About Felix Quigley

Campaigning to show that Srebrenica was and is a huge hoax, which is also the case with Racak, Qana and Mohammed el Dura/France 2. When people understand that these are hoaxes then they will begin to understand that Yugoslavia was destroyed, and most important that they plan to destroy Israel, because the US Empire plans to rule the world along with Islam, the latter being a very evil fascist ideology which is very close to the evil ideology of US and EU NATO Empire. Of course there will be adaptations but I am certain that is the general trend. Build4international!


4INTERNATIONAL now stands on its own in defending the 6 Jews arrested and being charged with the murder of a Palestinian Arab youth

The “great” jewish leader Ted Belman of Israpundit refuses to defend these 6 Jews

I am totally and completely as a revolutionary socialist, no religious affiliation, totally atheist, based on the science of materialism COMPLETELY DISGUSTED WITH ALL ISRAELI JEWISH LEADERS and above all with Belman

Belman of Israpundit issued one of the most pernicious attacks on Jews when he in a statement basically threw these 6 arrested by the Israeli pólice onto the garbage heap.

Murderers are murderers, whether Jew or Arab. Their lawyers will try to diminish the nature of the crime by arguing grievance. But that is not the issue here.The PA and Hamas share responsibility for the murder of the three Jewish boys because they glorify killers and encourage the killing of Jews. The same cannot be said of Israel. Israel never advocates murder or hate and so is not complicit in the murder of the Arab boy. Israel, in no way bears responsibility. The fact that Israel refused to knuckle under Arab demands and American pressure to “make peace” changes nothing. Ted Belman

Belman took the Word of the Israeli pólice

That is the same pólice which rammed through the Gaza withdrawal and the same pólice which pulled Jew after Jew out of their homes in Gaza


I can find no Jewish Israeli leader or blogger I MEAN NOT ONE who is prepared to stand up and defend these Jewish 6 against the Israeli pólice


But my disgust leads me to the point I have always made that there needs to be a new Trotskyist leadership built in Israel


I have investigated many such situations one of which was the so called massacre in Srebrenica. I found in Srebrenica that the whole deal against the Serbs was hatched by the Media among Muslims far away from Srebrenica and in which the Muslims were able to say anything

Something very similar has happened here. Everything we know is what the pólice tells. That includes a reenactment by 3 of the 6 accused who the pólice told us have reenacted the crime

So then if the case is thus AND SO FIRM why are they keeping the lawyers away from these 6

These 6 are being hung out to dry by the Israeli bloggers every dammed one of them

Only 4international is defending and will defend these 6 Jews from the pólice.

Let that be remembered. We certainly will remember it. What chance that Netanyahu defeats Hamas???!!! Not a chance nor any of these other “leaders” like Belman when they stick the kniffe into 6 Jews thus

The only site I find reporting is Arutz Sheva:

One of the fathers says:

“The father claimed that the main suspect in the murder “has psychological problems. He’s a dear person and wouldn’t have done something like this. If he did do something like this, it’s because of his sickness.”

“The cousins are crazy for him, my son is crazy for him. They’d do anything he’d tell them. But he confessed out of illness, he’s mentally sick. I don’t believe that he would do something like this, but I know that he is sick,” added the father.

He further noted that one of the minors arrested “takes pills too. He’s a child who doesn’t go to yeshiva because he has fears. I know each of these children closely. They are good kids who aren’t capable of doing bad things. He (the main suspect) is psychologically sick, and he dragged them after him to it. He has an illness, everyone knows.”



4international calls for full defence by Jews and Socialists of the 6 charged by the Jerusalem police AND by Netanyahu

We call especially for full details of the questioning of these Jewish 6 by the police

Also we call for investigation of threats of kidnapping against other members of the family, the younger sister and brother

Investigate the role of Netanyahu especially that consistently this leader is not prepared to defend Jews of Sderot from Hamas bombs and rockets

Investigate also the US promotion of ISIS terrorists in Jordan and Turkey, and the reports that there is an ISIS cell in Hebron. ISIS is active in the area and thus the CIA is active in the area. MI6 is also involved here.




So we are now expected to believe … 6 Jews snapped and resorted to violence and a ghastly murder.

But remember the above is ALLEGEDLY and if the police are not doing another frame-up against religious Jews whom the police hate then I personally will be somewhat surprised.

4international has said that we have seen no evidence that Jews murdered this Arab boy. We have seen plenty of evidence that Jews did not murder this Arab boy.

There are so many angles to this whole episode that a Sherlock Holmes would be stressed out to follow all of the leads, not least that there were kidnapping threats against other members of the boy’s family, and that the whole issue of involvement of very dark forces, not Jews, not religious Jews, not “settlers”, but other dark forces are involved.

I was amazed at the BBC reports last night on the World Service that the lawyers for the accused 6 Jews has NOT YET SPOKEN TO HIS CLIENTS and that there is a warrant against the lawyer seeing the 6 Jews.

And that in order to see the 6 clients the lawyers have to go to the High Court today TO HAVE THE WARRANT LIFTED so that the lawyer can speak to the 6 Jews and have some definite information as to what has been happening

If that is true and the BBC information is always biased against the Jews then that spells out for me one big fraud is happening

The whole thing I believe from the start to finish has been a carefully laid “false flag” in which the purpose and way is being laid to negate the Fascist Gorillas of Hamas, to negate the Israeli Jewish community as a whole who now understand that peace with Muslims is impossible, and to ram through a settlement with a new and united Palestine Authority

Answer why are 6 Jews charged with the murder of an Arab and their lawyers have a warrant against them seeing the same 6 Jews?

Answer why the police officer investigating made it known that there was major doubt it was a revenge killing by Jews at all, but now has gone quiet on that

Especially answer why the murdered boy had his sister and younger brother also threatened with kidnapping etc.

Remember also this:

All of the main actors are acting out of much desperation

1. This political snake and incompetent Netanyahu acts continually from great weakness. He allows Jews to be rocketed by Fascist Muslims day and night non-stop. He amasses Jews on the border of Gaza and does nothing. Netanyahu is a bluffer and bluffers, unless you are Doc Watson, grow desperate (Doc was not a bluffer ever but bluffing is the Netanyahu stock and trade). A whole false flag operation could be being directed by Netanyahu because he is so desperate!
2. Obama and his crisis ridden governmental rule. Because of Obama and Clinton HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS IF NOT MILLIONS of Christians and minority religions are being driven out of Iraq. And that is only the start of his crises! Obama is desperate for some kind of victory. So Obama is desperate that a PA Unity Government succeeds
3. But a PA Government leading some kind of Pali State is impossible without outright military dictatorship which will involve the Fascist Islamic Holy Warriors of War
4. Abbas is desperate also. Hamas is desperate. All of this rotten edifice known as the Palestinians IS desperate. And really who directs them, owns them? It is the US State and CIA!
5. Finally the “Left” fascists are also desperate because this Antisemitism is NOT the tradition of revolutionary socialism, which we on 4international alone represent.


In the space of less than a week, Israel finds itself trapped in an ungovernable maelstrom of violence. Its root cause is the Netanyahu government laxness in the face of the traumatic discovery on July 30 of the bodies of the Israeli teenagers Gil-Ad Shaer, Naftali Fraenkel and Eyal Yifrach, kidnapped and slain by Hamas. This was followed two days later by the murder of a 16-year old Palestinian, Muhammad Abu Khdeir, from Jerusalem, which set off three days of violent riots by masked Palestinians in Jerusalem suburbs. They hurled rocks and firebombs, disrupting traffic and starting four large fires around the city.
Scores of Palestinian rockets thundered non-stop from the Gaza Strip in the meantime. Saturday night, their range was expanded to three southern towns, Beersheba, Ashkelon and Ofakim. Iron Dome only intercepted a fraction of these launches.

Friday night, the ill wind spread from Jerusalem to the Israeli Arab towns of the Triangle in central Israel, where masked men waylaid cars outside Qalanswa and, after determining the drivers were Jewish, pulled them out, beat them up and torched their vehicles.

From Taiibeh and Umm al-Fahm, masked youths waving Palestinian flags hurled rocks at passing highway vehicles and neighboring Jewish villages, rolling burning tires from Baq’a al-Garbiyeh. Riot police fought the rampages with tear gas and stun grenades and make dozens of arrests.
Saturday night, this rampage also spread to Nazareth.
The most striking feature of this breakdown of security has been the passive response of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon and the Israeli chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz.
In the beginning, Netanyahu appered to hear the popular fury and agony aroused by the murder of the three Israeli boys, whose killers were heard on a police tape laughing and celebrating after shooting them at point blank range.

He said at their funerals: “Even Satan could find no revenge for the blood of a child,” and: “Hamas is responsible, and Hamas will pay.” He said that punishment would not only be applied to the kidnappers but to their confederates in the kidnap conspiracy.
But instead, after the funerals, the IDF scaled down its counter-terror offensive on the West Bank. The hunt for the two kidnappers, Marwan al Qawasme and Omar Abu Ayshe, continued along with detentions of local Hamas activists and the shutting down the charity societies and other profit-earning enterprises supporting the movement.
Instead of being made to pay in earnest, Hamas was allowed to unleash a ferocious new barrage of rockets against Israel from its Gaza launching pads. They were greeted only with feeble Israeli air strikes of evacuated Hamas and Jihad Islami facilities. But in the face of one of Israel’s most acute security crises in recent years, the Israeli army was held in check.
In fact, the prime minister decided to outsource the solution. Egypt, Jordan, Turkey and Qatar were entrusted with trying to persuade Hamas to accept a truce and halt its rocket barrage.

Hamas immediately raised unacceptable conditions. But even so, Israel knows from long experience that for this Islamist extremist group, a ceasefire accord with Israel is non meant to be binding, only a temporary shift for avoiding punishment.
The root problem remained unsolved, only shelved for a while, until a new crisis comes along to make Israelis forget what happened. This process is already in train in the case of the grave menace posed by a nuclear Iran, which has been blocked out of popular awareness by the new calamaties.

Very few people noticed that in the latest round of P5+1 negotiations with Iran, the Obama administration agreed to leave Tehran in possession of all its nuclear facilities so long as it remained six months away from break-out capacity to a bomb. Netanyahu’s epic failure to make good on his vow to prevent a nuclear Iran was thoroughly obscured by the disasters circling around Hebron, Jerusalem, Sderot and Qalanswa.

Leaving crises in the pending tray until a more urgent calamity relegates them to the bottom drawer is a long-held Netanyahu strategy which is now jumping back in his face.
The messages Israel sent Hamas Friday, July 4: ”Quiet will be greeted with quiet,” and “The IDF does not seek escalation” were not treated as a fair offer, but an exhibition of weakness. Like the bombardment of empty buildings in Gaza, it eroded the IDF’s deterrent capacity and its reputation as the stalwart guardian of national security.
This weakness was not just seized on by Hamas, but by the Palestinian, the Israeli Jewish and Israel Arab streets, who grabbed the reins of the current crisis.
It was never up to the Egyptian president or the Jordanian monarch to resolve the predicaments of Israelis and Palestinians. They should never have been put in that position. Israel’s prime minister and his defense command one of the most competent armies and counter-terror forces in the world. It should have been allowed to do its job of keeping the country safe from enemies.
Internal Security Minister Yitzhak Aharonovich declared Saturday night: “We have zero tolerance for lawbreakers. They will be brought to justice. We will not permit innocent people to be wantonly harmed.” The trouble is that it is not up to the police to fix the decline of national and personal security in Israel. The forces of law and order are brought in when all else fails. Since those who should be responsible are still not playing their assigned roles, the escalation of violence inside Israel and on the Gaza front is to be expected.


IMF Calls for Funding of Fatah-Hamas Unity Government

International Monetary Fund urges international donors to step up funding to fill ‘sizable gap,’ even as rocket wave crashes on Israel.

By Ari Yashar

First Publish: 7/4/2014, 10:00 AM

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) on Thursday urged international donors to increase funding for the Palestinian Authority (PA) to aid “Palestinian reform efforts,” indicating the new Fatah-Hamas unity government.

IMF mission chief Christoph Duenwald said the PA is “doing a commendable job” of managing its economy, but that the global donor community needs to fill a “sizable” gap in funds for the PA, reports AFP.

It is worth noting that as of March, the PA had reached a staggering $4.8 billion in debt.

“Against the background of rising political uncertainty, the economy of the West Bank and Gaza is weakening,” said Duenwald. “Unemployment, particularly youth unemployment, currently at 43%, continues to rise from already high levels.”

In his call for funding, Duenwald said “continued donor support is vital at this time, as is a comprehensive easing of Israeli restrictions to underpin the Palestinian reform efforts.”


The IMF is now behind the Hamas and PA Government. This is the most important fact and is the key to understanding the abductions of the 3 Jewish youth and of the abduction also of the Palestinian Arab youth. The background is being ignored by essentially Jew and Israel hating commenters on blogs like the Irish “The journal” (please understand that many of these commenters on these “Irish” blogs are not Irish)


So the question is why the IMF which along with NATO its armed wing is so intent on preserving the descendents of Hajj Amin el Husseini. same reason as why they promoted the Islamist Savage Izetbegovic in Yugoslavia in the 1990s, who hosted Bin Laden in Bosnia and began the process leading to 9-11


Consider that the whole of the capitalist system is in deep crisis. There is mass unemployment in Europe. There is also mass unemployment in America because many of the population especially youth have no contract in work, but work day to day, month to month. Big moves to disable protest are being taken by the Spanish PP government.


The capitalist governments in Britain have over decades allowed the influx of big numbers of Muslims who have not and will not integrate into British social life but instead demand Shariah Law living. That breaks down parliamentary democracy and is a step towards Fascist Rule (where parliament does not rule)


Meanwhile in America the Obama Government is at this very moment signing for millions of ilegal immigrants to be made legal. This changes a country very quickly and most of all it makes a joke out of laws and regulations, laws and regulations which were laid down by “parliamentary democracy”, in this case Congress.


Capitalism in a deep crisis will do ANYTHING to survive. This extends to spy snooping on all of us and to making war on its competitors, especially on the China and Russian Empires.


And in that context what capitalism in crisis is doing is creating Alliance with the strongest fascist forces at present on earth, which are those of Islam…the Jihad! With ISIL! And our report from Aaron Klein shows that is what the US and EU has done.


We cannot yet know who was behind the abductions of the past week. But stirring it up between Jew and Arab and destroying the Jews while keeping Islam as a Fascist battering arm may be the main aim


So this article is very important. We Trotskyists on http://www.4international.me say that the Jews in the world MUST HAVE their Homeland which is Israel.


We believe that there are many Arabs, and many Palestinian Arabs, who can be won to this concept also. This also applies to the Arab youth and the Arab women but not exclusively them either…all Arabs.


Many Arabs can see that “Palestinianism” is in fact Fascism and so can see this form of Fascism as the weapon of the capitalist ruling clases of the world. Yes this article is important and it raises the vital question…what is in it for the IMF?:





(begin Martin Sherman analysis here)

By adhering to a policy of avoiding confrontations which Israel can win, the government risks leading it into one in which it might lose. It is time for a bold new offensive – before we are overtaken by events.
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu at Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee meeting, June 30, 2014 Photo: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST

To remain at peace when you should be going to war may be often very dangerous….Let us attack and subdue…that we may ourselves live safely for the future.
– Thucydides (c. 460–395 BCE)

No government, if it regards war as inevitable, even if it does not want it, would be so foolish as to wait for the moment which is most convenient for the enemy.
– Otto von Bismarck (1815–1890)

If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival.
– Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

For anyone with half a brain it should be crystal clear: The peace-with-Palestinians paradigm is irredeemably broken.

The triple murder of the abducted teenagers, together with the shower of rockets on the South, should have driven that point home, even for the most obdurate devotee of what, perversely, has become known as the “peace process.”

Cavalcade of counterproductive concessions

Over the last half decade, the Netanyahu government has made a series of humiliating and hazardous concessions in an ill-advised and ill-fated attempt to sustain an unworkable process and an egregious endeavor to curry favor with an innately inimical US administration.

Predictably, this has produced nothing but further demands for even more hazardous and humiliating concessions.

The cavalcade of counter-productive climb-downs began shortly after Binyamin Netanyahu’s return to power in 2009, when he reneged on his election pledges and accepted the idea of a Palestinian state.

This ideological capitulation dramatically transformed the debate on Palestinian statehood from whether there should be a Palestinian state, to what the characteristics of that state should be. It was followed in November 2009 by acquiescence to an unprecedented 10-month construction freeze in the hope of coaxing the Palestinians into negotiations. The only response this elicited – and only as it was just about to expire – was a demand for it to be extended.

Then, in 2012, in stark contradiction to Netanyahu’s publicly professed principle of resolute refusal to bow to demands from terrorists (which in large measure brought him much of his initial public prominence), he bowed to the Hamas conditions, releasing over 1,000 convicted terrorists in exchange for a single IDF soldier, Gilad Schalit. This was something so abjectly compliant that even his predecessor, the wildly accommodative Ehud Olmert, had resisted such an exchange.

By so doing, in a stroke Netanyahu made a mockery of his own defiant doctrine which had deemed concessions to terrorists counterproductive.

Counterproductive cavalcade (cont.)

Israel was soon to reap the bitter fruits of its misplaced “largesse” with the brutal murder this April of Baruch Mizrahi, a father of five, at the hands of a terrorist freed in the Schalit deal.

Then in 2013 came the demeaning apology to the vehemently anti-Israeli Turkish premier, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, for the action of Israeli commandos, who were defending themselves against a frenzied lynch mob aboard a Turkish vessel trying to violate a lawful maritime quarantine of the terrorist enclave of Gaza. Again, the apology was made despite strident assurances that they would not be given. Worse, Israel conceded to the payment of compensation to families of the assailants, killed or maimed during their attempts to disembowel the IDF combatants. The only tangible result of this undignified expression of contrition has been continued anti-Israel invective from Erdogan and undignified wrangling over the level of compensation.

Perhaps the most egregious act of all came later that year – wholesale scores of convicted terrorists were released to coax the Palestinians into agreeing to reenter negotiations, which they should have had a greater interest in conducting than Israel did. This gesture once again proved futile, with Israel being blamed for the failure of the talks and Mahmoud Abbas setting up a unity government with Hamas.

The fatal futility of Palestinian-peace paradigm

The fundamental reason for this depressing chain of futility is desperate adherence to a notion that some form of consensual peace deal can be struck between Israel, as the nation-state of the Jews, and the Palestinian Arabs, who seek to become self-governing.

The procession of one failed Israeli gesture after the other is a consequence of our refusal to discard the disproved paradigm of land-for-peace and the two-state principle that derives from it.

We were only able to keep the “process” from collapsing and maintain false hope that one day it might bear fruit by consenting to increasingly far-reaching concessions.

Just how far Israeli positions have been eroded can be judged from the content of Yitzhak Rabin’s last address to the Knesset in 1995, when he sought ratification for the Oslo II Accords. The Palestinian demands, which were then considered by many in Israel as excessive to an almost treasonous degree, would today evoke right-wing opposition that others would characterize as unreasonable and unrealistic “rejectionism.”

The refusal to acknowledge the futility of such efforts to reach a durable peace accord has had a calamitous effect on both Israeli and Palestinian perspectives on policy options/imperatives that Israel can/must undertake.

Degrading deterrence

This policy has, in effect, precluded any prospect of inflicting strategic defeat on the Palestinians – (see my “Redefining (failure as) victory,” January 3, 2013) – since it would, in all likelihood, terminate any chance of sustaining the “peace process,” and subject Israel to international censure .

However, as Palestinians sense Israeli reticence, it stiffens their political demands and emboldens them to persist in operations of armed attrition, secure in the knowledge that they will not be subjected to unacceptable losses.

Accordingly in 2012, despite the impressive display of the IDF’s military prowess, Operation Pillar of Defense was terminated prematurely – leaving Hamas with what could be portrayed – not unconvincingly – as a strategic victory, gaining them enhanced international standing, and winning important concessions for its farmers and fisherman. (The subsequent degradation of Hamas’s strength had little to do with Israeli policy and much to do with that of Egypt’s Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.) The continued bombardment of the South from Gaza makes a mockery of any claim that Hamas and/or its radical spin-offs have been deterred by previous Israeli military operations. Yes, like Hezbollah in the North, it has been perhaps forced to regroup, redeploy and rearm – but clearly its will to engage remains undiminished and its operational capabilities has been greatly enhanced.

Tactical containment vs strategic victory

After all, the capabilities of the weaponry at its disposal have increased dramatically. Thus, while earlier the range of the Palestinian rockets was barely 5 km., and the explosive charge they carried weighed about 5 kg., today their missiles have a range of 75 km. and warheads of 90 kg.

Not too long ago, if anyone dared to predict that greater Tel Aviv and Jerusalem would be in danger from missiles launched from Gaza, he would have been dismissed with disdain. However, now that the unthinkable has occurred, it is time for a radical reassessment of the policy paradigms Israel has tethered itself to for far too long.

The nation has bound its military to a doctrine of tactical containment rather than of strategic victory. This is no longer a viable approach – neither operationally, nor intellectually.

Indeed, it is not only the continued shelling in the South that underscores that the Palestinians’ determination to harm Israelis remains largely unimpaired. It was also the recently emerged, information that they have initiated dozens of abduction attempts, all of which were foiled—until inevitably one was not.

Clearly, then, if Israel cannot effectively impact the Palestinians’ motivation and dissuade them from hostile activities that endanger the lives and limbs of Israelis, the government is duty bound to protect its citizens by curtailing the enemy’s ability to achieve their goals.

In other words, we must inflict strategic defeat, and impose strategic surrender, on the Palestinians – which implies taking control of the territories where the attacks are planned, prepared and perpetrated.

The perilous path of ‘conflict management’

To achieve this, we must forsake the vain hope of ever reaching an agreed and lasting peace with some Palestinian partner in exchange for any configuration of territorial concessions.

This clearly requires a sharp discontinuity in the mindset of the Israeli leadership, for even those skeptical about the land-for-peace principle and Palestinian sincerity/ability to conclude a durable peace agreement subscribe to the concept of “conflict management” instead of “conflict resolution.”

This is a perilous path to tread as the dramatic erosion of Israeli positions and the equally dramatic enhancement of Palestinian capabilities, discussed previously, vividly illustrate.

Indeed, with tumultuous convulsions engulfing the Mideast and pushing ever closer to Israel’s borders, old assumptions as to alleged allies and alliances are no longer relevant. These developments make any agreement concluded with any Palestinian totally meaningless.

For as I pointed out last week, even under wildly optimistic assumptions that some Palestinian partner were found who could conclude an acceptable accord with Israel, and even if he had the requisite authority to implement its terms, and the requisite sincerity not to renege on them, and even if he were not replaced by some more radical successor who would repudiate the accord, external forces in the region could render it worthless.

A micro-mini demilitarized Palestinian state will be a flimsy foil indeed between Israel and an Islamic State-controlled regime in Jordan.

Will abduction prove a transformative event?

By adhering to a policy of avoiding confrontations which Israel can win, the government risks leading it into one which it might lose.

This cannot and must not continue. What is needed is a proactive initiative to preempt the emerging perils before they descend upon us. In this regard, the government must resign itself to the unpalatable fact that Israel is unlikely to win international affection. The most we can realistically hope for is to be grudgingly respected; the least it must unequivocally ensure is to be greatly feared.

Undoubtedly, for such a drastic metamorphosis in the perceptions and policy preferences of Israeli leadership, some sort of dramatic transformative event is required.

It is still too early to assess whether the abduction and murder of the three Israeli teens will become such an event. There are, however, increasing signs that it has ignited considerable public outrage and anger, and is precipitating a perceptible stiffening of public attitudes toward the Palestinians, and impatience toward the government – and what is increasingly seen as its ineffectual impotence.

It is time for a bold new offensive – before we are overtaken by events. If the tragic deaths of Naftali Fraenkel, Gil-Ad Shaer and Eyal Yifrah act as a catalyst to galvanize the public into compelling the government into effective action, their murders may well come to symbolize a turning point in the salvation of the nation.

‘Cry “havoc!” and let slip the dogs of war…’

The government must seize the moment and act in the spirit of the call by Mark Anthony in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. With much of the Arab world in disarray and enmeshed in internal turmoil, Israel must:

1. Disavow the “peace process,” disengage from contacts with the Palestinians as a national collective, and declare them to be what they themselves declare themselves to be: An implacable enemy of the Zionist entity.

2. Launch a $1 billion strategic public diplomacy offensive (1 percent of the state budget), focusing on delegitimizing the Palestinian narrative and highlighting the depravities of the Arab world, in general, and of Palestinian society, in particular, while contrasting them with the moral merits and scientific, technological and other accomplishments of Israel.

3. Coercively dismantle and disarm the Palestinian security forces.

4. Refrain from any support for the unsustainable Palestinian economy, withhold any services hitherto rendered to it and allow it to collapse, as it inevitably will.

5. Offer generous relocation grants to any individual Palestinians wishing to extricate themselves from the hardships that will inevitably result from the forgoing measures and build a better life for himself/his family in a third party country of their choice.

In weighing the implementation of this program, Israelis should bear in mind: If you will it, it is no fantasy.



The 5 points that Martin Sherman advances above are in my opinión important and we subscibe. They are however missing some things which also are important.

The reaction to the murder of the Jewish boys on the part of many Jewish blogs who are also hostile to the betrayals of Netanyahu has told us on http://www.4international.me a great deal and has in particular highlighted the basic political bankruptcy of this Brand of Zionism.

Some of these reactions that we read were calling for massacres of Arabs

Not only do we oppose this but note that such calls for individual terrorism always plays into the hands of the enemy. Trotskyists have always opposed this and see individual terrorism as no substitute for the mobilisation of the masses.

In this regard Martin Sherman does not state clearly his position on this. He does not do so I believe because it involves getting in and doing battle with the likes of Israpundit, one of those which was carrying comments in the past week which were downright dangerous.

http://www.4international.me believes that there are many Arabs who can be won to support for our policy and programme, that Israel must be respected and supported as the Homeland of the Jews. There are many Arabs, especially youth and women, who can be won and mobilised to that view. It is entirely posible that they will remain in the future Israel and become supporters of the whole concept of the Jewish Homeland. They too will become Zionists.

What is it about Israel that is most attractive? To me it is certainly not these scripture quoting bigots as I found on Israpundit who distainfully will answer every issue in argument with a contemptuous wave of some obscure scripture.

Jews above all are a forward moving and forward seeking people. They are the same as all of us progressive people such as the Irish.

The great thing that Jews have done in their Israel is that they have created a climate of tolerance of religión.

martin Sherman does not seem to take this into accound as a major direction to the future



[EDITOR'S NOTE: Since publication, this story has been corrected to clarify that the fighters trained in Jordan became members of the ISIS after their training.]

The officials said dozens of future ISIS members were trained at the time as part of covert aid to the insurgents targeting the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Syria. The officials said the training was not meant to be used for any future campaign in Iraq.

The Jordanian officials said all ISIS members who received U.S. training to fight in Syria were first vetted for any links to extremist groups like al-Qaida.

In February 2012, WND was first to report the U.S., Turkey and Jordan were running a training base for the Syrian rebels in the Jordanian town of Safawi in the country’s northern desert region.

That report has since been corroborated by numerous other media accounts.

Last March, the German weekly Der Spiegel reported Americans were training Syrian rebels in Jordan.

Quoting what it said were training participants and organizers, Der Spiegel reported it was not clear whether the Americans worked for private firms or were with the U.S. Army, but the magazine said some organizers wore uniforms. The training in Jordan reportedly focused on use of anti-tank weaponry.

The German magazine reported some 200 men received the training over the previous three months amid U.S. plans to train a total of 1,200 members of the Free Syrian Army in two camps in the south and the east of Jordan.

Britain’s Guardian newspaper also reported last March that U.S. trainers were aiding Syrian rebels in Jordan along with British and French instructors.

Reuters reported a spokesman for the U.S. Defense Department declined immediate comment on the German magazine’s report. The French foreign ministry and Britain’s foreign and defense ministries also would not comment to Reuters.

The Jordanian officials spoke to WND amid concern the sectarian violence in Iraq will spill over into their own country as well as into Syria.

ISIS previously posted a video on YouTube threatening to move on Jordan and “slaughter” King Abdullah, whom they view as an enemy of Islam.

WND reported last week that, according to Jordanian and Syrian regime sources, Saudi Arabia has been arming the ISIS and that the Saudis are a driving force in supporting the al-Qaida-linked group.

WND further reported that, according to a Shiite source in contact with a high official in the government of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, the Obama administration has been aware for two months that the al-Qaida-inspired group that has taken over two Iraqi cities and now is threatening Baghdad also was training fighters in Turkey.

The source told WND that at least one of the training camps of the group Iraq of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Syria, the ISIS, is in the vicinity of Incirlik Air Base near Adana, Turkey, where American personnel and equipment are located.

He called Obama “an accomplice” in the attacks that are threatening the Maliki government the U.S. helped establish through the Iraq war.

The source said that after training in Turkey, thousands of ISIS fighters went to Iraq by way of Syria to join the effort to establish an Islamic caliphate subject to strict Islamic law, or Shariah.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/06/officials-u-s-trained-isis-at-secret-base-in-jordan/#5D8EZyLi4bHgrYuv.99





The important website Israel national News is critical of the way that the Mayor of Jerusalem, Livni, Peres, even Netanyahu were presuming that the murder of the Palestinian youth was a “revenge killing”, while the Israeli pólice investigation was issuing reports, even warnings, not to jump to any conclusions and that the murder was still under investigation:

(begin report here)

Yet as early as Wednesday morning Israeli police issued a statement urging people to refrain from drawing hasty conclusions, saying they were exploring all possible leads, including both “nationalistic” and “criminal” motives for the crime.

Apparently in vain, a statement by police insisted: “The circumstances of the event have not yet been established. All directions of investigation are being looked into. Please exhibit responsibility and wait for official results and announcements by the Jerusalem District Spokesman.”

And the above footage – if genuine – casts yet more doubt on the theory that Mohammed was targeted at random by Jewish extremists.

We already know that Mohammed was abducted and bundled into a car by unknown assailants – although initial reports suggested the car was black, as opposed to the light-colored vehicle seen in the video above. And it is clear that the figure said to be Mohammed does not go willingly – matching testimony that he was forced into the vehicle.

But that the men are wandering the streets of an Arab neighborhood late at night, and strike up a conversation with the teen before a waiting car pulls over to pick up the victim, raises the possibility that Mohammed was targeted specifically for one reason or another, as opposed to being randomly picked by Jewish vigilantes.

Such a scenario would fit in with suggestions offered by Moshe Nussbaum, a leading Israeli journalist and police affairs expert who raised questions over the background to the killings.

As reported earlier Thursday by Arutz Sheva, in an interview with Channel 2 Nussbaum noted that not long before Mohammed’s abduction, his parents had reported to police that his younger brother had been the victim of an attempted kidnapping himself.

Bizarrely, while the boy’s mother had told police that “settlers” (who for some reason she was unable to describe further) had attempted the abduction of her nine-year-old boy, his father had insisted that the would-be kidnappers were Arabs.

When police asked the father to file a formal complaint, he said he would, but that he would come down to the police station later on to do so in order to be able to comfort his son first. Yet the father never showed up, despite police contacting him several times subsequently to ask him to file the complaint.

The questions are numerous. Why were two boys from the same family targeted within a short time of one another? Was it a coincidence, or was the family embroiled in a wider familial or criminal dispute which would lead to two of its members being specifically targeted? Were the attackers in the first incident Jewish, or Arab – and why the discrepancy? Why didn’t Mohammed’s father follow up with a complaint?

One former police official who spoke to Arutz Sheva on condition of anonymity Wednesday claimed the Abu-Khder family is well known to police sources in Jerusalem, adding “it’s a problematic family with internal clashes that have been ongoing for many years.”

He asserted that he was “confident that as time passes it will be clarified that the murder was criminal and nothing more.”

But with a gag order still in place over the progress of the investigation it is impossible to say with any certainty whether the murder of Mohammed Abu-Khder was a revenge killing, or something else entirely.

What is clear however, is that in the rush to label the murder as a “revenge” attack, some nagging questions have been left unanswered.



Yet as early as Wednesday morning Israeli police issued a statement urging people to refrain from drawing hasty conclusions, saying they were exploring all possible leads, including both “nationalistic” and “criminal” motives for the crime.

Apparently in vain, a statement by police insisted: “The circumstances of the event have not yet been established. All directions of investigation are being looked into. Please exhibit responsibility and wait for official results and announcements by the Jerusalem District Spokesman.”

And the above footage – if genuine – casts yet more doubt on the theory that Mohammed was targeted at random by Jewish extremists.

We already know that Mohammed was abducted and bundled into a car by unknown assailants – although initial reports suggested the car was black, as opposed to the light-colored vehicle seen in the video above. And it is clear that the figure said to be Mohammed does not go willingly – matching testimony that he was forced into the vehicle.

But that the men are wandering the streets of an Arab neighborhood late at night, and strike up a conversation with the teen before a waiting car pulls over to pick up the victim, raises the possibility that Mohammed was targeted specifically for one reason or another, as opposed to being randomly picked by Jewish vigilantes.

Such a scenario would fit in with suggestions offered by Moshe Nussbaum, a leading Israeli journalist and police affairs expert who raised questions over the background to the killings.

As reported earlier Thursday by Arutz Sheva, in an interview with Channel 2 Nussbaum noted that not long before Mohammed’s abduction, his parents had reported to police that his younger brother had been the victim of an attempted kidnapping himself.

Bizarrely, while the boy’s mother had told police that “settlers” (who for some reason she was unable to describe further) had attempted the abduction of her nine-year-old boy, his father had insisted that the would-be kidnappers were Arabs.

When police asked the father to file a formal complaint, he said he would, but that he would come down to the police station later on to do so in order to be able to comfort his son first. Yet the father never showed up, despite police contacting him several times subsequently to ask him to file the complaint.

The questions are numerous. Why were two boys from the same family targeted within a short time of one another? Was it a coincidence, or was the family embroiled in a wider familial or criminal dispute which would lead to two of its members being specifically targeted? Were the attackers in the first incident Jewish, or Arab – and why the discrepancy? Why didn’t Mohammed’s father follow up with a complaint?

One former police official who spoke to Arutz Sheva on condition of anonymity Wednesday claimed the Abu-Khder family is well known to police sources in Jerusalem, adding “it’s a problematic family with internal clashes that have been ongoing for many years.”

He asserted that he was “confident that as time passes it will be clarified that the murder was criminal and nothing more.”

But with a gag order still in place over the progress of the investigation it is impossible to say with any certainty whether the murder of Mohammed Abu-Khder was a revenge killing, or something else entirely.

What is clear however, is that in the rush to label the murder as a “revenge” attack, some nagging questions have been left unanswered.


Arutz Sheva





THE MURDERING OF ABU KHDEIR…role of agent provocateur leadimg to Holocaust of the Jews



There are a couple or more of possible explanations and none involve Jews murdering this youth. Despite stupid hot heads shouting their mouths off this is just not the Jewish or Israeli way. The actions by Stern and Likud during the 1940s were actions in a war essentially against Britain

1. There is a history of the repression by Arab Islamic Koranic forces of this young boy as a gay boy. This is so well known in the area that a jewish Israeli police officer (retired) knew of this family and the rows inside this family
2. But that is only the start. The family of this boy may well have been prepared to kill him. His life may already have been in danger from his own family. This needs investigation because we now have THOUSANDS of documented cases of family members murdering their own. There is so much good work done on this by Pamela Geller who has turned out to be a real friend of those oppressed Muslims in such danger from Islam. Pamela remember is Jewish. Yet there she is helping Muslims in danger.
3. That is not all though because the killing of this youth happens just at a very particular conjuncture of events. The PA and Hamas were trembling at the prospect of war on them, serious warm by Israel following the outcry among Jews over what happened to the 3 Jewish youth murdered at Hebron. The extended phone call lasts for over 2 minutes and it shows that one of the youth rang the police, they shot them when they realised the phone call to the police was being made, but as is normal the recording kept on happening (you ever tried to end the call on one of these smartphone! Not so easy!) Thus the killing of this Arab youth becomes the work of Fatah and hamas, remember they are united now, and as part of a plan to pin it on Israel and Jews to take the heat off
4. All points to that act of Fatah and Hamas as agent provocateur in the situation. It is on the same level as the Mohammed el Dura Blood Libel, and very like the Qana set-up
5. The whole ramifications of the killing of this gay youth implicates those who benefit obviously Hamas and Fatah.
6. But if only Hamas and Fatah were alone. For one thing Hamas and Fatah are the Babies of the US Governments down the years, governments of all stripes democrat and republican. It is in the interest of the US and EU Imperialisms that they deflect the anger of the Jewish people and leave the Jewish people confused and indecisive. So the US Government at whatever level, say the CIA, may be involved in the sense that they are rescuing their “babies” in the PA and Hamas outfits. So Jews in trying to understand the killing of this Arab youth may look to Ukraine and the backing of US for fascists in Kiev
7. Then there is the Israeli ruling class itself and strange as it sounds we cannot dismiss them either because many events over the past 10 years have shown that the Israeli elites (many are centred around Haaretz, so called Labourites, Peres and Livni) do really fear their own Jewish people far more than they fear the enemies of the Jews, the descendants of the Nazis, because the “Palestinians” are indeed the continuation in the world of Nazi Jew Hatred. There is that phone call which is very damming. How could Jewish police listen to that over 2 minutes of torment and dismiss it? Is there more to come on that? At best these people in positions of responsibility (now dismissed) are unprepared and do not seem to realise they are in a war. What gives there? Perhaps just accidental! But may be a metaphor for the whole of Israel without a Trotskyist leadership to guide its thinking and practice.


Implications of the killing of Abu Khdeir

Above all it comes in the context of the Israeli Government of Netanyahu being unable to really challenge the Jihad waged by Islam against the Jewish state. Obama is in essence the plaything of Obama. This was confirmed when the IDF a week ago hit out against not ISIS but the forces of Assad. This has went seemingly unnoticed but actually IGNORED DELIBERATELY by writers like Israpundit, Richard Landes and martin Sheehan. The conclusion THERE IS NO GUIDANCE ON VITAL ISSUES OF LEADERSHIP

But further conclusion only us on tiny http://www.4international.me is noticing these things

Hundreds of comments on Thejournal.ie so far see sample of this Irish sheer hatred of Jews of commenters in action on http://www.thejournal.ie/palestinian-teenager-killed-tensions-1551195-Jul2014/ and everyone is hiding that Abu Khdeir was murdered most likely by the Arabs and no Jew was involved. Is that not the Nazi method to vilify the Jew. For what purpose? For the plans of the Arabs to Holocaust the Jews (again)

At the very least wait until the facts are known. So statement by Netanyahu widely reported is correct “Netanyahu urges ‘all parties not to take law into own hands,’ calls on police to crack case fast.”

At the same time Israel faces threat of Holocaust especially by the surrounding of Israel by ISIS and with the Iranian threat of Nuclear Bomb still there. And Israeli leaders cannot provide a way forward because remember that Obama created ISIS against Assad (initially), and thus Israeli leaders are unable to lead in this very difficult situation for Jews.

Talking of a planned Holocaust of the Jews is NOT overstating it. The Muslim world understands only the one condition of life for Jews and Christians, that of the “dhimmi”, which is that of a second or lower class subservient who pays a tax and in the case of Jews in the Ottoman Empire was forced to wear distinctive clothing or distinctive badge as part of the dhimmi “bargain”. By the way Muslim friendship to Christian and Jew as in Karen Armstrong talking about Muslim Spain is a myth. Not true. Muslim Spain was vicious and cruel.


This is the essence of “Palestinianism”…he founded it
Jew hatred is the Spring Wheel of the Koran


They are bankrupt those on Israpundit shouting out for massacre of all the Arabs


They shout for massacre by Jews of Arabs because they are politically bankrupt. Their empty shouts are related to their political bankruptcy. They are also completely opposed to socialism, communism and Trotskyism (they glory in the name of Jew but they are communist hatersm that is fascists. …and Ted Belman the editor keeps on his site as main commenter a Fascist who seeks the murder of Trotskyists.


The whole of the Israeli elites are bankrupt and that includes all of the blogs and commenters, all without exception.


The issue for the Jews of Israel, that is the Jews who have found refuge in Islam, a refuge against Antisemitism, is that the capitalist system is changing or morphing towards Fascism and one of the forms of this Fascism is the movement called “Palestinianism”.


The “Palestinians” is or are the continuation of the Third Reich, and coming out of Islam is devoted to one main thing the destruction of the Jewish people.


Jew Hatred in the Koran is not something which occurs. It is the SPRING WHEEL of the Koran.


There is need now for a Trotskyist Party in Israel which will be based on these concepts.


It means in concrete form that what we say is true. The Jews and Muslims cannot live together without the Muslims making war on the Jews.


Thus the Jews must live alone. There can be Muslim friends indeed there can, but they are only friends if they recognise that Jew Hatred in the Koran. That is the first step. Otherwise they are not friends. Then if they recognise this they will insist that they are in Israel only as guests.


www.4international.me is unique in these positions.


It is not just that we are unique in the Jewish struggle to survive as a Jewish nation. We are unique period.


We mirror an event in history which is unique and which all forces struggle to hide. Leon Trotsky as the 1930s came started to emphasise that nation and nationalism were important concepts.


You can say that class is the spring wheel (using that metaphor again)…But nation while not the spring wheel (In that Hess was wrong and Marx right) is still of supreme importance.


Islam does not have nation, that is the central point. But Zionism is the classic national liberation movement far outpacing in every way Irish nationalism.


The great power of Leon Trotsky in the 1930s is really his tenacity more than anything else. He continued to struggle in the midst of enormous personal tragedies.


The Fascist that Ted Belman keeps on Israpundit glories in the murder of Trotsky by Mercader but these Belman cronies weep their crocodile tears over the mirder of the 3 Jewish youth in Hebron


But the legacy of Trotsky in the 1930s is enormous. He came to the rescue of the Jews in the 1930s and was the main advocate for the Jews setting up their state, their territory with spiritual essence also, in the Palestine area.


What Israel and Jews today must do is this: they must take complete possession of Judea and Samaria, every inch of it, and also all of Gaza and Golan, and the world must be told to make provisions for these Muslims. Since Egypt created a cold peace and not a real peace, a coldness which still exists under el Sisi, the land of Sinai must also be taken possession of.


Therefore those are the borders to defend by force of arms, the River, the Sea, the border with Egypt


Meanwhile the Jewish leaders and blogs are nearly silent on the murder of the Christians in Nigeria. That must change. Many things must change. There is above all need for the Trotskyist Party in Israel.

If you agree with us above help us to build it.


The 3 Jewish boys were murdered because the murderers, probably planning a kidnap, panicked. The 3 Jewish boys would have meant nothing as humans because all of the literatura says that Jews are Dogs, and dogs in Koranic literatura teaches that dogs are the lowest form of life.

This whole episode raises issues which the Israeli leadership not only cannot solve but cannot even face up to.

The Jewish leaders are not very different to the leaders in any other country, such as British Labour, British Tories, Democrats or Republicans

They do not understand what is the Islamic Jihad.

Those who may understand it are using it for international capitalist (imperialist) purposes, as for example war on Russia (begun in Ukraine) and in China

How to understand what is Islam and what is the Jihad? Well first of all there must be a desire to understand.

If there is a desire to understand buy and study a few of the books that Andrew Bostom has either written himself or put together because much of his work is the printing of Islamic historical documents

History is not taught in schools

If you meet any young person and ask them what is Islam, what is the history of Islam, what is the history of Islam in Europe especially Spain, there will be total and complete ignorance

That is an issue for leadership. In essence that means a Trotskyist Party with a special youth movement to educate the youth.

Why that’ because nobody else will do that. It is a revolutionary issue of the first order.

So what can Israel and Israelis do today on the day after the finding of the bodies of the 3 youth in a Palestinian Arab village north of Hebron?

Understand about the Israeli leadership:

  1. Every Israeli leader from Ben Gurion through leaders with Militant and Jewish background on to Netanyahu today have failed to confront what is the Islamic Jihad against Jews and Israel
  2. They have also not confronted the Antisemitism of Europe and European leaders like Thatcher or Heath and this even though Europe murdered 6 millions of Jews in the Holocaust. That is sobering
  3. Also these Israeli Jewish leaders down through the years have stubbornly refused to accept and work on that the American people are friends of freedom and hope for Jews but that the American Capitalist System leaders are in the vast, vast majority the very opposite. And for a Jew today that is indeed also sobering

The basic policy of us Trotskyists is that Antisemitism is a great menace to Jews, today just as much as in 1939

The “Palestinians” are just the battering ram of world Antisemitism. The central fact and reality is that the “Palestinians” were founded and these Arabs given their present nature and identity by an Arab who worked closely in the Holocaust with the Nazis

There is and always have been 22 other Arab states. The Jews ask only for ONE state in which they can be safe.

The planned Palestinian Arab state would sit on the Judean plateau which overlooks the millions of Jews in the area along the Tel Aviv coast, with Ben Gurion Airport and flight path involved.

That could not work given, as I said, Islam

Understand Islam! Understand Islamic Jew Hatred!

This cannot be done by discussion alone, only by study. Study is primary to discussion.

This will not come about spontaneously. We need a Trotskyist Party. Helpp us to build a Trotskyist Party in the world




Netanyahu and his government have shamelessly exploited the disappearance of the boys to break up the tentative steps by Hamas and the Fatah organisation of Palestinian Authority President Mamoud Abbas toward forming a “national unity” government, ahead of elections next year. The agreement, struck in April and signed on June 1, was intended to end the current division of the Palestinian territories between the Hamas-controlled Gaza and Fatah-controlled West Bank.



nigeria churches

church in Nigeria destroyed by Muslims…media is silent


Ramadan in Nigeria: Massive Attack on Five Churches, Boko Haram Burnt Five Churches, Over 100 Worshipers Killed During Sunday Service Global Jihad 2014 Nigeria: Jihad, Ethnic Cleansing, Boko Haram 23 Comments


Geller calls it “ramadan bombathon”

The jihadists “are still in pursuit of the remaining villagers.” And so the ramadan bombathon is upon us.


Geller refers to Obama’s “surrender to Islamic supremacists”

With the advent of the Obama presidency and the attendant surrender to Islamic supremacists, jihadists are slaughtering and conquering with impunity. There is nothing to stop them now. And they know it. Remember, Obama said Boko Haram has “legitimate concerns.” – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/06/ramadan-nigeria-massive-attack-five-churches-boko-haram-burnt-five-churches-killed-worshippers-sunday-service.html/#sthash.wlwxmAD5.dpuf


Furthermore Geller describes this horror against Christians by Muslims in Nigeri as “slaughtering and conquering with impunity. There is nothing to stop them now. And they know it”


Who is reporting on this? I hear nobody.


There is continual terror against Christians in many parts of the worldm above all in Nigeria


Who reports? Pamela Geller, Jihadwatch but the main rich Media are silent.


Please help us to grow http://www.4international.me so that we can play our part more fully.




the kidnapping phenomenon of the “Palestinians”
the same theme of children being kidnapped

This is an article by a Palestinian Arab which is presently being aired. I think he is a business man. He is very fair towards the Jews and Israel and he falls right into one of our perspectives, that of the perspectives for the Middle East of http://www.4international.me, a perspective that is struggling to make itself known to even a few. We believe that Jews must live alone to be protected from Antisemitism…a simple enough concept but ont he elft we are alone in this This Palestinian Arab man will be a welcome guest and that concept I hope he would agree with…at any rate it would be a test. So it fits with our basic concept. Our concept of “living alone” is rooted in our fear and understanding of Antisemitism


(follows interview with a Palestinian Arab and finishes with our thoughts)


The three Israeli teenagers abducted June 12: Gilad Shaar, Naftali Frenkel, and Eyal Yifrach.



Responses such as these should help the world — which has been trying to force a peace agreement with the PA down Israel’s throat — wake up to the reality that the PA is a terrorist organization that has been inciting acts of violence and radicalism, and should be treated as such. Its leaders should be recognized as terrorists who deserve jail rather than a red carpet treatment in Western capitals.


While some argue that freedom of speech is sacred, it seems the only freedom of speech the PA allows is the one that incites terrorism.


The first thing the world should remember is that the PA is now officially united with Hamas, a terrorist organization that pledges to destroy a sovereign nation, Israel, and establish a Muslim caliphate. Financing the PA now is therefore financing terrorism.


Yet, despite uniting with Hamas, the PA will still apparently be receiving generous financing from the U.S., Canada and Europe.


The UK, with the best of intentions, offers an average of $135 million a year to the PA for development; nonetheless, the Guardian newspaper reported that the money, always fungible, was instead being used by the PA to finance terrorist imprisoned in Israeli jails — thus inadvertently financing more terrorism.


In addition, it is no secret that the PA officials have been stealing hundreds of millions of dollars of the aid money intended to improve the livelihoods of my people, the Palestinians, with no sign that Western aid to the PA ever filters down to the Palestinian public.


Instead of financing the PA leaders’ lavish lifestyles, the world might finally start questioning the PA’s institutionalized incitement of terror and hatred to my people which they relay daily through media, education and the religious institutions.


Ever since the PA came into existence, it has been keen to mass-produce and institutionalize the hatred of Jews and also the West. With their government-controlled TV shows that teach children how to kill Jews, and textbooks that preach hatred for Israel, the PA and Hamas are directly and fully responsible for each and every terror act committed by Palestinians, including the kidnapping of the three teenagers.


Is this what the West is so breathless to support?


Ironically, the PA is claiming no responsibility for the kidnappings, however you cannot be running TV, newspapers and social media encouraging terror and the murdering of Jews and then claim that you are innocent when acts of terror happen.


Another reason for kidnapping the three teenagers, of course, is also the regular prisoner-release agreements forced on Israel. Gilad Shalit was kidnapped and held for five years then released in a prisoner exchange agreement for more than 1,000 terrorist prisoners who were let out of jail. Such deals have been openly encouraged and blessed by the PA leader. In other words, the PA encourages the kidnappings of Israelis to exchange them with terror prisoners.


The world should therefore understand Israel’s position when it recently called off releasing yet more terror prisoners in a deal promoted by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry. These releases just encourage the kidnapping of more Israelis.


As a Palestinian, I do not wish for any of my people to be in jail; nonetheless, I cannot sympathize with those who kill children and innocent civilians. I also know that releasing those prisoners in “swaps” sets a bad example, and even encourages more of my people to commit acts of terror: they see they can be released in a few years in a prisoner exchange brokered by the West.


Would the U.S. or Europe agree to give its cities and parts of its soil to a terrorist organization to establish a country the way Secretary Kerry has been pushing Israel to give up most of the West Bank and return to pre-1967 borders?


Also, if the US or any European country were facing terror attacks from any neighboring country, wouldn’t it seek to build a barrier to protect itself from that country? The U.S. already has a fortified wall along parts of its border with Mexico to stop illegal immigration — an offense not by any means close to any of the terrorist acts that have claimed the lives of thousands of Israeli civilians over the years. Therefore, can the world keep blaming Israel for having a security barrier?


Can we Palestinians blame Israel when the barrier never existed before Hamas and the PLO started launching terror attacks on Israel on a daily basis? Yes, the wall looks sad and ugly and depressing, but if Israel’s neighbors proclaim every day that their sole desire is to displace Israel, what else — apart from surrender — can Israel do?


We Palestinians know that Israel welcomed us with open arms before the PA came and brought terror-preaching with it. And yes, there have always been constant acts of Palestinian terrorism. But PA terror has became (sic) a major industry — in which terrorists are pampered, protected, financed, employed, and glorified by the PA — with streets, soccer stadiums and summer camps named after them. And Europe breathlessly joins in.


Israeli measures towards securing the safety of its citizens as well as that of the Palestinians, have been demonized by the world and the so-called Palestinian sympathizers, who choose to ignore the fact that Palestinians’ lives have become harder because of the terrorists and not because of Israel. A Palestinian businessman, for instance, who frequently passes illegally into Israel to buy his products, said: “Most people are mad at those who kidnapped the kids…[because] When they commit such acts, we rejoice, celebrate for Israel’s suffering, then sit down and worry if we will be allowed into Israel for work and medical treatment. To me, such a kidnapping only destroys the livelihood of my four children. This has to stop, for our own sake.”


The Palestinian Authority is a terrorist organization, and its leaders are terrorists who deserve international arrest warrants rather than the red-carpet treatment in Western capitals. The PA has been an inciter of terror; it jeopardizes the safety and livelihoods of Israelis and Palestinians alike.


This tragedy should remind the world that the PA — and organizations like it — is a threat to all of us and should not be rewarded with still more funds for terrorist behaviour. For the sake of both Israel and the Palestinians, it is not Israel but the PA that should be boycotted, excluded and even dissolved.




Remember here that the BBC calls the ISIL Militants. The BBC does this not once but every single time.


The BBC thus creates an image in the mind of the listener. The image is that the ISIL is not a group of terrorists but a group of militants. They have a militancy for a historical reason which is that they are oppressed. That is the  (could we call it subliminal – it is more than subliminal it is very open propaganda) propaganda message poured out day after day by the BBC. The BBC is awash with money and it is paid for by the population. The BBC was talking this very morning on a BBC World Programme of planning to reach half a billion people. A neat trick. The BBC is being paid by the people in order to enslave the minds of those very people. I talk here in an overall and general sense (there IS some good stuff on the BBC)


If the BBC thus creates a subliminal message that ISIL is so and so, then what does the BBC do towards Fatah, Hamas and the “Palestinians”?


In the various studios of the BBC the “Palestinians” can do no wrong. The “Palestinians” for the BBC are the ultimate “victims” of history.


In order to create that picture the BBC has lied about history. The BBC in order to carry off that “The Palestinians are victims” concept has lied about everything (not almost everything but everything) since the beginnings of Zionism.


I mean the whole thing! The whole of the history! Insidious lie after insidious lie!


It is just dishonest treatment of history by the BBC. Very often it is leaving out of certain aspects or factual narrative. I would say that the BBC are absolute “masters” of this technique.


In that latter regard let me tell of one trick or aspect which really gets my rag out!


I actually follow this trick as it is used by two reporters whom I follow in a more or less desultory manner, one doing a BBC weekend morning programme the other is a non BBC programme. The trick is this: It is the selecting of a piece of propaganda by SOMEBODY ELSE, the reporter plays the piece of propaganda, but does not comment. This is a method, a very invidious method, a method of distortion.


Of course there are millions of communists and revolutionists behind www.4international.me and they are just waiting for the word. So all of those conspiracists who think of communism as the great danger to everything will be very worried to hear that we on 4international have just bought a new inkjet printer. It costs about 60 euros and we thought about it. The cost has not broken me financially but I did think what it could be used for and it is not an offset printer churning out millions of copies per hour. (allow for my twisted sense of humour here)


But since that is irony above the real thing that we lack is organization. At this stage we do not want to do much more than tell the truth, first to ourselves, and then to a few more people, but most of all and enduringly to tell the truth to ourselves, and that is hard enough. Not hard in the sense of it being a chore, just difficult.


To conclude…On the above remarkable document. He is a Palestinian Arab. He sees the falseness. He articulates it well. But in the end he is using the Jews of Israel also and there are Jews also who in business use Palestinian Arab cheap labour for profit.


From that latter concept there has to grow up a layer of Israeli Jews who are using the situation for their own gains. But the truth of the matter and of the situation, a situation both historical and contemporary (what happens day in day out with rockets from Gaza onto Sderot last night), it is that Arab Antisemitism which runs right through the whole situation and land is that Jews and Arabs cannot live together. There MUST be separation for the safety of Jews. To keep your feet on the ground and think and act realistically. Is that the basic answer for the Jews of Israel? I think it is a big part of it.


Britain opposed the Jewish state in 1948 (Haifa) and US Empire is now the enemy of the Jews


What Martin Sherman leaves out of this analysis is the most important factor of all. This factor exists in the form of a reality, a certain reality that must be addressed before any other.


That factor is the existence in the world of the US Empire and its lapdogs in NATO and the EU.


ISIL is important, of course it is but the drive behind ISIL is not only the Islamic Jihad rooted in the Koran, but also (perhaps I could say more and more) it is the actions of Empire with its EU and NATO in tow on the world scene.


How far back to go? Well I would certainly go back to the role of the US post 1945 when the US ruling class recruited all of the Nazis into their government and especially into their intelligence services. Edward Snowden is an issue for all Jews and it must be an issue of how Jews can support that American freedom fighter.


What WAS the Second World War fought for then? So that the US ruling class could co-opt the Nazis. Is that it?


A key part of this growing Empire, the British Government, rather than giving the new state of the Jews a fair wind in 1948, in fact openly brought Nazis into Palestine to fight the Jews.


Moving forward a bit who was it that insisted on the PLO being rescued after the PLO was routed in the Lebanon War in 2002? It was the then US President and all of the prestige of Empire which did that. Many Jewish soldiers had laid down their lives for the US President to do that to the Jews.


The actual “philosophical” basis for the rescue of the PLO was the propaganda and actions of the Churches and especially of the Vatican

(see http://emperors-clothes.com/vatican/pressure.htm)


I have got one, and only one, criticism of the analysis of Martin Sherman because I agree with almost all, but it is a weighty criticism all the same. Sherman is basically asking the key question but not giving any answer: Why are the Jews of Israel, this very significant nation of people, continuing to elect (and I use the word after some thought) douchebags like Netanyahu.


Netanyahu seems to have absolutely no backbone at all. I wonder if Netanyahu has been kept alive politically by means of the valiant sacrifice of his brother. But however this man is the wrong man to lead Israel in a period of warfare.


The answer which Martin Sherman does not give to the question which is inherent in everything that he writes which is that the Israeli people, a valiant people, continue to elect such douchebags as Netanyahu because (I emphasize most strongly) no other alternative is being offered to the Israeli people.


It needs a new leadership (however that can be created I myself thinking that it must be based on Trotskyist principles)


Such a leadership will be democratic, centralized, theoretical, a cadre based on history. It will as a first step break up, expel or imprison (with capital punishment restored for crimes against Jews) both Fatah and Hamas


The new war of the Jews is actually against two main foes. One of these is a very old enemy of the Jews indeed and that is the forces of Islam and Mohammedan Jihad. But the second is war against Empire, that is against the same Empire which in the 1990s made war against the Serbs ON BEHALF OF THAT JIHAD, and on that basis also removed Saddam, removed Mubarak, Ben Ali and Gadhafi, all of whom were secular dictators, to open the door to precisely the ISIL situation Sherman refers to. My reference above indicates that I believe that the Vatican is central to this Empire. The present Pope Francis is all about drawing closer to Islamic Jihad in Catholic Nigeria, and everywhere that Christians are slaughtered daily.


A war on two fronts! Sad as it really is that is the only reality for the Jews. I wish it could be peaceful admiring of the grass growing in your garden but alas cannot be that.





from the Nazi period this Serb is being beheaded by a crosscut saw by Fascist Croatians


heads of Serbs beheaded by Jihadists in Yugoslavia supported by the Empire (Bill Clinton supporting Izetbegovic)
Christian priest beheaded by the Jihad (financed and backed by the Empire led by Obama in Syria)


FELIX QUIGLEY PLACED THIS COMMENT ON THE MARTIN SHERMAN BLOGS (That is a Jewish Israeli blog and the commenters there were creating a situation where they were leaving out the overall reactionary strategy in the world of Empire, above all were leaving out for the readers of Sherman’s blog the role of Empire in Yugoslavia)



(begin extracts from Facebook)


Felix QuigleyThe lesson of Yugoslavia is that the US (The Empire) sets out deliberately to break up states, and to impose its henchmen in order to keep control. This is what is happening now in Iraq and Syria and none of the comments above reflect that

From Wikipedia “The accords called for NATO administration of Kosovo as an autonomous province within Yugoslavia; a force of 30,000 NATO troops to maintain order in Kosovo; an unhindered right of passage for NATO troops on Yugoslav territory, including Kosovo; and immunity for NATO and its agents to Yugoslav law.

In commentary released to the press, former United States Secretary of State Henry Kissinger declared that:

The Rambouillet text, which called on Serbia to admit NATO troops throughout Yugoslavia, was a provocation, an excuse to start bombing. Rambouillet is not a document that an angelic Serb could have accepted. It was a terrible diplomatic document that should never have been presented in that form.[4]

—Henry Kissinger, Daily Telegraph, 28 June 1999

    Felix Quigley…a further comment on the above words by Kissinger…”Kissinger is right and wrong. It was not a “terrible” document but a real document. the intention of the US (The Empire) was to bomb Yugoslavia and to destroy the Serbs as a nation people, and to have compliant US people in power in all of the former Yugoslavia. THAT is happening now in the countries which surround Israel and the Israelis are asleep, or like Caroline Glick who supported the 2003 war on Saddam, are compliant with US Imperialism…see many articles on this theme on www.4international.me, also on www.tenc.net and on www.hirhome.com
    defending Israel, defending Jews against antisemitism, support for Serbs, unity of Serbs and Jews.


In jailing Al Jazeera journalists like Greste el Sisi is defending the Christians from the Jihad savages


The present “Left” denies the Jihad of the Muslim Brothers against Jews and Christians


http://www.4international.me takes the political position of backing the military gpvernment of el Sisi in Egypt in its suppression of the Muslim Brotherhood and in its suppression also of Al Jazeera includingm and we stress thism the jailing of its journalists. We do so against ALL “Left” groups on the planet and against American and EU Imperialisms. In backing el Sisi and in urging the suppression totally of the Muslim Brotherhood we are also opposed to all “Human” Rights Groups. We cannot help but note how spineless and opportunist is Netanyahu and all Israeli leaders on the issue.


These are some points to consider:



  1. Egypt is at war with the Muslim Brotherhood
  2. Al Jazeera backs and finances the Muslim Brotherhood
  3. Al Jazeera pretends to be an impartial News Service but is not
  4. Al Jazeera offices in Cairo (that means all of Egypt) closed down July 2013
  5. Al Jazeera journalists … Arrested in a Cairo Hotel end of December 2013 … 6 months later
  6. They had no accreditation
  7. They were there on the basis of Al Jazeera being “neutral” but el Sisi has exploded that lie…That is what the case centres on, that Al Jazeera is neutral
  8. But is Al Jazeera in the war of the Islam Caliphate neutral or was it ever thus! Thus this is the myth that has been exploded
  9. Raised is the issue: Is Egypt really at war with the Muslim Brotherhood, a war which is still being fought?
  10. The “Left” backs Al Jazeera because it has sold out on its revolutionary socialist principles and because the “Left” today IS The Muslim Brotherhood (remember Galloway supporting the Flotilla to Hamas in Gaza)
  11. Exposed here above all is the US advocacy of the Muslim Brotherhood
  12. Also exposed is the spinelessness towards the necessary supporting El Sisi against the Muslim Brotherhood of the lsraeli leaders. Only 4international.me takes a clear position



Greste was arrested in December of 2013. The office of Al Jazeera in Cairo was closed down in July 2013. The Prosecution against Greste and two others included the relevant point that they had no accreditation. If the military government had closed down the office in July what was Geste doing in Cairo with a full operation going on in a hotel in December? (see note 1)


4international has read all of the attacks on el Sisi for the jailing of Greste. But the jailing of Greste is not a thing in itself, an abstract issue of “democracy” because the real issue is that Greste was working for Al Jazeera, and that Al Jazeera is NOT a normal news service, but was engaged in the war of the Muslim Brotherhood against the Egyptian people and especially against Egyptian women and non Muslims such as the Coptic Christians. THAT was the issue in the trial and sentencing of Greste.  (see note 2)


The Reuters article on the jailing of Greste is full of all the condemnations of the British, the Dutch, the Americans, Human Rights Watch and the UN. Those condemnations by THOSE tyrants should be enough to tell us that el Sisi is on the right tracks in suppressing Al Jazeera. If all those are on the side of Greste and against el Sisi then we can conclude that el Sisi is on the right track here. But more seriously, the whole of the lies of the ruling establishments concerning Islam are being challenged by the brave el Sisi (see note 3)


In fact the conclusion of el Sisi and the great majority of the Egyptians who elected el Sisi was that Al Jazeera was helping a terrorist organization. That is irrefutable! (see note 4)


Israelis Jews and all freedom lovers, but not the present “Left” or the BBC who are not freedom lovers, will take careful note of the position of those like Obama and Kerry leading American Imperialism especially (see note 5)



If Jews are to survive in this world today of deepening economic and political crisis and conflict with growing Antisemitismm and Fascist forces on the “Left”, as well as deep Antisemitic forces in US and EU Imperialisms, then it needs a courageous leadership. On the issue of support  for el Sisi Jewish leaders are cowardly. The Jewish leaders as they stand at present are political cowards, as cowardly as the Jewish leaders who were not prepared to ram home their victory in 1967, after they the Jews had been fighting a war for their very survival, a defensive war against the Muslim Brotherhood. Now their support for el Sisi if you could call it support is niggardly. You will find that every one of these Jewish leaders do not oppose el Sisi but they do not support him either. In fact against the Muslim Brothers the support of the Jews in the whole world should be unconditional. The best formula is a critical support for el Sisi but against the Muslim Brotherhood it is unconditional support (see note 6)







NOTE 1…Greste was arrested in Cairo with colleagues at the end of December 2013. The interior ministry said the journalists were accused of news reporting which was “damaging to national security”.[9] Greste was imprisoned in Egypt in solitary confinement for a month before any formal charges were made.[10] On 29 January, it emerged that the Egyptian authorities were to charge 20 Al Jazeera journalists, including Greste, of falsifying news and having a negative impact on overseas perceptions of the country.[11] His colleagues, Mohamed Fadel Fahmy and Baher Mohamed, are also imprisoned; the three men were being held in the same cell in early February 2014.[12] The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights has urged the authorities in Egypt to “promptly release” the Al Jazeera staff they are holding in custody.[2]


On 21 February, Greste was refused bail and had his court case adjourned until 5 March.[13]


On 31 March, he and co-defendants Mohammed Fahmy and Baher Mohammed made a request to a judge during a hearing to be released. [3] During the hearing Greste told the judge: “The idea that I could have an association with the Muslim Brotherhood is frankly preposterous.”[3]


On 23 June, Greste was found guilty by the court, and sentenced to seven years in prison. Mohammed Fahmy also received seven years and Baher Mohammed received a sentence of ten years in prison.[14] International reaction was swift and negative. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was highly critical of the sentences of Greste and his co-workers, terming them “chilling and draconian” and noted he had spoken to Egyptian governmental officials including President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi.






NOTE 2…Many Egyptians see Al Jazeera as a force determined to destabilise the country, a view that has been encouraged in the local media, which has labelled the journalists “The Marriott Cell” because they worked from a hotel of the U.S.-based chain.


A video that appeared on a pro-government channel and spread online, reinforced the view that the journalists had sinister intents, showing their arrest in their hotel room, with close-ups of their computers, cameras and communications equipment.


Al Jazeera’s Cairo offices have been closed since July 3 when security forces raided them hours after Mursi was ousted. Criticism of the government and army has virtually vanished from Egyptian media since then.




NOTE 3…One Dutch woman and two Britons were sentenced to 10 years in absentia on the same charges of aiding a “terrorist group”.


Judicial sources told Reuters the verdicts could be appealed before a higher court and a pardon was still possible.


Egypt’s public prosecutor last week ordered the release of another Al Jazeera journalist, Abdullah al-Shamy, on health grounds after he spent more than 130 days on hunger strike.


Western governments and rights groups have voiced concern over freedom of expression in Egypt since Mursi was ousted. The crackdown has reinforced doubts about Egypt’s democratic credentials three years after an uprising toppled Hosni Mubarak and raised hopes of greater freedoms.


The case comes after a similar outcry over mass death sentences being handed down to Brotherhood supporters.


“Egypt’s reputation, and especially the reputation of its judiciary as an independent institution, are at stake,” U.N. human rights chief Navi Pillay said. “There is a risk that miscarriage of justice is becoming the norm in Egypt.”


Britain, whose ambassador attended the hearing, said it was summoning the Egyptian ambassador to protest.


“Freedom of the press is a cornerstone of a stable and prosperous society,” Foreign Secretary William Hague said.


The Dutch foreign minister also summoned Egypt’s ambassador. Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop said her government was “deeply dismayed that any sentence was imposed” and was “appalled by the severity of it”.


“The Egyptian foreign ministry strongly rejects any comment from a foreign party that casts doubt on the independence of the Egyptian judiciary and the justice of its verdicts,” the foreign ministry said in a statement.





Human Rights Watch said: “These… verdicts are a stark admission that in today’s Egypt, simply practicing professional journalism is a crime and that the new constitution’s guarantees of free expression are not worth the paper they are written on.”


Egyptian officials have said the case is not about freedom of expression and that the journalists raised suspicions by operating without proper accreditation.




NOTE 4…Three Al Jazeera journalists were jailed for seven years each by an Egyptian judge on Monday, in what Washington called “chilling, draconian sentences” that must be reversed.


Cairo defended the journalists’ convictions – for aiding a “terrorist organisation” – and rejected the widespread condemnation as “interference in its internal affairs”.


The three, who all denied the charge of working with the now banned Muslim Brotherhood, included Australian Peter Greste and Canadian-Egyptian national Mohamed Fahmy, Cairo bureau chief of Al Jazeera English.


The third defendant, Egyptian producer Baher Mohamed, was given an extra three years for possessing a single bullet, at the hearing attended by Western diplomats, some of whose governments summoned Egypt’s ambassadors over the case.


The men have been held at Egypt’s notorious Tora Prison for six months, with the case becoming a rallying point for rights groups and news organisations around the world.


They were detained in late December and charged with helping “a terrorist group” – a reference to the Muslim brotherhood – by broadcasting lies that harmed national security and supplying money, equipment and information to a group of Egyptians.


The Brotherhood was banned and declared a terrorist group after the army deposed elected Islamist president Mohamed Mursi in July following mass protests against his rule. The Brotherhood says it is a peaceful organisation.


Al Jazeera, whose Qatari owners back the Brotherhood and have been at odds with Egypt’s leadership, said the ruling defied “logic, sense and any semblance of justice”. “There is only one sensible outcome now. For the verdict to be overturned, and justice to be recognised by Egypt,” Al Jazeera English managing director Al Anstey said in a statement.


The ruling came a day after U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry met newly elected Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi in Cairo and raised the issue of the journalists.




NOTE 5…On Monday, Kerry said he called Egypt’s foreign minister to register his “serious displeasure” at the “chilling, draconian sentences”.


“Injustices like these simply cannot stand if Egypt is to move forward in the way that President al-Sisi and Foreign Minister (Sameh) Shoukry told me just yesterday that they aspire to see their country advance,” Kerry said in a statement.



NOTE 6…For Egypt’s neighbor Israel, security and stability are the top concerns. In recent pre-election statements, El-Sisi has said he would honor the 1979 Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty as president.

“I respect all international accords, including the treaty with Israel,” he said.

Israel and Egypt have a shared interest in cracking down on Islamic terror groups in the Sinai, and in targeting the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, which is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.

“Abdel Fattah El-Sisi is Egypt’s strong man right now and has been fighting against radical Islam and against the Muslim Brothers. This is very positive both for Egypt, but also for Israel and the entire Middle East,” former Israeli Ambassador to Egypt Zvi Mazel told JNS.org in January.

“We shouldn’t go out on the roofs and cry out in favor of El-Sisi. But what is going on in Egypt is positive for Israel, and you cannot deny it,” he added.


(by FQ…in fact nothing could show the reactionary Jewish Israeli leaders better. That is exactly what the Jewish leaders in Israel and int he whole Diaspora especially in America and Britain should do. They should go on the roofs and cry out for El Sisi against the Muslim Brotherhood)







There is not a thing the British ruling classes can do. From royalty down they are slaves of Islam. At stake are the lives of so many innocent and poor (by now) Britons and Irish too. The Muslim enclaves are well established and if you attack Islam you are labelled a racist from all sides especially the Churches and the “Left”

There is really nothing to stop this and it will take a totally revolutionary process but leadership on the left is absent and the present “Left” are covering for Islam. Many will die at the hands of these ISIS in Britain and Europe

A party needs to be built on the left that will concéntrate on teaching the youth what is Islam, especially its historym with special emphasis on Spain which is the centre of so many lies a la Karen Armstrong. Works of the early writers on this must be fundamental in this education and to counter the lies of Armstrong.

But in the meantime the British ruling class elites have ALREADY sacrificed the lives of thousands. Is this stoppable no! The proof is to google under pictures “ISIS Iraq” and that is your answer. They are primed to kill and will kill.





ISIL Jihadists move against Lebanon and Jordan and ….


As the Obama admin pretends jihad is a figment of the conspiratorial imagination of “fringe” counter jihadists and scrub our counter terror materials his fantasy – the big lie – is exploding and isn’t containing itself to Syria and now Iraq. It’s not a news story that is going to disappear. ISIL has just begun.

The media had amended the name of the Islamic army tearing through Syria and Iraq ISIS (Islamic State of Suria and Iraq). But the correct name is Iis ISIL (Islamic State in the Levant). What is the the Levant? The geographical area they mean to rule. The Levant includes Egypt, Lebanon Nigeria Central African Republic Thailand Burma ritz Levant is the following countries and they mean to seize it.

And it’s not ISIL that’s the problem, it’s the ideology.

Countries and regions located in the Levant region. (Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, Cyprus,  and Hatay.

Members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria are claiming on jihadist websites that the group is preparing an operation in which more than 15,000 of its militants will storm into Jordan, WND is reporting.

- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/06/jihadists-move-lebanon-jordan.html/#sthash.LdrFtFjj.dpuf




The key issue is the 2003 war against Saddam. Just yesterday the Israeli regime led by Netanyahu has launched attacks on Assad which has meant the Fascist Islamist opposition to Assad has gained.

(Israel struck nine Syrian targets in response to boy’s death, and as a boost for the rebel bid for Quneitra

DEBKAfile Special ReportJun 23, 2014, 3:36 AM (IDT)

Israel carried out nine strikes against Syrian military targets after midnight Monday, June 23, in retaliation for a Kornet rocket attack which killed an Israeli boy, and injured two others a few hours earlier. They were conducted by air and by Spike NLOS anti-tank missiles (Tamuz), against the Syrian 90th Brigade command center in Quneitra and three battalions

But back in the years before the pivotal 2003 war on Saddam Netanyahu was doing the very same thing, as we will see. This was also the position of Caroline Glick and Ted Belman of Israpundit. The actions of all of these people, all Jews, opened the door it Jihad int he world and in the Middle East that may well threaten as never before the Jewish people and Israel.)


We have seen in these 4international articles over the past few days that Israeli politicians around Sharon were totally opposed to the Bush War




(plus other articles in the past few days, including one from 2008 on http://4international.me/2008/09/01/do-not-pin-iraq-onto-the-jews-and-israelsharon-opposed-the-war/)


Thus in 2003 and the years leading up to the Bush War on Saddam this critical situation for Jews as brewing. The War in 2003 created the situation where THE LEADER OF ISRAEL Arik Sharon,  was telling Bush that he was opposed to the War. (Just read my article to see how explicit and prescient was Sharon)


But there were MANY OTHER JEWISH FORCES who were working apart from Sharon, meaning apart from the Israeli Government, and who were cutting right across Sharon.


They were:

Certainly Caroline Glick

Certainly Ted Belman of Israpundit. Belman had a whole line about US and BUSH recreating the world)

Certainly and above all Netanyahu


On this we now turn to Netanyahu and here we introduce an extract from Wikipedia for you to consider. Note that Buchanan is correct when he refers to Perle, Feith and Wurmsur (But there were many others) (I am opposed to Buchanan on a critical issue, Buchanan is silent on what we say about the opposition of Sharon to the war on Saddam and he is silent because he is essentially Antisemitic)


I have already mentioned Glick and Belman. But go into the records and there were more. Thus there is within Jews today a battle going on. There are those like Glick and Pamela Geller, plus many more who are really communist haters and who will do anything in that regard on behalf of US Imperialism


Now this weekend we have Netanyahu cheered on by Belman who throws Israel and the IDF against Assad, which is like a stab in the back against all those Christians and other minorities who support Assad against the Jihad.


I have just looked at the sites of Pamela Geller and at Israpundit and they are silent, which means they support Netanyahu in this ominous development. It is back to the 2003 Bush War on Saddam


Read also very carefully the remarks by Ian Buruma in the pivotal New York Times. Read this very carefully. See how Buruma has described the situation. The image created is that the US and Israel are together in this horrific development the War to remove Saddam


THEY ARE ALL TOGETHER except for one Little detail … we now know that the Israeli Government under Sharon was opposed, AIPAC was opposed, the spokespeople for Sharon in America were opposed and were telling all Jews coming to America to OPPOSE THIS WAR


But the Israeli Government was surrounded and was bushwhacked by the NeoCons which also were made up by Glick and Belman, and Geller carries this on in the present.


Can Israel win today with these people still around and doing the same thing in different forms? No it cannot win. It is being betrayed.


(Start extract from Wikipedia here)

In March 2003 Patrick J. Buchanan, referring to the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the report, wrote that “Their plan, which urged Israel to re-establish ‘the principle of preemption,’ has now been imposed by Perle, Feith, Wurmser & Co. on the United States.”[4]

Ian Buruma wrote in August 2003 in the New York Times that:[5]

Douglas Feith and Richard Perle advised Netanyahu, who was prime minister in 1996, to make “a clean break” from the Oslo accords with the Palestinians. They also argued that Israeli security would be served best by regime change in surrounding countries. Despite the current mess in Iraq, this is still a commonplace in Washington. In Paul Wolfowitz‘s words, “The road to peace in the Middle East goes through Baghdad.” It has indeed become an article of faith (literally in some cases) in Washington that American and Israeli interests are identical, but this was not always so, and “Jewish interests” are not the main reason for it now.

Buruma continues:[5]

What we see, then, is not a Jewish conspiracy, but a peculiar alliance of evangelical Christians, foreign-policy hard-liners, lobbyists for the Israeli government and neoconservatives, a number of whom happen to be Jewish. But the Jews among them—Perle, Wolfowitz, William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, et al.—are more likely to speak about freedom and democracy than about Halakha (Jewish law). What unites this alliance of convenience is a shared vision of American destiny and the conviction that American force and a tough Israeli line on the Arabs are the best ways to make the United States strong, Israel safe and the world a better place.





This issue involves the Independence of Israel, Independence especially from the clutches of the US State Department, which has a history of Antisemitism.


The reason that Sharon opposed the Bush War was the very opposite of why Chomsky and the “Left” leading those demos of millions in London and Madrid opposed the Bush War. Like Saddam did also, Sharon knew that the main danger was not being dictatorial, but the Jihad and Sharia Law.


When Bush went to war on Saddam the writing was already on the Wall for millions of Christians. That is ironic considering that Bush and Blair were both Christian freaks!


This good article from Forward a few years ago has got good sources on this vital matter. We cannot move forward without dealing with it:


Olmert’s predecessor, by contrast, was anything but an amateur in Israeli-American relations, and more broadly in dealing with America’s policies in the region. When it came to Bush’s decision to go to war in Iraq and to democratize the Arab Middle East from within, Ariel Sharon took a far more sophisticated position.

Publicly, Sharon played the silent ally; he neither criticized nor supported the Iraq adventure. One reason for his relative silence was Washington’s explicit request that Israel refrain from openly backing its invasion of an Arab country or in any way intervening, lest its blessing damn the United States in Arab eyes.

But sometime prior to March 2003, Sharon told Bush privately in no uncertain terms what he thought about the Iraq plan. Sharon’s words — revealed here for the first time — constituted a friendly but pointed warning to Bush. Sharon acknowledged that Saddam Hussein was an “acute threat” to the Middle East and that he believed Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction.

Yet according to one knowledgeable source, Sharon nevertheless advised Bush not to occupy Iraq. According to another source — Danny Ayalon, who was Israel’s ambassador to the United States at the time of the Iraq invasion, and who sat in on the Bush-Sharon meetings — Sharon told Bush that Israel would not “push one way or another” regarding the Iraq scheme.

According to both sources, Sharon warned Bush that if he insisted on occupying Iraq, he should at least abandon his plan to implant democracy in this part of the world. “In terms of culture and tradition, the Arab world is not built for democratization,” Ayalon recalls Sharon advising.

Be sure, Sharon added, not to go into Iraq without a viable exit strategy. And ready a counter-insurgency strategy if you expect to rule Iraq, which will eventually have to be partitioned into its component parts. Finally, Sharon told Bush, please remember that you will conquer, occupy and leave, but we have to remain in this part of the world. Israel, he reminded the American president, does not wish to see its vital interests hurt by regional radicalization and the spillover of violence beyond Iraq’s borders.

Sharon’s advice — reflecting a wealth of experience with Middle East issues that Bush lacked — was prescient. The American occupation of Iraq has ended up strengthening Iran, Israel’s number-one enemy, and enfranchising militant Shi’ite Islamists. A large part of Iraq is slipping into the Iranian orbit. Iraq’s western Anbar Province is increasingly dominated by militant jihadi Sunnis who could eventually threaten Syria and Jordan, the latter a strategic partner and geographic buffer for Israel.

All these developments harm vital Israeli interests. This past summer, Israel fought a war against two militant Islamist movements supported by Iran — Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza — that were enfranchised and legitimized in their anarchic countries thanks to Bush’s insistence on hasty and ill-advised democratic elections “in this part of the world.”

Had Sharon made his criticism public, citing the dangers posed to vital Israeli interests, might he have made a difference in the prewar debate in the United States and the world? Certainly he would have poured cold water on the postwar assertions of critics, like professors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer, who have fingered Israel, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and pro-Israelis in the administration for instigating the war. Ayalon, incidentally, was directed by Sharon to warn all Israelis visiting Washington not to encourage the American scheme for war in Iraq, lest Israel be blamed for its failure.

There were, of course, neoconservative types in Israel who did encourage the United States to occupy Iraq and advocated democratic elections wherever possible in the Middle East. But there were also many Israelis, this writer included, who spoke out openly and publicly against the American scheme.

Even Aipac officials in Washington told visiting Arab intellectuals they would rather the United States deal militarily with Iran than with Iraq. And pro-Western Arab leaders like Egypt’s Husni Mubarak and Jordan’s King Abdallah were outspoken in their criticism of Bush’s war plans, even though they could fall back on far less credit and lobbying support in Washington than in Israel.

Read more: http://forward.com/articles/9839/sharon-warned-bush/#ixzz35LpRi8UO


The issue of the 2003 Bush War on Saddam is fundamental. It is key. I return to this issue all of the time.


The opposition to the 2003 Bush War from the “Left” was clearly


1. part of the Alliance of the “Left” with Islam

2. a negation of the Jihad


i can show easily that this Alliance of the “Left” with Mohammedanism stands in contradiction to the great socialist founders, and most specifically with positions of Leon Trotsky.


The “left” refuses to believe that there is a Jihad in the world by the forces of Mohammedanism. But that should have been the real reason for opposing the Bush War on Saddam. Let me explain.


Saddam was at every point prepared to enter into Alliance with Bush and US for one reason and one reason only. Saddam saw as the main danger to himself and to his state as being the Jihad. Thus the FBI/CIA interviews with Saddam post capture tell a lot (Wikipedia has report)


“…had resisted U.N. weapons inspections because he “was more concerned about Iran discovering Iraq’s weaknesses and vulnerabilities than the repercussions of the United States for his refusal to allow U.N. inspectors back into Iraq,” according to the reports.[5] The former leader reportedly maintained that he did not collaborate with Al-Qaeda, as had been suggested by George W. Bush administration officials in support of its policy of regime change in Iraq.[6] Hussein said he feared Al-Qaeda would have turned on him, and was quoted calling Osama bin Laden a “zealot.”[3] 


The opposition of Saddam to the UN Inspections was also to show Iran that he was still strong. (Honour in Arab politics, loss of face…see Richard Landes on this) Saddam also had reason to fear Iran.


Thus there was a clear opportunity for the US and Britain to créate an Alliance with Saddam against Iran and against the Jihad in particular.


Bush did not take that road. There is obviously no question about that.


Was Gadhafi afraid that Bush would do the same to him? Yes (after Desert Storm who would not be!) but to pose it like that is to miss the other reality (that other reality!) which is far more important. These are secular Arab rulers who fear the Islamic Jihad. That was far more important in pushing Gadhafi into an Alliance with Bush and Blair agaisnt the Jihad.


The “Left” misreads, misunderstands, and now is an agent of Islam, and the “Left” opposition to the Bush War was leading all of those millions of youth and workers into a specific AND REACTIONARY direction. Under leaders like Chomsky and probably ALSO under the influence of state agents in their ranks the “Left” was becoming a problem for the working class itself…still is.


(see http://4international.me/2014/06/20/the-barbarism-brought-on-by-bush-glick-and-blair-overthrowing-saddam/)







Sayyid Qutb on trial in 1966 and executed by the secular Nasser


Sharon was wiser by far than the US influenced Caroline Glick and privately opposed Bush removing Saddam.


The “left” opposed the Bush/Glick/Blair war because they are degenerate “pacifism”…Also fuelled by anti-Americanism and pro Islam sentiments a la Karen Armstrong


The coming to power of Obama created an even newer and more dangerous situation. The middle class enraged is a most dangerous thing. The Middle Class in America elected Obama from its position of pacifism and from its phoney doctrines of anti-racism. These savages of the Middle Class thought it wonderful to elect a “Black” man. Thus the enraged Middle Class, the Media, the BDS crowd, Media Matters dot org, and so on decided to do away with political research. The history of Obama and CIA man Bill Ayers was ignored.


Obama got rid of all of these secular type rulers in the Arab world. This was a continuation of US and EU support for Izetbegovic and getting rid of the secularist Milosevic.


These leaders were downed one by one by Obama, including Mubarak, Ben Ali and Gadhafi.


Then followed Syria. The protests again were got underway. Obama insisted that Assad must go (see it…repeat of former Saddam Mubarak Gadhafi and Ben Ali)


Obama now had control of the US State Machine and in saying Assad must go Obama piled up an Armada opposite Syrian shores. But Assad had a political backing, that of minorities in Syria who feared the Jihad. For Christians and Kurds the Jihad meant death.


The same exists now in Iraq. First Obama withdraws the US Army. The road is thus cleared again, on top of murder of Saddam, for Jihad


Now Obama goes through some subterfuge. He sends a few hundred folk into Iraq. Just useless to stop ISIL. A joke!


He lays his conditions again, for the secular Assad and the secular Nuri Al Maliki (relatively speaking he also is secular) and Obama is really calling for total chaos in Iraq.


The Kurds are in danger. The Christians and others in total danger. The North will be a bloodbath as Kurds will fight to defend themselves but on their own??? The South Obama will insist will be handed to Iran. The vast majority of the country will descend into a tribal barbarism with brutal Sharia the norm.







To Martin Sherman and Richard Landes and my friends among the Jews…This is the disintegration of the world capitalist system