About Felix Quigley

Campaigning to show that Srebrenica was and is a huge hoax, which is also the case with Racak, Qana and Mohammed el Dura/France 2. When people understand that these are hoaxes then they will begin to understand that Yugoslavia was destroyed, and most important that they plan to destroy Israel, because the US Empire plans to rule the world along with Islam, the latter being a very evil fascist ideology which is very close to the evil ideology of US and EU NATO Empire. Of course there will be adaptations but I am certain that is the general trend. Build4international!

A TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE DAVID ICKE BIG LIE AGAINST JEWS

‘A combination of factors is pushing the United States to “disengage” from Israel says David Icke and he produces on his  website this horrific amalgam based essentially on the Protocols of Zion lie. This Big Lie by David icke is ana daptation of the Jeffrey Goldberg “chickenshit” fuss, about nothing really, the unity of Israel and America does not depend on Obama but on American history

‘A combination of factors is pushing the United States to “disengage” from Israel, a regime that will not last a month without US support, says an analyst.

http://www.davidicke.com

“Times are changing for Israel, they spend a lot of money to manipulate public opinion, all of Hollywood and mass media is Jewish-controlled (and) Zionist-controlled, and people realize the lies that are being told to them on their Nightly News on a daily basis,” he said.

“But the American people can see through this. The American people, particularly at university level, are smart (and) well-educated and they have this implicit sense of fairness,” he added. “All of this combined” Harris said, “is adding up to what is going to be a perfect storm for Israel where the people of the US are going to reject Israel, and that is the process that we are beginning to see the early stages of.”’

Read more: US beginning to ‘disengage’ from Israel: Analyst

UNITY BETWEEN AMERICA AND ISRAEL FOREVER…BASED ON POOR IMMIGRANTS SEEKING SALVATION

Jewish immigrants landing in New York. The unity between America and Israel does not depend on Obama, or any US elitist President, or even on Jeffrey Goldberg!

I am very much in sympathy with Ari Soffer of Israel National News who deconstructs the message from Jeffrey Goldberg,  over the Obama people reference to Netanyahu as “chickenshit”,  and as a “coward” in relation to the Iran Nuclear Bomb and general threat. I will try to tell you why. I come from kind of a different direction to this. Bear with me though!

 

I am a Marxist, Leninist, Trotskyist and I feel it is part of my political principles to defend Israel as the Jewish Homeland against whomever.

 

Goldberg reminds me of something, which is the Lenin attack on empty windbags in 1920. It was the second Congress. If you want to scan this work just google it, under “Left Wing Communism an Infantile Disorder”. It is not a strict parallel with Goldberg but what is!

 

(I like this extract and I think of Goldberg)

It is with the utmost contempt—and the utmost levity—that the German “Left” Communists reply to this question in the negative. Their arguments? In the passage quoted above we read:

 

“… All reversion to parliamentary forms of struggle, which have become historically and politically obsolete, must be emphatically rejected” [[__ Rjc: Could be incomplete here; check __]]

 

This is said with ridiculous pretentiousness, and is patently wrong. “Reversion” to parliamentarianism, forsooth! Perhaps there is already a Soviet republic in Germany? It does not look like it! How, then, can one speak of “reversion”? Is this not an empty phrase?

(end quote)

 

Look at the last 3 sentences and reflect. Is there not a parallel with many I read on these Jewish blogs, like a Jonathan Ross on Israpundit who attacks Martin Sherman, while the total reactionary who hates me so much, one Yamit82, keeps silent while this Ross attacks the same (outstanding) Martin Sherman

 

I do not want to be diverted by this nonentity Ross but the issue here is this. Martin Sherman wants Israel to be proactive above all. That is his essence in helping Arabs even financially to leave Gaza and JS.

 

What does Ross put in place of that “feet on the ground” and proactive Martin Sherman. He is for the Islamic State Fascists overthrowing the Jordan Government. With the Hashemites gone then the Arabs called “Palestinians” will set up their state there (in Jordan). What a fool!

 

I would say that the Jordan Government, the Kurds above all, and even Assad must be defended against the Theocratic Fascism of Islam. The denonair Ross of course would dismiss that. But then like Sherman I try to keep my feet on the ground.

 

I see this all the time in my study of the David Icke phenomenon. I notice that they are all, these Israel haters, in that bracket of declaring the end of Israel.

 

I would point out that the unity between America and Israel does not DEPEND UPON the American ruling class governments or upon the particular elites in power in Israel. It is far deeper than that. I will go into this very soon as I am reading around this from my own Irish emigrant, especially emigrants to America, perspective.

 

Goldberg is an Israel hating gadfly, very much beloved by the utterly reactionary Harry’s Place which produces something called “Sarah Brown”. And need I say more!

 

(Begin article for our readers by Israel National News)

 

 

In essence, this latest article epitomizes the art of manufacturing news in order to create pressure on Israel, very similar to the eyebrow-raising prominence granted to announcements of new apartment buildings being built in Jerusalem, or to Jews legally purchasing homes in Arab-majority neighborhoods.

The approach of fair-minded individuals to such blatantly manufactured “news” such as this, rather than taking the bait and reacting hysterically to it (in either direction), should be to soberly deconstruct it.

Why does a man like Jeffrey Goldberg create such stories, and what is the subtext to it? What does it mean for there to be a “crisis in relations” when military and economic cooperation is still booming, and when the majority of Americans (reflected in Congress) still firmly support Israel? More fundamentally, even if there were to be a “crisis” in relations, what is Goldberg actually suggesting Israel do about it? 

Of course, as I mentioned, the motive behind such stories is to engender fear. The message here is that “America is losing patience” with naughty little Israel, and that Israel must therefore learn to toe the line better and fulfill Washington’s dictates to the letter, instead of God-forbid formulating its own independent foreign policy which may sometimes conflict with that of its ally. It is part of a wider worldview held by a significant portion of assimilated American Jewry, that just as they are besotted with and have tied their very identity to the goldene medina to the extent that they cannot do without it, so the Jewish state must act similarly. Essentially, it is a projection of the exile-mentality onto the Jewish state.

In terms of why such unprofessional name-calling and personal antipathy should even be significant: again this is all part of the “what will they say?” neurosis of the Jew in exile. Relations with non-Jews should not be marked by undue hostility or servility any more than our relations with other Jews, but rather with a level head and a focus on the physical realities we are confronted with, such as shared interests and a firm grip on one’s own red lines (even if the other party in the relationship doesn’t really know his own). That may sound obvious (and it is), but to those riven with inferiority complexes it is asking the impossible; there is nothing more terrifying to the Goldbergs of this world than not being liked (and, incidentally, nothing more spine-tinglingly pleasurable than being accepted as “one of the guys”, to the extent that “they” are willing to badmouth the leader of the Jewish state to you.)

What we are reading in his article then is essentially projection. This kind of antipathy from the non-Jewish world is the worst nightmare to someone like Goldberg, and so he naturally opts to use it as a weapon to pressure Israel into changing its policies. This is a tried-and-tested tactic of the Israeli left and of the Jewish left in the Diaspora, and as the influence of the legitimately-elected political left in Israel wanes, such illegitimate attempts to foist a concessionist agenda on Israel using means outside of the democratic process have predictably increased.

So yes, it is vindictive and petty in an almost childlike way – but Goldberg’s article must be read by anyone striving to understand precisely the self-defeating neuroses a free and independent Jewish state must avoid if it is to remain as such. The Israeli government must not allow these kinds of blatantly political broadsides to influence our own legitimate, internal political discourse, which should be conducted confidently, if cautiously, and with a level-head. 

That is not to ignore the harmful impact of such personal antipathy. Of course, a professional relationship on any level is extremely difficult to maintain in the face of personal animosity between parties who are meant to be cooperating.

But if Goldberg is correct that the Obama administration is genuinely considering something as radical as throwing its most dependable ally in the Middle East under a bus because some top officials feel personally slighted, or because Bibi is not an agreeable person to work with, that is simply a reflection of how and why American foreign policy under this current administration will not, and should not, be taken seriously by anyone.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/15889#.VFHxJUmDMcA

JEWISH OWNED RADIO STATION IN SPAIN TAKES ON A DAVID ICKE ASSOCIATE CALLED RICHIE ALLEN

The close associate of David Icke, Richie Allen, has been taken on by Jewish owned “Talk Radio Europe” for 2 hours daily to spew out conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theory is the ebola of political analysis.

 

The person in charge of hiring is called Bill Padley. The person who owns the radio station is called Nathan Thomas and he is Jewish. He is Chairman of the station.

 

Bill Padley is described by local media in Spain as “has vast radio experience, having worked in major British radio stations since 1975, including Radio Victory, Radio Clyde, and BBC London. He was also a founder of the UK’s biggest independent radio production company.

 

“I love this radio station. I have found it to be really professional with a really good team of people. I said “yes” to taking on the role of Station Manager as I believe in TRE and believe there is a lot I can bring to the table” says Bill.”

 

As station manager Padley has therefore employed the David Icke associate Richie Allen.

 

On what basis I do not know. Padley must be asked on what basis he has employed Richie Allen?

 

There are absolutely huge questions about both Icke and his whole circle of associates after the collapse earlier this year of “The Peoples Voice” in London. Icke associate Richie Allen was one of the main reporters there. The questions are about finance. It seems that no answers have been forthcoming about where the money was spent.

 

Remember that this Talk Radio Europe media operation is Jewish owned. This is most important when one considers the totally biased against Israel politics of David Icke.

 

I heard the Icke associate Richie Allen on a You Tube video saying that Israel was illegal. Will that be being repeated now on Talk Radio Europe a Jewish owned radio station?

 

Does Bill Padley and the Jewish owner NATHAN THOMAS realise the totally biased hatred that Icke has for Israel? Surely that is going to be reflected in what the Icke associate Richie Allen put across to unsuspecting English speakers in Spain, counting many Spanish a huge clientele. And owned by a Jew!

The following is from today’s David Icke website that the Icke associate Richie Allen is advising with highest recommendation to read:

FOLLOWS EXTRACT FROM ANTI-ISRAEL ARTICLE ON TODAYS DAVID ICKE WEBSITE

UK’s Exeter University students in historic landslide vote to boycott Israel

new Wednesday 29th October 2014 at 09:15 By david-icke

‘Students at Britain’s Exeter University have made history by turning out in record numbers to vote in favour of boycotting the apartheid state of Israel.

JEWS BEWARE OF NEOCONS LIKE DANIEL GREENFIELD WHO ARE NO FRIENDS OF ISRAEL

the PLO when driven out of Jordan slunk away with their collective tail between their legs, but when they left Lebanon they did so with flags flying and fingers giving the victory sign. Big difference that needs explaining! The difference was caused by the backing against Israel they were being given by Reagan

Daniel Greenfield is a shrill for US Imperialism which hates the Jews and Greenfield is no friend of the Jewish people no matter what image he throws up. The purpose of Greenfield is to block revolutionary socialism and to present the Jewish people with a certain perspective or ideology.

 

According to this Greenfield ideology the American Imperialist Globalist enemies of the Jews are the friends of the Jews. As a complement to this perspective or ideology is the thing claimed by Greenfield that if these leftists” were defeated Israel would be home and dry!

 

In short Greenfield says that American Imperialism is the friend of Israel and it alone is its friend. That is a lie. It is a lie that Daniel Greenfield churns out week after week. Consider the record of the person who is often held up as the friend of Israel – not Clinton or Obama – but Reagan.  It is deeply embedded inside the Greenfield circles which cover nearly 100 per cent of Zionism (not quite but nearly) that Reagan was really a good ol’ guy ad a clear friend to the Jews.

 

But he wasn’t! Reagan was no friend to Israel and no friend to the Jews.

 

Does that mean that the present so called left are not Antisemitic whores. No I am not saying that.  I am far from saying that! In fact I continually say the opposite! The left which includes a wide selection of groups calling themselves all kinds of left sounding names are indeed nothing but Antisemitic whores. But I think the US Imperialist Governments are also Antisemitic whores and they have more power as has their state controlled Media Machines. Perhaps Greenfield’s is part of that Whore Media as well! Indeed I think it is!

Greenfield talks in his latest article how “Leftists” backed the “Arab Spring”. Well myself on http://www.4international.me opposed the Arab Spring from the very first. We saw it as the Gateway through which the Islamist Jihadist would ride to power. They did this in country after country and in every one we backed the sitting dictator against this Arab Spring (Islam Jihad) on one basis and only one basis – these dictators like Ben Ali, Gaghbo, Mubarak, Arafat, Assad, were all secular, at least secular in a relative sense, as opposed to the Muslim Brotherhood. So to take the Egypt example, for brevity and clarity, we defended Mubarak, opposed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood, defended el Sisi, and we still do. I know for a fact that very few groups have such a clear record as this. I am not boasting just pointing out that these positions do actually exist. I consider the positions Greenfield takes up as being not consistent and I could deal with other things in his article. But the main thing I focus on is that Greenfield is a shrill for US Imperialist Power int he world. it is not that everything he says is wrong but that everything he says and does is underpinned by that. This is a serious issue at a time when more and more Jews are seeing that it is necessary to break the ties with US Imperialism, grow closer to the American people, and for the Jewish state to be first and foremost an independent Jewish state.

Consequently I will limit myself to quoting just ONE paragraph from the latest Greenfield article and also provide the url for the reader to view it all:

The left backed the Arab Spring which rewarded the ambitions of Arabist and Islamist activists at the expense of Coptic, African and other minorities. Its great regional obsession is statehood for the Arab Muslims of Israel, (better known by their local Palestinian brand), but has little to say about the Kurds in Turkey or the Azeri in Iran. The million Jewish refugees and the vanishing Christians of the region never come up in conversation. They certainly don’t get their own lefty protest rallies.

http://sultanknish.blogspot.co.il/2014/10/the-lefts-worst-crime-in-middle-east

 

This was ALL well covered in the very useful article which Francisco Gil White wrote some time ago. Note in this article that the PLO when driven out of Jordan slunk away with their collective tail between their legs, but when they left Lebanon they did so with flags flying and fingers giving the victory sign. Big difference that needs explaining! The difference was caused by the backing against Israel they were being given by Reagan when they left Lebanon for Tunis.

 

(start extract from Gil White article here)

 

1982-1983 [ negative ]

 

The US rushed to protect the PLO in southern Lebanon from the Israelis.

____________________________________________________________

 

Not content with the above, in September 1982, Edgar Bronfman, from his perch as President of the World Jewish Congress, publicly endorsed Ronald Reagan’s plan for Middle East peace. Reagan was using Bronfman as a ‘Jewish diplomat’ to speak for Israel, and American newspapers dutifully carried the headline “Jewish leader OKs Reagan peace plan.”[69]

 

But who cares what Bronfman said? He was not a spokesman for the Israeli government. As a matter of fact,

 

 

“the [Likud] Israeli government [led by Menachem Begin]…unanimously and totally rejected the American initiative.”[70]

 

And what was Bronfman endorsing?

 

 

“The Camp David peace accords call for an interim, five-year period of autonomy for the Palestinian inhabitants of the West Bank and Gaza during which the final status of the territories is to be negotiated.”[71]

 

Autonomy leading to final status was code for a peace process leading to a Palestinian state. We have already seen that the US was quite keen to have Yasser Arafat and the PLO terrorists run such a state (see 1977 section). Thus, Reagan’s plan to create a Palestinian state, which Bronfman endorsed, was another American attack on Israel.

 

Even as US President Ronald Reagan was pressing for a Palestinian state run by the PLO, these terrorists were attacking Israeli civilians from their bases in Lebanon. Above we noted that in 1970 Jordan’s King Hussein had militarily expelled the PLO terrorists from his country.

 

“Thereafter the PLO shifted its bases to Lebanon and continued its attacks on Israel. The PLO’s relations with the Lebanese were tumultuous, and the organization soon became embroiled in Lebanon’s sectarian disputes and contributed to that country’s eventual slide into civil war.”[72]

 

This was a repeat of the problems the PLO had earlier caused in Jordan.[73]

 

Because the PLO was murdering Israeli civilians, Israel invaded Lebanon, and launched a

 

 

“campaign that Israel said would wipe out the PLO as a political and military force and open the way for true peace in the Middle East.”[74]

 

The Israelis very nearly did just that. They failed, however. But not for lack of trying. Rather, what happened is that as Israeli troops got ready to deliver a knockout blow to the PLO, the US intervened to save them. The Washington Post noted the contrast between the PLO’s earlier exit from Jordan, and from Lebanon:

 

“From Amman [Jordan], the PLO troops left unheralded, in ridicule. From Beirut [Lebanon], they left in a compromise negotiated by the United States, waving their Kalashnikov rifles. Arafat left not in the middle of the night but with an emotional dockside sendoff from the Lebanese prime minister, a French Navy escort and U.S. air cover.”[75]

 

But why did the US do this? Because the PLO is the US’s pet, and the US meant to use it again as an attack dog (as we shall see). If any further evidence for this ‘master-pet’ relationship were needed, consider that, in Lebanon, the US had been using the PLO as its *guard* dog:

 

“The Lebanese occupation by Israel caused the Palestinians to have to leave Lebanon eventually…They had been the protectors for the American diplomatic community in Beirut…There was liaison with the PLO, and the Americans were depending on them for their security.” — Vincent Cannistraro, senior intelligence official.[76]

 

It’s a love affair!

 

A bit later, a rival Lebanese faction assassinated Bashir Gemayel, the leader of the Lebanese phalangists. Two days after that, in the resulting chaos, a massacre was committed in Sabra and Shatila, blamed on these now-headless phalangists. Despite the fact that nobody was blaming Israeli soldiers, Ronald Reagan (who was then using the Contra terrorists to kill innocent civilians in Nicaragua) launched a ferocious diplomatic attack against Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin and his Likud government, claiming Israel was responsible for this. Edgar Bronfman Sr., president of the World Jewish Congress, again provided cover for Reagan by supporting this attack wholeheartedly.[77]

 

Before closing this section, it is important to note that despite the US rescue of the PLO, Arafat’s eviction from Beirut was a severe blow that essentially defeated the organization. By 1983, the Christian Science Monitor was writing as follows:

 

 

“The Palestine Liberation Organization continues, meanwhile, a loss of regional influence that began with Israel’s summer 1982 invasion of Lebanon. As part of the initial cease-fire, Mr. Arafat and the majority of Palestinian guerrillas abandoned their base in Beirut. Since then, a hard-line faction has challenged Arafat’s PLO leadership. Now Arafat’s back is literally against the sea, and his departure from [the northern Lebanese city of] Tripoli seems only a matter of time.”[78a]

 

Sure enough, two months later, the New York Times reported that:

 

 

“Mr. Arafat, who is believed to be in Tunis, is scheduled to meet Monday with Lebanon’s Prime Minister, Shafik al-Wazzan, to discuss his organization’s terms for withdrawing the rest of its guerrilla forces from [Tripoli,] Lebanon.”[78b]

 

The US did what it could to make sure that the remaining PLO troops would get out of Lebanon safely:

 

 

“White House spokesman Larry Speakes said the Reagan administration wished for the ‘unhampered’ withdrawal of the Palestine Liberation Organization troops loyal to Arafat.”[78c]

 

And the Reagan administration became quite strident about this, in fact.

 

 

“The United States said today that it had told Israel that it ‘hopes and expects’ the Shamir Government will halt its military actions around Tripoli and allow Yasir Arafat and his Palestine Liberation Organization fighters to be evacuated from the city.

 

 …officials said privately that Washington was losing patience with the Israeli tactics that have delayed Mr. Arafat’s withdrawal.”[78d]

 

At the time, as the same New York Times article explains, President Ronald Reagan’s point man on the Middle East was one Donald Rumsfeld, now Secretary of Defense in George Bush Jr.’s administration.

 

 

“Today, in what State Department officials said was an effort to demonstrate to the Arabs the American desire for good relations with them as well as the Israelis, Donald Rumsfeld, the special Middle East envoy, arrived in Baghdad for talks with Iraqi leaders.

 

 Mr. Rumsfeld is the highest ranking American to visit Iraq since the Reagan Administration took office in 1980.”

 

What has been reviewed for the years 1982-83 does not suggest in the least that the Reagan administration really intended to have good relations with the Israelis. To confirm that, it suffices to read on and find out what happened in 1985.

 

From its new base in Tunis, the defeated PLO would find it very difficult to attack Israel, which is why it resorted to such high jinks as taking hostage the Italian ship Achille Lauro in 1985 (see below). The US would therefore make sure to revive the PLO, and eventually bring it to power in the West Bank, where it could once again easily kill innocent Israeli civilians.

(end extract from Gil White article to be found on http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm#1982)

THE HYPOCRISY AND HATRED OF ANTISEMITES IN THEIR SUPPORT FOR IRAN IS CLEAR IN THIS EXECUTION

(The Daily Mail has this heart breaking story)

The Iranian woman executed for killing a man she said was trying to rape her urged her mother not to mourn in a will written shortly before her death.

Reyhaneh Jabbari, 27, was hanged at dawn on Saturday despite international outcry and a high-profile campaign within the repressive state urging authorities to stay her sentence.

In her last will and testament, the young woman said that she did not want to be buried in a grave where her mother would go to cry and suffer, nor did she want her to wear black.

‘I don’t want to rot in the soil. Please don’t cry. I love you’, she told Sholeh Pakravan. ‘I wish I could have hugged you until I died’.

Scroll down for video 

Put to death: Reyhaneh Jabbari was hanged at dawn on Saturday morning despite calls for clemencyJabbari also asked that her organs were donated anonymously, according to The Sunday Times.

Footage today emerged of a distraught Mrs Pakravan wailing outside the gates of Rajai Shahr Prison, near Tehran, after her daughter was put to death.

She had been summoned to the site to see Jabbari for the last time on Friday and had epxressed her bitter torment and disbelief in a Facebook post earlier this week.

RECENT ARTICLE BY MARTIN SHERMAN HAS HUGE IMPLICATIONS…GAZA WAR MEANS ISRAEL NEEDS NEW LEADERSHIP

Hamas and Fatah have no interest in a settlement. Their whole aim in life, their political strategy is to drum up hatred of Israel in order to DESTROY Israel.

This is not accepted AT ALL by Netanyahu. In this regard Netanyahu is interesting. In fact in words he may accept it and in books has stated it.

But our great forebear “Lucy” with all apologies to Moses used very few words indeed because Lucy had the brain of an ape, kind of a monkey, but had the upright gait of a human.

And our “Lucy” got it all going! With action!

So I am cautious about words and plan to use less of them. I think this is good advice:

“Words can be twisted into any shape. Promises can be made to lull the heart and seduce the soul. In the final analysis, words mean nothing. They are labels we give things in an effort to wrap our puny little brains around their underlying natures, when ninety-nine percent of the time the totality of the reality is an entirely different beast. The wisest man is the silent one. Examine his actions. Judge him by them.”
Karen Marie Moning

http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/actions

I think the recent article by Martin Sherman (google name and “into the fray” makes excellent sense. The Arabs keep firing rockets at Jews, or firing stones at Jews especially at the cars of Jews, they keep building tunnels into Israel to leap out like the proverbial bogeyman to kidnap Jews, and the Jewish talkers are great at words, but cannot do a dammed thing to créate anew reality.

The Antisemites of the world, like Kerry, like the EU Fat cats, rush over to Gaza to set up a fund to rebuild. But it will only get knocked down because you cannot stop the Arabs from trying to obliterate Israel off the map.

Geert Wilders is a great guy. You just want to hear him speak. They guy is so humble and for him words are leading all the time to action.

In his recent interview with Frontpagemag (who hate me) Wilders is so down to earth it is startling. One piece I remember so well. He explains how in his visits to Egypt to name one he found the people so friendly but when it came to Jews and Israel it was immediate hatred.

THE BOTTOM LINE WAS THE KORAN AND ISLAM WHICH LAY LIKE A CURSE (MY WORD) ON THESE PEOPLE

So they will rebuild it. They will keep hating Jews. They will attack Israel. Israel will knock it down again.

The Antisemites int he West will be happy too. They will hate the Jews even more and drive even more Jews out

THE BANKRUPTCY OF iSRAEL LEADERSHIP

Hamas top dog’s daughter received medical treatment in Israel

By on Oct 19, 2014 at 8:43pm in Hamas, Israel, Palestinian jihad with 20 Comments

HaniyehHaniyeh and the other Hamas top dogs know that the jihad propaganda that they endlessly pump out against Israel is just that: propaganda. They are doubtless laughing up their sleeves at the easy marks in the West who fall for it. “Hamas leader’s daughter received medical treatment in Israel: sources,” Reuters, October 19, 2014:

There follows the report from Reuters on this. But I cannot get my head around this report. I see this not as praise for the Israeli state but the most total condemnation.

So Israel is being pounded by black antisemitic propaganda by this “Palestinian” Arab Antisemitic propaganda filth day in and day out worse tan Goebbels

And these people in this israelí state, as in the Israeli Medical elites, are attacking Israelis in this way by giving medical care to the enemies of the Jews.

Was it all right for a Jew to aid a Nazi as the Nazis pushed the Jews onto cattle trucks throughout Europe by giving that Nazi medical aid.

Where in all that is holy on this good earth any difference.

I am as an Irishman disgusted with Israel and disgusted with the whole of the Israeli state under Netanyahu and all of the others for letting this go on. This is a comment to Robert’s article “What a pity this part of the hospital’s statement was omitted. I quote from JPost.
“The hospital said that Haniyeh’s daughter had been admitted for a number of days, noting that she was one of over a thousand Gazans that the hospital treats every year”.

Reuters article follows:

(Reuters) – A daughter of the leader of Hamas in Gaza was admitted to an Israeli hospital for emergency medical treatment this month after she suffered complications from a routine procedure, two sources familiar with the case said.

Ismail Haniyeh’s daughter’s week-long admission to a hospital in Tel Aviv – which Israeli and Palestinian officials declined to confirm or deny – shows humanitarian coordination between the sides continues just weeks after the Gaza war ended.

Haniyeh, who has 13 children, is the leader of the Islamist group in Gaza and one of its most senior figures overall, serving as a deputy to Khaled Meshaal, who lives in exile.

Two sources – one Palestinian and the other a foreign diplomat with knowledge of the case – declined to name the daughter and, out of respect for her privacy, asked that details of her condition not be published.

Like many Hamas officials, Haniyeh spent the seven-week-long war largely in hiding. His home in the northern part of the Gaza Strip was destroyed by an Israeli air strike.

An Israeli official said he could not discuss specific medical admissions from Gaza.

But he said that in most cases a request by a Palestinian doctor to allow a patient across the border for urgent treatment was sufficient – indicating Haniyeh may not have been personally involved in his daughter’s application.

During the war and since it ended in late August, dozens of patients from Gaza have been brought to hospitals in Israel, where the resources and technology for advanced treatment and complicated operations are vastly better….