Category Archives: 4international

ISRAEL AND JEWS GENERALLY CONTINUE TO BETRAY JEWS BY NOT DEFENDING ASSAD UNCONDITIONALLY AGAINST JIHAD

by

0

One of the main attacks by Leon Trotsky on Stalin and Stalinism was that they continually lagged behind the events of the day, in other words the speed of events was continually too much for the Stalinists. But that also applies to the political situation today in general. For example some Jews today in Israel are arguing about “gay marriage”, these stuck in the past and dogmatic religious reactionaries do not see the danger from events in the very present as fast moving events swirl around them, and Syria is one, where if Qatar and Obama succeed in their attention, to put Assad on the run, then millions of Alawites and Christians will be butchered, as this extract from http://www.debka.com shows.

If true it is most alarming:

(START QUOTE) Members of Bashar Assad’s Alawite sect, their inhabitants, mainly women and children, have been fleeing en masse from their homes in fear of rebel retribution. They are making for the coastal towns of Tartus and Latakia which are still under regime control.
The question is for how long. In the third week of March, Russian warships stopped docking at the naval port of Tartus after finding its piers and facilities crowded with Alawite refugees who came up to the Russian seamen begging for food, water and medical aid.
From March 21, Russian warships on the Mediterranean were ordered to avoid Tartus and relocate their visits to Lebanon’s Beirut port.

The Saudi operation for shipping heavy rocket launchers from the Balkans to Aleppo is complicated.
The rockets are fixed to vehicles weighing 43.7 tons each. The rockets themselves are 7.6 meters long and weigh 800 kilograms.

To arrange the transfer of this heavy artillery to the rebels in Aleppo, Prince Bandar contacted Hakan Fidan, head of the MIT-Turkish National Intelligence Organization. They agreed to set up an overland route from the Balkans via Turkey and across the Syrian border to Aleppo, under the protection of the Turkish army.

Our sources report that Ankara’s initial refusal of cooperation was overcome with a sharp reminder by Prince Bandar of the scale of Turkish exports to Saudi Arabia and the damage to the Turkish economy of their potential suspension.

The news that Saudi Arabia was supplying Syrian rebels with heavy weapons stunned the Arab League summit taking place in Doha, Qatar this week, bringing it to a clamorous end, debkafile’s intelligence and Middle East sources reveal.

Saudi and Qatari delegates were heard hurling shrill abuse at one another and exchanging blows in private meeting rooms down the corridors of the assembly hall. The conference proceedings were abruptly halted as Arab delegation members pitched in to separate them. A total blackout was quickly drawn down on the summit as it broke up in disarray.

http://debka.com/article/22857/Saudi-heavy-weapons-supply-to-Syrian-rebels-breaks-up-Arab-summit-in-uproar

We of 4international are on the side of Israel in everything, the small Jewish Homeland, still hanging on, but look here what the Jewish leaders of Israel are doing. They stood aside on the defeat of Mubarak, they praised the murder of Gadhafi, they are now aiding Obama greatly through the mechanism of (post Obama recent visit to Israel) Netanyahu aiding Turkey, and they are largely silent on the plight of Assad AND NOT JUST ASSAD ALSO THE ALAWITE MINORITY AND CHRISTIAN MINORITY.

And this is widespread. Look across the Internet and you will find only our group 4international insisting that Assad must be defended. We say if Assad falls then there is a massive slaughter of Alawites and Christians. How hard is that to understand?

And if there is such a massacre of the Alawites will the Jews be far behind (also getting massacred) because remember Netanyahu is tied to Obama in stopping the Iran bomb, which Obama will not do, is opposed to doing, because Obama no matter what he says in public sees Iran with the Bomb and a balance of power, really a state of extreme uncertainty, in the Middle East. That causes an immediate race for all to have the Nuclear Bomb.

The lesson of Gadhafi remains. Remember that Gadhafi made an agreement, he gave up his Bomb technology, and the result!!!

Most proceed in a daydream. But for action there is a reaction etc., the old dictum but true, and the result of Obama literally betraying gadhafi and the previous agreement will play itself out for a long time.

Just like the people who put deposits into a Cyprus bank and lost, then when the rules are changed, there is a total loss of trust in world affairs.

THAT IS A HUGE DESTABILISER RIGHT THERE.

IS EUROPEAN COUNTRIES NOW EXPOSED TO THE IRANIAN NUCLEAR THREAT AS WELL AS ISRAEL?

by

0

http://www.debka.com as far as 4international is concerned is the premier website of analysis and hard news. It mixes hard news with some speculation but such is welcome always if it is intelligent. Speculation by its very nature is a leap in the dark so do not hold it against debka if it is wrong or only partially correct at times. Distinguish between fact and speculation.

I listen each week to a discussion on a commercial radio station Talk Radio Europe and this discussion is always so far away from reality it is alarming.

So today I reprint the article which is today on debka. With comments by me. Interspersed.

BEGIN DEBKA

Our commanders now authorized to open fire. Go home, Obama!

DEBKAfile Special Report March 17, 2013

The words and deeds coming out of Washington in the last three days bring little comfort to the Israeli government as it prepares for Barack Obama’s first visit as president Wednesday, March 20.
According to an authoritative leak, Washington has effectively cancelled the Europe-based missile shield system that was designed to protect that continent and Israel against Iranian ballistic missile attack. The cancellation was part of the plan announced by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel last week to install 14 additional missile interceptors in California and Alaska to build up United States defenses against a threatened North Korean attack.

Not only has the Obama administration reduced its missile defense commitment to Europe and Israel, debkafile notes that Washington persists in overlooking the tight coordination in tactics and diplomacy on nuclear issues between Pyongyang and Tehran.

The European-based missile shield has been put forward by Moscow repeatedly as a major obstacle to Russian-US cooperation on nuclear arms reduction and “other issues” – meaning the really hot-button ones of a nuclear Iran and the Syrian civil war.

By meeting Moscow’s complaint, Barack Obama was gambling heavily on coming out of the understandings he reached with Russian President Vladimir Putin with an acceptable settlement of the Iranian nuclear controversy and the future of the Assad regime in Syria.

So far, his winnings are slim.

Russian officials are not rushing forward to welcome the reshuffling of missile shields between Europe and America. Kremlin circles were quoted Sunday by The New York Times as commenting stiffly that there would be no reaction until they were fully briefed by American officials next week.

In any case, Tehran wants no part in the diplomatic softball game the Obama administration is playing with Moscow. Indeed, Iranian officials are behaving exactly like their North Korean partners – with threats.

{Before dealing with the Iranian reaction to this let us pause. On the TRE discussion recently a man called Steve who is from Liverpool attacked Netanyahu as “that fella in Israel who wants to start a war”. Note the disrespect for Netanyahu and thus for Israel and Israelis, I would say too disrespect for Jews. And he attacked Netanyahu but was silent on the Iranian threats to Israel. Why was he silent on those threats? Did he mean to say that Iran is NOT a threat? The answer to his thinking because the leader of the discussion a man from Glasgow called Steve Gilmour did not say “Hold a minute what do you mean there?”

To continue on consider that if Iran has nuclear bombs deliverable and if from the above on debka Obama and Russia are removing defences from Europe where does this man now stand?

Europe also is exposed to threat from Iran.

Can this fact not get through to such think skulls.

Can it be that bias against Israel and their enthusiasm for the Palestinian narrative of history blind them to seeing reality.

So will theya rgue that Iran is never a threat? Will they continue to argue this? Will they change?

but if they ever accept that iran is a threat to Europe what about Irana s a threat to Israel.

Will they say then they do not care. But that is OPEN ANTISEMITISM!

{CONTINUE DEBKA}

Saturday, March 16, Deputy Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces Brig. Gen. Massoud Jazayeri broadcast two bellicose messages on the Revolutionary Guards website sephanews.com:

1 “Our commanders have been authorized to respond to any kind of hostile move by the enemy.”
debkafile’s military sources note that this message appeared two days after Iranian Air Force fighters tried to shoot down a US Predator drone flying over the Strait of Hormuz. It also comes at a time that Iranian officers are found on field combat duty in Syria and Lebanon as well.

2. The Iranian general went on to declare: “Mr Obama, do not make a mistake: we too have all our options on the table. Before you get deeper in the region’s quagmire, go back home!”

This was Tehran’s answer to the US President’s comment Thursday in an Israeli TV Channel 2 interview:

“I have been crystal clear about my position on Iran possessing a nuclear weapon – that is a red line for us. If we can resolve it diplomatically that’s a more lasting solution, but if not I continue to keep all options on the table.” Obama added that Tehran is “over a year or so” away from getting a nuclear bomb.

In Tehran’s tightly controlled publicity environment, General Jazayeri would not have dismissed the prospect of the US activating its military options with such contempt without authorization from the highest level, i.e. supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

He was effectively telling the US president that, after pulling American forces out of the Middle East and relegating the handling of the Syrian issue to Moscow, “Mr.Obama” had burned his military options in the Middle East and should go home.
Our Iranian sources add that that Jazayeri’s remark was addressed equally to Israel. If Obama’s main purpose in his visit is to hear what Israelis have to say – as he himself has stressed – then he is wasting his time. , In Tehran’s view, the Israelis too have no place in the Middle East and should get out – as Iran’s leaders often declare..

ATHEISM IS A GREAT TABOO IN ARAB COUNTRIES (DEFEND ATHEISM)

by

0


THANKS TO THE EXCELLENT SITE “GATES OF VIENNA”

“The Unmitigated Horror”

Posted on March 10, 2013 by Baron Bodissey on the gates of vienna website

The Moroccan apostate Kassim al-Ghasali left Islam and became an atheist, and is now a political refugee in Switzerland. As reported by Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, he spoke at the Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy last month. The following interview with Mr. Al-Ghasali was published by Die Welt, and has been translated by JLH.

Elisabeth sends this introduction:

In February, I had the pleasure of listening to Kassim’s speech at the Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy. He is a young man from Morocco who dared to speak his mind and received death threats as a result. He currently resides in Switzerland, seeking asylum and hoping for the best. As JLH succinctly notes (and whom we thank for the translation):

“A quite sophisticated understanding of what the Enlightenment did and why it was able to do it, versus the amorphous situation in Islam, with no temporal central authority to institute reform.”

The translated interview:

“We Atheists Are Creating a Parallel Society”
by Olivier Jeges

In his blogs, Moroccan Kassim al-Ghasali openly and assertively professes his atheism. Because he can no longer believe in Islam, he receives death threats and had to leave his homeland.

Two years ago, in February 2011, Kassim al-Ghasali fled to Switzerland. He had to leave his homeland, Morocco, because he no longer believed in Islam and had publicly professed atheism. Since then, he has continued to receive death threats. Now the 22 year-old is writing two blogs with a worldwide readership from exile — one on political Islam and one on human rights subjects.

Interest in his essays is great. More than 13,000 users on Facebook follow him. At the summit on human rights and democracy in Geneva this year, he gave a talk about his experiences as an atheist in Morocco. In an interview, Kassim al-Ghasali talks about his life in Western society, his criticism of Islam and what it means, that he has had to leave his homeland for political reasons.

DW:

Scarcely any Moroccan will profess his atheism as self-confidently as you. When did you decide to turn away from your religion?

Al-G:

Essentially, it was less a moment in time than a process. Belief is often the result of a particular culture. Religion is at the center in our countries, or to put it better, it is the heart of this culture. I turned away from Islam when I began to question this culture. It is a culture that controls everything: our personal relations, our thoughts, even our imagination and our dreams. A culture that does not allow us to be different, or think differently. A culture that sticks its nose into everything.

DW:

What do these thoughts mean for you?

Al-G:

When I became aware of this problem, I concluded that religion — not just Islam — is one of the greatest obstacles on the path to modernity. That is, it makes no sense, on the one hand, to call for respect for human rights while, on the other hand, religious texts call for the killing of infidels, bullying women and oppressing minorities.

DW:

How did your family react?

Al-G:

It was a shock for my family. All of them were concerned. They didn’t really know what was happening. They were all of one opinion, but no one stood up for me. Not even when protest demonstrations against me were organized in front of my house. So I had to leave my home and my town and go into hiding until I had the entry permit for Switzerland.

DW:

Are you still in contact with your family?

Al-G:

Yes, there is communication, But is it positive communication? Unfortunately not. The only positive conversations are on the telephone with my mother when I ask her about recipes.

DW:

You have been living in Switzerland for two years. Have you found a job? Do you have friends?

Al-G:

I am not an economic refugee. Finding a job is not a priority. I would like to study. I get a little money from the Swiss state and that is enough to pay for books, food and an internet connection. Yes, working and earning my own money would mean being independent. But first, I want to study. I am frugal. I am not even thinking about buying a car, renting a big apartment or sending large amounts of money to my home country, as so many refugees do.

DW:

Could you or would you like to travel back to your homeland?

Al-G:

I will certainly travel there if Morocco has healed itself of the cancer of Islamism, whose adherents want to kill me. And if my country accepts me and does not wish to take away my right to live as an atheist. If Morocco respects universal human rights and becomes a secular state, I will consider visiting there or even living there again.

DW:

Do you have any estimation of how many people in Arab territory share your view of religion?

Al-G:

Because atheism is such a great taboo in Arabic countries, it is hard to say how high the number of atheists there is. Sometimes, atheists are not even acquainted with each other. Everyone thinks of his own life and safety first, before he openly admits to being an atheist. Yet recently some voices have been heard. Most of them use the social networks to exchange thoughts and talk openly about their lack of faith and their views on Islam and religions in general. That sends a good signal to the West, which has thought for years that all the people in Arab countries are alike and are satisfied with one another. Nonetheless, we atheists are a parallel society which must stay in hiding out of fear.

DW:

What do you think of the so-called “Arab Spring? Can you discern positive changes?

Al-G:

The beauty of Spring comes from various colors. Unfortunately, the supporters of the Arab Spring do not know these distinctions. They want everyone to think the same, dress the same and pray at the same time. Most of the supporters of the Arab Spring do not believe in human rights as the West understands them. For them, democracy is just a ladder for the climb to power. Then they fasten knives to the treads so that no other political parties can climb the ladder. What is happening in the Arab World now is comparable to what Europe went through in the 17th and 18th century. The difference is that this phase at that time brought forth enlightened philosophers and thinkers. In the Near East, on the contrary, the supporters of divine laws and the followers of Islam are coming to power.

DW:

But couldn’t Islam reform as happened with Christianity?

Al-G:

In my opinion, there can be no reformation or enlightenment in Sunni or Shiite Islam, because there is no church to be reformed. In Islam, we are subject to the power of a sacred book and the instructions it gives. Identity and understanding of self come from the Koran. If Muslims could use their reason without the instructions of a book which is recognized as the Word of God, then we could talk about enlightenment. But today most Muslims are against the ideas of the Western Enlightenment. And they do not know that Muslims would be capable of achieving the same rights as the people in Western society. Historically, there were several attempts at reform in Islam, but they were not welcomed. Any moderate Muslim who would like to reform Islam should admit to himself that terror and violence are in the Koran. The unmitigated horror. But no Muslim could admit that the Koran is a politically- and historically-determined book — and not the word of Allah.

DW:

What are your plans for the future?

Al-G:

I hope for and dream of the day when religious freedom and human rights come to Arab lands. I am working for that. I have dedicated my life to that. And in the meantime, I will drink a couple of beers every week with my girlfriend.

THE THREAT TO ISRAEL FROM A NUCLEAR IRAN GROWS THANKS TO OBAMA

by

0

IT IS TOO CLEAR

Israel and the Jews of Israel are being threatened as never before, comparable only to Hitler and the Holocaust. You will remember that all of the nations of the world especially Britain and America refused to allow Jewish emigration to escape the Holocaust. It is very like that today. The Jews have set up their Homeland in Israel but they are being isolated AGAIN by Obama and Cameron. This new threat of new Holocaust takes the form of Obama BACKING a Nuclear Armed Iran, which also means a Nuclear backed Muslim Brotherhood!

THE LEFT

Understand what the left is. It is NOT Trotskyist. It is a ragbag and is more influenced by Stalinist and Revisionist thoughts.

The left is bitterly the enemy of Israel, that is ISRAEL THE Jewish HOMELAND

Why would the left be opposed to the Jewish Homeland? Because the left has become totally Antisemitic. This was led by the Moscow Stalinists following the 1967 war, which was a defensive war by the Jews of Israel, to defend their country from Egypt’s Nasser and other Arab countries which were attacking…HISTORY SPEAKS FOLKS…

BUT…

If the left is antisemitic what then?
The answer to this is that this left which is antisemitic is not Trotskyist, that means not based on the Lenin and Trotsky principles of socialist revolution.

CONCLUSION FROM THE PRESENT LEFT BEING ANTISEMITIC

1. This antisemitic left is no use to workers and it is no use to Jews in such danger as we describe
2. A new alternative must be built
3. That alternative is already well underway
4. How do we know? We know this because of all the political groups and individuals in the world only http://www.4international.me has called it correctly on the Jihadist cum Imperialist war on Yugoslavia, and on the Muslim Brotherhood drive to Fascism inside the Arab Spring which was obviously directed by Imperialism

WHERE PAMELA GELLER AND ROBERT SPENCER GO WRONG

They go wrong and seriously because they are STILL placing their faith in a capitalist system which is in its death agony. What part of “death agony” pamela and Robert do you not understand?

It was Leon Trotsky who described this stage of the capitalist system as being the “death agony of capitalism”

Please tell me this then the two of you and I narrow the focus to make it understandable: Why is the unemployment among young people in Spain about 60 per cent, not getting better but growing? Why are animals such as the tiger and lion being wiped out in the world? What is this system which cannot guarantee the existence of such species?

V ery simple questions Geller and Spencer please answer and urgently.

WHERE THE PRESENT ISRAELI RULING ELITE, LIKE NETANYAHU, GO SO SERIOUSLY WRONG

Like Geller and Spencer they place their trust in the same world capitalist system. Hell Netanyahu even places his trust in Obama who is coming to Israel in a week or so to ram home upon the Israelis this Nuclear Iran and this Nuclear Power which the Muslim Brotherhood will have.

They lead the Jews of the world in supporting and defending capitalism

netanyahu often comes under attack from the left and in that case we defend Netanyahu from the left. An example of this is a Jewish man called Barrie Nathan on the talk radio europe station and this Jewish man Nathan is always attacking Netanyahu because Nathan would prefer Livni or somebody.

No barrie Nathan the fault is not with the Jews the fault is with the “Palis” and the left who want to have Israel obliterated and Jews homeless which adds up to Genocide of the Jews.

We will defend all Jews under attack from Antisemitism. Barrie Nathan why do you not do sol and you call yourself a Jew. What gives Barrie Nathan?

BUT MOST OF ALL THE FIGHT IS PRIMARILY AGAINST THE STALINIST AND REVISIONIST LEFT

This means in concrete terms the building of 4international.meI

Please urgently help and urgently get in touch. It is not hard write to me below and sign private…no problemo!

NETANYAHU MUST BE FORCED BY JEWS TO KEEP TRAITOR LIVNI OUT OF GOVERNMENT

by

0

THE POLITICAL SITUATION IN ISRAEL WHERE A GOVERNMENT IS BEING FORMED BASED ON THE RECENT ELECTIONS IS BECOMING CRITICAL. THE WEBSITE ISRAPUNDIT IS DISCUSSING THE ISSUES INVOLVED AND READERS HERE SHOULD FOLLOW AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSION.

MARTIN SHERMAN IS A SERIOUS COMMENTATOR ON ISRAELI AFFAIRS (FROM JERUSALEM POST)

I ADDED A COMMENT WHICH IS ACCEPTED, AND ANOTHER AWAITS MODERATION (http://www.israpundit.com/archives/52998/comment-page-1#comment-267935)

(START COMMENT)

This is the political DNA of Yesh Atid, and as such it is incompatible with that of Bayit Yehudi – despite the alleged like-mindedness said to prevail between the parties on other issues.

Thus, while Bayit Yehudi issued a very upbeat announcement Thursday, declaring complete consensus and coordination with Yesh Atid, I would be highly skeptical as to whether such consensus/coordination extends to the cardinal issue at the center of the respective DNAs of the parties: The issue of Palestinian statehood.

This seems to confirm my central thesis on the other thread.

There is a mountain between Bennett and Lapid.

Meaning…the people who voted for Bennett voted for a man who stood for the fight against the Jihad against Israel, specifically the Palestine Arab State issue and how to halt that in its tracks. (Very simply those for the Palestine State are for the Jihad, both the Jihad against Israel and the Jihad in general.

The article above is masterly in showing that many who voted for Lapid were people in Israel without any firm foundations, for example, he refers very specifically above to people voting against all politics, that is nihilism, or last minute voters, that are swung into action by latest tv reports. These are the chaff of political life.

The strength of the Bennett vote remains and may increase, as it is certain to me anyway that Obama will get together with Abbas and Hamas to actually INSTAL Hamas.

Thus the fear and hatred of Lapid will grow, and the position of Bennett will be stronger.

People here can counter oh but Bennett is this and that, he did this and that. I KNOW THAT. You may know it better than me because you may simply be better informed.

But my fundamental point is unchanged…it is the movement of the key people behind Bennett’s new party that is all important.

The conditions for a great advance in Jewish consciousness is there. All is needed is the independent revolutionary party.

Here I have not yet touched on the need for the arming of the Jewish people and for the complete overhaul of the IDF so that the IDF is answerable not to careerist bureaucrats but the Jewish people

WE ARE AT A TURNING POINT…BUILD 4INTERNATIONAL TO FIGHT ANTISEMITISM

by

0

PLANS OF OUR TROTSKYIST MOVEMENT….FIGHTING ANTISEMITISM

The Israeli Government and every Israeli Government since Independence in 1948 has refused to face the reality of Arab and International Antisemitism. But it is never easy for them because world Antisemitism is a reality ALWAYS facing Jews. That is what 4international is facing up to in our campaigns.

More and more the fight against Antisemitism is going to be the task of the Trotskyist movement as represented by 4international and 4international Young Socialists. We are beginning a campaign to bring the truth of the Antisemitism that Jews in Palestine (we use the historical term here) have faced from Arabs since 1920 especially covering that 1920 period, the 1929 massacres in Hebron, the Nazi link-up of the Arabs, the role in the Holocaust of the mentor of Yasser Arafat Hajj Amin el Husseini and much more.

BEGIN MAIN ARTICLE

In a recent article on Indymedia Ireland they make reference to “franchised international Jewish cult of holocaust” from an article in which they horrifically title “Holocaust Whose Holocaust?”

The Irish leftist scene is totally Antisemitic and all of these Leftist Antisemites have to be exposed.

But the big issue here is that all of the Governmental Parties in Ireland are Antisemitic.

The big issue of the day remains Iran.

Obama has been in league with the Muslim Brotherhood in the Arab Spring counter revolutions. As have Europe.

This is an extension of the EU defence of the Antisemites in the Arab Palestinian movement whether Hamas or Fatah, they are all based on Jew Hatred.

And Israel sadly is not in good shape to meet these challenges. Economically and culturally Israel is in fine spirit but its leaders on the issue of Antisemitism in the world have no answer, and Netanyahu remains too tied to other world governments especially the US Government as opposed to the US people and their Congress.

Israel has to make clear that it reserves the use of all methods to defend itself, included is definitely the use of nuclear weapons to strike and destroy totally the Iranian Nuclear Programme. That is the reality for the world. The situation is the same as stopping Hitler in 1939.

PLANS OF OUR TROTSKYIST MOVEMENT….FIGHTING ANTISEMITISM

The Israeli Government and every Israeli Government since Independence in 1948 has refused to face the reality of Arab and International Antisemitism.

More and more that is going to be the task of the Trotskyist movement as represented by 4international and 4international Young Socialists. We are beginning a campaign to bring the truth of the Antisemitism that Jews have faced from Arabs since 1920 especially covering that 1920 period, the 1929 massacres in Hebron, the Nazi link-up of the Arabs, the role in the Holocaust of the mentor of Yasser Arafat Hajj Amin el Husseini and much more.

DEBKA ARTICLE GIVING DETAIL TO SOME OF ABOVE, ESPECIALLY THE OBAMA HOPELESS STRATEGY TO CONTAIN IRAN, ALTHOUGH IT IS UNCERTAIN HE IS NOT ENCOURAGING ISLAM IN GENERAL, AS HE IS CERTAINLY DOING IN TUNISIA, EGYPT, LIBYA AND NOW SYRIA

(BEGIN DEBKA ARTICLE)

…recent weeks, reelected Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has repeatedly stressed he wants a broad government coalition for the critical objective of preventing Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon.
The question is how does he propose to achieve this when tough US and European sanctions have not just failed to stop Iran in its tracks but accelerated its nuclear progress. Iran is now estimated to be within four months of a nuclear bomb capacity from the moment a decision is taken to build one.
Those months are critical: On February 25 the five UN Security Council’s permanent members plus Germany sit down with Iran in Kazakhstan for a fresh round of negotiations. Former rounds in this format led nowhere and no breakthrough is expected this time either beyond, at best, a date for a continuation.
On March 20, President Barack Obama arrives in Israel for the first foreign trip of his second term. The purpose of his visit is plain, except to Netanyahu’s domestic rivals: Facing a 50 percent cutback in military spending, the Obama administration cannot credibly threaten to go to war against a recalcitrant Iran. But the US president may still wave the Israeli military option in Tehran’s face.

Not that the ayatollahs are likely to be impressed. Khamenei and Ahmadinejad have both dismissed talks with Washington “with a gun” at their head, meaning that they are not scared of the Israeli gun the Americans are putting to their heads.
In fact, the Islamic rulers of Tehran are reported by debkafile’s intelligence and Iranian sources to be fully confident that they are home and dry as a nuclear power after a secret US Pentagon research study was leaked that “casts doubt on whether the multibillion-dollar missile defense system planned for Europe” (originally by the Bush administration) “can ever protect the US from Iranian missiles as intended.”

In a recent article on Indymedia Ireland they make reference to “franchised international Jewish cult of holocaust” from an article in which they horrifically title “Holocaust Whose Holocaust?”

The Irish leftist scene is totally Antisemitic and all of these Leftist Antisemites have to be exposed.

But the big issue here is that all of the Governmental Parties in Ireland are Antisemitic.

The big issue of the day remains Iran.

Obama has been in league with the Muslim Brotherhood in the Arab Spring counter revolutions. As have Europe.

This is an extension of the EU defence of the Antisemites in the Arab Palestinian movement whether Hamas or Fatah, they are all based on Jew Hatred.

And Israel sadly is not in good shape to meet these challenges. Economically and culturally Israel is in fine spirit but its leaders on the issue of Antisemitism in the world have no answer, and Netanyahu remains too tied to other world governments especially the US Government as opposed to the US people and their Congress.

Israel has to make clear that it reserves the use of all methods to defend itself, included is definitely the use of nuclear weapons to strike and destroy totally the Iranian Nuclear Programme. That is the reality for the world. The situation is the same as stopping Hitler in 1939.

PLANS OF OUR TROTSKYIST MOVEMENT….FIGHTING ANTISEMITISM

The Israeli Government and every Israeli Government since Independence in 1948 has refused to face the reality of Arab and International Antisemitism.

More and more that is going to be the task of the Trotskyist movement as represented by 4international and 4international Young Socialists. We are beginning a campaign to bring the truth of the Antisemitism that Jews have faced from Arabs since 1920 especially covering that 1920 period, the 1929 massacres in Hebron, the Nazi link-up of the Arabs, the role in the Holocaust of the mentor of Yasser Arafat Hajj Amin el Husseini and much more.

http://debka.com/article/22754/US-withdrawal-from-Europe-based-missile-shield-will-impact-Israel’s-defense

THE SHAMEFUL HARRY’S PLACE SUPPORTS THE STATE REPRESSION OF THE EDL AND ATTACKS PAMELA GELLER

by

0

The British website Harry’s Place has come down on the side of the British state and police in their persectution of Tommy Robinson of the English Defence League.

Basically Harry’s Place is supporting the police arresting over 50 members of the EDL not at a demo but before (as they intended to attend) a demo.

 

This is very like what the British State did to the Miners as they planned to attend meetings and pickets. They arrested and stopped miners from travelling on the public roads of Britain

 

The horror show which is Harry’s Place lines up with all of that.

 

i reject this term of the “left” to descrine these police snitches in the so-called “United Against Fascism” and others and this sentiment of my rejection of this term, which is very misleading, is contained in this comment which I placed this morning on Harry’s Place:

 

Will Defens

You really must give more attention to your use of words to describe this new phenomenon. These people such as United Against Fascism are NOT the left.

You write:

“The lefts response to Islam is, a few blogs that the main stream press and Guardian types totally ignore. At the same time Islam is gaining a very powerful political base in this country. The people running Tower Hamlets are linked to the IFE. Nothing, not a peep from the left. In fact the left are actually in cahoots with them.. The left is actually helping racists and genocidal manics to oppress their won people.”

You are very wrong there in calling these “the left”. They are not in any way left, and are not standing in the traditions of the great socialist thinkers and practitioners. NO WAY!

But I have no ready answer as to what to call them. So I appreciate your difficulty.

The first thing to appreciate is that there is actually no left in existence, none at all.

These whom you call “the left” are as you point out in alliance with Islam which is a most reactionary ideology, and they are now also in league with the capitalist state, and with the police, no doubt therefore behind the scenes with the Special Branch.

They are certainly agents of the state machine which itself is in league with Islam for reasons which have not yet been consciously identified.

There is one obvious link to the arrest by the state aided by these folk whom you call the left, and that is the arrest of the miners at the edges of the British motorway system, on their way to rallies or pickets during the decisive Miners Strike.

Here just as in the Miners Strike the state is moving to attacking the INTENTION to demonstrate etc.

I would say that many of these in the UAF etc. are paid by the state (given the loose and undisciplined nature of these groups the infiltration must be enormous).. Also as Britain slips into crisis even more these precedents of arrest before an event will be used against all kinds of workers’ organizations.

I am at a loss to know what to call these people. I used to call them “left Fascists” but I am now rejecting this term. The left part is misleading.

The best I can come up with is “Pro-state provocateurs”

http://hurryupharry.org/2012/11/02/pamela-geller-and-robert-spencer-raise-funds-for-edl-leader%e2%80%99s-legal-defence/#comment-820029

 

FOR THE RECORD I DEFEND UNCONDITIONALLY THE ENGLISH DEFENCE LEAGUE AS THEY ARE REPRESSED BY THE BRITISH STATE MACHINE, AND I ALSO DEFEND UNCONDITIONALLY PAMELA GELLER AND ROBERT SPENCER. THAT IS THE CORRECT POSITION FOR A PRINCIPLED LEFT TO TAKE.

END THE PERSECUTION OF THE ENGLISH DEFENCE LEAGUE (EDL) BY THE BRITISH FASCIST-BECOMING STATE

by

0

IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOT CALL GROUPS LIKE THE SWP “LEFT FASCISTS” BUT IT IS NECESSARY TO CALL THEM “FASCISTS”

 

THE ARREST OF TOMMY ROBINSON LEADER OF THE EDL, AND OVER 50 MEMBERS OF THE EDL IN AN “INTERNMENT” TYPE SWOOP BY THE BRITISH POLICE, SHOWS FASCISTS LIKE THE SWP WORKING IN TANDEM WITH THE B RITISH POLICE.

 

Patrick Hayes on “Spiked” has referred to “anti-fascists” preparing a police state. Hayes is right. Yes they are preparing a police state. But Hayes is also wrong. These are not “anti-fascists” and certainly not of the “left” but these are indeed fascists. Groups like the SWP are Fascists. Not to be called ever “Left Fascists”.

 

Hayes is right on t he following report:

 

The modern anti-fascist left has provided plenty of justification for increased state control over political to and fro in modern Britain. It has strengthened the use of public-order laws over political freedom, and it has empowered the state to govern all forms of political speech. That control extends not just to the statements and actions of ‘fascist’ groups, but also to the statements and actions of left-wing groups and anti-fascists, too.

So for the next 30 days, any group – regardless of its grievance – is banned from marching in Walthamstow and the rest of the borough of Waltham Forest and in the nearby boroughs of Tower Hamlets, Newham and Islington. This blanket ban is directly down to the campaigning efforts of left-wing anti-fascist protesters, who have spent the past month taking to the streets to get people to join local Labour MP Stella Creasy in signing a petition to ban the EDL from entering Walthamstow. The successful campaign for a ban was celebrated by Creasy who, ironically, claimed it meant ‘our community can get back to its normal, peaceful and tolerant state’.

http://www.spiked-online.com/site/article/13036/

 

hayes is absolutely correct to draw attention to this Labourite Creasy. This very much reminds me of the Stalinist Comintern which insisted that Hitlerism was not all that bad in the months leading to Hitler grabbing state power in 1933.

 

Sure there are differences. It is a different historical situation. But in both cases the moves of dictatorship by the capitalist state are not being opposed but are being sanctioned by people like Creasy.

 

I nearly said, out of habit, “people like Creasy on the Left”

 

But that is precisely what I am challenging on. These are not people of the “left” at all. These like Creasy are Fascists. Everything today is reversed.

 

Just yesterday we on 4international wrote about this very issue. We are challenging the term “left” fascists. These people like Creasy with their hatreds of Israel and their joining with the state forces against the EDL, are not of the left but are Fascists.

 

In our defence of Tommy Robinson we are challenging the concept that people like Creasy are of the left.

BRITAIN HEADS TOWARDS SHARIA LAW AS THE STATE ARREST SCORES OF EDL SUPPORTERS AND LEADERS…FASCIST “LEFT” IS SILENT

by

0

October 26, 2012

Darkness Descending in England

By Pamela Geller

 

The arrest of over 53 people in the United Kingdom is the beginning of the end for once-great Britain.  The leaders of the English Defence League (EDL), Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll, were among those arrested, as well as Paul Weston of the British Freedom Party (BFP). 
 
(4INTERNATIONAL SAY ABOUT THESE ARRESTS
 
It is amazing is it not that it takes a freedom loving woman who lives in New York, not Britain, to raise an opposition to these police arrests of Robinson and co. The situation in Britain is all about media frenzy over sex, but police planning dictatorship,
 
This more than anything shows that there is no opposition at all from the present “left” to the plans of British Capital to instal a dictatorship in Britain, in which Sharia will be a component part)
 
 
(PAMELA GELLER TELLS THE STORY OF BRITISH POLICE MOVES TO DICTATORSHIP)
 
I spoke with Kevin Carroll about his recent arrest and that of Robinson and Weston, and he told me the appalling details.

Carroll told me that British authorities tried everything in the book to stop him from running for police and crime commissioner (PCC) for the Bedfordshire Police Authority.  Nonetheless, he officially won the right to run for PCC last Friday.  But then, the very next day, British authorities carried out these mass arrests of EDL and BFP members, stripping them and forcing them to wear white paper overalls like those given to incarcerated terrorists.  They were allowed no phone calls.

Meanwhile, British police raided the homes of Carroll, Robinson, and three others who had been arrested.  ”They absolutely ransacked mine,” Carroll told me.  ”They smashed the door off and wrecked my home.  They took my only vehicle, with all the tools of my trade inside, and impounded it, as well as Tommy’s car.”  The police, the bomb squad, forensics teams, and sniffer dogs spent seven and a half hours stripping Carroll’s van to the bone.  ”When they finished,” he said, “they found nothing!  They loaded it up with bugs and GPS monitors and threw everything in the back; it looks like it’s been in a blender.”

After smashing the door to Carroll’s home off its hinges, police officials repaired it, got a locksmith to put on a new lock, and left with the new keys, leaving Carroll locked out of his own home.  When Carroll was released, still wearing his white paper prison suit, it was dark and raining; true to form, police officials offered him no transportation, even though it was late at night on a Sunday.

Robinson is being held in Wandsworth prison, an old and antiquated structure with a large population of Muslim prisoners.  Weston was arrested and later released without charge for refusing to leave a reception area without information about Robinson.  And it is clear why officials would not want that information to get out: not only has Robinson been placed with the general prison population instead of segregated for his own protection, but prison officials have even put him in a cell with hostile Muslims.  He was allowed to call his wife Jenna, and he told her that he knew it was going to be “lively” in the cell.  That was an understatement: prison officials have deliberately put Robinson in physical danger and even imperiled his life.  Carroll contacted a high-ranking police official to request that Robinson be segregated, and she received a promise that he would be, but it hasn’t happened yet — and Robinson has even been denied bail.

“They are really coming at us with everything,” Carroll told me.  ”I’m even on police bail at the moment for ‘conspiracy to cause a public nuisance.’”  This is a politically motivated and trumped up charge, but in Britain it can carry a life sentence.

According to Carroll, Robinson was incarcerated for leaving the United Kingdom and entering the United States fraudulently for our September 11, 2012 Stop Islamization of Nations free speech conference in New York City.  Robinson could get twelve to eighteen months in prison just for that.  ”They are really turning up the heat here, Pamela,” said Carroll.  ”They are going after all of us, especially Tommy and me.”  The EDL said in a statement: “Tommy has been dragged from one court to another — almost always without any serious chance of conviction — simply in order to help disrupt our activities and to prevent us from voicing our legitimate concerns about the spread of Islamic extremism.”

Carroll’s bail hearing is set for November 30, which gives him just two weeks after the November 15 elections to prepare his defense.  Anyone who can vote for Bedfordshire police authority commissioner and who loves freedom should vote for Kevin Carroll; it could be your last hope to preserve the freedom of speech and the principle of the equality of rights for all people in Britain.

Clearly the establishment elites in Britain are extremely worried that Carroll might win and upset the entrenched culture of accommodation to Islam and sharia; in fact, one of the briefs in Carroll’s case actually stated that this was why he was arrested — because he is running for PCC.  The dhimmi elites understand that this could be the beginning of their end.  ”The police,” said Carroll, “are out to finish us on behalf of the establishment.”

This is a defining moment in British history, as significant as any major turning point.  It is in many respects like the Night of the Long Knives, which marked the point of no return from Nazism for Germany.  With these outrageous and politically motivated arrests, Britain has entered a dark and dangerous new era.  Said Weston: “The full power of the State appears to be concentrating on shutting down any political dissent.  This does not really feel like a democratic country anymore.”

Carroll is organizing a demonstration outside Wandsworth prison this coming Saturday morning.  All free citizens in Britain should be there.  And is there no one is the political establishment in the U.K. who has any decency, integrity, or spine?  No one who will stand up against these outrages?

Pamela Geller is the publisher of AtlasShrugs.com and the author of the WND Books title Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/darkness_descending_in_england.html#ixzz2Aab029NC

THESE JIHADISTS WERE PLANNING MASS MURDER OF BRITISH WORKERS AND YOUTH BUT THE ABSURD “LEFT” IS SILENT!

by

0

ThreeAQ.jpgThe mowers

These are 2 reports from Jihadwatch about the planned mass murder in Britain by Jihadists.

No reports on this from the Fascist Left. Indymedia. SWP, and many others I have looked up…nothing.

 

They just ignore the reality because the reality does not fit in with their dogma, the dogma being that Islam is revolutionary and potentially socialist because it opposes American Imperialism.

 

The Fascist Left often add the word “objectively” against American Imperialism. And they think “potentially” socialist.

It is all total rubbish and is an insult to socialist, materialist, truthful thought.

 

If these bombs had gone off as the Jihadists planned! Look at the London tube bombings and the Madrid train bombings? it was workers of all ages and professional working people who were caught up and if they went off today in Madrid it would be a large percentage of unemployed working class youth.

This present left is absurd!

And they wonder why some people seem to dislike Islam. “‘Jihadists talked of building an Ultimate Mowing Machine,’” by Paul Cheston for the London Evening Standard, October 23 (thanks to Jay):

A jihadist gang accused of plotting suicide bombings more devastating than the 7/7 attacks on London talked of building an ‘Ultimate Mowing Machine’ to kill and maim.Irfan Naseer, 31, Irfan Khalid, 27, and Ashik Ali, 27, from Birmingham, have pleaded not guilty to engaging in conduct in preparation for terrorist acts.

But the prosecution claims that in covert recordings made by police after the men returned from Pakistan they are heard talking about putting sharp blades on the front of a truck and “running” into people, the court heard.

Recorded speaking on September 10, they discussed an idea for a weapon that had been published in an outlawed extremist online magazine called Inspire under the headline “The Ultimate Mowing Machine”.

It was an article the prosecution said the defendants were clearly aware of.

Naseer said: “So Ashik, it feel like I’ve been driving a monster truck, you know.”

Khalid said: “Yeah and do what AQ (al Qaida) said, put that blades at the front of it and trample on everyone.”

He continued later: “Just drive it into people in (a) crowded area.”

The men also discussed what would happen to their bodies after they had been martyred in a suicide attack, the court heard.

In what the prosecution caled a “very telling exchange”, they discussed where they would be buried in Birmingham while being watched by surveillance officers driving through the Small Heath area of Birmingham on September 11 last year.

Khalid said: “”Nah, I’m just thinking… most likely it’ll be Handsworth (cemetery), if there’s a body left.”

Naseer replied: “One thing, one thing, remember, once that once you done, it doesn’t matter where you get buried, innit.”

Mr Altman said: “The exchange puts beyond doubt that they were planning a suicide attack.”

Khalid and Naseer also talked about people “getting killed” in their local area and how no one would come there any more because it would be a “little war zone”, the court heard.

Khalid was recorded saying: “This earth here ain’t ever be the same, how these people think that, all everyone’s gonna be merry merry kuffar are gonna come and eat and drink here, it’s not gonna happen, because after we’ve done, Insha’Allah, yeah, after later on, yeah.”

He added: “These people are gonna be getting killed and that here, there’s gonna be little war zone, yeah.”

In another conversation he described Westerners as evil, saying: “All I’m saying is look how much hatred they have for Islam.

“That does make you go mad.”

 

Yes, and just look at the love overflowing from these guys, and see how unjustified that hatred is!

The men were recorded taking a large flatscreen television to their flat, on which to watch violent videos.They were also heard boasting that they had been contacted by a potential “investor” who they hoped might give them up to £10,000.

A Dawah charity shop was going to be used as a cover to recruit more people to their cause and they planned to set up charity stalls selling cakes and perfume in Coventry, Leicester and Walsall.

Naseer was recorded talking about the September 11 al Qaida bombers and how they increased their iman (faith) by “doing 10 (chapters of the Koran) a day”, while talking to an associate….

 

Posted by Robert on October 26, 2012
 
 
 

“Terror trial: Estranged wife wanted to be ‘fourth lion,’” from the BBC, October 25 (thanks to all who sent this in):

The estranged wife of a man accused of plotting a terror attack offered herself as a helper in an attempt to win him back, a court has heard.In a reference to the spoof film Four Lions, Salma Kabal asked Ashik Ali if she could be the “fourth lion”, Woolwich Crown Court was told.

Brian Altman, QC, prosecuting, said she was snubbed by him and is not on trial.

Mr Ali, 27, Irfan Khalid, 27, and Irfan Naseer, 31, all from Birmingham, deny preparing for terrorist acts.

The jury has heard the trio planned to set off a series of suicide bombs in an attack which prosecutors said would have dwarfed the 7 July 2005 bombings in London and two of the men had received terror training in Pakistan.

Mr Altman told the jury Ms Kabal did not know what the group were planning as Mr Ali withheld details from her.

‘Lioness’

She offered to be the “lioness” of the group, the court heard.

Mr Ali told his wife he wanted to fight the jihad – or holy war – overseas but did not want to get her involved, the court heard.

Mr Ali said he still loved her but said he did not think she could adapt to fight the jihad abroad, and made reference to drone strikes, the court heard.

Mr Altman said the group made reference to the film Four Lions, in which a group of incompetent terrorists wear fancy dress in a comedy plot, and Mr Ali laughingly told his wife: “Oh, you think this is a flipping Four Lions. We’re one man short, there’s three of us. We ain’t Four Lions yet.”

Ms Kabal replied: “I’ll be your fourth one.”

Mr Ali said: “You can’t be the fourth one.”

Ms Kabal said: “Lioness.”

Mr Altman said: “That may be the arithmetic in the context of the film title, but the comment, couched in a joke, and made in order to divert her, is telling.

“It is telling because it reveals, we suggest, the truth, that there were three of them together but they were not planning a trip abroad to fight jihad.”

The prosecution claims Mr Naseer and Mr Khalid went to the Taliban stronghold of Waziristan, in Pakistan, in the summer of 2011 for training.

In another echo of a plotline in the 2010 film, Mr Ali joked with his wife about blowing up Muslims in Birmingham, the court heard.

‘Vaseline plot’

As Ms Kabal tried to ask him again about his alleged plans, Mr Ali said: “The General Saab, you know, the command we send from high above, innit, hierarchy is that you should blow your Muslims up man, yeah.

“Blow up all the Muslims around Alum Rock up innit and Washwood Heath and Aston”.

The court heard the group discussed various alternatives to a bomb attack, including mixing poisons into Vaseline or Nivea and then rubbing it on car doors, in an attempt to kill “about 1,000 people”.

In a bugged conversation, the court heard, Mr Naseer recalled: “You know like the door handles on a whole, imagine putting it on whole like area innit overnight and when they come in the morning to work they start touching the, they open the door and then five minutes they die man, all of them start dying and that, kill about 1,000 people.”…

 

Posted by Robert on October 27, 2012 5:10 AM
 
 
 
 

MORSI’S EGYPT AND TALK RADIO EUROPE…CHRISTIAN GETS SIX YEARS FOR INSULTING MORSI

by

0

WILL THIS HAPPEN IN IRELAND, SPAIN AND EUROPE?

 

WILL PROTESTERS BE SENT TO PRISON HERE AS WELL?

 

Egypt: Christian gets six years in prison

for insulting Muhammad

and Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood president

 

BARRIE NATHAN OF TALK RADIO EUROPE TOLD US THAT HE SAW NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT IN MORSI’S EGYPT.

 

WILL YOU AND STEVEN GILMOUR YOUR DIRECTOR KEEP SILENT ON THIS?

(from www.jihadwatch.org)

 

If the Left and Islamic supremacists get their way, this is the sort of sentence we will see handed down in the U.S. before too long. “Egyptian court sends Copt to prison over anti-Islam post,” from Egypt Independent, September 18 (thanks to Twostellas):

An Egyptian court on Tuesday sentenced a Christian teacher to six years in prison after convicting him of blasphemy and defamation of President Mohamed Morsy and a plaintiff lawyer, according to Egyptian news reports.The Sohag Misdemeanor Court found Bishoy Kamil Kamel guilty of insulting Prophet Mohamed, sentencing him to three years. He was also sentenced to two years for insulting the country’s president, and another year for insulting a plaintiff lawyer.

Independent daily Al-Watan newspaper said on its website that security has been heightened outside churches in Sohag to preempt any violence in response to the verdict.

Sohag’s prosecutor referred Kamel to trial in August after receiving a complaint from Mohamed Safwat Tammam, 32, accusing Kamel of posting insulting caricatures of Prophet Mohamed on his Facebook page, as well as abusing the country’s president in his comments.

Kamel denied the charges during interrogations, claiming that his account had been hacked. Investigators say they had managed to detect his address through the account and arrested him.

A number of lawsuits have been filed against public figures recently over charges of blasphemy and defaming the president, who belongs to the Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party….

Islam Jihad…ONLY EXTREMISTS SAYS GILMOUR OF TALK RADIO EUROPE

by

0

Last Tuesday Steven Gilmour, director of Talk Radio Europe and a panel guest Mrs Thomas suggested that Islam is  peaceable religion, just spoiled by a minority of “extremists”
 
Gilmour placed great emphasis on the word “extremists”
 
 
Respect it (Islam as a religion of peace just spoiled by extremists), says Gilmour, as Islam in Mali hack another hand off. Tuesday Gilmour and Mrs Thomas said that it was just “extremists”

(From Jihadwatch) “The Islamic supremacists in Mali are characterized as “extremists,” but what they are doing here is strictly Qur’anic:

“This is the recompense of those who fight against God and His Messenger, and hasten about the earth, to do corruption there: th…

ey shall be slaughtered, or crucified, or their hands and feet shall alternately be struck off; or they shall be banished from the land. That is a degradation for them in this world; and in the world to come awaits them a mighty chastisement” — Qur’an 5:33

“And the thief, male and female: cut off the hands of both, as a recompense for what they have earned, and a punishment exemplary from God; God is All-mighty, All-wise.” — Qur’an 5:38

“Islamists hack off hand of 1 more robber in Mali,” from AP, September 18 (thanks to Kenneth):

BAMAKO, Mali (AP) — A spokesman for one of the radical Islamist groups controlling northern Mali says their fighters have cut off a thief’s hand in the former tourist hotspot of Timbuktu.
Oumar Ould Hamaha told The Associated Press the robber had been caught after breaking into a store, from where he had stolen merchandise worth $2,000. His hand was cut off Sunday afternoon.

It was at least the seventh amputation carried out by the Islamists since they seized control of the territory in April. It comes after last Monday’s gruesome double amputation of five highway robbers in the northern city of Gao. According to the strict form of Shariah practiced by the rebels, armed robbery requires the cutting off of both a hand and a foot.

Robert Spencer correctly adds to this report:

 
That’s not a “strict form of Sharia,” that’s a Qur’anic imperative. See Qur’an 5:38 above.

GENE ZITNER AND HARRY’S PLACE CAMPAIGN FOR OBAMA TO WIN AGAIN

by

0

I have placed this comment on a post by a Jewish dhimmi on the British website Harry’s Place. You will find it at

 19 September 2012, 12:32 pm

http://hurryupharry.org/2012/09/18/mitt-romney-half-of-all-americans-are-parasitic-freeloading-moochers/#comment-799305

 

 

 

Gene Zitver seeks to promote Obama at the expense of the Romney comment in a fund raising meeting about the 47 per cent who are tied in with government aid in some way.

Gene Zitver is therefore first and foremost a Jewish person who is campaigning for Obama to win.

But Obama travelled to Cairo in June 2009 and there insisted on the Muslim Brotherhood being present at his conference. The Muslim Brotherhood was a banned organization. Thus Obama was saying to Mubarak “We are on the side of your enemies”. And Obama repeated this in a whole series of countries…

TO THE POINT WHERE ISRAEL IS NOW SURROUNDED BY FASCIST STATES.

Gene Zitver supports THAT

THAT is the kind of oppositionist to Romney that Gene Zitver is.

THOSE WHO ATTACK THE FILM MAKER SHOW THEY ARE TRAITORS TO THE GREAT AMERICAN CONSTITUTION

by

0

The issue of the film is about censorship in America.

 

That is the single, ringing, clear issue that comes out of this film issue. in this Obama and Clinton BY ATTACKING THE FILM have proved that THEY ARE TRAITORS TO THE GREAT AMERICAN CONSTITUTION

 

That is essentially the issue that will determine if Obama and Clinton win in November and move towards an American Fascist/Shia compliant state.

 

Romney tries his best to combat Obama on this issue, but he is deficient, largely because Romney has not turned his back against the Antisemitic Palestinian narrative, which IS the Muslim Jihad in action, in that case against Jews and Israel.

 

All of these things are involved here:

 

* The Holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis in which the Jihad was complicit (through the Arab leader Hajj Amin el Husseini)

* The subsequent turn against Israel and the Jews BY THE WHOLE WORLD and the forcing of a Palestinian State onto the Jews and Israel.

 

ROMNEY HAS NOT CLEARED THE REPUBLICAN DECKS ON THAT ISSUJE. ALL PAST PRESIDENTS INCLUDIONG REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS WERE INVOLVED IN THIS, ESPECIALLY IN OSLO.

 

The position of Romney and the Republicans has thus onthis key and central question (of Israel and the Jihad against Israel) been deficient towards the traitor work of Obama.

 

Romney needs to come out and state in ultra clear and simple language that he defends to the nth degree the right of an American to make and distribute this film.

 

Instead Government Agencies have come knocking on the door of the FILM MAKER.

 

That indeed is the issue. THAT is the step towards a Nazi America. If Romney cannot fight Obama on that basis then he loses in November.But if Obama and his Democrats win Nazism in America will take a big step forward.

 

SOME OF THESE ISSUES ARE CONTAINED IN THE FOLLOWING REPORT. BUT THESE WRITERS ARE TOO SMART FOR THEIR OWN GOOD. LOOK AT HOW THE WRITER BELOW WANDERS MID-ARTICLE ABOUT WHY THE GOVERNMENT WOULD WANT TO INTERVIEW THE FILM MAKER. WHAT UTTER CRAP!

 

The Obama administration and the embassy rioters find common ground.

BY JAMES TARANTO, WSJ

The photo of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula being led from his Cerritos, Calif., home has become an Internet sensation, giving rise, among other things, to a popular QuickMeme and a call from Glenn Reynolds for President Obama’s resignation:

      “By sending–literally–brownshirted enforcers to engage in–literally–a midnight knock at the door of a man for the non-crime of embarrassing the President of the United States and his administration, President Obama violated that oath [to the Constitution]. You can try to pretty this up (It’s just about possible probation violations! 

Sure.),

     or make excuses or draw distinctions, but that’s what’s happened. It is a betrayal of his duties as President, and a disgrace.”

The assumption is that this was a pretextual arrest–one with a patina of propriety but improper motives, in this case punishing or intimidating Nakoula for engaging in constitutionally protected speech.

A Los Angeles County sheriff’s spokesman denies that it was an arrest: “He was never in handcuffs,” Steve Whitmore tells the New York Times. “He was never arrested. This is all voluntary.” But whatever it was, the Times suggests it was pretextual:

    “Federal officials appeared to be investigating whether Mr. Nakoula had been the person who uploaded the video to YouTube. If so, he would have violated the terms of his sentencing in a conviction in a 2010 check-kiting case, which includes restrictions against his using the Internet without permission from a probation officer.”

On the other hand, we can think of reasons the government might want to talk to Nakoula aside from punishing or chilling speech–namely, to understand the story behind the video that has been the pretext of anti-American rioting. Was it an innocent exercise in freedom of expression, or a false-flag operation? That is, were the producers in cahoots with the extremists who egged on the violence? We have no reason to think the answer is yes, but it would behoove the federal government to check out the possibility.

The “optics,” as the politicos say, were terrible. It certainly doesn’t look voluntary in the photos. But that could have been the fault of the “news media encampment” that, according to the Times, had “kept 24-hour watch outside his front door.” The large police presence–we count at least five officers in the QuickMeme photo–might well have been for protective rather than coercive purposes.

Nakoula’s face is covered in what the Times describes as a shawl. It seems a metaphor for the suppression of individual freedom by the American state. In truth, it was probably a sensible precaution. If you were in Nakoula’s position, you wouldn’t want murderous Islamist thugs to know what you look like either.

Yet even if law enforcement’s treatment of Nakoula was entirely above board, critics of the administration have good reason for suspicion that it is hostile to civil liberties.

On Friday, Politico reports, the White House asked Google, which owns YouTube, “to review the video to see if it was in compliance with their terms of use,” in press secretary Jay Carney’s words. Having already done so and finding it compliant, Google rejected the implicit censorship request.

Blogger Eugene Volokh, a First Amendment scholar, wisely counsels against the temptation to attempt to buy calm by yielding to censorship just this one time:

      “It seems to me to actually be safer–not just better for First Amendment principles, but actually safer for Americans — to hold the line now, and make clear that American speech is protected even if foreigners choose to respond to it with murder. That would send the message, ‘murder won’t get you what you want.’ Not a perfectly effective message to be sure, but a better one than ‘murder 

will 

    get you what you want.’ ”

The message of the administration’s ineffectual effort at censorship, however, is something like this: “We can’t guarantee that murder will get you what you want, but we promise we’ll do our best.” That’s arguably more provocative even than simple capitulation.

In its public statements, the Obama administration has put no daylight between itself and the embassy rioters in insisting that this is all about the video.

Susan Rice, the ambassador to the U.N., went so far as to tell ABC’s Jake Tapper yesterday that even the murder of four Americans in Libya, including the ambassador, was the result of a “challenge” to the video having been “hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons.”

As The Wall Street Journal notes in an editorial:

    “That doesn’t square with the view of Libyan officials, who say they believe the attack was the work of Islamists linked to al Qaeda. Peaceful protesters don’t typically carry rocket-propelled grenades and other heavy weapons to a demonstration. The fact that the attack happened on the anniversary of September 11 also suggests terrorist planning.”

If you think of the Obama administration as an extension of the Obama campaign, it’s easy to understand its insensitivity to civil liberties and its eagerness to embrace the pretext that the embassy riots were about the video. From the standpoint of Obama’s re-election, it is imperative that voters be as distracted as possible from Obama’s failures. The murders in Libya and riots across the Middle East underscore failures both tactical (insufficient protection of diplomatic missions and personnel) and strategic.

Obama’s strategic failure consists in having believed his own–well, we really need a barnyard vulgarity to complete that sentence properly. Here he is in 2008:

      I would come to meetings with world leaders with them understanding that I was opposed to this war in Iraq from the start, that I have consistently described a U.S. foreign policy that puts diplomacy at the forefront. . . .

 

I think the world would see me as a different kind of president, somebody who could see the world through their eyes. . . . If I convene a meeting with Muslim leaders around the world to discuss how they can align themselves in our battle against terrorism, but also put our–the relationship between the West and the Islamic world on a more productive footing, I do so with the credibility of somebody who actually lived in a Muslim country for a number of years.”

With the benefit of anonymity, the Times reports, “senior administration officials” are telling a different story:

    They had concluded that the sometimes violent protests in Muslim countries may presage a period of sustained instability with unpredictable diplomatic and political consequences. While pressing Arab leaders to tamp down the unrest, Mr. Obama’s advisers say they may have to consider whether to scale back diplomatic activities in the region.

Other than a Nobel Peace Prize, what exactly does Obama have to show for being a “different kind of president”?

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444450004578002392241383984.html#printMode

 

 

 

 

9-11 ANNIVERSARY TODAY…Reluctance to tell the truth about Islam has done such damage

by

0

Reluctance to tell the truth about Islam has done such damage.

 

On this anniversary day of 9-11 there is no better tribute than to publish the outstanding essay and video by Dr. Bill Warner, which is the most thought provoking essay I have ever read on Islam. 

 

Prepare to have your mind opened.

 

Everybody is talking about it: Why it is so difficult to teach what Islam is really about? And Dr. Warner gives the answer to that in a most satisfactory fashion.

 

{This essay is so important we have placed it in the “pages” section of this website. It goes under the heading of “http://4international.me/the-utter-depravity-and-cruelty-of-historical-islam-jihad-has-never-been-told/}

 

It is fitting that we should include a look at Karen Armstrong, not only does she lie about Islam but she is a good example of this.

 

In thinking about the lies and deception surrounding Islam and 9-11 over the past eleven years my mind “lit on” none other than that liar Karen Armstrong.

 

 I came upon a piece in Wiki which is rather good. It follows at the end.

 

On this eleventh anniversary I am in particular indebted to Jihadwatch, Atlas Shrugs and Gates of Vienna, sites which I consider to be the most important in understanding Islam.

The url for the Gates of Vienna transcription and video is http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com.es/2012/09/why-we-are-afraid-1400-year-secret.html#more

 

Once again the url for our article which will always appear at the side and on the main page of our site is:

http://4international.me/the-utter-depravity-and-cruelty-of-historical-islam-jihad-has-never-been-told/

 

 

 

Says Gates of Vienna about this great work by Dr. Warner on Islam:

Dr. Bill Warner is the founder of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI). The video below records a talk he gave recently about the real history of Islam, and why there is such a powerful tendency towards collective amnesia about it in the West.

His account of the destruction of classical civilization by the Great Jihad is a superb follow-up to Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited by Emmet Scott, which was examined at length here last month.

This is possibly the best concise exposition of the history of Islamic violence that I have ever heard

TORO DE LA VEGA…PUT AN END TO SUCH BARBARITY TO ANIMALS

by

0

19.06.12

(http://www.france24.com/en/20120909-activists-protest-against-spanish-bull-spearing-festival)

CAS International, PACMA, and Humane Society International have collected 71,000 signatures against the traditional feast of Toro de la Vega.

On June 19, this petition was presented to Pablo Trillo-Figueroa, Deputy of the Governing Council of Valladolid, Spain.
 
During the annual Toro de le Vega, in the province of Castilla y León, a bull is chased by a crowd of people on foot and on horseback. Meanwhile, the animal is repeatedly stabbed with spears till death follows. The tradition of Toro de la Vega is very controversial in Spain due to the extreme suffering that the bull must undergo. Many Spaniards believe that the event should be banned. Many lovers of bullfighting even openly speak out against this tradition. Toro de la Vega has been declared as an event of “national tourist interest” since 1980 and was in 2011 recognized by the Council of Valladolid as ‘cultural heritage.’
 
CAS International, started together with the Spanish political party PACMA and HSI, launched the campaign ‘Rompe una Lanza’ (break a lance) with the purpose of widely drawing attention to this subject and to gather signatures against this cruel tradition. “Break a lance” symbolizes the lances used against the bull.

Toro de la Vega © PACMA

“Toro de la Vega is not only a despicable event in itself, but also a bad thing for Spain, which lives on tourism,” said Silvia Barquero, spokesman of the Spanish party for the animals. “The image that we show the rest of the world is regrettable, and it is incomprehensible that this event is still allowed.” Marius Kolff, director of CAS, says that “CAS International since seven years annually visits Tordesillas with Dutch and Belgian volunteers to protest against this cruel tradition.”

About 500 animal rights activists protested in central Spain on Sunday against a centuries-old festival in which a bull is chased and then lanced to death.

For the demonstration the protesters arrived in the fortified town of Tordesillas, which will stage the festival on Tuesday, from across Spain on 10 buses rented by animal rights group PACMA which organised the event.

Wearing white T-shirts with the slogan “Break a Spear”, they gathered in the plain near the town where a bull is killed each year and held up wooden sticks representing spears above their heads before snapping them in two.

Each year hundreds of people, many on horseback, chase a bull through the streets of Tordesillas and across a bridge to the plain where they then spear it to death.

The ritual has been held every second Tuesday in September since at least 1453.

“It is the cruelest tradition incurred upon an animal in our country,” PACMA group said in a statement posted on its website ahead of Sunday’s protest.

Each region of Spain has responsibility for its own animal protection laws, usually with exceptions for bullfighting. The festival in Tordesillas is allowed under the laws of the Castilla y Leon region.

PACMA describes itself as the Animalist Party on its website and says it is the only political party that campaigns for the rights of all animals.

While it has run candidates in elections to both chambers of parliament, it has yet to have any deputies or senators elected.

Rachel Corrie Affair…PEACE ACTIVISTS DO NOT CARRY AUTOMATIC WEAPONS

by

0

Rachel Corrie – Peace Activist, Victim of Israel Whitewash Or Islamic Jihad Propaganda Tool?


“Peace activists” do not carry automatic weapons.

 

By Joel Leyden
Israel News Agency

Jerusalem, Israel — September 1, 2012 … Part of the following was communicated by the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the Israel News Agency.

Whether from Hamas, the PA or an Israeli living in Sderot, we would all agree on one thing – the death of Rachel Corrie was tragic. Where we disagree is that a free and democratic court in Haifa, Israel believes that this accident never would have happened had the ISM – International Solidarity Movement not encouraged activity, in a war-zone, that was risky to the point of life-endangering.

The Haifa District Court delivered its findings in the Rachel Corrie case on 28 August 2012. The decision settled a civil lawsuit brought by her American family in which they charged that Israel was responsible for the 2003 death of Corrie in Gaza.

Judge Oded Gershon found for the State of Israel, Ministry of Defense, ruling that there was no basis to claims that Israel was responsible for the intentional or negligent death of US born peace activist Rachel Corrie.

The 65-page decision of the Israeli court illustrated democracy in action. Israel did not have to open, hear and decide on this case. The decision was given after extensive testimony and investigation of the accident by experts on both sides. The District Court of Haifa is a respected component of Israel’s highly independent judiciary, which in the past has not hesitated to find against the IDF or the State of Israel.

Rachel Corrie, an American citizen from Olympia, Washington, died tragically on 16 March 2003 in the Gaza Strip. Corrie was a member of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), an anti-Israel organization whose members engage in direct confrontation with Israeli troops in the West Bank and Gaza, disrupting their operations on a regular basis.

The ISM has been directly linked to Islamic terror organizations. Huwaida Arraf, an ISM founder was recorded at two national conferences on two occasions admitted that the ISM works with terrorist groups like Islamic Jihad, the PFLP and Hamas.

During the course of one of these PR demonstrations, Corrie was fatally injured by the shovel of an Israeli army bulldozer leveling the ground in the Philadelphi Corridor area of Gaza.

The court exonerated the State of Israel from any civil responsibility in this case.

As the judge found, while a terrible tragedy, the death of Rachel Corrie was an accident that cannot be blamed on the IDF.

However, moral responsibility for the tragedy can be assigned. It lies solely with the organizers of the ISM, who sent a young American woman into a battle zone and encouraged her to engage in highly dangerous activities.

Corrie was in the Gaza Strip on behalf of the ISM at the height of the Second Intifada. That Palestinian-led organization uses foreign nationals as bait, deliberately placing them in volatile situations certain in the knowledge that Israel will be blamed if they are subsequently injured or killed.

In an interview the day Corrie died, Thom Saffold, a founder of the ISM, said: “It’s possible they (the protesters) were not as disciplined as we would have liked. But we’re like a peace army. Generals send young men and women off to operations, and some die.”

It should be noted that the ISM is not a peaceful organization and its members should not be termed “peace activists.”

Members of the ISM actively have supported terrorists and interfere in legitimate defensive activities of the IDF. In 2002, the ISM attempted to assist the wanted terrorists who seized the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, desecrating this holy site. A senior Islamic Jihad terrorist, Shadi Sukiya, was hiding in the Jenin ISM office – with the assistance of ISM activists – when he was arrested in March 2003. Richard David Hupper, an ISM member, gave USD 20,000 to the internationally recognized terrorist organization Hamas while working for the ISM in Israel, resulting in his 2008 conviction by a US federal court.

The court found that on the day of the accident the bulldozer was engaged in the military operational task of clearing the land in a dangerous area which posed a significant risk. These actions were designed to prevent acts of terror and hostility. The judge declared that the bulldozer’s leveling operation was “a war-related action” as defined by Israeli law, and therefore the state bears no responsibility for the damages inflicted on the plaintiffs.

According to the law, which is similar in many democratic states including the US, that settled the case and there was no legal need to discuss the cause of action. However, given the contentious nature of the case, the judge decided to go beyond the legal requirements and examine the merits of the claims made by the Corrie family and their supporters.

The ISM has prosecuted a long-term campaign against Israel in the Corrie matter. Among the claims made by these activists, and repeated in the civil suit, was that the bulldozer driver deliberately ran over Corrie.

The day of the accident, Corrie and other ISM members risked themselves by directly interfering in the IDF bulldozer activities, blocking their paths with their bodies. The IDF soldiers warned off the activists repeatedly and took great care to avoid the foreigners, changing their place of operations time after time.

The bulldozer involved in the accident was a DR9, a very large vehicle. The field of vision of the DR9 is extremely limited, not least due to the heavy shielding necessitated by attacks on bulldozer drivers. When the involved bulldozer turned and pushed a large pile of debris, Corrie was kneeling on the ground and was in a blind spot of the operator’s field of vision, behind the bulldozer’s shovel and the pile of dirt. Accordingly, as the judge found, there was no way in which the bulldozer driver could have seen Corrie.

The judge based his decision not only on evidence provided by the state, but also on an expert testifying on behalf of the Corrie family. This expert determined that the driver could not and did not see Rachel Corrie due to the nature of the vehicle he was operating.

Based on the evidence provided by four separate experts – including the one hired by the Corrie family – the judge found, this was a very regrettable accident but not a deliberate action. It was determined that that Corrie had risked her own life by placing herself in a dangerous situation, kneeling in front of a bulldozer whose driver could not see her. The judge also unequivocally determined that there is no basis to the claim of the plaintiffs that the bulldozer driver negligently caused the death of Corrie.

In an attempt to gain more sympathy to their cause, the ISM activists also falsely claimed that the bulldozer was attempting to destroy the house of a local Palestinian dentist.

The judge found that the mission of the IDF that day was confined to exposing the ground in a section of the Philadelphi Corridor. Leveling the ground and clearing it of shrubbery was necessary to expose hiding places exploited by terrorists, who used them to plant explosive devices and as camouflage for attacks.

As the judge stated in his judgment: “The mission was not, in any manner, intended to destroy houses.”

The IDF’s actions that day were necessary to prevented hostile activities and acts of terrorism. In the relevant period during the Second Intifada, a great deal of terrorist activity was concentrated in the Philadelphi Corridor. Just about an hour before the incident, a hand grenade had been thrown at IDF forces there.

From the start of the Intifada in September 2000 and until the day of the accident in March 2003, nearly 6,000 grenades had been thrown at IDF soldiers, there were 1,400 attempted sniper attacks, 150 explosive devices had been planted and 40 mortar bombs launched – and all in the Philadelphi Corridor.

This area was the center of smuggling activities, with numerous tunnels used to bring terrorists and weapons from the Egyptian town of Rafah into the Gaza Strip. In addition there had been unending attempts to kidnap Israeli soldiers. As a result of the aforementioned attacks, many Israelis had been killed or injured.

When the ISM decided to target the ground leveling operation, it knew that it was operating in a closed military zone. Civilians are prohibited from entering these zones and IDF soldiers made every effort to distance the anti-Israel activists from the area.

In addition, the United States Government had just published (16 March 2003) a travel advisory warning US citizens from travel to the Gaza Strip.

A lengthy, comprehensive and transparent trial concluded, after examining extensive expert testimony, that Israel was not responsible for Rachel Corrie’s death. The events of that day were scrutinized in detail and no evidence was found that supported the plaintiff’s version of events.

The death of Rachel Corrie was a tragic accident; however this accident never would have happened had the ISM not encouraged activity – in a war-zone – that was risky to the point of life-endangering.

Rachel Corrie, was not murdered by the IDF. She was no hero. She was not helping the peace process by allowing Islamic terror organizations to smuggle weapons and explosives into Israel to murder Israeli civilians.

Rachel Corrie was used as a propaganda tool. No different than a doctored photoshopped picture, words of Palestinians starving in a food saturated Gaza or a romantic concept called the Flotilla to break the seige of Gaza, as if Gaza did not have an Egyptian border.

Corrie was the victim of multi-million dollar PR hate campaign against Israel. A campaign that serves such dictators as Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Syria President Bashar Assad who embrace a false spin of the Holocaust, of nuclear weapons and of Palestinians suffering to deflect from their own severe internal problems of poverty and a total lack of human rights.

There truly is no Palestinian Israel conflict. Arab Israelis enjoy democracy, prosperity and equal human rights in Israel.

Rachel Corrie died in a war of Islamic Jihad (holy war against Jews and Christians) against democracy.
She joined the thousands who were murdered in the 9/11 terror attacks on New York and Washington and the 7/7 London terror bombings.

The only distinction for a truly naive Corrie was that she was fighting on the side of terrorism – not democracy.

 

 

Add to this report from INN…The main reason that the ISM gets away with all of this, which includes filling the minds of youth like Corrie with lies, is in the absence of true socialist leadership, and my response is build this website www.4international.me

 

LEADERSHIP, THE THREAT OF FASCISM AND THE DANGER TO JEWS ONCE AGAIN

by

0

 

These are some of the issues and principles on which the Trotskyist leadership must be built upon:

 

  • The Crisis in capitalism on a world basis
  • The emergence of Fascism in the form of the Muslim Brotherhood.
  • The close alliance which barack Obama and the whole of the Democratic Party organised with the Muslim Jihad.
  • The severe threat to Israel from the Islamic Jihad in the form of the Iranian Bomb and the growing threat of Nuclear Proliferation from all Islamist countries surrounding Israel.
  • The need for a new leadership to lead against these threats.

 

 

Let us take these one by one

 

 

 

 

  • The Crisis in capitalism on a world basis

 

 

Capitalism is a system which is based on the drive for profit and for nothing else. If it does not make a profit it has to be scrapped.

 

Of course this brute reality of capitalism is often hidden by sweet words but strip capitalism to its basics…the only interest is profit.

 

Science can go some of the way in this system but it is very limited.

 

In fact, under capitalism science can have a very negative effect. For example a recent BBC Report has pointed out that the growth of technology in many industries, for example the car industry in Detroit, has meant the working man is now more and more redundant. What this modern industry needs is highly qualified people who look after the computers, and the robot machines do the work. The cars are produced very effectively but more and more without workers. That should be a boon, reducing fatigue and boredom in humans, but it is only suffering for people and their families.

 

And this does matter! The American Election, all agree, is going to be decided by the economy.

 

 

  • The emergence of Fascism in the form of the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

There is a great piece by Leon Trotsky in which he imagines the capitalist system as an electrical circuit say in a house. There are junction boxes in the circuit. These are the countries in the capitalist system world wide. As pressure builds up (the capitalist crisis) the junction boxes blow a fuse. And the blowing of a fuse is the same as a transition to Fascism where the old “democratic” forms of government are no longer “strong” enough. That is beginning to happen and will intesnify. This actually leads on to the next point which has mystified most people, why capitalist governments, like that of Obama in the past 4 years, have united with Islam.

 

 

 

  • The close alliance which Barack Obama and the whole of the Democratic Party organised with the Muslim Jihad.

 

 

 

There are deep problems within the world capitalist system. The overthrow of Stalinist Soviet regimes, long the wish of capitalists everywhere, has only intensified national inter-intercompetition, tend to lead to war.

 

The last 4 years of the Obama government have been momentous and alarming.

 

It was the June 2009 speech of Obama to the Conference in Cairo which did most damage. In the speech Obama was addressing the Islamic World. Even though they were illegal in the country Obama was visiting as a guest Obama invited the Muslim Brotherhood to his speech.

 

This was the thumbs down for mubarak the ruler for 30 years, and the thumbs up for the Islamic Jihad.

 

It was Fascism on TWO levels. Firstly Obama intervened like a Fascist on the International Scene. He truly was rminiscent of Hitler or Mussolini. Secondly the Muslim brotherhood founned by Banna and added to by Qutb was Islamic Fascist.

 

Was Obama really thinking that he was helping “democracy” by helping the Muslim Brotherhood on that fateful day? That is very unlikely. More likely is that America, with its huge knowledge gathering ssources, knew very well the force (Fascism) it was unleashing

 

  • The severe threat to Israel from the Islamic Jihad in the form of the Iranian Bomb and the growing threat of Nuclear Proliferation from all Islamist countries surrounding Israel.

 

For the past 10 years Israel has been threatened with destruction almost every week from official sources in the Iranian Government, with its henchmen in Hamas and Hisbullah also making such threats.

 

I believe that Holocaust Denial is the main form of Antisemitism in the “democratic” capitalist west, especially in Europe.

 

If a European can by termed not Antisemitic then he has to reason something like this: “This people the Jews were nearly liquidated in the Nazi Holocaust. Fifty years later the same language is coming from Iran, along with Holocaust denial. Surely then these threats have to be taken very seriously.”

 

Are they taken seriously? Obviously no! Or Iran would have been stopped by Europe. Also you somethies hear “Oh but Israel has the Bomb so Iran has the same right”. That is Antisemitism right there!

 

The reason Israel got the Nuclear bomb was rooted in the Holocaust and who could begrudge them. The reason Iran wants the Nuclear Bomb is to make effective its threats.

 

 

 

  • The need for a new leadership to lead against these threats.

 

 

These are not small threats. This political situation is not common or usual. This is an extraordinary situation. This requires extraordinary attention to the major “detail” of leadership. That is all we are saying.

 

 

THE WAR ON ISRAEL BY PALESTINIAN JIHADISTS IS A WAR ON INNOCENT CIVILIANS

by

0

City of San Francisco to place sharia-compliant disclaimers next to every AFDI pro-Israel bus ad

Pro-freedom bus ad
PAMELA GELLER WRITES ON ATLAS SHRUGS

“Scott Goldstein, President of Titan Transit advertising, just called me. Titan handles the outdoor ads for San Francisco MUNI and BART.

In an unprecedented move, the city of San Francisco is placing ads right next to every one of our pro-Israel ads on San Francisco Muni buses, saying (according to CBS San Francisco) “Muni doesn’t support this message.”

 

 

This is unprecedented in the history of outdoor advertising. This is the manifestation of Sharia in Western society. Any war on innocent civilians is savage. They are reading the idea that “all Muslims” or “all Arabs” want to destroy Israel into my ad. That is nowhere in my message. They are the Islamophobes and racists.

The rush to assure the world that the “Palestinian” jihadists that they are not savages amazes me. The war on Israel is a war on innocent civilians. The targeting of civilians is savage. The relentless 60-year campaign of terror against the Jewish people is savage. The torture of hostage Gilad Shalit was savage. The bloody hacking to death of the Fogel family was savage. The Munich Olympic massacre was savage. The unspeakable torture of Ehud Goldwasser was savage. The tens of thousands of rockets fired from Gaza into southern Israel (into schools, homes, etc.) are savage. The vicious Jew-hatred behind this genocide is savage. The endless demonization of the Jewish people in the Palestinian and Arab media is savage. The refusal to recognize the state of Israel as a Jewish state is savage. The list is endless.

 

But what galls me are the scores of anti-Israel ads that ran without a disclaimer. Why didn’t they have a problem with the anti-Jewish ads? San Francisco has run a number of anti-israel ad campaigns. Why did they not run this disclaimer next to those ads? That silence is sanction and tacit approval. Institutionalized anti-semitism. Who cares if Muni approves the message or not? It is not their job to agree or disagree.

 

And for the Jews who are silent in the face of Islamic Jew-hatred to issue a kneejerk denunciation of me, you have six million (and counting) voiceless to whom you will have to answer.

 

I want to extend this ad’s run in San Francisco. Please help me do this. Contribute here.

Posted by on Friday, August 17, 2012 Iranian President: “Tumor” of Israel Will Soon Be Destroyed

 

 

WWW.4INTERNATIONAL.ME IS SUPPORTING THIS AD CAMPAIGN BY PAMELA GELLER 100 PER CENT

 

AND WE ARE DEFENDING GELLER AND SPENCER OF JIHADWATCH AGAINST DHIMMI JEWS WHO DO NOT WANT TO FIGHT AGAINST THE PALESTINIAN JIHADIST WAR ON ISRAEL AND JEWS. SUCH AS THE ADL!

 

WHY ATTACK GELLER AND SPENCER, 4INTERNATIONAL ASKS?

DID GELLER AND SPENCER SEND SUICIDE BOMBERS IN TO KILL ANY PEOPLE OF ANY DESCRIPTION?

THEY STAND FOR ALL THAT IS DECENT IN LIFE

SO WHAT LIES BEHIND THESE DHIMMI JEW TRAITOR ATTACKS ON THESE TWO AND OTHER FREEDOM FIGHTERS?

 

 

FURTHERMORE IRAN HAS LAST FRIDAY TOLD THE WORLD THAT ISRAEL IS A CANCER THAT WILL BE CUT OUT…IT IS A TUMOUR ETC.

THAT IS THE LANGUAGE OF NAZIS. THAT CAN ONLY END IN THE MURDER OF JEWS AND IF THESE GENOCIDISTS ARE ALLOWED A GREAT KILLING OF JEWS.

 

 

SO PLEASE, WHO ARE THE SAVAGES IN THIS?

 

GELLER IS CORRECT! MORE POWER TO HER CAMPAIGN IN AMERICA. WE NEED IT IN DUBLIN!

 

 

 

Media silence on this relentless genocidal rhetoric against Israel. But my ads are “offensive” and “racist.” If this isn’t savagery, what is?

Ahmadinejad: “Tumor” of Israel Will Soon Be Destroyed
Israel is a “cancerous tumor” that will soon be finished off, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Friday told demonstrators holding an annual protest against the existence of the Jewish state. “The Zionist regime and the Zionists are a cancerous tumor. Even if one cell of them is left in one inch of (Palestinian) land, in the future this story (of Israel’s existence) will repeat,” he said. “The nations of the region will soon finish off the usurper Zionists in the Palestinian land….A new Middle East will definitely be formed.”  (AFP)
    See also Iran’s Supreme Leader: Liberation of Palestine Responsibility of All Muslims
Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei underlined the importance of this year’s International Quds [Jerusalem] Day rallies, and reiterated that liberating Palestine from the grip of Israel and its allies is a religious duty for all Muslims across the world. The Leader described the occupation of the Palestinian territories and the formation of the Israeli regime as the root of evil in the Middle East. International Quds Day was started by the late Founder of the Islamic Republic, Imam Khomeini. (Fars-Iran)

THE PRO-ISLAM “LEFT” FASCISTS ON INDYMEDIA IRELAND NEED TO WASH THEIR MOUTHS OUT

by

0

www.4international.me is the only organization on the real left which stands in unconditional support and defence of the Jews and Israel.

 

It is therefore not a surprise that the Fascist Left, which is certainly a pro Islam left, and is also in varying degrees a Holocaust denying left, would reserve greatest hatred for ourselves.

 

This is from Indymedia. The name used to attack us is “Fuck Israel”. (We would advise the commenters on Indymedia Ireland to wash their mouths out) Anyway this character mouths at me:

 

“Fuck off with your war-mongering and blood-lust Felix, you NAZI scum”

 

There is much more of the same, but do we need to read it, on http://www.indymedia.ie/article/102247?comment_limit=0&condense_comments=false#comment291535

 

Essentially the issue is over iran and the Bomb. I say that Israel is going to strike against the Iranian bomb alone because it cannot place its security in the hands of America, of either Obama or Romney.

 

I argue furthermore that another name for Israel could be “never Again” in the sense that following the Nazi Holocaust the security of the Jews must always be in the hands of the Jews.

 

Thus on this pro Islam left there is a large amount of Holocaust Denial.

 

If they really took the Holocaust of the Jews seriously then they would empathise with the Jews over Iran, because goodness knows, Iran has made enough threats against Israel, usually calling it a cancer, or such like.

 

A new Trotskyist leadership must be built in the Left. The future does belong to socialism because capitalism is in steep decline and both the Republican and Democrats (latter under Carter/Bill Clinton/Obama) are working with Islam and the Muslim Brotherhood,  and thus we need a new left to follow in the footsteps of the Great Russian Workers Revolution led by Lenin and Trotsky.