netanyahu totally against the aspiring Fascist Antisemite Obama. Our defence is unconditional.

But the whole future of a people, the Jews, another people, the Serbs, many other peoples, all peoples, all human and especially animal life…all are threatened be decadent capitalism.

You understand that or you understand nothing! “Lucy” and “Ardi” would have struggled in vain if a new generation does not take up at least some of these issues in this essay.

OBAMA´S HATRED OF ISRAEL MEANS ISRAEL HAS NO CHOICE…IT MUST USE NUCLEAR TO STOP IRANIAN NUCLEAR BOMB

 

By Jim Stephens

March 29, 2010

Obama has instructed Israel to do NOTHING about the Iranian nuclear threat to Israel. And Obama is not trusted. Many Israelis now think he will allow and even support a Nuclear Iran. In other words Obama hates Israel.

This will have immediate effects which are unstoppable!

Now Israel is a small country and although it is well armed it can only do so much.

4international believe that Israel is unable to defeat Iran and the whole of the Islamic world PLUS the US by ordinary conventional warfare.

It is a matter of how time merges in to military strategy.

For Israel to continue to exist it HAS to engage in war with Iran on a first strike Nuclear basis.

This is why we are intensely interested in the following produced by the excellent (always) Debkafile.

[begin report by debka here]

Scenarios of a potential Israeli attack on Iran – usually without Washington’s assent – abound in leading US media in the last 24 hours. They contrast sharply with the impression Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu has been trying to convey to the public that he and President Barack Obama were of one mind on the Iranian question when they talked at the White House last Tuesday, March 23, but  the president wanted more Israeli concessions to get talks restarted with the Palestinians.
debkafile’s military sources point in particular to the work of two eminent experts on Iran’s nuclear program, Anthony Cordesman and American-Jordanian Abdullah Toqan for the Washington Institute for Strategic Affairs, who report the belief in some American military circles that “…nuclear weapons are the only weapons that can destroy targets deep underground or in tunnels…”
The quote was embodied in a 208-page report published Friday, March 26 under the heading: Options in Dealing with Iran’s Nuclear Program.

They explain that because of the limited scale of its air and missile forces, Israel would resort to “using these [nuclear] warheads as a substitute for conventional weapons, given the difficulty its jets would face in reaching Iran for anything more than a one-off sortie.”
Our sources note that in July 2009, the two researchers (in a 114-page report) maintained that the Israeli Air Force possessed the aircraft and resources for striking Iran’s nuclear facilities. This view disputed the estimates generally current Washington at the time. Then, too, Cordesman and Toqan were of the opinion that it was not necessary to hit scores of targets to cripple Iran’s nuclear bomb program: Seven to nine sites would suffice.
Our Iranian sources report that Tehran ran off thousands of copies of that report for distribution among its intelligence and Revolutionary Guards commanders, who were told to study every word, photo and map. Iran’s rulers took the work as seriously as though they had scooped a top-secret Israeli plan of operation.

In their latest work, the two researchers find that “”Ballistic missiles or submarine-launched cruise missiles [such as those with which Israeli Dolphin submarines are armed] could serve for Israeli tactical nuclear strikes without interference from Iranian air defenses.”
Saturday, March 27, the day after the Cordesman-Toqan paper was published, The New York Times revealed:
“… international inspectors and Western intelligence agencies say they suspect that Tehran is preparing to build [two] more sites,” six months after its secret enrichment plant was discovered in Qom.

The report goes on to say:  “The most compelling circumstantial evidence… is that while Iran appears to be making new equipment to enrich uranium, that equipment is not showing up in the main plant that inspectors visit regularly [at Natanz or at Qom.]“
Small manufacturing factories spread around Iran to avoid detection and sabotage “are a particular target of American, Israeli and European intelligence agencies,” some of which have been penetrated,” the report says.  Iran “has encountered difficulties in manufacturing centrifuges, the machines that spin at very high speeds to enrich uranium.”

Then, Sunday, March 28, The New York Times followed up with proposed scenario, captioned: “Imagining an Israeli Strike on Iran,” based on a simulation exercise conducted last December by the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution in Washington.

Its main point is that if Israel goes ahead with this attack, using a refueling base set up in the Saudi desert without Saudi knowledge, Washington will essentially tell its leaders they have “made a mess,” and instruct them “to sit in a corner while the United States tries to clean things up.”
The exercise does not indicate how the US will clean things up, whether diplomatically or militarily – or both – or just concentrate on keeping the Gulf oil nations safe from Iranian retaliation.
Iran next defies warnings and fires missiles at Israel, including its nuclear center at Dimona, with minimal damage and casualties – the strategy being “to mount low-level attacks on Israel while portraying the United States as a paper tiger…”

debkafile’s sources infer from this simulated war game that the Americans believe that, aside from the confrontation over Iran’s nuclear facilities, Israel and Iran will try and use their conflict to manipulate US policy.

The next stage would be for Hizballah to fire up to 100 rockets a day into northern Israel, following which Israel would launch a 48-hour campaign by air and special forces against Lebanon to destroy Hizbalah’s military strength.
The games simulators then predict an Iranian attack on the Saudi oil industry center at Dahran with conventional missiles, mining the Strait of Hormuz and damaging US oil shipping.
At that point, Washington will embark on a massive reinforcement of the Gulf region. It is clear that the US will then aim at destroying all Iranian, air, ground and sea targets in and around the Strait of Hormuz to inflict a “significant defeat” on Iran’s forces.
The game is projected to end eight days after the initial Israeli strike.

 http://www.debka.com/article/8685/

HIZBALLAH PREPARES TO MAKE WAR ON ISRAEL—5000 trained by Iran

by James Stephens

February 2, 2010

Basically the European Union is an antisemitic force and this is why the troops of countries like Spain over recent years have been travelling to Lebanon just north of Israel, where they have been allowing Hizballah to prepare for war against Israel. None of this will appear in the European press. This is why this report by DEBKAfile is so important to read

[Start DEBKA report here]

EXCLUSIVE: US intelligence finds 5,000 Hizballah training to seize Galilee towns
DEBKAfile Special Expose February 1, 2010, 9:19 AM (GMT+02:00)

US intelligence gathered over months on detailed war plans Iran, Syria, Hizballah and Hamas

Jones was not talking out of the top of his head, but on the strength of solid US intelligence gathered over months on detailed war plans Iran, Syria, Hizballah and Hamas have drawn up to send five Hizballah brigades sweeping across the border to seize five sectors of Galilee, while also organizing a massive Israeli-Arab uprising against the Jewish state.
Hamas would open a second front in the south and in the east. Syria is expected to step in at some stage.
This plan with attached special map was first published exclusively by DEBKA-Net-Weekly 430 on Jan. 22, 2010. Key excerpts appear here.  
 
Iran’s Revolutionary Guards instructors at especially established training facilities near Tehran

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards instructors at especially established training facilities near Tehran are already well advanced in training a cadre of 5,000 Hizballah fighters in special operations and urban combat tactics to standards equivalent to those current in similar US and Israeli military forces. 

At the outset of the course, the group was split up into five battalions, each given a specific northern Israeli sector for capture with details of its topography and population for close study.
(See attached map). 

1st Battalion:
This unit will break through the Naqura-Rosh Haniqra border pass and sweep south along seven kilometers to seize Nahariya, the Israeli Mediterranean city of 55,000 – or parts thereof.
UN peacekeepers have their headquarters at Naqura, the other side of Rosh Haniqra, and Israel defenses there are lax, so no military or geographic obstacles to this Hizballah drive are anticipated. This battalion will capture a large number of Israeli hostages for use as live shields against an Israeli counter-attack
A small group of 150 fighters, trained by Revolutionary Guards marines, will also try and reach the coast by swift boats. They are already standing by in Lebanon. 

2nd Battalion:

 

Hizballah control of a key road hub and stand in the path of Israeli reinforcements

 

This unit is assigned to capture the northern Israeli town of Shlomi, 300 meters southeast of the Naqura border pass and home to 6,500 inhabitants. Holding this town and its environs will give Hizballah control of a key road hub and stand in the path of Israeli reinforcements heading for Nahariya through routes 89 and 899 from key Israeli bases in the Galilee and Upper Galilee regions to the east. (See map). 

3rd Battalion: 

Driving further south than any other Hizballah unit, this battalion must reach the three Israeli-Arab villages of  B’ina, Deir al-Asad and Majd el-Krum, which are located north of the town of Carmiel and alongside Israel’s Route 85 which connects Acre on the Mediterranean with Safad in the central Galilee mountains. 

Iranian war planners want Hizballah to control the three Israeli-Arab locations for two advantages: 

One: As a commanding position for stirring up the disaffected Israeli-Arab villages and towns of Lower Galilee and Wadi Ara to the south into a full-blown uprising. The incoming combat force will be backed up by clandestine Hizballah cells which for some years have established, armed and funded the underground “Galilee Liberation Battalions” in Sakhnin, Araba and Deir Hana, by means of drug smugglers. 

Hizballah’s West Bank cells have been active for some time in the Wadi Ara region, through which National Route 65 connects central Israel to the North.
Two:   To gain fire control of Acre-Safed Route 85 from positions in occupied Arab villages and so have a shield ready for the Hizballah units holding Nahariya and Shlomi, and seriously impede the passage of Israeli forces from bases in the center of the country  to relieve these northern towns.  The Israeli Air Force will be constrained from attacking the areas held by Hizballah by the presence of large civilian populations.

4th Battalion:


This battalion will push southeast into the Kadesh Valley, on the rim of which the Makia and Yiftah kibbutzim and Makia moshav are clustered. Capture of these locations would afford Hizballah fire coverage of Israel’s northernmost Galilee Panhandle.

5th Battalion:

Hizballah’s Strategic Reserve.

 Hizballah will invite Syrian back-up forces to go into Lebanon

Rocket attacks from Lebanon will focus on disabling Israel’s strategic military sites, such as air force bases, missile bases, its nuclear facilities and naval bases. Targeting Israeli population centers is a lower Iranian priority.
Syria’s initial involvement will be limited to cover by artillery or air for Hizballah operations. But if the fighting escalates or drags on, Hizballah will invite Syrian back-up forces to go into Lebanon; Damascus will open Front No. 4 against Israel from the Syrian side of the Golan Heights. 

The Tehran-Hizballah war strategy is all but ready for any contingency. The obvious trigger would be an Israeli military operation against Iran’s nuclear facilities, but once all the elements are in place, they could be activated by any other pretext conjured up in Tehran or Damascus. 

In recent weeks, both Hizballah and its Syrian allies have mobilized their forces while telling the Arab world that the Jewish state is about to attack Lebanon.
 Hizballah leader Hassan Nasrallah is straining at the leash to attack Israel however the crisis over Iran’s nuclear program turns out.
Sunday, January 17, he said: “I promise you, in view of all the threats you hear today… that should a new war with the Zionists erupt, we [the Lebanese resistance movement] will crush the enemy, come out victorious, and change the face of the region. 

“God willing, Israel, the occupation, hegemony, and arrogance are in the process of disappearing!” 

Nasrallah was not alone in anticipating a troubled year for the Middle East.

The above report by DEBKAfile on http://www.debka.com/article/8575/#8575 shows that the only outcome for Israel is to fight or be totally eliminated

This throws into sharp relief all of those who oppose Israel, who do not support Israel, who do not support the right of this small country to defend itself against such gigantic odds, as is the whole of the Arab world along witht he Islamic world, all seeking to destroy Israel.

 

The issue still remains Iran and the Nuclear Bomb

by Felix Quigley

January 29, 2010

The issue still remains Iran and the Nuclear Bomb

It was very clear over 10 years ago when Robin Cook then Foreign Minister in Britain thought that talking, then perhaps sanctions, would stop the Islamofascist Mullahs of Iran

That was total bullshit by the British, the Europeans and by the US

Since then iran has got within reach of the Nuclear Bomb, and also has what the Europeans seem to overlook, the ability to reach by rocket every part of Europe.

Now as this report by DEBKAfile makes clear the EU has given up even on sanctions.

Sanctions never had a chance of getting off the ground anyway because the antisemitic Stalinists in China and Russia are in league with Iran and would block them

Israel is in the firing line and this report makes clear that its leaders are bankrupt

[Begin report from DEBKAfile here]

Israel’s president, prime minister and foreign minister are visiting Berlin, Warsaw and Budapest this week, apparently impervious to the European Union foreign ministers’ decision in Brussels Monday, Jan. 25, to back away from sanctions for Iran’s nuclear program outside the UN Security Council. 

German foreign minister Guido Westerwelle signed off on the motion, the day before Israeli president Shimon Peres’ Hebrew address to the German parliament in Berlin.
debkafile: The Netanyahu government clings to the anchor of supposed international sanctions for halting Iran’s advance on a nuclear weapon. Monday, before traveling to Poland, prime minister Netanyahu said at the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial museum:  “Today there are new Jew haters with new reasons to destroy the Jewish people. This is a test for humanity, and we will see in the coming weeks how the international community will stop the evil before it spreads.”
Well, he had his answer than same afternoon, yet this eloquence vanished on the plane trips to Europe.
None of the Israeli travelers have commented on the decision by the European foreign ministers to dump the sanctions option in the laps of Russia and China, knowing their vetoes are committed in advance and that both stand out for more diplomatic engagement plus concessions to Tehran.  The EU foreign ministers stated: “With Iran, [sanctions] will work out only if all the UN Security Council permanent members agree.” Every one of those ministers was fully aware that this proposition was a fantasy.
 

If Israel counted on Washington staying the course, there too there are signs of cold feet. The Obama has reduced the target of possible unilateral measures to the Revolutionary Guards Corps which is responsible for Iran’s nuclear program, in order to avoid harming the Iranian people. 

As debkafile has stressed before, the Revolutionary Guards have umpteen mostly criminal ways of beating sanctions: They run a vast network of straw companies worldwide and move money around through international crime, smuggling, terror and drug conduits out of America’s reach rather than the banking system.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi are undoubtedly Israel’s best friends on the European continent, but they too conduct a dual policy on Iran. They sternly denounce Iran, while at the same time hundreds of German and Italian companies do business with the Islamic Republic, some even selling components for its missile and nuclear programs. Indeed, German and Italian firms are in tight competition over the Iranian market, with the latter reportedly gaining the edge this year.
No German transaction with Iran has been cancelled under Israeli pressure contrary to reports to this effect.
The most realistic European leader is French president Nicolas Sarkozy who Tuesday, Jan. 26, called for new and different steps to be pursued to halt Iran’s dash for a nuclear bomb. Still, French foreign minister Bernard Kouchner did not hold out against his colleagues consensus in Brussels.

http://www.debka.com/article/8554/

So the issue is still Iran, the issue is still antisemitism in the present, the issue is still the continuum of antisemitism over 2000 years, of which the Holocaust was a part and an episode, and that the antisemites are preparing a new great killing of the Jews.

ISRAEL IS IN GREAT DANGER BECAUSE ANTISEMITISM IS NOT A LOGICAL THOUGHT SYSTEM

by Felix Quigley

23 December, 2009

It is very important to puncture the idea that the Arabs have been motivated by anti imperialism. What they were motivated by was good, old fashioned anti Jew hatred.

Leon Trotsky was asked what was his political position towards the 1929 Arab attacks against the Jews?:

He answered that he had not yet studied the issue adequately and that he was in the process of doing so. That he did not know what elements were involved, anti British feeling in other words anti imperialism, (I paraphrase) or whether it was the hatred of the Arab, Islam [using specifically the word “Mohammedans”] for Jews, in other words anti-Semitism.

Francisco Gil White made a very thorough study of this and his study cuts the ground from under the anti imperialist part of the answer of Trotsky.

That the Arabs are anti imperialist is a dominant theme inside the revisionist Left now and for a long time past. It is a strange concept because it is blatantly obvious that the ruling capitalist class governments of every country under the sun are up to their necks in collaboration with the Arab rulers.

So when the revisionist Left come forward and also support the Arabs they are singing from the same hymn sheet as their own governments. Some Left!

The most that you can say about the Arab regimes is that they are also imperialist and that they are competing with other imperialist powers on a world stage. And this fits the bill because we know that Islam conquered half the known world and was a bloody and an imperialist force. Yet the US with EU is the dominant force. One does not negate the other.

In order to make Islam or Arabs in to anti imperial forces the revisionist Left really have to invent this in their own heads. Make it fit their own schema, and this is what Nathan Weinstock was doing, thus Gil White was correct to tackle Nathan Weinstock head on

[Begin quote from Francisco Gil White here]

As you may recall from Part 1, even anti-Zionist historian Nathan Weinstock recognizes that the ‘Palestinian movement’ in British Mandate ‘Palestine’ was not exactly admirable. It was, he says, “deformed by racism.” Racism against whom? The British? That should be the first hypothesis for a movement that Weinstock calls “the Palestinian anti-colonialist movement,” because the British were the occupying imperialist/colonialist power in charge. But no, as Weinstock himself concedes, this movement was racist against the Jews (Zionist or not, mind you). Weinstock’s admission that the ‘Palestinian’ movement’s flag was anti-Jewish racism is important because it comes from someone who would like to defend the justice of this movement.

Precisely in order to defend this movement, Nathan Weinstock would like you to think that the violent racism of so-called ‘Palestinian’ Arabs was “understandable” because, he claims, the Zionist Jews and the British were “clearly” allied with each other against the Arabs (see Part 1). This representation is absurd. As Weinstock himself admits,

1) the British imperialists were helping the Arabs kill Jews (see Part 1 for Weinstock’s admission; British support for anti-Jewish terrorist violence is documented below);

and as Weinstock also admits,

2) the Arab feudal lords in ‘Palestine’ incited racist violence against the Jews in order to create a climate to intimidate fellow Arabs who might want to get along with the mostly socialist Jews, the better to further exploit the downtrodden Arab commoners (see Part 3)

Therefore, it is amazing that Weinstock, who says he is an anti-imperialist Marxist, should not defend the interpretation that the British ruling class and the Arab ruling class were allied against ordinary Arabs and Jews. After all, as I also show in Part 3, the Zionist Jews had no role in oppressing the Arabs; on the contrary, the Zionist Jews were indirectly and directly helping to end the oppression which the Arab (effendi) feudal lords made the ordinary (fellahin) peasant Arabs to suffer.

Nathan Weinstock would also like you to think that this allegedly ‘Palestinian’ movement was an expression of a Palestinian Arab “national consciousness.” But this is quite impossible. As I show in Part 1, the ideology of this movement was just plain old anti-Jewish racism, of the traditional sort in the Muslim world, and quite comparable — notwithstanding Weinstock’s loud protestations to the contrary — to the traditional European anti-Jewish racism that produced the Shoah (Holocaust). Moreover, as I show in Part 2, ‘Palestine’ as such never existed, and neither was there ever any such thing as an ‘Arab Palestinian’ population with a ‘Palestinian identity,’ much less Weinstock’s alleged “national consciousness.” Most of the so-called ‘Palestinian Arabs,’ as I also show in Part 2, were immigrants from elsewhere attracted by the economic boom that the Zionist Jews created when they transformed a desolate land into an oasis (few people are even aware of this).

So, although Nathan Weinstock may refer to the racist movement that killed innocent Jews in British Mandate ‘Palestine’ as the “Palestinian anti-colonialist movement,” the well-documented facts suggest that this movement had absolutely nothing to do with fighting colonialism. On the contrary, the aristocratic Arab leaders of repeated terrorist violence against ordinary Arabs and Jews were directly sponsored and assisted by the colonialist British Mandate government and the colonialist British military, as I will document below in some detail. It was this British sponsorship and assistance that initially set in motion the so-called ‘Palestinian movement.’ Later, the Nazis would also sponsor it. And after that, the United States.

Anybody who chooses to defend the ‘Palestinian movement’ should do so in full awareness of the facts documented below.

[End quote from Gil White here]

The above is from an article titled “How did the Palestinian movement emerge? The British sponsored it. Then the German Nazis, and the US”

Find it on the following url

http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov4.htm  

Gil White does then an outstanding job in showing how German and Italian Nazi propaganda against the Jews flooded the Middle East and all Arab countries. There was machinery in place and a structure that enabled this.

Gil White tells of how the German Government of Hitler was flooded with congratulations when and because it had passed the Nuremburg Laws, congratulations coming from all parts of the Arab world.

A question related to this must be answered. Why did the Nazi propaganda against Jews receive such a ready hearing in the Arab countries? Is there something connected to being an Arab that enabled the Nazi propaganda to be effective?

This brings to the question of Islam, the ideology which drives the Arab movement. John Bostom and Robert Spencer in their knowledge of the Koran have done important work which helps to answer this question. [We will examine their work later]

The study of this 1930s period and how the Arab world mobilized against the Jews is of great importance to the present. Instead of there being a Fascist movement as there was Hitler and Mussolini, there is today another Fascist movement, which is strangely enough concentrated outside Israel in the combined and united efforts of the revisionist “Left”, really a Fascist Nazi type movement in its anti-Semitic ideology, linked up with the openly Fascist anti-Semitic Islam which is operating like a rash in all countries, especially in countries in Europe, where the invective against Jews is strongest. You can see this Fascist movement of the revisionist “left” as they attempt to isolate and destroy the Jewish Homeland with their urgings for boycott, also in the caravans and boat sailings to break the “siege” of Gaza. They help and hand over money to a Jew killing and Jew hating movement in Hamas in Gaza, while Fatah’s exactly the same, although some very stupid Israeli Jews seek to work with Fatah. Meanwhile state governments such as that of Bush and Obama have been in alliance with Arabs and Islam against the Jewish Homeland. The aim is to bring the Jewish Homeland down. There can be no other aim because these are not stupid people.

Over the past 20 years the Iranian regime has made many threats to destroy Israel. Yet we hear people who argue in the west that Iran does not pose any threat to Israel. Just last week Iran has perfected a very advanced rocket which can reach Israel. There is no outcry. It seems that public opinion has been conditioned by many events and much propaganda to be totally blasé at the thought of Israel being struck by a Nuclear Bomb.

The world thus is not obsessed with the thought of Israel being hit by a Nuclear Bomb and the deaths of millions, which actually would include many Arabs as well. The world is obsessed with the war which Israel fought against Hamas, a war that was forced on to Israel, which it tried to avoid for many years. Even an imbecile should be able to see that.

Very alarming is the position of the trade unions, who on this issue are part of this Fascist force we mentioned above, even though Fascism will scrap all union organization. As we shall see later anti-Semitism is blind in its fury! The Fascist and Nazi British Trade Union Congress passes a resolution to isolate Israel, at this time! British unions are a strange ideological concoction but…There are shades here of the pact which Stalin made with Hitler in 1939.

Some reading I have been doing centres on references to a German Nazi called Rudolf Hoss

I will jot some points down now and edit them on Monday…

Rudolf Hoss, the Commandant of the largest concentration camp in Poland, was in 1942 called to a meeting with Himmler and was told that the Fuhrer had given the order for “a final solution of the Jewish Question”

“We the SS must carry out that order. If it is not carried out now the Jews will later on destroy the German people”

[Page 702, Hitler, by John Toland]

The parallel is clear

Everybody seems to discard the lies that Iran has been caught out in spreading. The Iran Government was caught out hiding the secret plant in Qom. They have also been caught out contradicting each other. Yet there are many people who believe Iran when it says it is looking for peaceful nuclear targets. They are expecting Iran to be telling the truth and not expecting Iran to be liars. The only answer for this psychosis is that people have been already indoctrinated in to a great hatred for Israel.

Back to Toland

“The decision taken the Fuhrer made it known to those entrusted with the Final Solution that the killings should be done as humanely as possible”

[Page 703, Hitler by John Toland]

The horror of this statement is explained by Toland, and it is alarming.

Toland explains that Hitler was under the influence of Christian antisemitism, and felt that he was doing their work in eliminating this “menace” to humanity, the Jews.

It is very similar to the speeches of Ahmadinejad re Zionists, the same thing really

Toland quotes Hitler directly

“I am now as before a catholic, and will always remain so”

Toland

“…he carried within him its teaching that the Jew was the killer of God”

“…The extermination therefore could be done without a twinge of conscience since he was merely acting as the avenging hand of God so long as it was done impersonally without cruelty

There is an almost exact parallel from the Hitler of 1941 to the Ahmadinejad and the Revolutionary Guards of today. The religion is different but the concept is the same.

Hitler was operating in the midst of incredible losses in the Russian Front.

Up to February 20, 1942…199,448 dead, 708,351 wounded, 112, 627 frostbite!

These pages by Toland are very important because it is shown that no matter that the Germans were being threshed by the Russians, and this had a serious effect on Hitler, his health, his manner, his appearance, yet he did not ever lose sight of the extermination of the Jews

“My prophesy shall be fulfilled that this war will not destroy Aryan humanity but it will destroy the Jew. Whatever the battle may bring in its course or however long ity may last, that will be its final course”

Toland Page 709

Toland perceptively adds to this the following

“The elimination of Jewry overrode victory itself”

In conclusion I believe that something very similar is happening around the personage of Ahmadinejad and the crazy chaos inducing Mahdi returning bullshit of the Shia religion of Islam that is driving Ahmadinejad on to create a great massacre of the Jews, the meaning of his drive for Nuclear arms, in order to do just that.

It is well to remember at this time that Hitler emerged right out of the Christian ethos and that the ground for the Holocaust was laid long before.