About Felix Quigley

Campaigning to show that Srebrenica was and is a huge hoax, which is also the case with Racak, Qana and Mohammed el Dura/France 2. When people understand that these are hoaxes then they will begin to understand that Yugoslavia was destroyed, and most important that they plan to destroy Israel, because the US Empire plans to rule the world along with Islam, the latter being a very evil fascist ideology which is very close to the evil ideology of US and EU NATO Empire. Of course there will be adaptations but I am certain that is the general trend. Build4international!


Sweden has recently voted to recognise the Nazi inspired and created (by the Nazi criminal Hajj Amin el Husseini) “Palestine” of Hamas/Fatah.

Sweden has a history of collaborating with the Hitler Nazis. They sold and kept on selling steel to the Nazis. Thus the steel that made up the barbed wire of the concentration camps is Swedish Steel. The Jews who threw themselves against the barbed wire which was electified were throwing themselves against Swedish Steel. The present Prime Minister (3 October 2014) is Stefan Lotven. With such a history of collaborating with the Nazis in the Holocaust of the Jews (as an Irish person) I ask why do the Swedes today not keep their Nazis lips sealed.

I am not introducing here psychological reasons. Many do say that these European countries either collaborated with the Nazis as did the Swedes or at the very least (the very best that can be said of them) stood by and never uttered a cheep as half of the Jewish people were murdered by the Nazis in their continent of Europe because that embarrases them and they are finding a way to lessen their guilt by saying “Look at those nasty Israelis. That makes us right in having collaborating with the Nazis against the Jews”.

As an Irish person I do not buy this. In fact I do not care. I only repeat what they did. I do know that when the monster Adolf Hitler died in 1945 the Irish leader DeValera signed a note of condolence.

Swedish immigration policy during the 1930s was, which the responsible politicians admitted, very restrictive against admitting Jewish refugees trying to escape the Nazi terror and mass murder into Sweden, before the deportations of Norwegian Jews began in 1942.[1] Jewish refugees were systematically discriminated against by the immigration authorities compared to other refugees.[2] At the end of the war and in the post-Holocaust debate Swedish politicians and officials tried excusing their previous restrictive policy toward Jewish immigration by using the Jewish minority in the country as a scape-goat, claiming that the Stockholm Jewish Community or “certain Jewish circles” had been even more restrictive than the Swedish state.[3]


Following on (same source)

Increasing antisemitism[edit]

In October 2010, The Forward reported on the current state of Jews and the level of antisemitism in Sweden. Henrik Bachner, a writer and professor of history at the University of Lund, claimed that members of the Swedish Riksdag have attended anti-Israel rallies where the Israeli flag was burned while the flags of Hamas and Hezbollah were waved, and the rhetoric was often antisemitic—not just anti-Israel. Charles Small, former director of the Yale University Initiative for the Study of Anti-Semitism, stated that “Sweden is a microcosm of contemporary anti-Semitism. It’s a form of acquiescence to radical Islam, which is diametrically opposed to everything Sweden stands for.” Per Gudmundson, chief editorial writer for Svenska Dagbladet and well known for his pro-Israeli stance for decades, has sharply criticised politicians who he claims offer “weak excuses” for Muslims accused of antisemitic crimes. “Politicians say these kids are poor and oppressed, and we have made them hate. They are, in effect, saying that the behaviour of these kids is in some way our fault.”[5] Much of the anti-semitism has been attributed to the growing Muslim immigrant population.[6]

The new period of the world wide Jihad where Muslim refugees take over whole áreas of these countries has had immediate effect (same source)


In 2010, the international media reported on increasing levels of anti-Semitic hate-crime in Malmö, the country’s third-largest city. The reports cited desecrations, the burning of a chapel and worshippers being taunted with ‘Hitler’ chants. In 2009 the Malmö police received reports of 79 anti-Semitic incidents, double the number of the previous year (2008).[9] For example, on January 13, 2009 Molotov cocktails were thrown inside and outside the funeral chapel at the old Jewish cemetery in the city of Malmö, south Sweden, as what seems as an anti-Semitic act. It was the third time the chapel has been attacked in the few weeks before this incident.[10] On September 28, 2012, an explosion occurred at Malmö Jewish community building, again as what seems to be an anti-Semitic act.[11] Fredrik Sieradzki, spokesman for the Malmö Jewish community, estimated that the already small Jewish population is shrinking by 5% a year. “Malmö is a place to move away from,” he said, citing anti-Semitism as the primary reason.[5]

In an article published in The Forward in October 2010, Judith Popinski, an 86-year-old Holocaust survivor, stated that she is no longer invited to schools that have a large Muslim presence to tell her story of surviving the Holocaust. Popinski, who found refuge in Malmö in 1945, stated that, until recently, she told her story in Malmö schools as part of their Holocaust studies program, but that now, many schools no longer ask Holocaust survivors to tell their stories, because Muslim students treat them with such disrespect, either ignoring the speakers or walking out of the class. She further stated that “Malmö reminds me of the anti-Semitism I felt as a child in Poland before the war. … I am not safe as a Jew in Sweden anymore.”[5]

So building on the Antisemitism of the Nazi Holocaust period where the Swedish elites joined the Nazis and helped to carry out the Holocaust they are now joining with the new Nazis of the Jihad today and are moving relentlessly to the isolation of Israel in the world, which of course means the isolation of the Jews of the world, because the key thing in all of this verbiage from the likes of George galloway and David Icke) 99.9 per cent repeating are supportive of Israel as the Jewish state.

This is not so difficult to understand. The history teaches us the reality. These European and American RULING CLASSES had a big role in the Holocaust ALONG WITH the German Nazis. This Antisemitism is carried on into the present.

These ruling classes have no real argument with the Nazis of Islam today and have welcomed this Nazi ideology into their coutries, They have envouraged widespread Muslim immigration. In Britain from Heath on and especially Tony Blair and the Labour Party have worshipped this Nazi ideology.

This ideology takes particularly rotting forms when people like George Galloway says that no Israeli can enter into Bradford where he is MP. The same sort of rotting ideology comes Fromm David Icke.

But note that Galloway and Icke never refer to the real history as we have done in this article. That is a clue to the way forward for http://www.4international.me


It is from an article which states:

Seven out of ten teachers failed a Holocaust history test set by the agency.

The Living History Forum is a Swedish government agency which has been commissioned with the task of promoting issues relating to tolerance, democracy and human rights – with the Holocaust as its point of reference.

5,081 teachers took part in the Living History Forum’s Holocaust questionnaire, but only two teachers answered all the questions correctly.

Only every 20th teacher was aware, for example, that between 81 and 100 percent of all European Jewish children alive during the Nazi regime were killed in the Holocaust.

According to Johan Perwe, the Living History Forum’s press secretary, the details surrounding the Holocaust are very important.

He told The Local that while detailed historical knowledge cannot be expected of the general Swedish public, teachers need this additional knowledge in order to educate their students adequately.

“Most Swedish people know about the Holocaust and have an emotional empathy toward the victims. However, if you do not know the whole picture, which is made up of many factual details, then you cannot understand what motivated the criminals behind it.”



UK Parliament votes 274-12 in favor of recognizing “the state of Palestine”





A “Palestinian” state would not make for a peaceful resolution of the jihad against Israel. It would simply become a new jihad base for newly virulent attacks against a weakened Israel. Do the British MPs know this? Probably not. Would they care if they did? Probably not.


How many times does this have to be done before the political elites get a clue? Or are they so thoroughly bought and paid for that that will never happen? The Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 was supposed to bring peace. Instead, I and just a few others warned that Gaza would just become a new jihad terror base. And we were right. So also, a “Palestinian” state would become yet another jihad terror base for attacks against a reduced, truncated Israel. The various “Palestinian” factions have never recognized Israel or retreated even one step from their repeated vows to destroy it utterly. Do these clowns even know what “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” means?


As long as they’re voting for jihad, how long will it be before the UK Parliament goes whole hog, as it were, and votes 274-12 to adopt Sharia as the sole law of the land? It would “promote community cohesion,” eh wot?




“British Parliament votes in favor of Palestinian statehood recognition,” by Jerry Lewis, Reuters, October 13, 2014:



Britain’s House of Commons voted in favor of recognizing a Palestinian state late Monday in a move that will not alter the government’s stance on the issue, but that carries symbolic value for Palestinians in their pursuit of statehood.


Lawmakers in Britain’s lower house of parliament voted by 274 to 12 to pass a non-binding motion stating: “That this House believes that the Government should recognize the state of Palestine alongside the state of Israel as a contribution to securing a negotiated two-state solution.”


Britain does not classify “Palestine” as a state, but says it could do so at any time if it believed it would help peace efforts between the Palestinians and Israel. Government ministers were told to abstain and the non-binding vote will not force Britain to recognise a Palestinian state.


Nearly 50 MPs were in the chamber to hear pro-Palestinian Labor Backbencher Grahame Morris open the four hour debate which he said was a chance for the UK to atone for its historic mistakes – a clear reference to the Balfour Declaration.


He and party colleagues knew in advance that with the unprecedented backing of the Labor party – as traditionally the political parties do not tell MPs which way to vote in what is supposed to be backbench business – his motion calling for the British Government to recognise a Palestinian State would be passed, probably by a substantial majority.


Several senior pro-Israel Labor party MPs including a number of members of the shadow cabinet – angered by the decision of party leader Ed Miliband and Shadow Foreign Secretary Douglas Alexander to order Labor backbenchers to back the Morris motion by issuing a ‘three line whip’ – were understood to be ready to defy the instruction and abstain on the vote which was due at 10 p.m. UK time, midnight in Israel.


Former Labor Foreign Secretary Jack Straw successfully moved a manuscript amendment which stated that recognition of a state should be agreed as a ‘contribution’ towards a two state solution. He said if Israel had its way and recognition should be delayed until an agreement is reached between Israel and the Palestinians, that – in effect – would amount to giving Israel a veto over Palestinian statehood.


The Palestinians, he reminded the Commons had no say or veto over the establishment of the State of Israel.


A counter argument was put forward by another former Foreign Secretary the Conservative Party’s Malcolm Rifkind who told MPs that it was not possible to recognize a state which has no boundaries, no army, nor a government. The Palestinians he said, currently have two administrations and simply did not qualify for ‘recognition’.


Also he noted wryly, Britain did not recognize the State of Israel until 1950 when its borders and government and been well established….


Hamas terrorists in Gaza

Hamas terrorists in Gaza

The same “conditions” that “provoked” Hamas into waging a war on millions of Israeli civilians still apply, spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri claimed Saturday night. 
“The conditions for the situation in Gaza exploding still exist,” Abu Zuhri stated to Al-Jazeera. “On the contrary, they are even tougher now than they were before the Israeli aggression in Gaza.”

Hamas spokesman rejects a demilitarization of Gaza, calls to “disarm the occupation” instead.


By Elad Benari

First Publish: 8/31/2014, 6:40 AM
Sami Abu Zuhri

Sami Abu Zuhri

Hamas on Saturday declared that any attempts to disarm the terrorist groups in Gaza are “worthless,” the Ma’an news agency reported.





Cairo Radio Statements:

May 19, 1967: “This is our chance Arabs, to deal Israel a mortal blow of annihilation, to blot out its entire presence in our holy land” 

May 22, 1967: “The Arab people is firmly resolved to wipe Israel off the map” 

May 25, 1967: “The Gulf of Aqaba, by the dictum of history and the protection of our soldiers, is Arab, Arab, Arab.” 

May 25, 1967: “Millions of Arabs are … preparing to blow up all of America’s interests, all of America’s installations, and your entire existence, America.” 

May 27, 1967: “We challenge you, Eshkol, to try all your weapons. Put them to the test; they will spell Israel’s death and annihilation.” 

May 30, 1967: “With the closing of the Gulf of Akaba, Israel is faced with two alternatives either of which will destroy it; it will either be strangled to death by the Arab military and economic boycott, or it will perish by the fire of the Arab forces encompassing it from the South from the North and from the East.” 

May 30, 1967: “The world will know that the Arabs are girded for battle as the fateful hour approaches.” 







Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri said in a statement quoted by the outlet that the demilitarization of the factions was “inconsistent with international law and our people will not allow it.”

“It is not required to disarm the Palestinian people, but rather to disarm the (Israeli) occupation and to ban the American administration from providing it with the weapons that are used to kill children and women,” Abu Zuhri declared, according to Ma’an.

The comments come several days after a long-term ceasefire agreement ended the latest round of violence in Gaza.

Further negotiations on a permanent ceasefire are ongoing, and one of Israel’s main demands has been a demilitarization of Gaza.

Hamas has been demanding, among other things, that a seaport and an airport be built in Gaza. On Friday, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon clarified that there was “no chance” Israel would agree to this demand.

“Hamas in essence accepted the terms of the ceasefire as we wanted, without all the issues it tried to bring up – a seaport, airport and prisoners. In accepted a ceasefire as we wanted without conditions,” Ya’alon said in a television interview, making clear that “there is no chance that Hamas will receive a seaport – it is not in Israel’s interest, it is not an Egyptian interest, it’s not even in the interest of the Palestinian Authority.”

Hamas leaders have been trying to present the ceasefire as a victory for Hamas, even as videos disseminated on the internet show aerial views of the Shejaiya neighborhood of Gaza, which was reduced to rubble in the fighting between Hamas and the IDF.

Shortly after the truce took hold on Tuesday, several senior Hamas and Islamic Jihad leaders appeared in public for a victory celebration. They had been hiding underground during the course of the Israeli operation.

Among them was Mahmoud al-Zahar, a senior member of the Hamas political wing, and senior Islamic Jihad leader Mohammed al-Hindi who gave a rousing victory speech to thousands of people gathered in a square in Gaza City’s Rimal neighborhood.

“We’re going to build our port and our airport, and if they attack the port, they attack the port. But anyone who attacks the airport will have their airport attacked again,” Zahar said.


There is no separation between the war of Hamas in launching rockets against Jews in Israel and the propaganda surrounding the conference asking for rebuilding of Gaza. This is all the Jihad against the Jews.


The Jihad is being conducted not just against the Jews but also against the people of Europe.


All of the Governments of the world are assisting in this Jihad against those who are not Muslims by giving in to this Jihad.

(There is also Antisemitism. The giving in to the Jihad in so many forms today is also an expression of historical Antisemitism. We warn all peoples including Jews that those people who Robert Spencer continually calls “Leftists” have nothing in common with authentic Trotskyism as we are proud to be.)


In this regard the British Government in the form of Theresa May did not attack the Jihadists but attacked Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, attacked the English Defence League and arrested Paul Weston of Liberty UK, the latter on the charge of quoting from a speech by Churchill.


The Jihad being waged against the people of Europe and assisted by the Governments of Europe is the same as the Jihad being waged by Hamas and Fatah aainst the Jews of Israel.


Note that the people in the various European countries cannot be blamed for this Jihad. The basis of this Jihad in Britain was the likes of the Labour Party and Trade Union LEADERS who helped to bring in a vast number of Muslims who have given the basis for the active Jihad against the people of Britain.


It is not the fault of the people of Britain but is the fault of the LEADERS of the people of Britain. I use Britain as just an example. The same applies to every country.


The leaders of Israel down the years are culpable in much the same way as these European leaders are. In general the Israeli elite have sold out on the revolutionary and progressive principles of Zionism.


The big question today is what can be done. If you agree with the above then you must also agree with the reality that a new leadership must be built to lead these peoples, and to lead these peoples against the betrayals of their Governments and Leaders.


In Israel it is vital that the Netanyahu Government be forced to resign. The Netanyahu Government is part of this general betrayal of these peoples, in this case betrayal of the Jewish people of Israel.


But this is not just an Israeli issue. The same need for a new leadership exists in every country in the world.


Unless the issue of leadership is focussed upon there is no way forward.


Boston: Muslim Marathon Bomber knew of brother’s role in 9/11 triple Jewish murders outside Boston


(Why myself and 4intenational.me are covering this report by Pamela Geller on the horrific murder of three Young Jewish men in Boston in what we believe prefigured the planned massacre in Boston)





The left is now well and truly divided into two main camps. On the one hand there are the non Marxists and real haters of Trotskyism. On the other hand there is www.4international.me  and no one else!


The division is total. It has its roots deep inside of left history. The capitalist ideologues who are stupid and ignorant people know nothing of this divide.


But it is fundamental. It is a totally fundamental divide.


Leon Trotsky listened to and used the expertise of the Czarist Generals and Experts when the young workers state of Russia was forced to fight the Russian Civil War on many fronts. There was a major split inside the Bolsheviks on this but Trotsky who was in charge of the Red Army persuaded Lenin to back him.


It is the same today although in vastly different conditions. Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, Bill Warner are real experts on Islamic Jihad. It does not imply political agreement but we on www.4international.me seek to utilise this expertise (please note those three are not the only ones). The reader will appreciate that, granted conditions have changed, it is the same thing. The analogy works very well.


The BBC and their associates who in Spain on the radio station “Talk Radio Europe” are Steven Ritson and Pippa Jones have never to my knowledge ever once breathed the name on air of Pamela Geller or any of these experts on Islam.


Ritson and Jones are not unusual in this. In fact that is the norm. I really have never heard the BBC say the name Pamela Geller and I do listen to a lot of the BBC World Service.


I insist that is the real split on the left right there. This split will grow and more people will know about it as www.4international.me grows and gains more resources.


In essence it is a philosophical issue. Pamela is pro-capitalism and we are socialist revolutionaries but that does not mean that we reject the expertise that Pamela has gained in struggle about Islam Jihad. We do not reject knowledge. We are not dogmatists. In fact we welcome greatly this amazing knowledge.


You can see why we print her article on this most serious issue, think about it, discuss it:


On September 11, 2011, devout Muslims who would go on to bomb the Boston Marathon slit the throats of three Jewish young men in Boston.

In what was one of the most gruesome killings in Greater Boston in many years, three Jewish young men were found with their throats slit inside a Waltham apartment on the tenth anniversary of September 11th. In the wake of the jihad bombings last April, I had posted that one of the victims was the Boston jihad bomber’s “only American friend.”

Had President Obama not scrubbed counter-terror material of jihadic doctrine and Islamic teachings, law enforcement would have recognized this Jewish slaughter on 9/11 for what it was — Islamic jihad. But it was not understood or investigated as such, leaving these savage jihadists to pursue their Boston Marathon jihad and the bombing of Bostons women and children on April 15, 2013.

jewish victims of Boston MuslimsPhoto: Murder victims of Islamic Jew-hatred: Raphael Teken (right with friend) was one of three people along with Erik Weissman

Had Obama not scrubbed counter-terror materials of all mention of jihad, perhaps Boston law enforcement would have pursued this triple slaying properly. Instead, the case was cold until after the jihad murderers set off coordinated bombings at the Boston Marathon and evidence tied them to the slaughter. If Boston law enforcement had been educated in jihad, and had intel agencies followed up on the warnings on the Muslim terrorist Tsarnaevs, the Boston bombing could have been averted.


Screen Shot 2014-04-15 at 7.41.43 PMIslamic Jew-hatred — it’s in the Qur’an.

The city of Boston who refused to run our pro-Israel ads — saying it might offend Muslims while running vicious anti-Jewish ads. And this is happening after the Boston Marathon bombings.

“Boston bombing suspect Tsarnaev allegedly knew of brother’s role in 2011 murders,” by Holly Bailey, Yahoo News, October 11, 2014 (thanks to Kenneth)

Federal prosecutors have identified a witness prepared to testify that Boston Marathon bombings suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev knew his older brother and alleged accomplice, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, participated in 2011 triple murder outside Boston.

The disclosure was made by Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s defense team in a federal court filing late Friday, as part of a larger push by his attorneys to gain access to “discovery” evidence compiled by the federal government in its case against Tsarnaev for the April 2013 bombings which killed three and injured several hundred near the marathon’s finish line.

The Sept. 11, 2011, murders–which occurred in Waltham, Mass., a suburb of Boston–remain officially unsolved. But the murders, which were initially written off by local police as a drug deal gone bad, have become a plot point in the Boston bombings case amid evidence that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was involved. This is the first time there’s been a suggestion that his younger brother might have been aware of his alleged participation in the murders—which some have said, if solved, might have prevented the marathon attacks.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who was killed during a confrontation with police three days after the bombings when his brother ran over him with a car, was close friends with one of the Waltham victims: Brendan Mess, 25, a martial arts instructor who police say also dealt drugs on the side. But Tsarnaev was never questioned in the case, even though friends reportedly told police they were suspicious when he didn’t show up for Mess’s memorial service.

In May 2013, Ibragim Todashev, a boxer who was also friends with Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was shot and killed by an FBI agent who was interviewing him about the case. According to a filing by federal prosecutors last fall, Todashev had implicated himself and Tamerlan Tsarnaev in the murders before he was killed.

As recently as this spring, the investigation into the Waltham slayings appeared to be ongoing. In April, a federal grand jury looking into the murders subpoenaed Katherine Russell, Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s widow, for items that belonged to Mess. But her attorney, Amato DeLuca, said she didn’t have anything.

The Waltham case has been the subject of a back and forth between federal prosecutors and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s defense team, who have repeatedly pressed the government for months to share their evidence and information about the murders. Prosecutors have pushed back, insisting the Waltham case isn’t relevant because Tamerlan Tsarnaev is not on trial.

But Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s attorneys, who appear to be crafting a defense based around casting the older brother as a bullying mastermind of the Boston operation, renewed their push for evidence on Friday arguing the government had previously said the case was “might be relevant if Dzhokhar were aware of it.” They then pointed to a letter they received from prosecutors on Aug. 15, 2014, saying the government had a witness prepared to testify that “Dzhokhar had such an awareness.”

The developments come just days before both sides are scheduled to release their initial list of witnesses in the bombings trial, which is scheduled to take begin in January. Both sides are due in a Boston courtroom on Oct. 20 for status hearing in the case. Prosecutors have asked that Tsarnaev, who has not been seen in court since July 2013 when he was formally charged in the attacks, make an appearance, but it’s unclear if he will.

Tsarnaev has pleaded not guilty in the bombings. If convicted, he faces the death penalty.


- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/10/boston-muslim-marathon-bomber-knew-of-brothers-role-in-911-triple-jewish-murders-outside-boston.html/#sthash.L7ishIN1.dpuf


This is the third and our final article onte murder of Alan Henning in Syria

I consider this to be something of a turning point and this murder has changed forever the consciousness of the British people especially working class towards Islam. This cannot be fully conscious as yet but things can never ever be the same again.

Of course Alan Henning was murdered by very violent Jihadists.

But although that is undeniably the case, the real murder, or can we say “murdering” of Henning took place because of non violent Jihadists.

That is those who promote Jihad in Britain, who defend Jihad in Britain, but would never be seen touching the throat slitting knife. I consider them to eb the biggst danger and in the murder of Henning the real culprits.

The charities who ran the convoy were already being investigateded and as we said one at least by the Charities Commission. They were shady!

But Henning had a very naive atitude towards Islam. He did not know. He did not understand.

I consider the responsibility for this to be  not Alan but the purveyors of information in Britain.

I start with the ruling class who banned the real experts on Islam from Britain. Theresa May banned Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller both of whom have studied and written many books on Islam.

And there is a bewildering number of agencies who work to stop us understanding the nature of Islam.

I call this the soft Jihad. Those who preach the Jihad of Islam and work to promote that, but preach peace.

I place the BBC at the very top of this list.

Was Alan Henning lured from Britain on that convoy…purpose beheading?

We can not prove that. But in any case he was on that convoy because of the soft Jihad in Britain.

Alan had no way of spotting the danger.

Alan was not equipped to do that. But we on 4international are, and we will.


This Is What We Know About Alan Henning, The Latest Hostage Threatened By ISIS

The murder of Alan Henning was awful, a terrible murder and it has left a deep mark on Britain.

There is no doubt in my mind after Reading through the various writings on this issue that Henning was surrounded by Islamist organizations all having their roots in the Muslim Brotherhood. No doubt either that Henning had nowhere and noone in Britain to turn to in order to clarify what was happening to him. Indeed his own Government elected by the people, the Tories, were under Cameron and May in league with these very Islamist organizations.

The BBC was giving out a daily diet of collaboration with these Islamist organizations. The Labour Party were conniving continually with the Islamists. Leftist spokespeople like George Galloway were totally in bed with Islam. No understanding of Islam and especially how Antisemitism is deeply rooted inside of Islam could ever reach the ears of Alan Henning.

Alan’s friends, working class Manchester friends, in that working class type taxi firm, were instinctively very afraid for Alan but they themselves had no real knowledge of the situation in Britain so could not warn him in an adequate way.

Alan Henning was therefore being groomed by these Islamist organizations just as much as the 14 year old girls in Rotherham were being groomed by Islamist sex predators.

I insist that the beginning of understanding of this crazy situation in Britain and elsewhere is to go back to an analysis of the Koran (whatever path you choose) and to pause and pay attention to the analysis of the much derided Karl Marx on the issue. I have sourced this previously so for now he roughly said that Islam divides the world between believers and non-believers.

Advice now to everybody if you know your way around computers (and if you can download kindle it is very easy here), look up the book “The Islamic Doctrine of Christians and Jews” by Bill Warner

Even if you only download the free fragment which often comes with these kindle books to encourage you to buy! At least get your hands on that.

Under the heading of “Kafir” Bill Warner states “The Word Kafir will be used in this book instead of “unbeliever”, the standard usage. Unbeliever is a neutral term. The Koran defines the Word Kafir and Kafir is not a neutral Word (my emphasis FQ). A Kafir is evil, disgusting, the lowest form of life. Kafirs can be deceived, hated, enslaved, tortured, killed, lied to and cheated. So the Word “unbeliever” does not reflect the political reality of Islam.”

This was NOT the conception which Alan Henning had of Muslims. How could he have such a conception? Everything he was listening to on televisión, radio, films, newspapers, and a thousand other sources militated against any truthful understanding of what Islam is. When people like Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer do their utmost to get across what is Islam by studying (hey big surprise here!) Islam, the life of Mohammed, the words of Mohammed – then the Home Secretary of Alan Henning a certain Mrs Theresa May bans them from Britain.

That IS the background to this case of how Alan Henning ended up as a prisoner of the Islamic State which the BBC (true to what I have said above) has just taken to refer to only as the “so-called” Islamic State.

That is the truthful background to how Alan Henning was beheaded. It is still necessary to trace some of these actual forces acting upon him, such as the various “Charities” who were misusing him so dastardly. There is a bewildering number of these Islamist outfits in Britain but they spread across the Globe, all with the hatred of the Jews, that original Mohammedan hatred, at their centre. This may be beyond me at this stage but I will in a later article try to put some sense into the situation.


The picture shows Alan Henning as the next victim of the Islamic State. The man in black is the British Jihadist. The story involves also the role of the British Government, the BBC and the British muslim groupings and leaders, along with many many others

The question which we Trotskyists are asking is whether Alan Henning (voluntary aid worker from Eccles, Salford in Greater Manchester) was set up in Britain for kidnapping and beheading by the Islamic State BEFORE he left on his fateful journey. We think that Alan was a non-political type, full of goodness, but this led to him being unaware of the reality of Islamic Jihad. His British born colleagues in the taxi firm in which he worked were very afraid (instinctively) of the situation but most likely they too did not have the information at hand to really and fully warn Alan of the terrible trap that was being sprung around him by Jihadist forces in Britain. All those Jihadists in Britain are now in the frame for investigation as indeed are the British Government of Cameron and especially Theresa May along with the BBC.

First up in our quest to know more is this report from the Charity Commission. This is from April in this fateful year of 2014

Charity regulator opens inquiry into Al-Fatiha Global

By Andrew Holt

The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into Al-Fatiha Global.

The inquiry is investigating serious concerns about the governance and financial management of the charity.

The Commission had been monitoring the charity since 2013, and the inquiry, which is the most serious level of the regulator’s investigatory work, opened on 21 March 2014.

The charity’s objects are to relieve sickness by providing free clinics for the people of northern Pakistan and to provide humanitarian aid globally in areas disrupted by conflict and natural disaster. Its activities include organising and participating in convoys to Syria.

The regulator says it is investigating:

Whether the trustees are effectively discharging their duties under charity law with particular regard to the proper accounting for the income and expenditure of the charity, and the management of the charity in accordance with its governing document and the law.

Regulatory issues in connection with reports in the public domain alleging inappropriate links between the charity and individuals purportedly involved in supporting armed or other inappropriate activities in Syria. (our emphasis FQ)

It is the Commission’s policy, after it has concluded an inquiry, to publish a report detailing what issues the inquiry looked at, what actions were undertaken as part of the inquiry and what the outcomes were.

The Charity Commission has issued regulatory advice under section 15(2) of the Charities Act 2011 to charities about the risks involved in working in conflict zones such as Syria and trustees’ legal duties and responsibilities.

It has been alledged that an Al-Fatiha Global initiative, Aid for Syria Convoy, included trucks named after the terrorist Aafia Siddiqui, who was found guilty in a US court of attempted murder, armed assault, using and carrying a firearm and assault on US personnel.

Earlier this month Al-Fatiha’s top fundraiser, coach firm boss Adeel Ali, was ­allegedly pictured in Syria alongside masked gunmen. He denies the claims.

PS Andrew Holt is Charity Times Editor