We live in a world of lies.

We still do not know who is the co-pilot of the German plane that was driven into the Alps causing unending suffering and loss for relatives.The simplest answer is that he was a man who suffered from forms of depression and moreover we do not know how this was effected by the nature of the world we live in. Which is without dispute the world of Jihad.

But on 4international we remarked from the beginning that we are continually denied knowledge about Islam.

At the most basic level our sensibilities are atacked by the likes of Karen Armstrong whose claims that Islam in Spain was a good experience for humans went unchallenged and still is unchallenged.

Here I exclude people like Robert Spencer (to pick one of these truthful anti-Jihadists) who does show that Armstrong gives totally false information about Islam in Spain.

But that work of Spencer is not the mass market which is controlled by the Media and by a whole machinery of state governemnts.

Whatever emerges in time (and the Media will not ever give us the truth) about this German co-pilot our world has been turned upsdide down by Islam and by the various forms of its Jihad

This Jihad takes many forms and the most serious form is not violence. It is ideology which is like a cáncer eating into democratic rights. I refer to my comment in this regard relating to Karen Armstrong. But it goes very wide. Do not misunderstand. The violence of Islam is critical (In the midst of this Alps tragedy I watched a stoning on you tube of a Young Somalian girl or woman buried up to her neck and stoned. But it is the interaction of this Jihad violence and human perception especially leadership that is of such moment to us today. (for example the betrayal of what goes for  the “left”)

Also on a purely mechanical level…The action of the co-pilot would not have been possible without 9-11

It was the reaction to 9-11 that meant that new locks were placed on cabin doors the most critical of which was the simple mechanical lock from INSIDE

That reaction to 9-11 was thus indeed the critical reaction that led to the Alps tragedy. Whether that ends up having a link to Islam or not that was central in this.


Could there be a Jihadist component to this tragedy? In cases like this things are not always totally clear and there are so many vested interests. But Islamic violence does try to make war on the “Infidel” and we know that Islamic Jihadists pay close attention to air transport violence.

What the report from the NYT shows is the utter terror in that plane with the first pilot locked out and hammering on the door. The passengers must have been going totally out of their minds at that point. The tragedy of the situation – imagine if you are a relative and forced to think back on that! The situation is one of complete terror. We cannot tell if there was a Jihadist component here and we may never tell but it is from Islam that all of our terror is coming (thinking of the terror inflicted on Christioan girls in North Nigeria at the hands of Boko Haram and will the Chibook girls ever be found is a big question?) That kind of terror is happening all around us.

The BBC throw doubt on the New York Times article. The NY Times report is a major challenge to all the dhimmies in which BBC occupies centre place. The BBC will try to rubbish the NY Times claims about one in the cockpit. That is what has happened in their latest article and they wheel out their main dhimmi Robert Westcott. He is a long in the tooth dhimmi! The BBC write: “Remi Jouty, director of the French aviation investigative agency, said he hoped investigators would have the “first rough ideas in a matter of days” but the full analysis could take weeks or even months. However, the New York Times quoted an unnamed investigator as saying that one of the pilots – it is not clear if it is the captain or the first officer – left the cockpit and had been unable to get back in. “The guy outside is knocking lightly on the door, and there is no answer,” the investigator said, describing audio from the recorder. “And then he hits the door stronger, and no answer. There is never an answer. You can hear he is trying to smash the door down.” A source close to the investigation gave a similar account to the AFP news agency. An alarm indicating proximity to the ground can be heard before the moment of impact, the source adds. Lufthansa has not named the pilots but it said the co-pilot joined Germanwings in September 2013, directly after training, and had flown 630 hours. Analysis by Richard Westcott, BBC transport correspondent This latest revelation, if true, begins to paint a dramatic picture of the last moments in the cockpit. But there are still plenty of questions to answer. Why did the plane dive? Locked doors don’t make planes crash. Why couldn’t the pilot open the door? There is an emergency procedure that should allow them to get back in. Who was flying? We now know the co-pilot was relatively inexperienced. Was he trying to cope with an emergency on his own? If there really was banging on the door, it might also suggest there was at least air in the cabin, because someone was clearly able to breathe. There had been talk of a depressurisation knocking everyone out. I am surprised such sensitive information has leaked out – again, it’s still not officially confirmed. The rules governing who listens to black boxes are very tight. Only a handful of people are normally allowed into the room when they play the recording back. WE ANSWER THE DHIMMI BBC ALWAYS FULL OF LIES FIRST OF ALL To Remi Jouty and yes of course investigations are thorough and can take much time, as much as is needed. Butthere is a difference between that and secrecy. My conjecture is that such is the righteous consternation in Europe over this atrocity is that there are going to be people inside this investigation who will do the honourable thing and stuff their secrecy. This is what has clearly happened. The report of the first quietly, then hamering and shouting, the horror of that, with passengers worried out of their minds, the plane diving, it is indescribable. That is true. That NY Times report is true and it is going to knock Europe inside out. Pay attention folks! This is it! This is the beginning of the end of the road (if there develops leadership) to dhimmi creps lioke the BBC. So on to Richard Westcott, BBC transport correspondent Westcott seems particularly dense. But it is a particular form of “denseness”. Look at the studied denseness of this dhimmi! And he knows and since he knows he goes actually to the heart of it as far as the dhimmies are concerned. He accuses “Who leaked?” But I realise also he does not live in the real world. In the face of such horror and such cover-up (rememeber we have had Rochdale, Rotherham, Oxford and so much else) some people will come forward., I believe that is what has happened. I bet the NY Times report will prove sound. Nothing will be the same again in Europe. This has got big moment for us all!


Head bowed in submission. Later he was on his knees in submission. Before he had been marched around under direction of a “Director”. Theme of Islamic State in this film production is SUBMISSION…submission to the on high! Most simple explanation is that he was promised he would live if he cooperated. He was shot in the head and flames were added by technology (this technology is really simple and according to Thomas Wictor in this case crudely applied) This explanation is OPPOSITE of conspiracy thought. It offers the SIMPLEST explanation! I fight Holocaust Denial conspiracists like David Icke by seeking the simplest explanation for phenomena.

FELIX QUIGLEY SAYS…This is the only explanation that makes sense about the burning of the Jordan pilot. The whole thing was staged by the Islamic State director (film director…or somebody with some knowledge of same). The question is why he did not fight back fiercely if he knew he was going to be burned alive. He was a military man. He was an Arab man. So why cooperate. That has never been explained until now…so give this a read.

I am very opposed to conspiracy theory. I seek always the simplest solution. And this is the simplest solution as to why the pilot ( brave man by very nature of his profession) did not fight for all he was worth

An extract “The terrorists had a Muslim pilot. They could make a statement about their own fearsomeness, the vulnerability of the aircraft they hate, and the danger of “betraying Islam.” It could be the greatest recruiting tool of all time—as long as the pilot were controlled. A military man, Lieutenant al-Kasasbeh would almost certainly fight if he were told he was going to be burned alive. What would he gain by cooperating?

His life. I believe he cooperated and mimed being burned to death because he was told that he would be spared and kept prisoner. Someone else suggested that he cooperated in exchange for a more merciful death by gunshot. I don’t think that would guarantee his cooperation.

Italian security contractor Fabrizio Quattrocchi was kidnapped in Iraq by al Qaeda. When they took him out on April 14, 2004, to murder him for a propaganda film, he fought, he tried to tear off his hood, and he shouted, “I’ll show you how an Italian dies!” before being shot.


The video of the murder was useless for propaganda purposes.

More recently, a defector from the Islamic State explained why he left the group.

He said he found the courage to attempt an escape after seeing a Kurdish fighter beheaded.

“I decided to risk my life to escape after I witnessed a wounded, captured Kurdish YPG fighter publicly beheaded. He was about my age, but unlike me he was extremely brave,” said Omer.

“He spat on every jihadist around him. He shouted slogans about Kurdish freedom and Abdullah Ocalan. I had never seen anyone so brave in my life. His fingers were cut yet he shouted insults against the jihadists. He was finally beheaded from behind to suffer, and salt was put on his half-cut neck to make him die in agony, but he did not give up until he painfully died,” he said.

Imagine if Lieutenant al-Kasasbeh had fought every attempt to put him in the cage. What if he’d spat and shouted insults? This couldn’t be risked, given that the Islamic State is not likely going to get another pilot anytime soon. Islamic State fighters are sadistic barbarians, but their leaders have rational, long-term plans. That’s why they staged the burning. It was the only way they could be assured that Lieutenant al-Kasasbeh would cooperate.

They wanted him to look penitent as he burned, holding his head in his hands, and they wanted him to sink to his knees in defeat, begging Allah for forgiveness. If they’d drugged him, he wouldn’t have been able to follow the director’s instructions. He had to be motivated, which means they promised him that he would live. Also, if he’d actually been burned alive, he may have toppled the cage in his involuntary death throes. Since they were going to use CGI flames, they needed to have the cage perfectly stationary.”


El Sisi is different. Unlike Netanyahu he is not simply a talker. I will never and can never forgive Netanyahu because he watched Hamas and Islamic Jihad bombs rain down on Sderot for 7 years without acting thus sacificing Jews. El Sisi acted the next morning after the horrific murder of poor Egyptian Copts in Libya by Islamic State savages.

I support el Sisi and call on all of Ireland and Israel to also support el Sisi.

I wrote 3 days ago the following:

“Libya was a relatively settled and prosperous country with many improvements made on the basis of its oil development market by Colonel Gadhafi, who also to his credit had a strong line in assistance to the impoverished Africa and Africans south of Libya
That all came to a shuddering end when NATO, America and leaders like William Hague attacked Libya placing Jihadists in power. The above and much more is the result.
We as a Trotskyist organization said at the time that leaders like Gadhafi had to be defended against the Jihad. There is no if and but. To block the deadly Jihad it is necessary to defend all secular leaders against the Jihad.
This certainly applied to Milosevic, but also much wider, namely the Shah against Khomeini, Gaghbo in Ivory Coast, Ben Ali in Tunisia, Mubarak and now el Sisi in Egypt, Assad and of course Gadhafi
Under Obama, under Cameron, under Sarkozy – we descend into a dark night.


Pictures from the Pamela Geller website interposed by picture of the murder of the American Ambassador.
Libya was a relatively settled and prosperous country with many improvements made on the basis of its oil development market by Colonel Gadhafi, who also to his credit had a strong line in assistance to the impoverished Africa and Africans south of Libya
That all came to a shuddering end when NATO, America and leaders like William Hague attacked Libya placing Jihadists in power. The above and much more is the result.
We as a Trotskyist organization said at the time that leaders like Gadhafi had to be defended against the Jihad. There is no if and but. To block the deadly Jihad it is necessary to defend all secular leaders against the Jihad.
This certainly applied to Milosevic, but also much wider, namely the Shah against Khomeini, Gaghbo in Ivory Coast, Ben Ali in Tunisia, Mubarak and now el Sisi in Egypt, Assad and of course Gadhafi
Under Obama, under Cameron, under Sarkozy – we descend into a dark night.
These corrupt leaders and their bankrupt capitalist system cause enormous sufferings to humanity
Pamela Geller says it all (Pamela banned from Britain by Teresa May!!!) while this happens in the suffering world:
The Muslim fighters of the Islamic State kidnapped a dozen Christians and executed them because they were Christian – but Obama say, the Islamic State is not Islamic. Terror in the White House. Obama armed and aided these savages.
Libya – this is the poison fruit of Obama’s handiwork in that once stable country. Look at the world in 2008 and look at it now. Libya, Mali, Nigeria, Egypt, Syria, Iraq ….. and Obama’s obsession is his hatred for the Jews and the arming and legitimizing of the world’s largest sponsor of terror, Iran.
Why is it the enemedia never questions Obama’s Libya catastrophe? – See more at:


America, The West, IS At WAR With Islam: What’s To Be Done? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

INDEED, it may appear to this site’s vast readership that there is nothing else to concentrate on, ad infinitum, other than Islam’s incessant barbarism against Israel, America and the west in toto.  

YES, while there are other pressing concerns which are addressed at this site, the fact remains that since Islam IS at war with Israel, America, and nations which refuse to submit to its dictates, concomitantly, these same nations are at war (they should be) with Islam. Agreed?

IN other words, if the definition of survival is the defense of ones personal safety and national security, surely the above paradigm has to be true. As such, doesn’t it make sense that the highest priority is placed on said (worldwide) incendiary area of concern?

SO atop yesterday’s highlighted commentary it was blared: there is a clash of civilizations. Plain and simple. 

BUT it is not enough to just assert a position, sans a concrete evidentiary case. Therefore, the following is more than germane, in order to rip off Islam’s mask!

IN this regard, America’s jihadi cells are primed, and they are ready to blow!

TO wit, once imbibed, how can one not assert:

“We are at War with Islam:  Muslims in America R Unwelcome Guests”

“A Radical Muslim’ is a ‘Practicing Muslim’, a ‘Moderate Muslim’ is a ‘non Practicing Muslim’ or otherwise known as an Apostate of Islam” – by Dave Gaubatz (Islam Exposed: Ask the Expert …ISIS, Islam And Obama: Understanding The Threat To The Free World

By keeping in mind my definition of Practicing and non Practicing Muslims, we should have shown the door to Muslims the day after Sept. 11, 2001.  Sharia law and the U.S. Constitution are not compatible and only one can operate in America.  I pick the U.S. Constitution.

We must stop kidding ourselves about Islam.  This ideology is very dangerous and has no place in this world, especially in America.  How many examples of violence in the name of Islam does it require to convince people Islam and Sharia law go together.  They are one in the same.  Sharia law is the 10 Commandments equivalent of Christianity.  You can no more as a Muslim practice Islam without Sharia law than a Christian could practice Christianity without the 10 Commandments.

It appears to be a simple solution to help prevent Islamic based terrorist attacks in America we should deport ‘all’ Muslims who practice Islam.  We should shutdown all mosques and Islamic centers.  We must close all of the acronyms related to Islam, beginning with CAIR National.

America and Americans have always been a land of friendly people and we have built America by allowing from all over the world migrate to this beautiful country.  From the beginning though we should have insisted all Americans must pledge allegiance to America.  Is this asking too much?

Muslims are taught to show no allegiance to any person, government, or country.  CAIR and ISNA send out brochures informing Muslims to not pledge their allegiance to America.  This should be a hint to senior law enforcement and politicians that trouble may arise from the people who will not show their allegiance to America.

Here are a list of words that mean the opposite of allegiance:

Do any of the opposites to allegiance have even a glimmer of hope that they are good for America?  Of course not.I ask each reader to answer one question.  Do you believe Islam is a healthy, fruitful, peaceful and non violent religion?  Only Obama and Sharpton would argue with you.  Most of you understand Islam is not good for the world.  Why then do we allow it to flourish in America?We allow Islam to flourish because politicians and the media (liberal and conservative) propagandize Islam as a peaceful religion that has been hijacked by radicals.  We have people like Hannity and O’Reilly (Fox News) who should be the voices of truth about Islam, yet each night they continue to broadcast that Islam was founded by a peaceful religious leader (Mohammed) and there are people within Islam (Al Qaeda, ISIS, etc..) who distort the true meaning of Islam and Muslims.  This must stop.Islamic based terrorist events make great news for media outlets.  These outlets spend millions to bring you firsthand information about terror events, but they never attack the basic ideology of Islam.  They will never tell you the Quran and ideology of Islam are the true dangers to our world.  Why will they not tell you the truth?  Because they make many more millions in revenue from broadcasting the terror events, but they understand if they come too close to telling you that Islam is violent and Islam was founded by a child rapist, they would lose sponsors.So the cycle will continue.  Muslims from around the world will continue to murder, rape, and sell innocent children into slavery.  They will continue to bomb our shopping malls, media outlets who begin to tell the truth about Mohammed and Islam, and sadly they will soon be attacking our children at their schools.If you love America and want your children to be safe from Islamic based terrorism committed by Muslims (not radicals), it is time we no longer provide a safe haven in America for practicing Muslims.  Being born in America does not meet the definition of an American.  You must pledge allegiance to this great country or you are no better than the worst of Boko Haram.  We do not need you if you cannot put America’s interest ahead of Prophet Mohammed’s violent ideology.Islam is at war with the world and Americans are at war with Islam.

MIND you, stating the obvious is an unpopular position to stake out. Boo hoo. Regardless, there is no other alternative, when one understands what is at stake. But for some added disinfectant, listen to what Thomas Jefferson had to say, afterwards, we can segue to Winston Churchill’s foresight.

Thomas Jefferson’s response to Muslims in 1801 is more important today than ever. America’s first war with Islamic terrorists should be remembered.

The First Barbary War (1801–1805) also known as the Tripolitan War or the Barbary Coast War, was the first of two wars fought between the United States and the Northwest African Berber Muslim states known collectively as the Barbary States. These were the Ottoman provinces of Tripoli, Algiers, and Tunis, which were enjoying a large autonomy, as well as the independent Sultanate of Morocco. The war was fought because U.S. President Thomas Jefferson refused to pay the high tributes demanded by the Barbary states and because they were seizing American merchant ships and enslaving the crews for high ransoms. It was the first declared war the United States fought on foreign land and seas.

In 1786, Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli’s ambassador to Great Britain. They asked this ‘diplomat’ by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved her citizens and why the Muslims held such hostility toward this new nation, with which neither Tripoli nor any of the other Barbary Coast nations had any previous contact. The answer was quite revealing. Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja (the ambassador) replied that Islam:

“Was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Qur’an, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

READERS, as promised, let Winston Churchill’s sage advice ring in your ears:

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities – but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”

As the Liberty Party press release on Weston’s arrest noted, following this portion of his remarks:

“Reportedly a woman came out of the Guildhall and asked Mr Weston if he had the authorisation to make this speech. When he answered that he didn’t, she told him “It’s disgusting!” and then called the police.

Six or seven officers arrived. They talked with the people standing nearby, asking questions about what had happened. The police had a long discussion with Mr Weston, lasting about 40 minutes.

At about 3pm he was arrested. They searched him, put him in a police van and took him away.”

ABSOLUTELY, Europe has gone off the rails. But the question begs asking: is America next?

IN the immortal words of George Santayana, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”


The essence of the New World Order. The above picture shows Serbian youth beheadings by the Clinton Alliance with the Bosnian Islamist Izetbegovic and with the Arab marauders into Yugoslavia. The Serbs suffered greatly, their country destroyed, but the NWO had the Media on its side – totally

This remarkable article from shows that the New World Order is no conspiracy theory but is a reality.


Moreover Islamic State and its total Nazi type destruction is part and parcel of this.  It was thought at one time unthinkable that the Nazis would set out to murder all of the Jews in the world but they indeed did set out to do so. The things that now ISIS is doing a year ago would have been thought impossible or unthinkable. But there is a logic to all of this “impossible to conceive” action.


The Nazis were so horrific that afterwards anything was possible. It is the same with this ISIS violence.


We enter a new stage in the disintegration of the capitalist system which drives now towards barbarity as stock market crash is being forecast even on WND aside posts.


Consider the general drift and one thing becomes obvious (if the wage slaves have the time or energy to stop and think). The nation state barriers are being broken down as the Empire makes war on nation.


It was Yugoslavia which was destroyed in the 90s. Many Serbs today are rotting in Hague jails as Jonathon Pollard rots in an American prison.


The intervention in Afghanistan destroyed that country. The removal of Saddam was the most important attack of Empire along the line to the New World Order. With Saddam gone there was no block to the Jihadist forces.


Then it was in this order with carefully staged strategy – Ben Ali of Tunisia, Gaghbo, Mubarak, Gadhafi and the attention switched quickly to Syria. The Egyptians fought back so valiantly against the Obama/Muslim Brotherhood alliance and that is still unresolved because Obama has not given up on the destruction of Egypt.


All this time you will notice world Antisemitism grows and Israel (which is the heart of the nation state concept) is enfeebled by a terrible set of leaders WHO WILL NEVER ACT.


Now the US turns even more on North Korea. To top it all Obama is in close alliance with all sections of Jihad and above all with Iran, the genocidal against Jews Iran and the Gay Hanging Iran!





The 114th Congress will be sworn in next week, and the media campaign for President Obama’s next power grab is already under way.


The New York Times, Washington Post and Politico (Tiger Beat on the Potomac) are all telling us the GOP Congress is ready to surrender its oversight responsibilities and grant extraordinary new powers to Obama under the rubric of fast track “trade promotion authority.”







It is the fulfillment of a plan at least six decades in the making.


Fast track would empower Obama to secretly negotiate the TransPacific Partnership and a TransAtlantic global governance agreement and sign them before showing them to Congress. When Obama does send them to the Hill, he would bypass committee hearings, dictate limited debate and outlaw any amendments or filibusters.


While these are labeled as “free trade” agreements, they are in fact a blueprint for international governance that kills American sovereignty and overrides the Constitution. Secretary of State John Kerry admits their purpose is to merge the U.S. economy with other nations, and a White House insider describes them as “the most important institutions that the president will leave as a legacy.” Not to be outdone, Vice President Joe Biden explicitly stated that the TransPacific Partnership fulfills the Obama administration’s vision for a new world order.


The TransPacific Partnership and its kin are the next step in a project conceived decades ago and pursued under both Democratic and Republican administrations. Their goal is to render independent nations null and void, and hand power over to unaccountable, transnational corporatist authorities.


This may sound like a plot lifted from a Bond super-villain, but it was in fact detailed at a congressional hearing in 1967.


George Ball, a globalist of the first order who kept himself busy on Wall Street when he wasn’t undersecretary of state for presidents Kennedy and Johnson, appeared with David Rockefeller at a hearing entitled “The Future of U.S. Foreign Trade Policy” before the Congressional Joint Economic Committee in 1967. They laid out a vision of a corporatist New World Order that did away with outdated “individual national governments.”


Let’s go to the Congressional Record transcript of the hearing. George Ball’s testimony speaks for itself. [Emphasis added]


“Today, a corporate management in Detroit or New York or Dusseldorf or London may decide that it can best serve the market of country Z by combining the resources of country X with labor and plan facilities in country Y – and it may alter that decision six months from now if changes occur in costs or prices or transport. … But to fulfill its full potential, the multinational corporation must be able to operate with little regard for national boundaries – or, in other words, for restrictions imposed by individual national governments.


“To achieve such a free trading environment we must do far more than merely reduce or eliminate tariffs. …


“Implied in this, of course, is a considerable erosion of the rigid concepts of national sovereignty, but that erosion is taking place every day … and I think it desirable that this process be consciously continued. … [M]odern business – sustained and reinforced by modern technology – has outgrown the constrictive limits of the antiquated political structures in which most of the world is organized, … the present crazy quilt of small national states … [C]ommercial, monetary, and antitrust policies – and even the domiciliary supervision of earth-straddling corporations – will have to be increasingly entrusted to supranational institutions. …


“[B]usiness decisions are frustrated by a multiplicity of different restrictions by relatively small nation states that are based on parochial considerations, reflect no common philosophy, and are keyed to no common goal.”


After dismissing the notion that governments represent the interests of their citizens as “parochial considerations,” Ball went on to say the European Union, then known as the Common Market, provided the roadmap to the borderless world he dreamed of. In fact, the EU shows us the “economic integration” now envisioned for the U.S. made the sovereign nations of Europe merely empty flags to be waved at soccer matches, with crucial decision-making powers stripped from national parliaments and vested in transnational institutions unaccountable to citizens.


David Rockefeller, the High Priest of the Eastern Establishment, followed George Ball and echoed his sentiments before the congressional panel.


Rockefeller made the case for merging North American economies in a North American Union and, at the prompting of a congressman named Donald Rumsfeld, advocated giving the president fast track negotiating power so Congress couldn’t get in the way of implementing his globalist plan.


(You can read the testimony yourself in the Congressional Record from 1967. Testimony by George Ball and David Rockefeller begins on page 271 of the pdf.)


You will find everything Ball and Rockefeller called for in the TransPacific Partnership and on the agenda of the new GOP-controlled Congress. Sen. Mitch McConnell has said he will work with the White House to give Obama so-called fast track trade promotion authority to enact the TransPacific Partnership and its evil twin, the TransAtlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.


These Obamatrade agreements are not about “free trade” – they are about creating international regulatory institutions whose diktat trumps the U.S. Congress, the Constitution and even the Supreme Court.


Why would anyone sworn to uphold the Constitution give President Obama the fast track power he and David Rockefeller want him to have?


And why would Republicans, elected on the promise to reign in an out-of-control president, choose to give him even more power?


Contact Congress and tell them to vote No on fast track for the TransPacific Partnership.