IRAN ALREADY HAS THE NUCLEAR BOMB

 

CONTINUING OUR DISCUSSION ON IRANIAN FASCIST MULLAHS, THE IRANIAN BOMB AND THE NEW WORLD EMPIRE WITH ITS HATRED OF JEWS

INTRODUCING FIRST WITH THIS ARTICLE BY OUTSTANDING LIBERTARIAN PAMELA GELLER JUST PUBLISHED http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/09/iran-already-has-a-nuclear-bomb-.html

‘Iran already has a nuclear bomb’

You have to wonder if Obama didn’t call Rouhani today to congratulate Iran.

Not since 1979 has their been contact at this level, the  first communication with Tehran since Carter. They attacked our embassy in ’79, killed hundreds of our Marines in ’83, and have been waging a war against us for decades. And Obama rewarded them today for what? For pursuing a rogue nuclear weapons program? He chased after them and after them after they snubbed him at the UN. Why? To what end?

Bush

A worker outside the Bushehr nuclear power plant in Iran (photo credit: AP/Vahid Salemi)

‘Iran already has a nuclear bomb,’ Israeli paper claims Times of Israel, September 27, 2013

Unnamed government analysts quoted by Maariv say Tehran has crossed all red lines and is already in possession of at least one nuclear weapon

Some Israeli government analysts believe Iran already has at least one nuclear bomb, an Israeli  journalist wrote in an article published Friday.

Shalom Yerushalmi, writing in the national daily Maariv, said that “government security sources up to date on development in Iran,” told him recently  that Tehran has crossed all points of no return and already has its  first nuclear weapon, and maybe more.

 

The report marks the first time a government  official has been quoted saying Iran already has a nuclear weapon. No  sources in the piece were named.

 

The  information, if true, would mark a major shift in international  relations and would be a game changer in terms of a regional power  balance.

“It’s too late for Israel [to prevent an  Iranian bomb]. Iran has crossed all the borders and all the constraints, and it has a first nuclear bomb in its possession, and maybe more than  that,” Yerushalmi writes, basing himself on what he says is the  assessment he heard this week from state security sources. ”We are  facing a historic change in the strategic balance of forces in the  region.”

He then quotes a source who he says is deeply  familiar with what he calls the relentless war against the Iranians.  “This is no longer about how to prevent a bomb,” the source is quoted  saying, “but about how to prevent its being launched, and what to do if  and when.”

Yerushalmi, still basing himself on the  anonymous security sources’ assessment, goes on to compare the current  behavior of Iran’s Supreme leader Ali Khamenei, and new President Hasan  Rouhani, in their interactions with the West, to a soccer coach at the  end of a hard-fought match which he knows he has now won. The Iranian  leadership is behaving with the air of “those who have achieved their  target, and therefore can today afford to be more generous and to offer  new (self-serving) messages.” The Iranian leadership can afford to be  friendlier, he writes, “because victory has been secured.”

Maariv led its Friday paper with a photograph  of a smiling Rouhani, alongside the headline, “What’s hiding behind the  smile,” and a sub-headline quoting the security sources saying Iran now  has “at least one bomb.” It then adds that most in the security  establishment, however, still believe that this “nightmare scenario has  not yet been realized.”

While most Western countries believe Iran’s  nuclear program is intended for military purposes, officials in Israel,  the US and elsewhere say Tehran has yet to “break out” toward a bomb, a  process that could take over a year.

Iran, which on Thursday agreed to renewed talks with world powers on curbing its nuclear program, says its program is for peaceful purposes.

On Friday, Iranian and UN officials met to  discuss whether to resume inspections meant to determine whether Tehran  worked on atomic arms, in a test of pledges by Iran’s new president to  reduce nuclear tensions.

Iranian envoy Reza Najafi said in Vienna that  it would be unrealistic to expect that “in just one day of meeting we  can solve our problems.”

Herman Nackaerts of the International Atomic Energy Agency said only that he hoped the meeting could “intensify the dialogue.”

The UN agency wants access to a site it  suspects was used to test conventional explosive triggers meant to set  off a nuclear blast.

A report released last month by the IAEA said  that while Iran was testing new centrifuges, which could help it  eventually create a nuclear weapon, its uranium stockpile was still  below the amount needed for a bomb.

“It is unlikely, at this point, that Iran  could dash toward further enrichment to weapons-grade without the IAEA  detecting Tehran’s activities,” Reuters quoted the Arms Control Association, a Washington-based advocacy and research group.

Israel sees an Iranian nuclear weapon as an  existential threat, and Jerusalem has campaigned vigorously around the  world for heavy sanctions to be placed on Iran, with a threat of  military action should those fail to stop the nuclear program.

Next week, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu  is due to deliver a speech at the United Nations during which he is  expected to press for maintaining pressure on Iran despite a recent easing of tensions between Tehran and the West. In comments Tuesday, Netanyahu urged the world not to be “fooled” by Iran’s newly moderate rhetoric, which he said was a “smokescreen” to obscure its continued drive toward nuclear weapons.

“Israel would welcome a genuine diplomatic  solution that truly dismantles Iran’s capacity to develop nuclear  weapons,” Netanyahu said. “But we will not be fooled by half-measures  that merely provide a smokescreen for Iran’s continual pursuit of  nuclear weapons. And the world should not be fooled either.”

to be continued…

 

 

CONTINUED FROM SATURDAY TO SUNDAY

 

The major change that has taken place in our world has not registered at all on human consciousness. This is not surprising when we have major influences like the BBC calling the SAVAGES who carried out the gross attacks on humanity in the shopping mall in Kenya as being MILITANTS. I used to think of “militants” as enthusiastic trade unionists. It is a moderate word. But that is the way the Media are playing the change in the situation following Obama making nice with Iran at the UN.

 

The crisis is one as always of leadership. It is a crisis of leadership. You would not get a sense of the crisis facing the Jews from world Antisemitism, and the worst of all threats has come from Obama making nice with the Iranian Fascists at the UN last week, from reading one Jewish site I read…Israpundit. There the editor Ted Belman has found time to print a feature supportive of this trash book by West, which is real Ku Klux Klan stuff, openly supportive of John Birch Fascism. How find time for that in such a crisis for the Jews!

 

We on www.4international.me are the only real friends that the Jews have. Who else but us has referred to the meddling role of the International Criminal Court in Kenya which I argue has disarmed Kenya against the Fascist Jihadists. Just as the Serbs were disarmed against the Fascism of Izetbegovic in Bosnia all those years ago.

 

We warned and warned that this Jewish movement was far too dependent on American Imperialism, which is now totally allied with Islam and the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

Netanyahu is a completely disastrous leader for Israel. 1. Netanyahu should never have given in to American Kerry pressure for those disastrous talks and 2. Israe should have struck in war against the Mullahs years ago and not wait for any go ahead from America whether it was Clinton, Bush and Obama. And Israel must strike now whatever the cost.

 

One bastard blogger on Israpundit actually questioned what right had 4international to call for Israel to make war on the Iranian Mullahs. We were not Jews you see this bastard commenter said. Well we had every right because we do not want the Jews to be holocausted again. That right.

 

Now this morning at the end of September 2013 the Jews are in the most serious danger since 1939 and the Jewish leadership like Israpundit following like Sheeple this obnoxious and full of lies about history Diana West is ALSO a big threat tot he Jews. 4international is the possible salvation of the Jewish people and we must build it.

BOSNIAN FEDERAL COURT IS DOMINATED BY MUSLIMS…FREES TERRORISTS

BOSNIAN COURT FREES MUSLIM TERRORISTS

Bosnian court frees Muslim terrorists

October 16, 2010 – 3:56 am Bosnian federal court that is dominated by Muslims, has released 3 well known Bosnian Muslim terrorists who were planning to bomb the Catholic Cathedral in Sarajevo, a catholic monastery in Fojnica as well as NATO installations in Bosnia.

Terrorists Rijad Rustempasic, Abdulah Handzic and Edis Velic were released from prison and ordered to stay at home.

The leader, Rustempasic, pictured left, is a well known domestic Bosnian Muslim terrorist with war-time credentials.

Rustempasic was the member of the El Mujaheed, the foreign born Jihadist unit of the Bosnian Muslim army. This unit is known for one of the worst atrocities against Christians in Bosnia including Islamic ritual of beheadings.

Inside the Bosnian Muslim Army, these Jihadists ran a college type course on bomb making and Rustempasic enrolled in it and is considered the bomb making expert.

After the end of Bosnian war, in 1996, Rustempasic took part in bombing of the catholic church in Humci near Bugojno, city that was recently rocked by terror explosions planted by Bosnian Muslims.

After prolonged terror stints in Bosnia, mainly against Croatians, Rustempasic left for Saudi Arabia in 2000 where he, perhaps deemed insufficiently elite, did not succeed in joining the Jihadist groups that were training for war in Chechenya.

In 2004, Rustempasic was arrested and served 5 months in jail for possession of explosives.

Rustempasic was also investigated in 2005 and that investigation led to the arrest of the Swedish national but ethnic Bosnian Muslim Mirsad Bektasevic. Among other things, Bektasevic also had 2 suicide vests and had plans to attack the US and the UK Embassy in Bosnia.

Bosnian Muslim terror expert, Dzevad Galijasevic said that the release of Rustempasic and his posse represents a signal to the Bosnian Muslim terrorists that they are free to conduct terror.

Bosnian Muslims themselves say that they are aware of some 300 hard core radical Bosnian Muslims and by radical they mean Bosnian Muslims ready to die for Islam.

Galijasevic also says that the release of Rustempasic follows Bosnian Muslim typical response to Islamic violence – first the man is removed from the media, political pressure subsides then terrorist is freed.

This repeated pattern of Bosnian Muslim institutional behavior suggests, claims Galijasevic, that the Bosnian Muslim institutions themselves are sympathetic to the Islamic terror.

Galijasevic has in the past warned that there are Jihadist sleeper cells inside these institutions. Recently, a Bosnian Muslim Wahabbi was identified as a high-ranking employee of Sarajevo airport.

Meanwhile, the Bosnian Wahhabis have issued a warning to the Bosnian leader Zlatko Lugumdzija after he made statements to the London Times where he said that Jihadists may destroy Bosnia if the Serbian Prime Minister Dodik is not crushed.

Lugumdzija blamed the Serbian Prime Minister Dodik for the rise of Jihadism in Bosnia and threatened to use force against the Serbian Prime MInister Dodik.

Lugumdzija scapegoats Bosnian Muslim Jihadism on alleged Dodik’s “nationalism” and secessionism as the cause of radical Islam so that, Lugumdzija claims, if he does not crush Dodik then the Islamists will crush Bosnia.

Anyway, Lugumdzija’s veiled threat against Jihadists has aggrieved them who are warning the the “people of good will who do not hate Islam and the Muslims” that Lugumdzija is a “liar” who plans to kill Bosnian Muslims.

http://serbianna.com/blogs/bozinovich/?p=941

JIHADIST AND FASCIST STATES TO REPLACE YUGOSLAVIA

by James Stephens

March 18, 2010

Obama in his drive to stir up antisemitism, to destroy Israela nd replace it with an Arab jihadist state is really a continuation of the whole of the US and EU smashing of the multicultural state of Yugoslavia and replacement by Jihadism and Fascism

So in that light, the unity of Serbs and jews, the following article should be studied

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

The Bleiburg in Potocari

(The Bleiburg memorial, with the Ustasha and Muslim symbols, dedicated “In memory of the innocent victims of the Bleiburg tragedy, May 1945″)

(The Bleiburg memorial, with the Ustasha and Muslim symbols, dedicated “In memory of the innocent victims of the Bleiburg tragedy, May 1945″)

At the end of February, Al-Jazeera showed an interview with Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic, currently on trial before the ICTY in The Hague. It was done as part of a 40-minute report with Rageh Omaar. The report opened with the rows of green funeral shrouds, wailing Muslim women, and the rows of names on the Potocari monument, near Srebrenica. The images that follow suggest that the Serbs rounded up some eight thousand civilians, and shot them in broad daylight. This is what the Arab world thinks happened. It doesn’t matter that it isn’t true. This imaginary Srebrenica has become a symbol for the entire Bosnian War: evil Serbs, unprovoked and driven by hatred, killing innocent, unarmed, peaceful Muslims while the West watches the “genocide” and does nothing.

For years, the Western media took for granted the death toll of 250,000 people mostly Muslims. A report by ICTY-commissioned demographers (Tabeau/Bijak) from 2003, indicating a death toll of 102,000 remained hidden for a year. Its accidental revelation in late 2004 caused a firestorm of denial and declarations that the final, official report, compiled by Mirsad Tokaca, would establish the real number, closer to 150,000. That, however, did not happen. Tokaca’s report, completed in late 2005, put the final number of war dead at 97,000. And yet despite these constant revisions, even it maintained that the number of dead in Srebrenica was 8,000!

ICTY’s own investigations suggest otherwise. Of the 7,661 persons listed as missing after Srebrenica was taken by the Bosnian Serbs in July 1995, some 5,371 are members of the Bosnian Army. Remains of 3,837 have been identified. Of those, 3,602 were men age 15-65, 201 were men aged 65 and over, 9 were boys under 14, 11 were women, and 14 of age and sex unknown. Tribunal investigators also found 448 blindfolds and 423 ligatures, indicating executions. They determined that “1,785 individuals died of gunshot wounds, 169 died of probable or possible gunshot wounds, 67 died of Shrapnel wounds or blast injuries, 11 died of gunshot and blast injuries, 6 died of other causes (trauma, suffocation, etc.), and 1441 died of undetermined causes.”

So, the “eight thousand civilians” turn first into 5,300 military men, 3,800 identified bodies, 1800 gunshot victims, and 450 executed. Keep in mind that the women and children abandoned by the “brave fighters” of the 28th Bosnian Army Division (from the “demilitarized safe area” no less) at the UN base in Potocari were safely evacuated by Bosnian Serb troops, using trucks and buses hastily requisitioned from Serb civilians. What kind of “genocide” leaves the women and children alive?

There are more problems with the mainstream narrative. Some 3,000 names from the list of the missing are shown as having voted in the 1996 elections. Either they were alive, or there was massive electoral fraud. Either way, someone lied. Serb researched Milivoje Ivanisevic (”Srebrenica ID Card”) accuses the Sarajevo government of burying people who died long before the war, as well as soldiers who died prior to July 1995, at the Potocari memorial cemetery. Bulgarian researcher Germinal Civikov questions the testimony of Drazen Erdemovic, the “crown witness” of the ICTY prosecution whose accounts were used in every Srebrenica-related case. In his book, Civikov shows that Erdemovic and his confederates could not have possibly killed 1,200 people in one night, as he claimed. Sure enough, only 127 bodies were found at the location.

Gen. Krstic, the first Serb officer convicted as “accessory to genocide” was nowhere near Srebrenica, having taken command on July 20, 1995 (five days after the town was taken). Momir Nikolic, another valuable witness for the prosecution, admitted to perjury – but his testimonies were kept! And the ICTY itself admitted that the actual facts of the case remain unknown, but the judges nonetheless believe some 8,000 men were killed. In a true court of law, it doesn’t matter what one believes – only what one can prove. And there is simply no proof for the “genocide” in Srebrenica, because it did not happen.

In the summer of 1992, British reporters took a photo of an emaciated Muslim man and arranged it so it appeared behind barbed wire, like an inmate of Nazi death camps. Western media howled about “Belsen ’92” and spoke of the Serbs as the new Nazis. A magazine that ran an analysis of the deception in Trnopolje was forced into bankruptcy by British libel laws, yet the truth of the analysis was never actually disputed. Deemed libelous was only the insinuation that the crew shot the photo with malicious intent. Because fabricating genocide photos is proof positive of humanitarianism, what? Anyway, the truth was out and the story of “Serb death camps” has mostly disappeared since. It was replaced by the constant invocation of Srebrenica as the “greatest atrocity in Europe since Hitler.”

A massive memorial complex was built in Potocari, at the former UN peacekeeper compound where those women and children sought – and found! – refuge. Bill Clinton, that paragon of honesty and virtue, attended the grand opening. While the Bosnian Muslims are broke and without jobs, their government spent lavishly on the Potocari shrine. So that “vengeance could become justice” as the dedication in Arabic says. So that a lie could become true.

At the end of WW2, during the withdrawal from Yugoslavia before the advancing Communist troops, a number of Croat fascists (Ustasha) were captured in northern Slovenia and southern Austria. The British also turned over several thousand POWs to the Communists. The Communists shot a number of them at the town of Bleiburg, the same way they executed tens of thousands of “class enemies” in Serbia and elsewhere, since 1944. However, after the war, Bleiburg was turned into a shrine by the surviving Ustasha and the Catholic Church. Modern Croatian history claims that 60,000 people were killed in Bleiburg (!). British historian D.B. MacDonald explains:

Inflating the numbers of dead at Bleiburg had several layers of significance. Firstly, it gave the Croats their own massacre at the hands of Serbs and/or Communists, which allowed them to counter the Serbs’ Jasenovac genocide with one of their own. Secondly, it allowed Croats to distance themselves from the Serbs and the Communist regime that had carried out the massacres. They could portray Croatia as an unwilling participant in the SFRY, more a prisoner than a constituent nation. Thirdly, by suffering such a massacre, the Croats underwent their own ‘way of Cross’, as it was frequently dubbed in Croatian writings.

(Balkan holocausts?: Serbian and Croatian victim-centered propaganda and the war in Yugoslavia, David Bruce MacDonald, Manchester University Press, April 19, 2003)

While inflating the number of dead in Bleiburg, the new Croatian government reduced the number of victims of Jasenovac, to establish the moral equivalence of the Ustasha and the “Serbo-Communists” (led by Tito, a Croat…), going so far as to declare the Ustasha the real victims, claiming that Jasenovac was a work camp in which the Jews killed each other and there were hardly any Serbs there anyway…

Even President Mesic, hardly a Serbophile, called Bleiburg an Ustasha festival at government expense. He also added that those buried at Jasenovac were innocents, while many of those buried at Bleiburg were their executioners. It didn’t change a thing.

Just as the Ustasha created a shrine in Bleiburg to cast themselves as victims (committing a horrific blasphemy by comparing themselves to Jesus), the shrine to the false genocide in Potocari serves to mask an aggressive ideology – whose insistence on a Muslim-dominated, centralized Bosnian state led to the war in the first place – with a halo of victimhood. Mustafa Ceric, the Bosnian Muslim religious leader, even put this “genocide” on the same level as the Holocaust at an interfaith conference last year.

The Bleiburg in Potocari is a symbol of the Bosnian War, though not in the way its creators intended. It is a fitting representation of a war steeped in manipulation and lies – an insult not only to the victims of Hitler’s “final solution,” but to reason and decency as well.

Posted by Gray Falcon at 12:00

1 comments:

Gray Falcon said…Already the professional victims and “genocide” peddlers are sending in their comments. One of them calls this a “tissue of foul lies” before launching into some rather crass language. As “proof” of this he (or she?) says that the checkerboard symbol on the monument is the Croatian national emblem, rather than an Ustasha one.

Wrong. As one Croat reader pointed out many years ago, the Ustasha checkerboard began with a white square, to symbolize the Croats’ “racial purity.” The current national checkerboard on the Croatian flag and elsewhere begins with a red square. So yes, this is an Ustasha symbol. And the Islamic crescent next to it isn’t inherently Nazi, of course – but it does show that Muslims (or “Croats of Islamic faith” as they were called then) were among the Ustasha, including those killed in Bleiburg. 

17 March, 2010 04:05

Post a Comment 

At the end of February, Al-Jazeera showed an interview with Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic, currently on trial before the ICTY in The Hague. It was done as part of a 40-minute report with Rageh Omaar. The report opened with the rows of green funeral shrouds, wailing Muslim women, and the rows of names on the Potocari monument, near Srebrenica. The images that follow suggest that the Serbs rounded up some eight thousand civilians, and shot them in broad daylight. This is what the Arab world thinks happened. It doesn’t matter that it isn’t true. This imaginary Srebrenica has become a symbol for the entire Bosnian War: evil Serbs, unprovoked and driven by hatred, killing innocent, unarmed, peaceful Muslims while the West watches the “genocide” and does nothing.

For years, the Western media took for granted the death toll of 250,000 people mostly Muslims. A report by ICTY-commissioned demographers (Tabeau/Bijak) from 2003, indicating a death toll of 102,000 remained hidden for a year. Its accidental revelation in late 2004 caused a firestorm of denial and declarations that the final, official report, compiled by Mirsad Tokaca, would establish the real number, closer to 150,000. That, however, did not happen. Tokaca’s report, completed in late 2005, put the final number of war dead at 97,000. And yet despite these constant revisions, even it maintained that the number of dead in Srebrenica was 8,000!

ICTY’s own investigations suggest otherwise. Of the 7,661 persons listed as missing after Srebrenica was taken by the Bosnian Serbs in July 1995, some 5,371 are members of the Bosnian Army. Remains of 3,837 have been identified. Of those, 3,602 were men age 15-65, 201 were men aged 65 and over, 9 were boys under 14, 11 were women, and 14 of age and sex unknown. Tribunal investigators also found 448 blindfolds and 423 ligatures, indicating executions. They determined that “1,785 individuals died of gunshot wounds, 169 died of probable or possible gunshot wounds, 67 died of Shrapnel wounds or blast injuries, 11 died of gunshot and blast injuries, 6 died of other causes (trauma, suffocation, etc.), and 1441 died of undetermined causes.”

So, the “eight thousand civilians” turn first into 5,300 military men, 3,800 identified bodies, 1800 gunshot victims, and 450 executed. Keep in mind that the women and children abandoned by the “brave fighters” of the 28th Bosnian Army Division (from the “demilitarized safe area” no less) at the UN base in Potocari were safely evacuated by Bosnian Serb troops, using trucks and buses hastily requisitioned from Serb civilians. What kind of “genocide” leaves the women and children alive?

There are more problems with the mainstream narrative. Some 3,000 names from the list of the missing are shown as having voted in the 1996 elections. Either they were alive, or there was massive electoral fraud. Either way, someone lied. Serb researched Milivoje Ivanisevic (”Srebrenica ID Card”) accuses the Sarajevo government of burying people who died long before the war, as well as soldiers who died prior to July 1995, at the Potocari memorial cemetery. Bulgarian researcher Germinal Civikov questions the testimony of Drazen Erdemovic, the “crown witness” of the ICTY prosecution whose accounts were used in every Srebrenica-related case. In his book, Civikov shows that Erdemovic and his confederates could not have possibly killed 1,200 people in one night, as he claimed. Sure enough, only 127 bodies were found at the location.

Gen. Krstic, the first Serb officer convicted as “accessory to genocide” was nowhere near Srebrenica, having taken command on July 20, 1995 (five days after the town was taken). Momir Nikolic, another valuable witness for the prosecution, admitted to perjury – but his testimonies were kept! And the ICTY itself admitted that the actual facts of the case remain unknown, but the judges nonetheless believe some 8,000 men were killed. In a true court of law, it doesn’t matter what one believes – only what one can prove. And there is simply no proof for the “genocide” in Srebrenica, because it did not happen.

In the summer of 1992, British reporters took a photo of an emaciated Muslim man and arranged it so it appeared behind barbed wire, like an inmate of Nazi death camps. Western media howled about “Belsen ’92” and spoke of the Serbs as the new Nazis. A magazine that ran an analysis of the deception in Trnopolje was forced into bankruptcy by British libel laws, yet the truth of the analysis was never actually disputed. Deemed libelous was only the insinuation that the crew shot the photo with malicious intent. Because fabricating genocide photos is proof positive of humanitarianism, what? Anyway, the truth was out and the story of “Serb death camps” has mostly disappeared since. It was replaced by the constant invocation of Srebrenica as the “greatest atrocity in Europe since Hitler.”

A massive memorial complex was built in Potocari, at the former UN peacekeeper compound where those women and children sought – and found! – refuge. Bill Clinton, that paragon of honesty and virtue, attended the grand opening. While the Bosnian Muslims are broke and without jobs, their government spent lavishly on the Potocari shrine. So that “vengeance could become justice” as the dedication in Arabic says. So that a lie could become true.

At the end of WW2, during the withdrawal from Yugoslavia before the advancing Communist troops, a number of Croat fascists (Ustasha) were captured in northern Slovenia and southern Austria. The British also turned over several thousand POWs to the Communists. The Communists shot a number of them at the town of Bleiburg, the same way they executed tens of thousands of “class enemies” in Serbia and elsewhere, since 1944. However, after the war, Bleiburg was turned into a shrine by the surviving Ustasha and the Catholic Church. Modern Croatian history claims that 60,000 people were killed in Bleiburg (!). British historian D.B. MacDonald explains:

Inflating the numbers of dead at Bleiburg had several layers of significance. Firstly, it gave the Croats their own massacre at the hands of Serbs and/or Communists, which allowed them to counter the Serbs’ Jasenovac genocide with one of their own. Secondly, it allowed Croats to distance themselves from the Serbs and the Communist regime that had carried out the massacres. They could portray Croatia as an unwilling participant in the SFRY, more a prisoner than a constituent nation. Thirdly, by suffering such a massacre, the Croats underwent their own ‘way of Cross’, as it was frequently dubbed in Croatian writings.

(Balkan holocausts?: Serbian and Croatian victim-centered propaganda and the war in Yugoslavia, David Bruce MacDonald, Manchester University Press, April 19, 2003)
While inflating the number of dead in Bleiburg, the new Croatian government reduced the number of victims of Jasenovac, to establish the moral equivalence of the Ustasha and the “Serbo-Communists” (led by Tito, a Croat…), going so far as to declare the Ustasha the real victims, claiming that Jasenovac was a work camp in which the Jews killed each other and there were hardly any Serbs there anyway…

Even President Mesic, hardly a Serbophile, called Bleiburg an Ustasha festival at government expense. He also added that those buried at Jasenovac were innocents, while many of those buried at Bleiburg were their executioners. It didn’t change a thing.

Just as the Ustasha created a shrine in Bleiburg to cast themselves as victims (committing a horrific blasphemy by comparing themselves to Jesus), the shrine to the false genocide in Potocari serves to mask an aggressive ideology – whose insistence on a Muslim-dominated, centralized Bosnian state led to the war in the first place – with a halo of victimhood. Mustafa Ceric, the Bosnian Muslim religious leader, even put this “genocide” on the same level as the Holocaust at an interfaith conference last year.

The Bleiburg in Potocari is a symbol of the Bosnian War, though not in the way its creators intended. It is a fitting representation of a war steeped in manipulation and lies – an insult not only to the victims of Hitler’s “final solution,” but to reason and decency as well.

Posted by Gray Falcon at 12:00

Labels: Bosnia, genocide, propaganda, Srebrenica, war crimes

1 comments:

Gray Falcon said…

Already the professional victims and “genocide” peddlers are sending in their comments. One of them calls this a “tissue of foul lies” before launching into some rather crass language. As “proof” of this he (or she?) says that the checkerboard symbol on the monument is the Croatian national emblem, rather than an Ustasha one.

Wrong. As one Croat reader pointed out many years ago, the Ustasha checkerboard began with a white square, to symbolize the Croats’ “racial purity.” The current national checkerboard on the Croatian flag and elsewhere begins with a red square. So yes, this is an Ustasha symbol. And the Islamic crescent next to it isn’t inherently Nazi, of course – but it does show that Muslims (or “Croats of Islamic faith” as they were called then) were among the Ustasha, including those killed in Bleiburg.

17 March, 2010 04:05

SUPPORT FOR MCCAIN OR OBAMA IS A NOOSE AROUND THE NECKS OF THE JEWS

by Felix Quigley

July 23 2008

Israpundit is now totally unable to take a political position in support of the Serbs against Islamofascism in the Balkans. This at this precise reaches a critical point with the arrest by Serb Quislings of the Serb Bosnian patriotic leader Radovan Karadzic. And the reality is that if you cannot defend Karadzic and the Serbs then you will not be able, or in a position, to defend Israel against the very same forces, the forces of Islamofascism and the forces of US Imperialism.

The sickness in Israpundit as a site which aims to give leadership to the Jews and to Israel runs very deep indeed. The support for McCain is an expression of this sickness.

Make no mistake we on 4international are opposed to both Obama and to McCain Continue reading

HARRY’S PLACE LIBEL THREAT…THE TIME WHEN THEY WERE SILENT

by Felix Quigley

July 11, 2008

The issue of Libel has arisen again in the British Blogosphere. This time it is the Islamofascists of Hamas who are preventing open discussion of their policies and programme in front of the British working class and British people in general.

http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/10/nick-cohen-on-libel-threats-the-muslim-brotherhood-and-us/#comment-205046

http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/10/were-being-sued-by-hamas-uk/#comments

Of course we on 4international without reservation defend the right of total free expression in the Media and on the Internet and we will fight to the death against Islamofascists who try to deny this freedom.

Hence without reservation and without conditions we defend David Taub and the Harry’s Place organization in the face of Islamofascist attack.

In the interest of truth, however, we point out that David Taub and Harry’s Place have been a supporter of the Islamofascist Izetbegovic in the Balkans. Continue reading

US IN THE BALKANS 10…ARE THESE LIES BY WIKIPEDIA?

by Felix Quigley

 

July 4, 2008

 

The firm belief of this website 4international is that the  Serbs did not murder a single person when they recaptured Srebrenica. This was a battle in a war and the Srebrenica Massacre  (so-called) was and is one giant hoax. We have asked Hoare, Kamm and co. to hurry up and bring forward the evidence for their low claim but we know they Hill not do so because it does not exist.

 

I plan to place some material down in print as part of our continuing articles.

 

The following is the Wikipedia entry which follows. Their url is at the end, you can consult the total which contains some photos, this Wikipedia entry seems to me to be blatant lies. But it stands there untouched and such is the power of the whole Imperialist class committed to the promotion of this Srebrenica Big Lie, and it must be said the crisis of leadership inside the opposition to Imperialism, that it will require a huge effort to dislodge.

 

 

[begin quote from Wikipedia here] Continue reading

US IN THE BALKANS 9…THE REAL ANSWER TO KAMM AND HOARE

by Felix Quigley

July 3 2008

When political sewer rats like Kamm and Hoare cite the Hague Kangaroo Court, set up and run by NAT, partisan enemy of Milosevic and the Serbs, then they should be given short shift. It is really not worth spending a great deal of time with Kamm and Hoare. They are basically full of racist hatred for Serbia and Serbs.

If one feels so inclined there are many references to guide these two particular sewer rats (among a veritable horde of same) towards, one may be the following:

[start quote here]

According to Michael Mandel, Professor of International law at York University in Toronto
the Tribunal’s claim genocide occurred at Srebrenica was not supported by the facts it found or by the law it cited. Even the trial chamber’s conclusion that ‘Bosnian Serb forces executed several thousand Bosnian Muslim men [with the] total number of victims … likely to be within the range of 7,000 to 8,000 was not supported by its specific findings.

[end quote here] Continue reading