A TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE DAVID ICKE BIG LIE AGAINST JEWS

‘A combination of factors is pushing the United States to “disengage” from Israel says David Icke and he produces on his  website this horrific amalgam based essentially on the Protocols of Zion lie. This Big Lie by David icke is ana daptation of the Jeffrey Goldberg “chickenshit” fuss, about nothing really, the unity of Israel and America does not depend on Obama but on American history

‘A combination of factors is pushing the United States to “disengage” from Israel, a regime that will not last a month without US support, says an analyst.

http://www.davidicke.com

“Times are changing for Israel, they spend a lot of money to manipulate public opinion, all of Hollywood and mass media is Jewish-controlled (and) Zionist-controlled, and people realize the lies that are being told to them on their Nightly News on a daily basis,” he said.

“But the American people can see through this. The American people, particularly at university level, are smart (and) well-educated and they have this implicit sense of fairness,” he added. “All of this combined” Harris said, “is adding up to what is going to be a perfect storm for Israel where the people of the US are going to reject Israel, and that is the process that we are beginning to see the early stages of.”’

Read more: US beginning to ‘disengage’ from Israel: Analyst

UNITY BETWEEN AMERICA AND ISRAEL FOREVER…BASED ON POOR IMMIGRANTS SEEKING SALVATION

Jewish immigrants landing in New York. The unity between America and Israel does not depend on Obama, or any US elitist President, or even on Jeffrey Goldberg!

I am very much in sympathy with Ari Soffer of Israel National News who deconstructs the message from Jeffrey Goldberg,  over the Obama people reference to Netanyahu as “chickenshit”,  and as a “coward” in relation to the Iran Nuclear Bomb and general threat. I will try to tell you why. I come from kind of a different direction to this. Bear with me though!

 

I am a Marxist, Leninist, Trotskyist and I feel it is part of my political principles to defend Israel as the Jewish Homeland against whomever.

 

Goldberg reminds me of something, which is the Lenin attack on empty windbags in 1920. It was the second Congress. If you want to scan this work just google it, under “Left Wing Communism an Infantile Disorder”. It is not a strict parallel with Goldberg but what is!

 

(I like this extract and I think of Goldberg)

It is with the utmost contempt—and the utmost levity—that the German “Left” Communists reply to this question in the negative. Their arguments? In the passage quoted above we read:

 

“… All reversion to parliamentary forms of struggle, which have become historically and politically obsolete, must be emphatically rejected” [[__ Rjc: Could be incomplete here; check __]]

 

This is said with ridiculous pretentiousness, and is patently wrong. “Reversion” to parliamentarianism, forsooth! Perhaps there is already a Soviet republic in Germany? It does not look like it! How, then, can one speak of “reversion”? Is this not an empty phrase?

(end quote)

 

Look at the last 3 sentences and reflect. Is there not a parallel with many I read on these Jewish blogs, like a Jonathan Ross on Israpundit who attacks Martin Sherman, while the total reactionary who hates me so much, one Yamit82, keeps silent while this Ross attacks the same (outstanding) Martin Sherman

 

I do not want to be diverted by this nonentity Ross but the issue here is this. Martin Sherman wants Israel to be proactive above all. That is his essence in helping Arabs even financially to leave Gaza and JS.

 

What does Ross put in place of that “feet on the ground” and proactive Martin Sherman. He is for the Islamic State Fascists overthrowing the Jordan Government. With the Hashemites gone then the Arabs called “Palestinians” will set up their state there (in Jordan). What a fool!

 

I would say that the Jordan Government, the Kurds above all, and even Assad must be defended against the Theocratic Fascism of Islam. The denonair Ross of course would dismiss that. But then like Sherman I try to keep my feet on the ground.

 

I see this all the time in my study of the David Icke phenomenon. I notice that they are all, these Israel haters, in that bracket of declaring the end of Israel.

 

I would point out that the unity between America and Israel does not DEPEND UPON the American ruling class governments or upon the particular elites in power in Israel. It is far deeper than that. I will go into this very soon as I am reading around this from my own Irish emigrant, especially emigrants to America, perspective.

 

Goldberg is an Israel hating gadfly, very much beloved by the utterly reactionary Harry’s Place which produces something called “Sarah Brown”. And need I say more!

 

(Begin article for our readers by Israel National News)

 

 

In essence, this latest article epitomizes the art of manufacturing news in order to create pressure on Israel, very similar to the eyebrow-raising prominence granted to announcements of new apartment buildings being built in Jerusalem, or to Jews legally purchasing homes in Arab-majority neighborhoods.

The approach of fair-minded individuals to such blatantly manufactured “news” such as this, rather than taking the bait and reacting hysterically to it (in either direction), should be to soberly deconstruct it.

Why does a man like Jeffrey Goldberg create such stories, and what is the subtext to it? What does it mean for there to be a “crisis in relations” when military and economic cooperation is still booming, and when the majority of Americans (reflected in Congress) still firmly support Israel? More fundamentally, even if there were to be a “crisis” in relations, what is Goldberg actually suggesting Israel do about it? 

Of course, as I mentioned, the motive behind such stories is to engender fear. The message here is that “America is losing patience” with naughty little Israel, and that Israel must therefore learn to toe the line better and fulfill Washington’s dictates to the letter, instead of God-forbid formulating its own independent foreign policy which may sometimes conflict with that of its ally. It is part of a wider worldview held by a significant portion of assimilated American Jewry, that just as they are besotted with and have tied their very identity to the goldene medina to the extent that they cannot do without it, so the Jewish state must act similarly. Essentially, it is a projection of the exile-mentality onto the Jewish state.

In terms of why such unprofessional name-calling and personal antipathy should even be significant: again this is all part of the “what will they say?” neurosis of the Jew in exile. Relations with non-Jews should not be marked by undue hostility or servility any more than our relations with other Jews, but rather with a level head and a focus on the physical realities we are confronted with, such as shared interests and a firm grip on one’s own red lines (even if the other party in the relationship doesn’t really know his own). That may sound obvious (and it is), but to those riven with inferiority complexes it is asking the impossible; there is nothing more terrifying to the Goldbergs of this world than not being liked (and, incidentally, nothing more spine-tinglingly pleasurable than being accepted as “one of the guys”, to the extent that “they” are willing to badmouth the leader of the Jewish state to you.)

What we are reading in his article then is essentially projection. This kind of antipathy from the non-Jewish world is the worst nightmare to someone like Goldberg, and so he naturally opts to use it as a weapon to pressure Israel into changing its policies. This is a tried-and-tested tactic of the Israeli left and of the Jewish left in the Diaspora, and as the influence of the legitimately-elected political left in Israel wanes, such illegitimate attempts to foist a concessionist agenda on Israel using means outside of the democratic process have predictably increased.

So yes, it is vindictive and petty in an almost childlike way – but Goldberg’s article must be read by anyone striving to understand precisely the self-defeating neuroses a free and independent Jewish state must avoid if it is to remain as such. The Israeli government must not allow these kinds of blatantly political broadsides to influence our own legitimate, internal political discourse, which should be conducted confidently, if cautiously, and with a level-head. 

That is not to ignore the harmful impact of such personal antipathy. Of course, a professional relationship on any level is extremely difficult to maintain in the face of personal animosity between parties who are meant to be cooperating.

But if Goldberg is correct that the Obama administration is genuinely considering something as radical as throwing its most dependable ally in the Middle East under a bus because some top officials feel personally slighted, or because Bibi is not an agreeable person to work with, that is simply a reflection of how and why American foreign policy under this current administration will not, and should not, be taken seriously by anyone.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/15889#.VFHxJUmDMcA

JEWISH OWNED RADIO STATION IN SPAIN TAKES ON A DAVID ICKE ASSOCIATE CALLED RICHIE ALLEN

The close associate of David Icke, Richie Allen, has been taken on by Jewish owned “Talk Radio Europe” for 2 hours daily to spew out conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theory is the ebola of political analysis.

 

The person in charge of hiring is called Bill Padley. The person who owns the radio station is called Nathan Thomas and he is Jewish. He is Chairman of the station.

 

Bill Padley is described by local media in Spain as “has vast radio experience, having worked in major British radio stations since 1975, including Radio Victory, Radio Clyde, and BBC London. He was also a founder of the UK’s biggest independent radio production company.

 

“I love this radio station. I have found it to be really professional with a really good team of people. I said “yes” to taking on the role of Station Manager as I believe in TRE and believe there is a lot I can bring to the table” says Bill.”

 

As station manager Padley has therefore employed the David Icke associate Richie Allen.

 

On what basis I do not know. Padley must be asked on what basis he has employed Richie Allen?

 

There are absolutely huge questions about both Icke and his whole circle of associates after the collapse earlier this year of “The Peoples Voice” in London. Icke associate Richie Allen was one of the main reporters there. The questions are about finance. It seems that no answers have been forthcoming about where the money was spent.

 

Remember that this Talk Radio Europe media operation is Jewish owned. This is most important when one considers the totally biased against Israel politics of David Icke.

 

I heard the Icke associate Richie Allen on a You Tube video saying that Israel was illegal. Will that be being repeated now on Talk Radio Europe a Jewish owned radio station?

 

Does Bill Padley and the Jewish owner NATHAN THOMAS realise the totally biased hatred that Icke has for Israel? Surely that is going to be reflected in what the Icke associate Richie Allen put across to unsuspecting English speakers in Spain, counting many Spanish a huge clientele. And owned by a Jew!

The following is from today’s David Icke website that the Icke associate Richie Allen is advising with highest recommendation to read:

FOLLOWS EXTRACT FROM ANTI-ISRAEL ARTICLE ON TODAYS DAVID ICKE WEBSITE

UK’s Exeter University students in historic landslide vote to boycott Israel

new Wednesday 29th October 2014 at 09:15 By david-icke

‘Students at Britain’s Exeter University have made history by turning out in record numbers to vote in favour of boycotting the apartheid state of Israel.

OSLO WAS MERELY A SYMPTOM BUT TO KILL THE DISEASE ISRAEL NEEDS INTERNAL REVOLUTION

This is a great analysis of the situation facing Israel and Jews by Moise Feiglin but there is a serious weakness in it which I from a Trotskyist and Marxist position will try to explain.

Let me first extract one paragraph (you can find it below also in the body of Feiglin’s text). Actually it could be any one of a number but I seek brevity:

“The increased security budget is not meant to preserve our safety. The budget – beside the widespread corruption that it funds (government-funded pensions and the like) – is meant to preserve… the Oslo mentality.”

Great material here by Feiglin. He is right.

What he points to in essence is that Israel (even more precisely Israeli leadership) has betrayed the Zionist principles of national liberation which led up to the founding of the state in 1948.

Where Feiglin goes wrong from this onwards is that the above paragraph requires a revolution inside Israel in order to surmount this problem (to Feiglin’s credit precisely identified) and move forward

Who will make the revolution? The masses of the Jewish people. And non-Jews who are lovers of Judaism and Israel also I have to include because this is not racist but political.

Is there any other requirement? Yes there is indeed one and only one.

Leadership!

Anything else to say about that?

Yes leadership is stressful. Individuals, groups and parties are known to fold (cave in, betray principles)

So it must be a party of a special type. If it is based on a revolutionary theory that is a good start. Of the cadres who make up the leadership have been tempered by experience that is another good thing.

Can Feiglin himself build such a party?

What a question!

A dualist answer I am afraid…Feiglin can help in the sense that the article above helps but more precisely…

I do not think so. Feiglin is too much of a dogmatist. Dogma is not discipline (Stalin had both dogma galore and discipline but no use here) and is opposed to theory (Theory is dead but green is the everlasting tree of life!)

So in essence Feiglin does point to the way forward but in my opinion cannot actually tread that road.

Israel’s Security Budget Undermines Our Security

By Moshe Feiglin, Jewish Press

Feiglin1Israel’s security apparatus has requested an additional 11 billion shekels in wake of Operation Protective Edge. In my opinion, Protective Edge proved that the security budget actually undermines our security.

Let me explain.

What was the Hamas’s budget during this war? A fraction of Israel’s. Maybe one percent. So, if everything depended on money, how is it that such a huge monetary gap in our favor did not lead to a resounding Israeli victory – quick, simple, and without fatalities?

Israeli soldiers seen at a deployment area near the border with the Gaza Strip in August. Israel could not win a war like the one this past summer with Hamas, according to the author, because its policy makers are “captive to the concept of the two state solution.”Israeli soldiers seen at a deployment area near the border with the Gaza Strip in August. Israel could not win a war like the one this past summer with Hamas, according to the author, because its policy makers are “captive to the concept of the two state solution.”

The reason we did not win in Gaza has nothing to do with money. We did not win because we are still captive to the concept of the two state solution. Since the Oslo Accords, this concept has spawned an entire “peace industry” – careers in politics, economics, academia, media, and justice, international funds, and a high-cultural life. Only politically-correct and one-dimensional thinking is allowed. In short, what we have is a true dictatorship.

Thinking out of the box built by the Oslo and two-state architects has become a death trap for anyone wishing to advance in Israel’s public service. It is not so pleasant to talk about, but this mental dictatorship has completely conquered Israel’s military leadership. An aspiring officer cannot progress past a certain rank if he does not toe the line. The result is that when it is necessary to scare the cabinet away from victory in Gaza, the Chief of Staff presents a slideshow demonstrating that conquering Gaza would take five years.

Now back to the military budget. In essence Israel’s military has forgotten what the word “victory” means. And yet, its “job” is to provide security. So how does its job? By building fences, anti-missile systems, warning bombs for enemy civilians, anti-tunnel systems, etc. In short, it exchanges ideology for technology.

The increased security budget is not meant to preserve our safety. The budget – beside the widespread corruption that it funds (government-funded pensions and the like) – is meant to preserve… the Oslo mentality.

The problem is that an erroneous idea is like a balloon. You can pour more and more money into it (Oslo has cost us close to one trillion shekels to date), but, ultimately, like the Maginot Line, it will collapse – leaving us without security and without money.

Thus, today’s security budget undermines our security. The more money we pour into it, the more the defense apparatus will be able to evade its responsibility to defend us and not the Oslo mentality. Our defense problem is conceptual – not monetary.

About the Author: Moshe Feiglin is the Deputy Speaker of the Knesset and a member of Israel’s Security and Defense Committee. He heads the Manhigut Yehudit (“Jewish Leadership”) faction of Israel’s governing Likud party. He is the founder of Manhigut Yehudit and Zo Artzeinu and the author of two books: “Where There Are No Men” and “War of Dreams.” Feiglin served in the IDF as an officer in Combat Engineering and is a veteran of the Lebanon War. He lives in Ginot Shomron with his family.

AFTER GAZA DISASTER NETANYAHU MUST BE OVERTHROWN

 

Gaza PALESTINIANS SIT in a damaged house as they watch a parade celebrating Hamas’s ‘victory’ over Israel, in the Shejaia neighborhood, Gaza. (photo credit:REUTERS)

 

The analysis of Martin Sherman on the Gaza War is surely correct. This war was conducted in the most disgraceful even farcical manner by the Israeli leaders.

 

Sherman is correct in that they dissipated the good will in the world by not advancing energetically in the first days to challenge Hamas Fatah power. Very quickly their hesitation gave the opportunity to Antisemites in various forums to themselves organise and advance

 

But Sherman is incorrect in one main respect which is that he expects the present elite to somehow create a programme which includes propaganda, they call it “Hasbara”. Propaganda is vital. But how can it be done and what is its content. Sherman is incorrect if he thinks or expects or even implies that the present lot can do this. The whole point is that they cannot

 

But if they cannot then who can.

 

There needs to be a new party leadership in Israel. Given the total bankruptcy of the present leadership right across the board this will have to be a Trotskyist Party. It is necessary to possess the state and the state apparatus…KEY CONCEPT!

 

I wish they were not actually necessary or a truth. Then we could all get back to our gardening.

 

But history ordains that it is not possible. We have to face up to the demands of the situation.

 

The present Israeli ruling class is very divided and is very bankrupt. LET US NUMBER THEM…There is the traitorous elite around Labour (that is not socialism in case you think it is the discredited Labour Parties of the world), there is a religious outfit called Shas, totally opportunist, not really political at all, there is the openly Shimon Peres residue BASURA (OSLO) as carried on by Livni. Then there is Likud who have various strains of patriotism but that is drowned out by their political ignorance, and their division among themselves. For example Feiglin INTERESTING GUY says good things at times, but the way he treated Glenn Beck shows he is a kind of doctrinaire who lives in the clouds. (Beck had to be welcomed to Jerusalem while never abandoning independence from Beck). These are basic primary school political lessons.

Martin Sherman is doing a very useful job in facing down the excuses for action (he is calling them “canards” Like it!

 

Sherman wants 1 per cent of budget, a cool billion, devoted to “Hasbara”

 

I agree and would even up it. That is how important!

 

It is always concrete. Lenin said Land Bread and Peace. THAT was Hasbara! It was concrete. It explained reality. It proposed action. It justified action. And the action was decisive and courageous.  For example Lenin pulled out of the War Bloodbath while Kerensky kept on the bloodletting. THAT alone won huge support.

 

First steps then 2 months ago LET US IMAGINE

 

  1. Explain the enemy. Clarify the enemy. That meant the “Protocols of Zion” of Hamas, An evil Nazi type organisation. And Caroline Glick did the second part. She explained how Fatah WAS Hamas at every point.
  2. So I think perhaps one relevant paragraph from the Charter of Hamas would be sufficient
  3. Thus explain the need for the necessary action. Do not overload! Ever!
  4. Which was to take over Gaza by means of a massive onslaught in the very first couple or three days
  5. Kill or arrest (then execute after military trial) the enemy leaders. Even be magnanimous and offer exile to some
  6. Explain through Hasbara that this is the only way to peace, and why there must be nobody who harbours Antisemitic views living in the state of Israel (Our central point which we continually make). Explain this by means of basic maps produced by the pioneering Mark Langfan (for example 3 dimensional maps which show that the hills of Judea and Samaria are overlooking the massively populated Coastal Strip of Tel Aviv and are in striking distance, easily, of the main Israeli airport
  7. Arabs of Palestine can expect a new and promising life elsewhere. Offer this challenge to the world governments to help them, especially Arab Governments to help the Palestinian Arabs find a new life. What happens if they refuse? No matter this is not predicated on the cooperation of our enemy!!!)
  8. Remind the world that the Arabs got 22 states since 1922, not bad going at all, and they are most rich
  9. Even among these Arabs in Palestine there are some who do really love Israel and love Jews. They are exceptional people. Love them! This is a humanitarian solution and not a racist thing in any way!
  10. From that position of decisive power and complete understanding of use of the state (we are never Anarchists a battle which goes back now nearly 200 years) the way opens up
  11. A new situation is created through action

BUT THERE IS NO OTHER WAY. THERE IS CERTAINLY NO OTHER WAY THAN THIS.

 

GIVE SOMETHING TO US PLEASE!!!

Do you agree? Good and we ask something in return. When you see attacks on Leon Trotsky do some digging because the above ideas are straight from our understanding of what Leon Trotsky was all about. Please. Do your own research. No sly digs either. I want the truth in everything. And I want some loyalty from my friends!

 

ISIS MURDERER HOLDS THE KNIFE BUT BBC PREPARED THE WAY IN BOSNIA!

 

 
Picture of the heads of Young Serbs. The war in Yugoslavia of the 90s was where Young Christian Serbs were beheaded by Jihadists. This was supported by the British and the US … like TOTALLY. The Media was totally against Milosevic and the Serbs and this is where this ideology came from. Now these poor deluded fools like Foley are being beheaded by those very same Muslims who they supported in (we have to say it) their foolish lives. It is really tragic. The BBC and the Media are the real criminals here

 

Pamela Geller wisely comments on this:

 

This is not surprising. Typical, actually. Both James Foley and Steve Sotloff were sympathetic to the jihad cause. Foley went to Syria because he was “exasperated by islamophobia” and wanted to “build bridges between Muslims and Christians.” And Sotloff was supportive of terror organizations in Egypt. And Syria.

 

Many of Sotloff’s tweets show sympathy for terrorists.

 

The British hostage now being held by his British Muslim executioner “worked so hard” for Bosnian Muslims.

 

“British hostage threatened by Jihadi John helped Muslims in Balkans”

 

THAT IS PRECISELY THE WORK OF HARRY’S PLACE AND ALL OF THEIR LIES DOWN THE YEARS

 

EVEN MORE…The aid worker threatened with beheading by Islamist terrorists has ‘tried so hard’ to help others, friends say The jihadist holds the British hostage at the end of the Sotloff video, 03 Sep 2014

 

A British hostage threatened with beheading by Islamist terrorists spent years helping Muslims rebuild war-torn communities in the Balkans, it has emerged.

 

Former colleagues said the aid worker was revered by Muslims in Croatia, who nicknamed him the “Crazy Scotsman”.

 

They said they could not understand why the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (Isil) wanted to murder him when he had “tried so hard to help” Muslims.

 

 

IN ONE REAL SENSE IT IS NOT THE ISIS WHO MURDERS THESE COMPLETELY NOT UNDERSTANDING JOURNALISTS

 

IT IS THE BBC WHO IS DOING THE REAL MURDERING BY THEIR COVER UPS DOWN THE YEARS AND STILL AT IT

 

WILL THE BBC DRAW ATTENTION TO THESE FACTS NOW? NO OF COURSE NOT!

 

 

BBC LIARS BBC LIARS BBC LIARS

 

 

 

WE OPPOSE TOTALLY THE MASTERSON ATTACK ON GALLOWAY BECAUSE IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXPOSE THE LIES OF GALLOWAY BY THEORY

 

The above picture presents Galloway as being some kind of noble fighter against injustice

 

This picture is truer to the real person. Galloway is a washed up and depraved product of the Stalinists post 1967 defeat of the Arabs by Israel

 

The Stalinist regime in Moscow had backed the Arabs in the Middle East for its own reasons, and part of this if not central was backing the Arabs against Israel. Remember the Jews were in serious difficulties following the 1947 partition resolution in the UN and the following decision by 5 Arab countries to make war on the nascent Jewish state. The British and US State Department had also delared war unofficially on the Jews and were totally refusing to sell arms to the Jews. The previous year 1946 one year after the Holocaust the British were hanging Jews in Palestine. It was Stalin who rescued the Jews with the go ahead to an arms shipment bought from Czechoslovakia.

However by 1967 that had ALL changed and now the Stalinist regime was backing the Arabs totally. With the defeat of the Arabs in the 1948 war the Stalinists turned totally against the Jews in an Antisemitic campaigm that equalled the worst propaganda of the Nazis

Galloway essentially comes out of that Stalinist (post 1967) defeat campaign. Of course he uses his own words but there are big similarities to what the Stalinists were saying, for example a constant theme was that “Zionism” equals nazism, runs through both the discource of the Stalinist post 1967 and Galloway to the present.

So now to the present and this attack on Galloway that we are talking about. It is clear to me that Galloway has falsified history in a disgraceful manner. Moreover I think that this falsificationn can be shown to the people of Ireland, not naturally all at once, but certainly with work and a party it is possible.

I wrote this yesterday and it is relevant in this issue of Galloway:

“There was NO Palestinian Arab nationalist consciousness at all.

Sha’o ben-Tekoa (Phantom Nation Inventing the Palestinians as the Obstacle to Peace) shows this very conclusively and he uses the writings of Khalidi to do so. The fact that he can use him is most telling.

Sha’o ben-Tekoa goes on to document the two occasions which are of note. It was the founding of newspapers.

The first was a newspaper called “el Karmil” in 1908. Rashidi called it the first “Palestinian” paper.

The name of that newspaper does not refer to any nation. Sha’o ben-Tekoa claims it is the name of a hill!!!

Sha’o ben-Tekoa also points out this was 45 years after the first Zionist paper. But more important than that is that no Arabs were calling themselves “Palestinians” (period we talk about here is the run up to World War 1) so how can Rashidi call it the first “Palestinian” consciousness. This is magic making.

In this book Sha’o ben-Tekoa is quite relentless in exposing this word “Palestinian” or “Palestinians”. This is only a sample. I feel this is needed and is a guide to the way forward.”

(end extract here)

It is material like this that makes me certain that it is possible to expose the lies of Galloway.

The man who struck against Galloway is obviously on a different, and bankrupt, track. He does not think it is possible to expose Galloway politically as 4international is doing above.

He Masterson does not build a party or leadership in Scotland or Ireland. Instead he lashes out in a physical attack on Galloway.

To what purpose? What has he achieved by that? How has he exposed that Galloway is lying when he claims that the Jews took the land of the “Palestinians”? For one thing they were not “Palestinians”, did not call themselves “Palestinians”, and since the Treaty of Versailles and the beginning of Wilson’s mandate system the Arabs have achieved 22 states, as they have at present, even though that too is being ravaged by the Jihad

I refer especially also to the bankrupt political position of this guy called “Charles” above who thinks that hitting Galloway is a “result”.

I have crossed swords with this “Charles” before on this site and he is certainly a Marxist hater and especially a Trotskyist hater and he once referred to Trotskyism as “shite” on this very site.

Now all he can say about this serious attack on Galloway is “result”.

It has certainly exposed the reactionary politics of this “Charles”. I believe that this “Charles” as a defender of Israel is bankrupt and is being used by Israel haters on this site because of this bankruptcy. True Trotskyism is a different matter though. We will expose the lies of Galloway and do not have to resort to what the bankrupt Masterson, with obviously the agreement of “Charles”, did.