Author Archives: Felix Quigley

BARRY RUBIN IS NO FRIEND OF THE JEWS…HE DOES NOT DEFEND THE CHRISTIANS OF SYRIA AGAINST SHARIA

by

0

(RUBIN HAS A NEW ARTICLE UP ON SYRIA BEING CARRIED WIDELY. IN THIS ARTICLE RUBIN REFUSES TO DEFEND ASSAD AND DEFEND THE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY OF SYRIA, BOTH AGAINST THE SHARIA OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. BY A STRANGE TWIST OF FATE THIS RESPECTED JEWISH WRITER BUT WHO WE ON WWW.4INTERNATIONAL.ME DO NOT RESPECT ONE BIT HAD BECOME A BIG ALLY OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD)

 

{Rubin article is onhttp://www.israpundit.com/archives/46298/comment-page-1#comment-166039}

 

 

 Barry Rubin ranks up there as one of the greatest enemies of the Jews, even though most American Jews give him a pass, and many Jews in Israel do so also because they are influenced by America.

The reality facing Jews today whether they accept it now or not is:
Jewish leaders in America and Britain who have their agents in Israel are the big danger.

Rubin is in reality a political imbecile and is totally devious. the reason I say the latter, and that his deviousness takes precedent over his imbecility, is that he leaves out a factor which he knows of very well.

That is that Assad is fighting the war on behalf of secularism and against the combined efforts of Sharia and Wester Capitalist Governments.

Notice I said “combined”.
This is indeed an Alliance of Interests.

We saw this first of all in Yugoslavia although it was also there in the CIA involvement with Suharto in Indonesia.

there is a very deep crisis in capitalism which surpasses the crisis of 1929 (because capitalism is much older) and this crisis has driven all of the capitalist governmental interests to seek an alliance with Islam.

It is in vain that Spencer or Geller complain about this. The underlying material forces are much stronger. There is to be no going back on this Alliance. There is a difference between Romney and Obama. Obama is enthusiastic about this Alliance. Romney is not enthusiastic but will also do it anyway.

This is because by the time Romney takes over the crisis will have moved on. It is mostly a crisis of credit. There is trillions of credit (paper money and increasing) flooding the system.

Season economists in Britain like the very respected Roger Bruton spit on the efforts to rescue the euro, but the euro is inseparable from the dollar.

On this issue of Assad. None of us really like Assad one bit because of the way he carried on the Arab war against Israel while his grandfather knew very well the real value of Israel. But things change and what has chamged with all of these Arab leaders like Ben Ali, Mubarak and Gadhafi, is that they were forced to become while not total secularists certainly in the fight against Sharia Law.

That is very fundamental. That is why Gadhafi HAD to be defended. The issue of Lockerbie was a total distraction especially since the father of a girl killed was certain that libya was not involved.

I listened to a man called David on a radio station yesterday and he played a clip on the massacre, then he related about the birth of his daughter a few months ago, then he said but that does nopt mean that if you do not have children you would not understand, you see he is a Christian and Christians like to cover all bases. But because of the images of the massacre of children he said “something needs to be done”. But he did not state out clearly that that something was to remove Assad by war, which is the position of the French. “Something needs to be done” was also the basis on which many Germans supported Hitler.

This Assad issue is very dangerous for the Jews. I have no time at all for Rubin. I see people like Rubin in this article betraying the 2000 year old Christian community in Syria and handing them over to the Sharia. (By the way Pamela has no clear position of defence of Assad and is not different from what I understand to Rubin)

I have a little doggie friend and he is very aware of what happens in and around our home. But it does take him a while to work new things out. I place him far ahead of Rubin. As for the comparative intelligence of my cat and Rubin, well she would spit in disgust if I was to call barry Rubin intelligent

DEFEND ASSAD AGAINST THIS CHILD MASSACRE CONSPIRACY! AND HAVE ISRAEL STRIKE IRAN TO DESTROY THEIR NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST BOMB PLANS!

by

0

I SUSPECT VERY STRONGLY THAT THE MASSACRE OF CHILDREN BEING REPORTED BY THE BBC THIS MORNING IN SYRIA IS PHONY, A SET-UP.

 

I take that as given. Every piece of news that comes across on the BBC my first presumption is always that it is false. This is the correct position for a socialist revolutionary to take.

 

On www.4international.me we stand in the most uncopmpromising way in defence of the Jews, in defence of Israel, that Israel must urgently strike the Iranian fascist regime and with Nuclear weapons if it is seen as necessary to defend Israel.

 

But we cannot forgive Jewish leaders who have not defended Gaghbo, Ben Ali, Mubarak and Gadhafi with everything that the Jews have got.

 

None of those leaders can be said to be friendly to Israel. That is not the point. The point being that they were also opposed to the Sharia Law in their countries, and as the policy of the US and Europe has become clearer to ujs, they were therefore opposed to the Sharia/US Alliance.

 

In political life you do not have to be a friend of somebody to defend them.

 

The whole history of the last two decades of the life of Trotsky was that he sought to make every alliance against Hitler and Mussolini.

 

But the present Sharia in alliance with Obama and the EU leaders is a worse threat to the world than even the Nazis were.

 

That is why I cannot forgive the take by debka on this so-called massacre, and I cannot forgive Belman of Israpundit for not standing on his hind legs like a real man and warniong about how similar this looks to the conspiraciers against the Serbs.

 

I follow with 2 items, first my challenge to Belman on Israpundit this morning and secondly the atrocious debka take on the massacre. And on Assad.

 

1. MY CHALLENGE TO ISRAPUNDIT AND TED BELMAN THIS VERY MORNING

 

 

It is not at all that the Jews are gullible. It is that the Jewish leaders, especially in America, have been conditioned by their own (American) ruling class with its great powers of persuasion (for example Ted Belman of this Israpundit conditioned through his years as a LAWYER, to follow whatever garbage the elites throw at the population through the Media.

I was not there. I cannot say what happened.

However I have listened to the BBC and the reporting on this “massacre” follows the pattern of the reporting of the Srebrenica “massacre”.

Except that they have become more bold since 1995 because then they did not report a massacre until 2 months after the event.

The Irish times has reported on Srebrenica many hundreds of times since 1995 but in the first 2 months there was no mention at all of a massacre.

Now they can put this type of news story in circulation very fast and nobody bats an eyelid.

I can handle all of that but what I cannot handle is Jewish leaders like Belman who toe the line like any other gullible Media dimwit.

The reason they can put it out so fast is largely due to people like Belman and it is worse in his case because he has had a chance to understand how the Media in Yugoslavia worked.

An alternative theory, with the merest tiny bit of reflection, and I am no expert at all, but the whole point is I do not need great expertise, I just need to reflect back on Yugoslavia, on Qana, on Jenin, on El Dura etc..

1. Who benefits? Assad does not benefit at all because he is interested in keeping the shaky Russians on board with him.
2. Clearly benefit are those who call for HUMANITARIAN Intervention such as the CIA, the sections around Obama like Rice who are for Humanitarian Interventions everywhere, Joe Lieberman…and Ted Belman? But why the latter?

An alternative theory thinking only of the practicals of this specific massacre story:

We know that Al Qaeda is there and we know their ruthlessness.

We know the CIA and SAS are there and they would do anything for political global strategy.

We know that Al Jazeera and Kuwait are there and we saw just how ruthless they were in Libya in murdering not a hundred but tens of thousands of black Africans.

We have experience of the Qana affair where the same Islamists raided the nearby morgues in order to locate the very bodies that they later had actors dig or pull out of the rubble, in the case on one child pulled out time after time. THESE TYPES WOULD DO ANYTHING. THAT IS THE WHOLE ESSENCE OF THE EXPOSURES BY SPENCER ON JIHADWATCH AND BY PAMELA ON ATLAS SHRUGS.
And again on the BbC this morning these Antisemites focus on CHILDREN.

A lady from Save the Children (note a lady to give the maternal touch) was calling for humanitarian intervention.

And Belman, a Jewish leader through Israpundit in America and Israel, and a man who networks with Eidelberg et al, falls for all of this.

This makes me think that the issue is Assad and Jewish leadership opportunism devoid of principle, you know sell your granny fro a penny.

Assad is in league with Hizbullah, Hamas and Iran. So Belman is quite incapable of calling for a defence of Assad from the forces of Empire/Sharia.
Belman cannot act because he leaves out a fact I raised a year ago which is: defence of Assad does not mean lowering the guard against Assad by Israel.

Nothing to stop defending Assad. Nothing to stop Israel from striking against Assad if it needs to. But that entails seeing Israel as an independent force in the world.

THAT BELMAN AND HIS ILK IN THE Jewish ELITE CANNOT EVER DO

They have always and will always see Israel as an adjunct to the US which has brainwashed them.
Nor does defence of Gaghbo, Ben Ali, Gadhafi or Mubarak ever stop Israel from hitting Iran with a Nuclear Weapon to save the Jews.

Only the www.4international.me can take these positions and only that organization can become the defender of the Jews in the long term consistent sense.

 

http://www.israpundit.com/archives/46250/comment-page-1#comment-165533

 

2. THE NOTORIOUS DEBKA TAKE ON THIS “MASSACRE” THIS MORNING

 

Assad’s latest massacre at al-Houla

The wanton slaughter by Syrian forces of 92 confirmed victims, 32 of them children under ten, at the Homs village of Al-Houla Friday, May 25, was the most horrifying atrocity in the Middle East this week, but not the only one: In Sanaa, six days ago, al Qaeda’s suicide bombers, having penetrated Yemeni military ranks, detonated two tons of explosives at a parade rehearsal killing more than 100 soldiers and civilians and injuring 400.
Yet, according to the New York Times, after 15 months of bloodshed, President Barack Obama is working on the Yemenbi model for a plan to push Bashar Assad out of office, while “leaving remnants of his government in place. The Yemeni model replaced President Ali Abdullah in Sanaa with his vice president Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi.
Whereas US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton condemned Assad and his “cronies” for the al-Houla massacre, the “Yemen plan” would leave in place those very “cronies,” including Assad’s close relatives, who are responsible for massacres not only in al-Houla, but also in Homs, Hama, Idlib and Deraa, to name a few.
According to the NYT, when Obama tested the idea with Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev at the Group-of-8 summit in Camp David last Saturday, May 19, the Russian prime minister raised the example of “Mubarak in a cage,” referring to Mubarak’s court appearance at his trial. Obama then “countered with Yemen, and the indication was, yes, this was something we could talk about.”
This scrap of dialogue lifted the veil from a key aspect of Obama’s broader Middle East program and the role he has assigned Moscow for carrying it through. This role was first revealed exclusively by DEBKA-Net-Weekly 542 of May 25 which reported that the US president is acting to bring the Russians into a partnership for securing deals on the Iranian nuclear program and the Syrian crisis.
So far, his venture has had two results:

1.  The Iranian nuclear impasse and the outcome of the Syrian civil war have been more tightly integrated than ever before.
2.  Any deal reached by the US, Russia and Iran on the two issues would have to entail a carving-up of Middle East influence among those three powers.
As for Israel’s role in the ongoing bargaining, we also disclosed in debkafile of May 19 that Israel’s Binyamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak had agreed to stand back for Barack Obama to put his interim deal with Iran to the test. Despite their reservations, they decided to go along with it after receiving assurances from the White House that Iranian violations would result in the immediate termination of negotiations and bring military action forward as the sole remaining option for stopping a nuclear Iran.

The US president promised to put his accord with Israel before the G-8 summit. And he did.
But for now there is no deal although Israel, in effect, gave Obama six months’ grace to explore his diplomatic initiative with Vladimir Putin and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei before turning back to the military option.
But as the days pass, major hurdles are piling up in the path of what some observers hail as Obama’s “Grand Bargain,” and others his “Grand Failure:” The Six-power talks with Iran have failed to persuade the ayatollahs to give up uranium enrichment up to weapons-grade; the world wants actions not words to halt the brutal massacres in Syria; rising bloodshed in Yemen continues to cripple the country. Obama’s hopes of a crisis-free six months for electioneering in peace look more and more like pipe-dreams.
The bargaining with Tehran is likely to stay stalled because Iran’s leaders take Obama’s deal with Israel as a six-month respite from a military threat. So why should they hurry in May or even June to reach a compromise with America on its demand to stop 20 percent uranium enrichment?
Bashar Assad and his army chiefs likewise feel US hands are tied by Obama’s hopes of a breakthrough with Iran and they can safely carry on with their “unspeakable crimes” for the next six months under the Iranian-Russian umbrella. Words however strong will not discourage him from sending tanks to crush every last opponent and their children.

And Israel, seeing the US president lurching from one bargaining position to another to keep his initiative afloat, shifts uncertainly in and out of its unwritten commitment to withhold military action against Iran until November.

None of the parties involved in granting Obama his six-month grace period, whether Vladimir Putin, Ali Khamenei, Binyamin Netanyahu or Bashar Assad, can be sure that he will in fact be returned to the Whie House in November. And even if he is, how much will be left of his Grand Bargain.

 

http://www.debka.com/article/22034/The-Al-Houla-atrocity-The-outcome-of-nuclear-diplomacy-with-Iran-

ISRAEL BREAKS WITH OBAMA OVER IRAN AND IT IS THE SAME ISSUE AS DEFENCE OF MLADIC

by

0

Netanyahu, Barak refuse to see US official

 

with negative report on Baghdad talks

DEBKAfileExclusive Report May 26, 2012, 10:25 AM (GMT+02:00)

State's Wendy Sherman, senior US delegate to world power talks with Iran
State’s Wendy Sherman, senior US delegate to world power talks with Iran

The rupture between the US and Israel over Iran’s nuclear program widened further Friday, May 25  when Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak decided not to be available to hear the briefing brought to Jerusalem from Baghdad by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman who headed the US delegation to the Six Power talks. The report she delivered to National Security Adviser Yaakov Amidror and Foreign Ministry Director-General Rafi Barak was that no progress had been achieved in Baghdad due to Iran’s refusal to budge on its “right” to enrich uranium at low (3.5-5 percent) or high (20 percent) levels or shut down the Fordo nuclear plant near Qom.
Although the participants agreed to reconvene in Moscow in three weeks, the Iranian delegation stressed there would be no progress until the US and the other five world powers (Britain, France, Russia, Germany and China) recognized Iran’s absolute “right” as a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty to enrich uranium.

Meanwhile, every day spent on diplomacy is thoroughly exploited by Iran to zip ahead with its nuclear plans. The Vienna-based UN nuclear watchdog (IAEA)’s quarterly report released Friday reveals that since February Iran almost doubled its stockpile of more highly enriched uranium which is close to weapons grade from 73.4 to 145 kilograms.
The centrifuges at the Fordo facility, built into the side of a mountain, rose to over 500 from 300 in the last report.

Using the IAEA figures, debkafile calculates that if Fordo goes on producing 23.9 kilograms of 20-percent enriched uranium per month, Iran will by the end of December have accumulated 336 kilograms of near-weapons quality uranium.
The IAEA also reported that Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched to less than 5 per cent grew to 6,232 kilograms from 5,451 reported in February.

Its inspectors recorded “the presence of particles” of 27 per cent-enriched uranium at Fordo. Iran maintained the particles were a result of “technical reasons beyond the operator’s control.”

The IAEA report was released a day after talks between Tehran and the six powers ended without progress.
Iran’s senior delegate Saeed Jalili declared that his government would never accept the Washington-ruled distinction between two categories of nations – one permitted and the other forbidden to enrich uranium. He claimed this was against international treaties.

Friday, the Washington Post quoted Mohammad Hoseyn Moussavian of Princeton University as revealing that in 2004, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said, “I would resign if for any reason Iran is deprived of its rights to enrichment.”

 
Moussavian is presented as an Iranian academic visiting Princeton to lecture and write a book on the Iranian nuclear issue. debkafile reveals that he was the contact man in one of the direct, back-channel negotiations taking place in Paris between the White House and Khamenei. His words therefore were intended to carry weight as a reminder to Obama that the supreme leader, like the US president, intended to come out of their dialogue strengthened – not undermined. And therefore, for both their sakes, Washington must endorse Iran’s “right to enrichment.”
Tehran presented a second ultimatum for the nuclear talks to continue: phased sanctions relief, starting with the postponement of the European Union’s oil embargo scheduled for July 1 until the end of negotiations and the reconnection of Iranian banks to the SWIFT international money transfer system.

 
The gap between Israel and the Obama administration widened in the course of Washington’s direct, secret give-and-take with Tehran. In early April, Defense Minister Barak reported that Israel offered some compromise on the enrichment issue. debkafile disclosed at the time that Israel had informed Washington of its approval of a “1,000 formula.” Iran would be permitted to activate 1,000 centrifuges for enrichment and keep 1,000 kilograms of 3.5-per cent enriched uranium. 

The Netanyahu government backtracked when this concession was used by US officials as a lever for further accommodations with Iran.
The direct US-Iran channel and the second round of Six Power talks with Iran have clearly left the standoff over Iran’s nuclear solidly in place: Iran stands by its right to enrich uranium up to weapons grade, the US stands by diplomacy, however hopeless, for resolving the controversy, while Israel demands a time limit for negotiations. Its military option was put back on the table for so long as Iran’s enrichment centrifuges continue spinning at top speed

 

 

www.4international.me is totally on the side of the Jews and Israel in this issue of Iranian Nuclear Bombs.

 

We say that the Iranian regime is as much antisemitic as was Hitler.

 

In fact there is a direct line. The man who led the Bosnian Muslims against Milosevic and Mladic was called Izetbegovic. His history goes back to the Holocaust. He was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Bosnia during the years of the Holocaust. We do not know how many members of the Muslim Brotherhood there were in Bosnia during the Holocaust, but we do know the name of one, that was Hajj Amin el Husseini, who was the chief organizer of the Holocaust in the Balkans. In other words joint membership of the pro-Hitler Muslim Brotherhood. They may have been the only two in Bosnia.

 

Move forward just a little, to the early 1990s, and Iran was working with the US State Department and the US Army and Air Force to airlift Nazi Arab Muslims into Bosnia to fight the Serbs. They carried out many beheadings, thus anticipating what happened to Daniel Pearl.

 

This was Jihad against the Serbs, with the direct help of the US ruling classes.

 

Now there is a Jihad against Israel and it takes the form of the Iranian Nuclear Bomb.

 

You can see an antisemite immediately. He or she will offer no interest in what Iran is getting up to in Fordo inside that mountain.

 

This apparent “naivety” and sometimes even impatience with the issue being raised has at its root Antisemitism.

 

Some of the worst offenders in this regard are those who claim to talk about defence of the Serbs re Srebrenica, like Harman and Peterson, while they are defending the Nazi Iranian regime and its bomb building AGAINST JEWS.

 

Of course, this is Antisemitic and Nazi because this bomb building in Iran has got only the one target and that target is Israel.

 

So what is the future?/ What to do?

 

The answer is that no step can be taken without putting into place the alternative leadership which has to be www.4international.me.

 

It is necessary to defend Mladic unconditionally. The Serbs had a full right to use whatever methods it decided to use. In the war against the Nazis by the freedom fighters opposed to the Nazis (The resistance) nobody has ever, i mean ever, criticised the methods of The Resistance to Hitler.

 

Same with the Serbs today. Same with the Jews of Israel today.

 

We on www.4international.me defend unconditionally each and every method od struggle which the Jews use in order to survive against these enemies.

 

 

EGYPT…MUSLIMS ARE USING DEMOCRACY AS A GATEWAY TO SHARIA AND FASCISM…BUT ROLE OF WSWS

by

0

WSWS EXHIBIT 1

 

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/jan2012/musl-j30.shtml

 

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg defended his longstanding police commissioner last week after revelations about his role in a vicious anti-Muslim film widely shown to city police officers as part of “counterterrorism” training in 2010.

Muslim civil rights activists and their supporters gathered on the steps of City Hall on January 26 to demand that Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly and police spokesman Paul Browne resign. Kelly provided a lengthy interview for the film, The Third Jihad, which was screened for nearly 1,500 officers.

After a yearlong cover-up, Kelly was forced to admit that he cooperated with the makers of the film. While including a hollow claim that it does not accuse all Muslims, the movie argues that most Muslim-Americans are involved in a stealth campaign to promote terrorism.

 

WSWS EXHIBIT 2

 

http://wsws.org/articles/2012/jan2012/bro1-j05.shtml

The powerful movement of the Egyptian people that brought down Mubarak was therefore an enormous blow to US imperialism and its regional allies.

 

 

WSWS EXHIBIT 3 (part 2 of above which is part 1 in a 3 part series)

 

By the end of the 1990s, the Brotherhood began to fashion itself as a political party, issuing a draft manifesto and consistently outperformed the legal opposition parties in elections. In the 2005 elections, it was virtually the sole organised opposition party to Mubarak’s ruling National Democratic Party (NDP), winning 88 seats, about one fifth of the parliament. The government arrested thousands of its members, trying many in military courts. It amended the constitution to prevent independents from running for Parliament, making it impossible for the Brotherhood to stand in November 2010 elections characterised by massive fraud.

 

WSWS EXHIBIT 4

 

and part 3

 

or why the wsws is full of devious betrayal

 

The demands for social equality and genuine democratic rights can be won only through a conscious revolutionary struggle of workers and peasants against the junta and its defenders, from the right and nominal left. It means building a mass movement aimed at bringing a workers’ government to power.

To conduct this struggle, Egyptian workers need two things: an international socialist strategy and their own independent fighting organisations. The way forward lies in the fight to unite Egyptian workers and the rural poor with their brothers and sisters throughout the region in a combined struggle against capitalist exploitation and imperialist oppression, for the United Socialist States of the Middle East, as part of a struggle for world socialist revolution. This requires the building of the revolutionary leadership of the International Committee of the Fourth International.

 

This www.wsws.org is really reactionary. Look at what they have done. Do not bother to read the rest it is soooo boring

 

the first extract shows the wsws lining up with the likes of Rauf and against Jihadwatch and Atlas Shrugs. They are for CAIR and Hamas.

 

The second is a plain lie. Mubarak was not brought down by other than Obama. It was Obama who turfed Mubarak out. This was just the end of the US and Western Capitalist Governments aim to create Sharia states in the world.

 

Capitalism likes Sharia.

 

Sharia is used to discipline the masses of the poor and is a form of Fascism.

 

The one key thing about Mubarak is that he too, along with Ben Ali, Gaghbo, Mubarak and Gadhafi, all opposed Sharia. The US Government and all Western Governments, especially Europe, support the creation of Sharia states.

The only way to stop Sharia in Egypt was through Mubarak. Obama pulled the rug from under Obama. Obama fell. the Sharia takes over.

 

And the WSWS supported the taking down of Mubarak.

 

In the third extract above the wsws use this rhetoric about workers and poor peasants of Egypt etc., but the wsws has helped to remove Mubarak, who had long been the bulwark against the Muslim Brotherhood and Sharia.

 

Obama was always all for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. When he took power his first phone call was made known to be to Abbas, and his first meethjing was when he travelled to Cairo and insisted that the Muslim Brothnerhood be present at his conference.

 

That is the same Muslim Brotherhood whom Mubarak had kept out of political life.

 

Yet the wsws was all for (in the above extracts) the taking down of Mubarak through what they call “revolutions”

 

With “revolutions” like this which the wsws promote the working class anywhere does not have any chance.

 

And the enemy, US Imperialism, must be pleased with the wsws.

 

ISRAEL HAS TAKEN ENOUGH BULLSHIT LIES FROM OBAMA ABOUT IRAN…IT WILL STRIKE

by

0

May 23, 2012…this is a fateful day for the world.

 

The world in which I live is inhabited by really strange people (The Media) who are desparately trying to keep the ordinary folk from understanding what is happening (Reality)

 

Well the reality is that Israel is going to go to war with Iran and the reality also is that www.4international.me stands in the warlike and just tradition of Leon Trotsky and we will be the only ones on the left who will stand unconditionally with Israel.

 

Obama is sympathetic to Iran and to Islam. Some European leaders (Sarkozy was) were worried about Iran and the Nuclear Bomb, but Europe is in crisis and these leaders cannot focus. Also in everything the Europeans are deep down Antisemitic and they blame Jews subconsciously for Iran. So they hesitate in front of Iran.

 

Israel cannot hesitate. If it hesitates in front of Iran then Israel will be wiped out. Dirty Nuclear bombs can be let off. Iran will have the material and they will have the weapons to deliver (Arab suicide killers)

 

This is why in the end Israel and its leaders can take only so much bull shit from Obama. Obama does lie and if your whole people are threatened, especially the Jews, the lies after a time do not work.

 

And this is why when Ehud Barak spoke the following (In Hebrew but so there was no mistake had an English translation on hand) then this means that war on Iran from Israel is just so inevitable.

 

HIS WORDS WERE :

 

“There is no need to tell us what to do, and we have no reason to panic. Israel is very, very strong, but we do know that the Iranians are accomplished chess players and will try to achieve nuclear capabilities. Our position has not changed. The world must stop Iran from becoming nuclear. All options remain on the table.”

 

see full analysis of the background on http://www.debka.com/article/22024/Israel-revives-military-option-after-Obama-rejects-its-nuclear-demands-of-Iran

 

All options on the table means we will not wait until Obama is reelected in Nopvember.

4INTERNATIONAL AFFIRMS ONCE MORE…THE SREBRENICA “MASSACRE” WAS AND IS A GIANT LIE

by

0

THE SREBRENICA “MASSACRE” WAS AND IS A GIANT LIE

 

THAT IS WHERE WE ON WWW.4INTERNATIONAL.ME STAND, ALWAYS HAVE AND ALWAYS WILL…

 

WE STAND COMPLETELY BEHIND THIS STATEMENT BY JARED ISRAEL:

 

“The Srebrenica massacre charge is a slander that only has credibility because it
has been presented so much and so often, with such powerful forces behind not, and because some Serbs and foreign intellectuals have — for whatever reasons — falsely admitted guilt on
behalf of RS.”

http://www.vidovdan.org/arhiva/article2481.html

 

AND OVER COMING WEEKS WE INTEND TO PROVE THIS. BUT WHY? WHY BOTHER? WHY IS THE WHOLE OF THE WORLD MEDIA LINING UP BEHIND THIS BIG LIE WHICH MAKES THE TRUTH SO DIFFICULT TO GET ACROSS?

 

IN FACT IF THE SREBRENICA BIG LIE STANDS THEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SCIENCE TO STAND…THE FOLLOWING GETS TO THE HEART OF IT:

 

The issue of the destruction of Yugoslavia remains as yet a mystery.

The Serbs had fought with the Allies to defeat the Nazis. Had collective memory ended?

Leading in destroying their nation was their former allies, but those allies were now joined with precisely the Germans and Muslims, precisely those they had fought against together. What had happened?

On the one hand this was a terrible betrayal of trust, a moral issue.

But on the other it calls again into question the nature of the war against the Nazis especially in so far as the elites were concerned.

This also raises the issue of the war itself. It is a fact that Trotsky never gave his support to the war because he reasoned that it was an imperialist war, a war between the Imperialists.

I do not think that this meant that Trotsky would oppose war actions against the Nazis. After all Trotsky had called (IN 1933!) for the Red Army to act against Hitler.

But it WAS an imperialist war and this was demonstrated most clearly when the British, French and Americans were recruiting tens of thousands of top Nazis into their anti-communist movements even before the Jews were out of the death camps. They were recruiting the very killers of the Jews. So what was the talk about liberty etc. of Churchill all about!?

Yet if the “Desert Rats” who were British forces not defeated Rommel in North Africa then the Jews of Palestine would have been genocided in total since the Nazis under Gehlen, who was under Hajj Amin el Husseini and Himmler/Eichmann, were ready to move in.

Then again a little later the nephew of top Nazi Hajj Amin el Husseini, a man who became known as Yasser Arafat, was essentially recruited by the US and Europe, with the Norwegians to the front, to plan a new Holocaust of the Jews in the First and Second so-called Intifadas.

THIS was the context of the destruction of Yugoslavia.

On the surface it looked as if the likes of the Guardian had turned on their former ally, the Serbs, and were supporting the Nazis behind Izetbegovic.

But it was just more of the same.

The alliance against Hitler’s Nazis was thus opportunist. They had joined precisely those Nazis in 1945. So their betrayal of the Serbs who HAD fought the Nazis in the Second World War should not have been that big a surprise.

But it was and the Serb leaders did not fully understand that

　

The Yugoslavian crisis covers the whole of this historical period. It started in the 1980s. Her we are over 30 years later and Mladic is being tried by the very criminals of NATO whom we will prove in these pages over coming weeks were responsible (I am speaking here of the Alliance of western capitalism with Islam and Sharia which Bat yeor describes but does not correctly label)

We fight in solidarity with all who are defending Mladic.

But this is a discussion. There are many differences between the 4international and all others.

These points are worth making as we start to follow the Mladic issue:

　

THE CENTRAL ISSUE WAS AND IS THE TERMINAL CRISIS OF CAPITALISM

THE DRIVE BY CAPITALISM TO WORLD DICTATORSHIP

A WORLD WIDE PHENOPMENON…THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM HAS CREATED A WORLD UNIFIED ECONOMY

CANNOT SEPARATE YUGOSLAVIA AND THE CIA, FROM GADHAFI AND THE CIA, FROM MUBARAK AND THE CIA, ETC. ETC.

HOW DO THEY FIGHT? WHAT IS OVERALL STRATEGY OF THE ENEMY?

　

(WE MENTION HERE 3 ELEMENTS)

CORRUPTION OF THE “LEFT” (TO EXPAND ON LATER)

GRAND STRATEGY OF CAPITALISM IS ALLIANCE OF WESTERN CAPITALISM AND ISLAM

IN WHICH ANTISEMITISM (PALESTINISM) PLAYS A CENTRAL ROLE AS IT ALWAYS HAS

　

　

TO REPEAT AND EMPHASISE…THE SERBS WERE UNKNOWINGLY FIGHTING AGAINST THIS ALLIANCE

(THE ALLIANCE OF WESTERN GOVERNMENTS WITH ISLAM)

THUS IZETBEGOVIC WHO WAS IN ACTUALITY THE FASCIST, SHARIA LOVING, NAZI, AND NAZI FRIEND OF EL HUSSEINI, HAD TO BE PROMOTED AS A “GOOD GUY” BY THE SERVILE GUARDIAN-TYPE MEDIA)

　

AND THAT SET THE SCENE FOR THE ORGY OF LIES ABOUT YUGOSLAVIA STILL GOING STRONG.

JOIN 4INTERNATIONAL AND FIGHT TO DEFEND MLADIC UNCONDITIONALL AGAINST MEDIA LIES

by

0

SHORT STATEMENT ON THE MLADIC TRIAL BY WWW.4INTERNATIONAL.ME

 

The Mladic Trial poses above all a new leadership in the world, based on the only revolutionary class, the working class.

This new leadership has got very special relevance for Jews who face great danger from Palestinism Antisemitism cum Terrorism. Antisemitism grows apace out of this Fascist Palestinism!

Against the Nazis of the Croats and Bosnian Muslims the Serbs did not stand a chance, but pause to understand why they had no chance. The Fascists killing the Serbs were backed by the Media and by every Western Government bar none.

Meanwhile the Serbs were stabbed in the back by the Stalinist remnants in Russia and China. For example the Chinese are clearly economist Stalinists, and the Russians through Gorbachev and Yeltsin were all about making deals with Imperialism.

And the Serbs HAD TO return to the principles of Trotsky.

But how could they do that? There was no Trotskyist movement to lead and to make the political positions of Trotskyism known, while so called Trotskyists like

www.wsws.org are traitors clearly. (I will be interested to see what THEY have to say on the Mladic trial)

It touches also on the issue of nation and nationalism. Lenin was wrong on this. Trotsky also at that time.

But Trotsky was to change very much as the 30s went on.

Trotsky was much influenced by the way that Stalin used antisemitism inside Russia and indeed Trotsky came to advocate a Jewish state in Palestine.

Trotsky became the first Zionist from a true revolutionary socialist viewpoint. That is what links the Serb issue, and the Jewish issue, partly religious freedom that Marx stood for, and partly the nation, nationalism.

It is late in the day and we have to urgently build a cadre of fighters who understand these issues. And build this cadre in a period of capitalist crisis.

There is a link between the Mladic trial and the capitalist crisis driving millions onto the dole.

DEFEND MLADIC AGAINST THE SREBRENICA MASSACRE HOAX

by

0

IF WE ALLOW THIS SREBRENICA MASSACRE HOAX TO STAND THEN THE WORKING CLASS IS LOST.

 

This is because this is a massive lie that has been elaborated by the Media, and if they get off with this, they can get off with anything, lies against workers in struggle, lies against trade unionists, above all lies against Jewish people, so there is a lot at stake.

 

It is significant that in the very first day of the trial of Mladic these liars are exposed. They have not provided the defence with thousands of pages of evidence which the defence needs.

 

From this I conclude that this Hague Lies Operation is also in crisis, and is propped up mainly by a Media which lies everywhere.

 

WHY THEN DEAL WITH SREBRENICA AT ALL. THIS IS THE TAKE OF VETERAN SERB CAMPAIGNER JARED ISRAEL ON THE WHY OF IT ALL….

 

Overview:

 

Why should one read articles refuting the charge

 

 that Serbs committed mass murder in Srebrenica?

by Jared Israel
Emperor’s Clothes

UN document detailing crimes against Serbs in and around Srebrenica, 1992-1993
PDF files
Comments by Petar Makara
Emperor’s Clothes
[10 June 2005]

========================================================

[ www.tenc.net ]

Overview

July 11 is the tenth anniversary of the recapture of the East Bosnian town of Srebrenica by Bosnian Serb troops. In coming weeks we will be sending you a number of pieces challenging the official story about Srebrenica. According to the official account, after the Serbs re-took Srebrenica, they slaughtered 8000 Muslim men.

Why should people read articles challenging this massacre story? After all, it’s consistent with what one has been told: that Srebrenica was a safe haven where the UN was supposed to protect Muslims from supposedly murderous Serbs; that the Muslims, portrayed in the media as an oppressed group, were moderate and tolerant while the Serbs were supposedly fanatical Muslim-haters with a Hitlerian vision of a mono-ethnic state; that therefore it was no surprise that when the Serbs took Srebrenica, they supposedly killed thousands of Muslims as fast as they could.

Why should you read material challenging the Srebrenica massacre story when you, dear reader, have limited time and you may have read nothing in the media that would cast doubt on any of the above?

My answer is, that is precisely why you should be skeptical about the massacre story. 

Permit me to explain.

The credibility of the official massacre story depends on the credibility of media coverage of Yugoslavia in general and of what happened in Eastern Bosnia, including Srebrenica, in particular.  If that coverage has been objective, why should one entertain the possibility that the entire media has manufactured or gone along with lies about a supposed giant massacre? 

How might the media objectively cover a bitter conflict like the one in Bosnia?  First, it would endeavor to fairly report what each side said, giving them equal time.  Then it would investigate claims.  For example, if each side accused the other of spreading hate propaganda, the media might publish each side’s claims and then compare those claims to samples of each side’s propaganda, both written material and what was said at rallies and in mass meetings.  If each accused the other of atrocities, the media could publish the accounts of both sides, and then do hard investigative work to see who – if anyone – was telling the truth. It would hunt for lies, because what people lie about is most revealing.

If you are like most, you have no idea what the Serbs said about what happened in and around Srebrenica from the time the Bosnian war started in the spring of 1992 until the so-called fall of Srebrenica in 1995.  No idea at all.  And therein lies the evidence that the media cannot be trusted about Srebrenica: because in fact, the Serbs said, and published, a great deal about Muslim extremist atrocities against them, but the Western media published virtually none of it. What was published by the Western media stands out for the same reason that gold stands out, because it is rare.

For the Western media to have lied for the past ten years about Srebrenica assumes that the media has been organized, by whatever means, to distort information.  It is hard – and rather awful – to believe that such a level of organization for lying could exist. But exactly the same level of organization is required in order for the entire media not to have sought out Serbian eye-witness accounts and human interest stories, to have suppressed almost all evidence of funerals of Serb victims, news reports in the Serbian media, documents and photographs distributed by the government of Serbia and by the Bosnian Serb government and army, and so on. The public is unaware of the existence of such data because the media has suppressed almost all of it. You, by the very fact that you have not seen this material, are living proof.

Let me give you an example. 

In June 1993 the United Nations published a 132-page report entitled “Memorandum on War Crimes and Crimes of Genocide in Eastern Bosnia (communes of Bratunac, Skelani and Srebrenica) committed against the Serbian population from April 1992 to April 1993.” Note the dates: April 1992 was the very beginning of the war in Bosnia.  The Serbs charged that from the outset of the war the so-called Bosnian government (they say it was a government run by a faction of Muslims, the extremist faction) had a policy of genocide against Serbs.

You never heard of this document? I am not surprised.  I checked with the Lexis-Nexis media search engine. I could not find a single English-language newspaper or TV news program that reported that it existed. 

The point is, in order for the public to come to any judgment about the accuracy of this UN document, it had to know the document existed and what was in it. To that end, the media of course should have reported the existence of said document and what it charged, with extensive quotations in newspapers of record such as the New York Times, and it should have seriously investigated the horrific charges. 

The undeniable fact that most people, at least (but not only) in the NATO countries, are completely ignorant of what the Serbs wrote and said about Muslim extremist crimes against Serbs in Eastern Bosnia, including Srebrenica, is sufficient to make a prima facie case that media reporting concerning Eastern Bosnia, including Srebrenica, has been anti-Serb propaganda, not news.  Thus there is every reason for you to be skeptical concerning media claims about a supposed huge massacre by Serbs in Srebrenica.  By suppressing virtually everything said and written by the Serbian side in the bitter Bosnian conflict, the media has perjured itself.  Would you accept, on faith, the word of a perjured witness?

Below are links to the pdf files of the UN report so that you may read it, only 12 years late.

Jared Israel
Editor, Emperor’s Clothes 

=========================================================

Memorandum on War Crimes and Crimes of Genocide in Eastern Bosnia (communes of Bratunac, Skelani and Srebrenica) committed against the Serbian population from April 1992 to April 1993.

A/46/171 and S/25635

Item 115 (c) of the preliminary list
Human Rights Questions: Human Rights Situations and Reports of Special Rapporteurs and Representatives

2 June 1993

Note: Four sections of the UN document repeat the same three introductory pages, followed by the appropriate texts.   

=========================================================

Comments by Petar Makara


Consulting Editor, Emperor’s Clothes

The horror that Bosnian Serbs suffered at the hands of Muslims in the vicinity of Srebrenica is no secret. The Yugoslav State Commission for War Crimes submitted a 132 page study presenting this Serbian suffering as early as May 24, 1993 to the United Nations Security Council. Representatives of Republika Srpska (the Bosnian Serb Republic) were not allowed to submit similar documents because  Republika Srpska was not recognized by the United Nations. Yugoslavia, as a UN member state (since 1945) and one of its  founding nations, was allowed to submit this document.

The Security Council admitted the study as an official United Nations document. The document was given UN id numbers A/46/171 and S/25635 and dated 2 June 1993.

Many UN documents, crucial for understanding the civil wars in Bosnia in 1990′s, were, on American insistence, declared classified. But this document was not. Its distribution was marked “General.” Any Western journalist could have stopped by room GA57 in the basement of the U.N. Building at the corner of 46th Street and 1st Ave. in New York and gotten a copy. Or they could just called the U.N. Public Inquiry Office at (212) 963-4475 and ordered it.

If the contents of this document are false, why didn’t the Western media report it and refute it?  Its suppression eloquently proclaims its validity and the dishonesty of the media that suppressed the very news of its existence.

We present it in its entirety. More. It is scanned in original form. You can print the PDF files and you will have a photo-copy of the original.

– Petar Makara
Emperor’s Clothes

***

Introduction
http://emperor.vwh.net/sreb/un-intro.pdf 
Pages 1 – 21 of the document. Historical background. Serbian suffering in the region. Repeated acts of hostility toward the Serbian population in and around Srebrenica, this time in the 1990s. A list of recent Serbian victims of Muslim crime.

The list of Serbian victims
http://emperor.vwh.net/sreb/un-victims.pdf 
Pages 22 – 40 of the document. Bosnian Serbs from in and around Srebrenica murdered by Bosnian Muslims from April 20, 1992 to April 5, 1993, organized by date, victim’s first name, father’s name (in parenthesis), last name, year of birth, place of birth, county.

Massacres
http://emperor.vwh.net/sreb/un-massacred.pdf 
Pages 41 – 51 of the document. General description of the crimes committed: Types of torture and murder, plunder of Serbian property, cleansing of the Serbian population.

Muslim perpetrators
http://emperor.vwh.net/sreb/un-perpetrators.pdf 
Pages 52 – 80 of the document. Bosnian Muslim perpetrators. Their full names, types of crime committed. Places and dates of their crimes.

Victims’ statements – part 1
http://emperor.vwh.net/sreb/un-statements-1.pdf 
Pages 81 – 104 of the document. Some surviving Serbian victims tell, in their own words, what they went through and how they survived.

Victims’ statements – part 2
http://emperor.vwh.net/sreb/un-statements-2.pdf 
Pages 105 – 132 of the document. Continuation: surviving Serbian victims tell what they went through.

 

NO REPORTING INSIDE THAT FIRST MONTH…THE HOAX TOOK TIME TO ASSEMBLE!

by

0

 

MLADIC IS UP ON TRIAL IN THE HAGUE AND HE HAS TO OVERTURN THE BIGGEST LIE AND HOAX EVER IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND. IT IS A HUGE TASK BECAUSE THE WHOLE MEDIA IS ROTTEN AND CORRUPT
 
 
IN 2008, 4 YEARS, AGO,  WE NOTICED SOMETHING VERY PECULIAR ABOUT THE MEDIA AND THIS “MASSACRE”
 
IT TOOK THE MEDIA MONTHS AND MONTHS FOR THE MEDIA TO TALK ABOUT ANYTHING TO DO WITH A MASSACRE AT ALL.
 
TO US THAT MEANT THAT IT TOOK TIME TO ASSEMBLE THE LIE
 

 

 

 

 

August 5, 2008

 

 

Just recently I noticed that somebody called John Peter Maher has provided us with a vital piece of evidence. The place was interesting. The writer was responding to the scurrilous attack on the Serbs and Karadzic by Pajamas Media and Phyllis Chesler. I wish to report the highlights of this research here because it confirms other research that I have been doing in recent times on the record of Irish newspaper of record The Irish Times.

 

I discovered hundreds of articles on the Irish Times all asserting the Massacre of 8000 men and boys, which is a hoax. I reckoned this means that there would be a major article on this Srebrenica issue in the Irish Times of about one every ten days.

 

But there were none at the time of the alleged massacre, and none for at least a couple of months after the alleged event. In other words there was a very strange gap.

 

This simple fact backs up the reports of the Dutch soldiers (not the Dutch politicians) on the ground who stated that they knew of no murders by the Serbs.

 

 

That is basically no Srebrenica Massacre for the Irish Times to report on at all until it was essentially put together by false stories by a whole number of people connected with the EU, Dutch politicians (but not Dutch soldiers who were on the spot, US politicians in the UN like Albright etc etc.

 

 

The putting together of the story thus needed time. It also needed ambiguity and mystery.

 

 

So for example these liars created a mystery about missing Muslims which they numbered as thousands of missing Muslims. They were not missing at all. Those thousands had reached Tuzla. So this initial period is very important to understand how this Lie was created. The great strength of the work of this writer is that he focusses on just this period.

 

 

Hence in reading those comments in answer to the scurrilous piece by Phyllis Chesler I fairly pricked up my ears when I saw what John Peter Maher was writing.

 

At least Pajamas Media allows some dissenting opinion although some of our readers and supporters have been censured.

 

But in any case this one reader has placed a number of comments which are a direct challenge to the whole of the Srebrenica Hoax story. I will reprint some of his work here and I thank that writer for his invaluable contribution.

 

It is so important because it deals with the period immediately following the retaking of Srebrenica, and especially during that first month until Albright made her false accusations to the closed session of the Security Council of the UN. That is the key period to understanding how the greatest hoax in the history of humanity was created.

 

[start quote here]

 

John Peter Maher:

When did commentators first start using the formulation, the catch phrase, “The Srebrenica Massacre [of x-thousands of Muslim men and boys]”?

When did the “Srebrenica Massacre” story break?

No reports from 10 July 1995 and the immediately ensuing days and weeks ever refer to “the massacre of 8000 (or 7000 etc) Muslim men and boys”.

FROM Iran, no mention of a massacre having taken place:

“Iranian foreign minister [Velayati], in a message to the UN secretary-general, has asked for immediate action to prevent a massacre of the defenceless people of Srebrenica by the Serb rebels. SOURCE: Vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran Network 1, Tehran, in Persian 0930 gmt 11 Jul 95; Source: Voice of the Islamic Republic of Iran Network 1, Tehran, in Persian 0930 gmt 11 Jul 95; SECTION: Part 4 Middle East; THE MIDDLE EAST; IRAN; ME/2353/MED. Message to UN secretary-general. Text of report by Iranian TV on 11th July.

From the front, no mention of a massacre having taken place:

Reports from the front in mid-July 1995, e.g. Chris Hedges in the New York Times of 18 July 1995, reported that thousands of armed Muslim fighters “slipped” through Serb lines under fire and arriving safe in Tuzla, held by Muslim forces (and a US garrison).

The lag time between as yet unbaptized “Srebrenica Massacre” on 10-11 July 1995 and the first press reports is over a month. David Rohde, who spearheaded the story that became known as “the Srebrenica Massacre”, did not himself use any such phrase or make such a claim. In his story, in the Guardian of 19 August 19 1995 we find “…I saw what appeared to be a decomposing human leg protruding from freshly turned dirt…” He repeated Albright’s fabrication about a massacre in a soccer stadium in a nearby town, [where] human faeces, blood, and other evidence indicated large numbers of people were confined, and perhaps shot.” Also: “United Nations official estimate that 4,000 to 6,000 Muslim men are still missing in the wake of the Srebrenica and Zepa assaults.”

Zbigniew Brzezinski:
The news would have still been hot when Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote an Op-Ed piece in “The New Republic” of 7 August 1995, under the headline: AFTER SREBRENICA. Zbig Brzezinski says only that something awful “might” happen.

Nowhere does Brzezinski mention a “Srebrenica massacre”. That catch phrase does not appear until weeks after the alleged event. It will not be found in the press until the American-sponsored Croatian “Storm” (Oluja) on Serb Krajina in August-September 1995.

(In)Consistency: Madeleine Korbel Albright, whose “Albright Group” now has the franchise for the cell phone business in Kosovo, brought the earliest allegation of a Serb massacre of Muslims on August 11, 1995. The chief United States delegate to the United Nations told a closed session of the Security Council that 2,000 to 2,700 missing Bosnians from the Srebrenica enclave might have been shot by the Bosnian Serbs.– She did not use the formulation “Srebrenica massacre.”

So, the numbers in Albright’s document and subsequent tellings and re-tellings are not consistent. What this implies we know from the Book of Daniel, chapter 13, where Susanna is denounced by corrupt Elders. Since their testimonies were inconsistent, as Daniel showed by “debriefing” the corrupt judges separately, the judges were condemned for bearing false witness.

LEXIS-NEXIS searches now permit us to track down press reports on whatever story. Readers can see for themselves what results turn up in searches dated between 10 July 1995 and the beginning of October 1995, using parameters such as

(Srebrenica AND massacre)
(Srebrenica AND missing)
Srebrenica AND 7000 OR 8000)
(7000-8000 men and boys) …

(Koranically, once boys attain the age of fifteen, they are “warriors” for Islam.)Remeber boy bombers in Israel.

Did the Srebrenica Massacre” happen? Draw your own conclusions.
Remember the the “Jenin Massacre” in the world press’ satanization of Israel

Jul 28, 2008 – 1:59 am John Peter Maher:

 

 

 

Just to repeat what John Peter Maher said once more:

 

“Madeleine Korbel Albright, whose “Albright Group” now has the franchise for the cell phone business in Kosovo, brought the earliest allegation of a Serb massacre of Muslims on August 11, 1995”.

 

And this was a lie and based on lies.

 

 

The hoax was constructed around the whole lie, or speculation, that there were thousands missing.

 

 

By about 2 weeks later though Chris Hedges of the New York Times no less had totally taken the ground from under that speculation with his article that the thousands missing had reached Tuzla, a Muslim and US controlled stronghold.

 

 

Hence as Maher points out a dearth of reports in the Media because essentially there was nothing to report on.

 

This Srebrenica Massacre is a Giant Lie. It never happened. It was made to happen by the repetition hundreds of thousands of times by a World Media which is totally corrupt.

 

 

To understand this giant lie you have to understand the giant corruption in this giant world media that capitalism and imperialism has inflicted upon us.

 

 

Thank you Maher for a vital piece of evidence.

SREBRENICA WAS A PLACE WHERE BOSNIAN MUSLIMS HAD SLAUGHTERED CHRISTIAN SERB SMALL FARMING PEOPLE FOR YEARS

by

0

 
 
These are writers who are sympathetic to the Serb cause. As the trial goes on we on www.4international.me will deal with their take in more detail.
 
But let us put one issue to rest where it is clear indeed that www.4international.me is really not reading off the same page at all as these writers of the following article. I can illustrate this by extracting one sentence which appears near to the end. It is:
 
Ratko Mladic may or may not be a war criminal depending on different opinions; however, if he is a war criminal then where are the Bosnian Muslim war criminals…
 
There is precisely where www.4international.me parts company with these writers.
 
They are not defending Mladic at all.
 
The context is that western capitalism, the US, all the European states, even Canada and Austrlia, had joined with Islam Jihadists aginst the Serbs.
 
In that context how could any Serb, including Mladic, be guilty of anything. The Serbs in those conditions chose their methods to fight to defend themselves. Who are these three writers here to criticise in the slightest what methods to use!?
 
At that point these 3 writers step into the camp of Kamm and Hoare.
 
As in the case of Abyssinia, and in the case of Leon Trotsky in his unconditional defence of haile selassie, our defence of  Mladic, Milosevic and all other fighters on the Serbs side, I say ALL, is one of UNCONDITIONAL DEFENCE
 
I have for many years been a critic of Mr Ed Harman and others on this very issue. In defence of Mladic, and in defence of the Serbs over the issue of Srebrenica, the defence must be UNCONDITIONAL
 
iT IS POSSIBLE TO HAVE HAD DISAGREEMENTS WITH SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC OVER THIS AND THAT POLICY ETC.
 
BUT ONCE SLOBODAN WAS IN THE HAGUE, A PRISONER OF THE WESTERN CAPITALIST/JIHAD ALLIANCE OF NATO THEN THE DEFENCE OF MILOSEVIC HAD TO BE UNCONDITIONAL.
 
It is quite shameful that that actually was not done, never, by anybody, while Milosevic was in the Hague.
 
Of course, who am I and what is www.4international.me? Without a powerful party the individual is just that, and individual.
 
That is why the defence of Mladic must not be left in the same hands but a revolutionary party which will defend Mladic unconditionally be created
 
I am sure this will be a recurring theme.
 
Basically, we take the same position towards Mladic and the Serbs as we do towards the Jews. Against Imperialism and Antisemitism we defend them unconditionally.
 
We have written much on www.4international.me about Srebrenica. Basically it is a Giant Lie, the worst that mankind has ever experienced. If you do not get that right you get nothing right.
 
Mladic is a fighter, a warrior in the fight for Truth. For Mladic to advance he has to tell the truth about this Big Lie. For the likes of The Guardian to advance they have to continue with the Big Lie. That is why we disagree so strongly with the formulation as described above.
 
There is no half way house. That is why Srebrenica is a revolutionary issue.
 
We extend our solidarity with the writers here. Later on another occasion I am sure we will go into their views in more detail.
 
 
 
 
{Start of article in question}
 
 
May 17, 2012

The writers here are:  Murad Makhmudov and Lee Jay Walker, Modern Tokyo Times

The trial of Ratko Mladic will be sweet music to the American agenda, the “Muslim victim card,” to cover-up the international terrorist ratlines which allowed terrorists to enter Bosnia, to cover-up the role of the Bosnian Muslim leadership in allowing Srebrenica to happen; and so forth. Therefore, the trial of Ratko Mladic is aimed at shaming the Bosnian Serbs and to pin all the blame on one side. Irrespective of the guilt of this individual this distortion is beyond what is reasonable because it is based on covering-up the real events of what happened. Indeed, the BBC today, like other major agencies, will mention the slaughter of 7,000 Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica but ignore the 3,500 Orthodox Christians who were slaughtered by Muslim forces before this event took place. These massacres apply to killing Orthodox Christians in and around Srebrenica, irrespective if they were little girls to old and elderly people.

 

It is this usual “good” versus “evil” whereby the mass simplicity of many media outlets not only shames the international media, but it makes you doubt everything that you read. For example, when terrorists in Iraq strike, the BBC states clearly that terrorists have struck. However, when terrorists strike in Syria then the BBC casually hints that “the opposition claims that it is the responsibility of the Syrian army.” Of course, such manipulation of language is part of the problem and the simplicity of outsiders who ignore whole histories and why such hatred exists, is just thrown away. The same also applies to the real motives behind the conflict in the first place.

Indeed, it is “pure colonialism” whereby the histories of the “hated” are belittled and the past is re-written by individuals with an agenda which is far from liberal. Therefore, all history must be forgotten in order to dehumanize the Serbs and the same applies to massacres committed against the Serbian people.

Before, focusing on Srebrenica, Ratko Mladic, and historical realities, some clarity must be given. All sides in the Bosnian conflict committed atrocities irrespective of religion or in the name of different ethnic nationalist movements. Therefore, many Catholics were massacred, many Muslims were massacred, many Orthodox Christians were massacred and you also had internal Muslim massacres which emanated around the border zones of Bosnia and Croatia.

Also, without a shadow of a doubt and despite the complex nature of Srebrenica and the final events which took place; it is clear that thousands of Muslims were killed by Bosnian Serbs who desired revenge. This fact can’t be glossed over no more than can the massacres against the Orthodox Christians of Srebrenica and the surrounding region by Bosnian Muslim forces. Either side, or international media outlets which desire to gloss over this reality and distort to the point of propaganda, merely shame the victims and themselves for spreading hatred.

Is this new, sadly not because all civil wars are brutal and massacres will take place on all sides. During World War Two the United States dropped two nuclear bombs on the civilians of Japan and did horrendous carpet bombing. The British likewise did carpet bombing against Germany. Similarly, Japanese and German forces massacred many civilians. War crimes of course depend on the writ of the victors. Therefore, the slaughter of killing hundreds of thousands of civilians in Nagasaki, Hiroshima, and the carpet bombing of Tokyo is deemed to be “humanity.” After all, did the individuals who ordered Nagasaki, Hiroshima, and the carpet bombing of Tokyo, face war crimes?

Srebrenica and quotes from powerful individuals

The UNPROFOR commander, French General Philippe Morillon, recounts that “the Serbs took me to a village to show me the evacuation of the bodies of the inhabitants that had been thrown into a hole, a village close to Bratunac. And this made me understand the degree to which this infernal situation of blood and vengeance [...] led to a situation when I personally feared that the worst would happen if the Serbs of Bosnia managed to enter the enclaves and Srebrenica.”

“I feared that the Serbs, the local Serbs, the Serbs of Bratunac, these militiamen, they wanted to take their revenge for everything that they attributed to Naser Oric. It wasn’t just Naser Oric that they wanted to revenge, take their revenge on; they wanted to revenge their dead on Orthodox Christmas.”

On February 12, 2004, Philippe Morillon testified at The Hague Tribunal that Bosnian Muslim forces under Naser Oric “engaged in attacks during Orthodox (Christian) holidays and destroyed villages, massacring all the inhabitants. This created a degree of hatred that was quite extraordinary in the region.”

Indeed, it is reported that approximately 3,500 Orthodox Christians in and around Srebrenica had been killed by Muslim forces during the brutal conflict. This applies to beheadings, individuals being burnt alive, and other ghastly and brutal torture methods. Therefore, the 5,500 plus Muslim fighting unit under Naser Oric was famous for its brutality and clearly the hatred on both sides in this part of Bosnia was unique. After all, Muslim forces loyal to Fikret Abdic had been allies of the Serbs on the border areas of Bosnia and Croatia in the western area. These Muslim forces fought against Alija Izetbegovic because they didn’t follow his Islamic aspirations.

Srdja Trifkovic who is an historian comments that “It is often pointed out that Srebrenica was an UN “protected zone,” but it is seldom noted that the enclave was simultaneously an armed camp used for attacks against Serb villages in the surrounding areas. Muslim General Sefer Halilovic confirmed in his testimony at the Hague Tribunal that there were at least 5,500 Bosnian Army soldiers in Srebrenica after it had obtained the “safe haven” status, and that he had personally arranged numerous deliveries of sophisticated weapons by helicopter.”

The importance of the above quote is that the Muslim General Sefer Halilovic acknowledges the sizeable Bosnian Muslim armed forces in Srebrenica and that sophisticated weapons were delivered. This was a strange “protected zone” which not only allowed the Bosnian Muslim units to slaughter Serbians in surrounding areas but it also enabled re-militarization. Of course, the same process is now happening in Syria whereby the opposition obtains more external military support, while at the same time the central government is lambasted for being militarist. It is not only blatant double standards but it is the direct covert participation of outside forces, who then manipulate the media in order to distort the “real picture” on the ground.

Srdja Trifkovic also comments that “During the Bosnian war between May 1992 and July 1995, several thousand Muslim men lost their lives in Srebrenica and its surroundings. Most of them died in July of 1995 when the enclave fell unexpectedly to the Bosnian Serb Army and the Muslim garrison attempted a breakthrough. Some escaped to the Muslim-held town of Tuzla, 38 miles to the north. Many were killed while fighting their way through; and many others were taken prisoner and executed by the Bosnian Serb army.”

Philippe Morillon further testified that the crimes committed by Bosnian Muslim forces were “extraordinary” and made the Serbs’ desire for revenge to be“inevitable.” This does not justify the events that took place once Bosnian Serbian units took control of Srebrenica because like Srdja Trifkovic comments “Many were killed while fighting their way through; and many others were taken prisoner and executed by the Bosnian Serb army.”

However, the media neglect of the massacres against Orthodox Christians in and around Srebrenica – and such leniency taken against Bosnian Muslim individuals who committed such crimes – not only leaves a sour taste – it is a falsification of history and covers up many untold stories which helps to dehumanize the Serbians. It also negates to share responsibility where it belongs – this applies to all parties who committed massacres. This also includes the United States and CIA which conveniently “overlooked” 8,000 of the most brutal and fanatical Islamists to enter Bosnia on false passports in order to slit the throats of Orthodox Christians.

Major-General (Ret) Lewis Mackenzie who is a retired Canadian general also raises serious doubts about so-called “good” and “evil.” In his article called “The real story behind Srebrenica. The massacre in the UN ‘safe haven’ was not a black and white event,” which was published in The Globe and Mail (July 14, 2005), he clearly highlights neglected facts behind the “real” Srebrenica.

Lewis MacKenzie comments that “As the Bosnian Muslim fighters became better equipped and trained, they started to venture outside Srebrenica, burning Serb villages and killing their occupants before quickly withdrawing to the security provided by the UN’s safe haven. These attacks reached a crescendo in 1994 and carried on into early 1995 after the Canadian infantry company that had been there for a year was replaced by a larger Dutch contingent.”

“The Bosnian Serbs might have had the heaviest weapons, but the Bosnian Muslims matched them in infantry skills that were much in demand in the rugged terrain around Srebrenica. As the snow cleared in the spring of 1995, it became obvious to Nasar Oric, the man who led the Bosnian Muslim fighters that the Bosnian Serb army was going to attack Srebrenica to stop him from attacking Serb villages. So he and a large number of his fighters slipped out of town. Srebrenica was left undefended with the strategic thought that, if the Serbs attacked an undefended town, surely that would cause NATO and the UN to agree that NATO air strikes against the Serbs were justified. And so the Bosnian Serb army strolled into Srebrenica without opposition.”

General Morillon comments bluntly about the Muslim warlord called Naser Oric because he states that “Naser Oric was a warlord who reigned by terror in his area and over the population itself. I think that he realized that these were the rules of this horrific war, that he could not allow himself to take prisoners. According to my recollection, he didn’t even look for an excuse. It was simply a statement: One can’t be bothered with prisoners.”

The brutal civil wars throughout the former Yugoslavia led to the ethnic cleansing of Serbians in Krajina. However, not only was nothing done about this, the Croatian forces who did this had been backed by America and other nations during the conflict. Indeed, all sides, irrespective of religion or ethnicity had used similar methodologies in their areas of power.

Also, the ghosts of past Muslim SS Units who supported Nazi Germany alongside Croatian fascists, was still etched into the memory because the events of World War Two were never reconciled under communist rule after the war. Therefore, with this, and the Ottoman Muslim past of enslaving young Orthodox Christian boys and then converting them to Islam – then the fear was not based on myths or on distant memories. On the contrary, the divisions within the former Yugoslavia were witnessed by the surviving elderly generation on all sides whereby histories meant different things.

Lord Owen supports the comments of General Morillon because on page 143 of his book, Balkan Odyssey, the respected Lord Owen comments that “On 16 April I spoke on the telephone to President Milosevic about my anxiety that, despite repeated assurances from Dr. Karadzic that he had no intention of taking Srebrenica, the Bosnian Serb army was now proceeding to do just that. The pocket was greatly reduced in size. I had rarely heard Milosevic so exasperated, but also so worried: he feared that if the Bosnian Serb troops entered Srebrenica there would be a bloodbath because of the tremendous bad blood that existed between the two armies. The Bosnian Serbs held the young Muslim commander in Srebrenica, Naser Oric, responsible for a massacre near Bratunac in December 1992 in which many Serb civilians had been killed. Milosevic believed it would be a great mistake for the Bosnian Serbs to take Srebrenica and promised to tell Karadzic so.”

Lewis MacKenzie states that “two wrongs never made a right, but those moments in history that shame us all because of our indifference should not be viewed in isolation without the context that created them.”

Many Bosnian Muslim figures also point the finger at Alija Izetbegovic because clearly the power of the Bosnian Serbs in this period was much reduced after the arming of both the Bosnian Muslim forces and military of Croatia. Indeed, how is that Alija Izetbegovic sent Bosnian Muslim forces to crush Muslims loyal to Fikret Abdic in the west – yet, he did nothing apart from notify the Bosnian Muslim military leaders in Srebrenica to abandon this area before Bosnian Serbs entered?

By glossing over the massacres of 3,500 Orthodox Christians in and around Srebrenica; the role of the United States in turning a blind eye to 8,000 international Islamists (some members who did September 11 had learnt much in Bosnia); the actions of the Bosnian Muslim leader, Alija Izetbegovic, in abandoning the Muslim enclave; and other important factors. It entails that Srebrenica is being manipulated for all the wrong reasons and that the dehumanization of the Serbians is a convenient way for Western powers to gloss over the reality on the ground. It also suits the Bosnian Muslim leadership which abandoned the enclave despite fighting against fellow Muslims in the west.

In a past article by one of the writers of this article, it was stated that “… it is clear that “the real Srebrenica” is not being told and the same applies to the “hidden Islamic jihad” which took place during the civil war and how ex-President Bill Clinton gave the green light to Islamists from all over the world to enter Bosnia.”

“Srebrenica should be remembered but it should be remembered in its duality and this applies to thousands of innocent Orthodox Christians and Muslims who were killed by both sides. It also should be remembered that Bosnian Muslim forces had slaughtered thousands of Christians first in the surrounding region of Srebrenica and that the “safe haven” was abused. Military generals from the international community who were in Bosnia state this clearly, and Morillon testified in court.”

The over simplification of major media outlets shames the mass media in general because the same cover up and lack of basic facts, are still being told by major international media agencies. Indeed, the coverage and headlines in some media outlets is bordering on anti-Serbian racism. Also, to gloss over the events of what happened prior to the Bosnian Serbs entering Srebrenica is not merely shoddy journalism, it is open manipulation and propaganda.

If healing is to take place in Bosnia between the various communities which share two entities, then all sides must acknowledge that massacres took place within each community. The alternative is that “hatred” will be manipulated by extremist Bosnian Muslims and likewise, extremists in the Bosnian Serbian community will manipulate the open bias towards them. Tens of thousands of individuals were killed on all sides and if the next generation is to rebuild then it can only rebuild under a fair and honest approach.

Ratko Mladic may or may not be a war criminal depending on different opinions; however, if he is a war criminal then where are the Bosnian Muslim war criminals? For that matter, where are the American war criminals which dropped Agent Orange over Vietnam and so forth? This is the problem because leading powers can bomb nations in distant lands because nothing ever happens. After all, they control all the power mechanisms. Therefore, one hundred thousand Iraqis are allowed to be killed because of failed policies because leading nations will not be held accountable.

Also, from the point of view of Ratko Mladic, if 3,500 Orthodox Christians were killed despite Bosnian Serbian units trying to contain the Bosnian Muslim units; then how many Orthodox Christians would have been slaughtered by Naser Oric and Muslim units if the Bosnian Serbian units had not been able to contain the Muslim forces to a certain degree?

Given the statement by General Morillon that Naser Oric had commented that “One can’t be bothered with prisoners” and then times this by the massacres that units did under him; then clearly Ratko Mladic is viewed differently by segments of the Bosnian Serbian community who were protected by units under him. After all, if Naser Oric and Bosnian Muslim units had been able to kill thousands of Bosnian Serbs despite the armed forces of the Bosnian Serbs in eastern Bosnia. Then it is clear that units under him would have killed untold numbers if they had been given a free reign and this applies to beheadings and burning people alive.

It is clear that hatred in this part of Bosnia was unsurpassed compared with other areas and this is based on the brutality of both sides. Also, Bosnian Muslim leaders point the finger at the Bosnian Muslim leadership in Sarajevo which abandoned the Muslim enclave. It is clear that many events are extremely murky and have been covered up in order to suit several important agendas.

Professor Muhamed Filipovic, Bosnian ambassador to the United Kingdom (1994-96), commented that Alija Izetbegovic had given the Bosnian Serbs the green light to enter Srebrenica. He states that “Serbians are going to be allowed to enter Srebrenica” before they did without any Muslim units fighting. This was ordered by Alija Izetbegovic because of an agreement with the Bosnian Serbs.

Hakija Meholjic, former Srebrenica police chief, states that “We saw the treachery. Both by Alija Izetbegovic and by the international community – There are just good and bad people in every nation. Alija was a bad man.”

It is therefore essential that all areas surrounding the reality of what happened in and around Srebrenica is debated openly, irrespective of the “bad light” that may ensue on both the Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Serbian leadership. It is known that thousands of innocent Muslims and Orthodox Christians were killed by both sides. Also, senior figures within the Bosnian Muslim leadership in authority, and within Srebrenica, make it clear that Alija Izetbegovic sacrificed Srebrenica. He also did this despite knowing the brutal reality of what Bosnian Muslim forces had done prior to the Bosnian Serbs entering.

The ongoing war crime of Ratko Mladic won’t address these important areas and instead “a whitewash” awaits the final verdict. Therefore, the role of major media institutions in ignoring the enormous complexity of Srebrenica is nullifying the real issues of what happened, both prior, during, and after the Bosnian Serb units entered Srebrenica.

This means that the open manipulation of events suits both the Bosnian Muslim government and Western powers which played “a dirty game” during a brutal civil war. Irrespective of the final verdict against Ratko Mladic, it is clear that he is “a scapegoat” in many areas even if he was responsible for war crimes which led to the deaths of many Muslims.

PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO LINKS BELOW – MADE IN NORWAY AND WITH QUOTES FROM BOSNIAN MUSLIMS WHO ARE NOT AFRAID TO SPEAK OUT.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIrjffmjQg0 Part 1 (please note starts after 30 seconds)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_ac24F0opI Part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylnTpjYSPfI Part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIX_nJE-IoE Part 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJrNeZgnj7Y Sky News – Hidden Islamists of Bosnia

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lSRFC-jVPw　 (Islamists in Bosnia because of USA, Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Islamist Alija Izetbegovic)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03DQJ7skClg&feature=related　 (Islamists in Bosnia because of USA, Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Islamist Alija Izetbegovic)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cyl5wxJPIQs　 (Muslim massacres of Christians)

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/rival-muslims-battle-on-in-bihac-1422695.html　 (Inter Muslim fighting – Serbs supported moderate Muslims

MLADIC MUST BE DEFENDED UNCONDITIONALLY AGAINST US/BRITISH IMPERIALISM

by

0

GUARDIAN VULTURES, WHO ALSO HATE ISRAEL, AND ARE PRO PALESTINIAN TERRORISTS/FASCISTS, WILL MISREPORT THIS TRIAL

 

THIS IS A REPORT FROM THE GUARDIAN

 

(The Guardian writes, with that sickening British uppishness)

 

The writer in The Guardian happens to be a bloke called Peter Beaumont, but any at The Guardian would do!

 

“Ratko Mladic at The Hague: body language for a history lesson”

After what seemed like delaying tactics, the former general now looks eager to give the court his version of Serb history

Ratko-Mladic-The-Hague

Ratko Mladic, the former Bosnian Serb army chief, during his initial appearance at the UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague. Photograph: Martin Meissner/AFP/Getty

The first words that Ratko Mladic spoke to the court were significant ones. Asked to confirm his name, he was deliberate: “Ja sam General Ratko Mladic.” “I am General Ratko Mladic.” Not a simple assent. Not even his given name, but The General.

As the hearing began he toyed with some stalling tactics…(That claim by Beaumont gives a flavour of The Guardian reporting on this. Actually Mladic is quite an ill man and as events have proved the Prosecution have been withholding vital evidence from the Defence)

 

He would, he explained, be defending not himself but his “country and his people”. The gestures and facial tics – both bidden and unbidden – have supplied further clues to what is in store when Ratko Mladic’s defence against charges of genocide, crimes against humanity and breaches of the laws and customs of war gets under way.

At one stage he shook his head at the mention in the summary of the indictment that he oversaw the murder of up to 8,000 men and boys in Srebrenica. More telling was a little swallowed laugh when Srebrenica was mentioned again.

There was a faint smirk too when he was charged with holding UN peacekeepers and observers hostage during the Nato bombing campaign.

What seems clear is that having told prosecutors in Serbia that he did not recognise the tribunal in The Hague, Mladic, former commander of Bosnian Serb forces who laid siege to Sarajevo and committed war crimes in municipalities across Bosnia, is unlikely to be able to avoid grandstanding in the witness box. The soldier who once warned his political master Radovan Karadzic that his plan of “ethnic cleansing” would be seen as amounting to genocide has not changed in his years in hiding. The man Serb prosecutors said after his arrest was desperate to “communicate” will use the soap box of The Hague to tell his own version of history to those many who still regard him as a hero.

There were hints of what attitudes he still maintains. Asked what languages he understood, Mladic explained tendentiously he understood his mother tongue of Serbian, pointedly adding he understood Macedonian – essentially the same language. Not Croatian, mind, or Bosniak, identical in most ways, the language spoken by Orthodox Christians from an Orthodox culture.

He condemned too the “denouncers” speaking “monstrous rubbish” in the words of the indictment, setting the stage for what is likely to be his argument in his defence – that the Bosnian Serbs were the victims, not those victimising.

Perhaps this is what he would have alluded to had the judge allowed him to carry on describing where he was born and in what circumstances – during the second world war – a history lesson that was cut short.

But there will be plenty such instructions in the weeks and months to come of how Bosnian Serbs suffered through history up to the present day. It was after all Bosnian Serbs who fled during the second world war who sheltered him in the village of Lazarevo.

Over the years he enjoyed the same protection from soldiers, priests, villagers and businessmen, all of whom shared the same view that Ratko Mladic has of himself: a hero of the Serbian people, a victim of history and the west, a man more sinned against than sinning.

Now at last he has the chance to tell that story about himself after being silenced for all this time.

• This article was amended on 6 June 2011. The original referred to gestures and facial ticks. This has been corrected.

 

 

OUR COMMENT

 

But it IS the Srebrenica Massacre that is up for debate.

 

www.4international.me is not at all alone in stating that this “Srebrenica Massacre” is one of the biggest lie ever.

 

It is up there with the Big Lie that the Jews drove the Arabs from their lands in 1948. That just did not happen. The Arabs left, not fled, but left, as part of a calculated attempt to genocide the Jews.

 

Just keep in mind that according to mallmann/Cuppers research that in 1942 the Nazis had a team of exterminators staning on the ready in Athes, ready to move in and carry out The Final Solution in Palestine. The Desert Rats defeated Rommel and ACCIDENTALLY saved the Jews of Palestine.

 

THAT WAS A MERE 6 YEARS BEFORE 1948.

 

Similarly the late 80s was a mere 40n years following the extermination of the Serbs/Jews/Gypsies in Bosnia, and Izetbegovic, the leader of the Bosnian Muslims in the 90s was involved with Hajj Amin el Husseini in the Holocaust against the Serbs.

 

The Guardian reporting on this trial will have to be exposed and we will do it!

THE CENTRIFUGES ARE SPINNING AS WE SPEAK…NETANYAHU WARNS

by

0

 

WE MUST REMEMBER THAT IN IRAN WE ARE DEALING WITH A TRUE FASCIST MOVEMENT

 

It is based on antisemitism, hatred of Jews. Along with that it is based on the Islam programme of conquering the world for Islam.

 

When Islam emerged it was not a Fascist movement because we insist that Fascism is a word to be used only in the context of Fascism as a modern and contemporary phenomenon.

 

Leon Trotsky wrote most about Fascism, analysing it from every angle, and insisted that Fascism was a method of rule which is connected to the historical decline of the Capitalist system.

 

Robert Spencer has produced a brilliant and timely book which insists that Islam as a method of thought and practice was patched together as a system AFTER the Arab conquests. It was quite specific to those conquests.

 

But everything changes and adapts to new circumstances.

 

Iran and Islam must be connected consciously to the present terminal decline in world capitalism

 

There are forces now emerging within capitalism itself which feel threatened by this new form of Iranian/Hamas/Hizbullah fascism. It depends on Israel to act and on the Jews to act to defend themselves.

 

The key, and the difficult part for Israel and the Jews, is that they must act on many fronts. Israel is threatened on all of these fronts.

 

  1. Obama who is essentially antisemitic and who also puts his electioneering before the safety of millions of Jews
  2. The Power’s programme of “Responsible to Protect” which is also the source of the New Fascism

 

The following notes by Debka make it clear that there ARE forces in the world feeling seriously threatened by Iran Fascism. But Israel must act and we on the outside must stand up and be counted in defence of the Jews once more:

 

 

 

DEBKAfileExclusive Report April 26, 2012, 5:30 PM (GMT+02:00)

Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz meets top US soldier Gen. Martin Dempsey in Washington

Israel Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu acted Thursday, April 26, to correct the damaging impression of divided and uncertain perceptions of the Iranian nuclear threat left by statements delivered in the last two days by himself and Defense Minster Ehud Barak.
Israel’s chief of staff Gen. Benny Gantz rallied to the task with an unambiguous comment that “other countries have readied their armed forces for a potential strike against Iran’s nuclear sites to keep Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The military force is ready. Not only our forces but other forces as well,” he said without elaborating.

“We all hope it will not be necessary to use this force, but we are absolutely sure of its existence.”
debkafile reports from Washington that Gen. Gantz’s words were seen in US official circles as the strongest affirmation yet from Jerusalem that Israel has partners for a direct attack on Iran’s nuclear sites.
It was also an attempt by the chief of staff to erase the question mark he placed in a previous comment over Iran’s resolve to attain a nuclear weapon.  

Wednesday, April 25, debkafile reported widespread criticism on the Israeli street and in military circles of the mixed and conflicting messages coming from top officials with regard to the Iranian peril. Netanyahu also responded to the criticism in person by declaring in a TV interview, “Iran hasn’t stopped its program …the centrifuges are spinning as we speak.”

BREITBART REPRESENTS THE MOST PROGRESSIVE FORCE IN AMERICA

by

0

No doubt about it, the place to be if you want to understand where the American people and the American working class are going, is on www.breitbart.com

Obama is at the centre of all of these moves against the American people and the American workers because Obama has got no respect for the great American Revolution and the great American Constitution, the great American tradion of Free Speech.

Obama is in no way of the left, not a socialist, is a raging Imperialist, but his politics chime with a disgustingly disorientated Stalinist left.

The new Fascism in the world is going to come partly out of these circles. And it will be laced with antisemitism as is seen in a recent use of an antisemitic cartoon by a section of the anti Wall Street movement.

As the world capitalist system hurls into economic crisis so the need to turn to Fascism. So the need to do away with democratic rights as contained in the American traditions.

It must be emphasised that Obama does not represent the black workers of America. He does the precise opposite. Because black workers like white workers, and even polka dot workers, need ALL their rights in order to defend themselves against dictatorship.

Obama represents the dictatorship of capital.

This story about this woman called Kagan shows how Obama had her appointed to the Supreme Court in order to do away with these basic rights of the American people and the American working class. The contempt which Obama and Kagan on the Supreme Court have for these traditional basic democratic righnts is exposed by Breitbart’s writer.

Starts here:

Breitbart News has discovered previously unknown handwritten notes from Elena Kagan to radical professor Derrick Bell, sent to Bell as Kagan worked on his seminal 1985 article on Critical Race Theory in the Harvard Law Review (99 Harv. L. Rev. 4).

The notes, which were not among materials presented to the Senate during Justice Kagan’s confirmation hearings, are preserved among Bell’s papers at the New York University archives.

Kagan’s work on Bell’s article was revealed in 2010 by Harvard Law School professor Charles Ogletree, after President Barack Obama nominated her to the Supreme Court. Ogletree cited her “phenomenal edits” on Bell’s “classic” article. 

Bell’s article, “The Civil Rights Chronicles,” combined exposition and fiction to argue that the Constitution was–and remains–tainted by white supremacy, and that the United States awaited “a common crisis that will overcome racism” through radical constitutional reform.

Unlike then-Harvard Law Review president Carol Steiker, who corresponded with Bell via typed letter (apparently on a 1980s-vintage dot matrix printer), Kagan chose to write to Bell exclusively on yellow notepad paper. She did not explain her choice to write by hand, save to suggest in one note on Aug. 30, 1985 that she was pressed for time.

Most of Kagan’s notes to Bell concern minor editorial comments on the “Chronicles,” as she and the other editors prepared his article for publication. One interesting passage concerns a legal question that Kagan and Steiker posed about Bell’s attempt to argue for a new constitutional right–a “substantive due process right” to “racial healing”:

As Carol and I told you on the phone, we’re a little bit concerned at the focus on this part of the piece. The doctrinal section centers on the idea of creating a substantive due process right to racial healing. But the reader is left wondering: why wouldn’t the Court strike these laws down on first amendment grounds? It strikes me that the Court would indeed strike these laws down on the ground of free speech or free association.

The section of the article to which Kagan was referring was entitled “The Chronicle of the Slave Scrolls.” In it, the main character, Geneva Crenshaw (who would recur in many of Bell’s writings) tells a fable about finding parchment scrolls on the west coast of Africa inside a model of a slave ship. 

The scrolls “simply taught the readily available but seldom read history of slavery in America” as related by those who had lived through it. Crenshaw relates that the discovery of the scrolls inspired black Americans to meet in “healing groups” that inspired them to compete more fiercely for achievement and respect–until a “television minister” warned that the scrolls were inciting racial hatred by teaching about old evils. States then passed “Racial Toleration Laws” that prohibited any teaching about the history of racial conflict, and blacks eventually acquiesced.

The lesson, Crenshaw says, is that “[t]he Constitution protects the efforts of black people only when those efforts leave vested interests undistured [sic].” 

Bell, through the narrator, provides the solution in the form of “a substantive due process right that barred government interference with the racial healing sessions,” based on the same

 right to privacy recognized in Roe v. Wade as part of a “penumbra” of constitutional protections. Bell’s narrator says a right to “racial healing” would give special protection to the idea that “the racism of whites rather than the deficiencies of blacks causes our lowly position in this society.” 

Crenshaw–perhaps echoing Kagan’s note–is skeptical that the Court would grant such a right. Bell’s answer is “skillful lawyering” and “a more liberal Court”; Crenshaw later replies that only a “common crisis” will bring the needed change.

As Solicitor General, Kagan cheered when Obama seized a national “crisis” to pass unrelated legislation whose goal is to create an effective right to health care. She has not recused herself from the subsequent Obamacare case, as she has from today’s suit over Arizona’s immigration law, in which her “skillful lawyering” played an important role.

If Obama is re-elected, Kagan could be part of the “more liberal court” Bell envisioned–and great changes in constitutional jurisprudence could be the result.

DIRTY NUCLEAR BOMB IN THE HANDS OF HIZBULLAH WILL CAUSE GREAT KILLING OF THE JEWS ONCE AGAIN

by

0

Antisemitism in countries in Europe and the antisemitism of Obama provides the cover for a great killing of the Jews in Israel.

This is a most serious warning to the world. It now emerges from this debka article that we have been concentrating on the wrong thing. We have been thinking of a rocket attacking Israel with a nuclear bomb on board.

But what debka has made clear here is that iran has the enriched uranium on hand, and that the trigger facility is on hand also. Hence Hizbullah on the border with Israel, essentially protected by UN forces, can explode dirty bombs against Israel.

But that would harm Arabs also, some antisemites may argue. The answer to that is the concept of suicide bombing. That specific concept makes that thought irrelevant.

Jew hatred is what drove Hitler and Jew hatred is what drove Hajj Amin el Husseini.

As Israeli leaders wrangle over Iran, a new US spy agency will deal with Tehran
DEBKAfileExclusive Report April 25, 2012, 5:38 PM (GMT+02:00)

Some fear they’ve missed the boat.

Israeli leaders were harshly criticized on the eve of Israel’s 64th Independence Day for too much speechifying and no real action against a nuclear Iran, whereas the US in contrast finally made a move by establishing a new Pentagon spy agency for gathering intelligence inside Iran. April 24 and 25, when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak addressed memorial ceremonies for the fallen, they reiterated the same old “Israel will not permit Iran to acquire nuclear arms” – a remark which the Israeli street has stopped taking seriously. Many members of military and intelligence circles are quoted by debkafile as believing that Israel may have waited too long and, along with the US, lost the initiative.
Jerusalem and Washington are still at odds on Iran, but the theme of their dispute has shifted. It is no longer about Iran’s timeline for building a bomb, but what kind. They agree that Tehran will not possess advanced nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles capable of penetrating the US and Israeli missile defenses any time soon. Israel is now worried about more primitive devices like the ones in the North Korean and Pakistani arsenals which Israeli believes are in the final stages of constructions.
The question in Israeli intelligence circles is this: Why is the impending North Korean nuclear test considered by the US, Japan and South Korea a major menace while no one seems to care about devices identical to the one Pyongyang plans to explode on the way to operational capability.

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Strategic Affairs Moshe Ya’alon said publicly earlier this month that by the end of 2012, Iran would have a dirty bomb.
His disclosure drew no reactions, although it was a warning. A dirty bomb combines radioactive material with conventional explosives. Its chief danger is the spread of radioactive contamination. Cruder and cheaper to producer than a nuclear bomb, counter-terror agencies have long appreciated that it is easily transferred to terrorists. Ya’alon’s warning therefore means that Iran may soon be able to transfer dirty bombs to the Lebanese Hizballah units sitting on Israel’s northern border and the Palesinian Hamas and Jihad Islami in Gaza.
The Weekly Standard edition for publication on April 30 wrote the following sentence: “The supreme leader and his guards can have a nuclear weapon in their hands in as little as 43 days, provided Iran’s nuclear scientists have mastered the manufacture of a nuclear trigger – technically much less difficult than enrichment.”

The UN nuclear watchdog in Vienna and US intelligence officials have reported tests on nuclear materials conducted in recent weeks at the Parchin site near Tehran, to which access has been denied UN inspectors.

In Washington, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced was the formation of a new Pentagon spy agency called the Defense Clandestine Service. Defense Department sources said the new organization would expand the military’s intelligence and secret war efforts outside war zones in areas insufficiently covered until now, indicating deep penetration inside hostile territory, primarily Iran.

Other sources point out that by creating a new in-house Pentagon spy agency, Panetta and President Obama demonstrated their opinion of the quality of intelligence they were receiving from the CIA, of which the defense secretary was director until recently.

IF YOU CANNOT DEFEND ASSAD YOU CANNOT DEFEND ISRAEL EITHER (FROM RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT)

by

0

There is a lengthy discussion on Israpundit on Powers and “Responsibility to Protect”. These Jewish leaders in the Diaspora are in total crisis because they do not know how to fight against the phenomenon of the “Arab Spring” which is at the same time the fight against Fascism, and indeed the alliance of the capitalist powers with Islam is the making of the modern Fascist Movement.

In this context the word that is never mentioned by Ted belman, Pamela Geller, Spencer and others is Marxism or Trotskyism. Rather than the truth they try to muddy the waters on Leon Trotsky and his defence of the Jews and the Israel in the making.

I wrote the following in a comment (url below) and please understand that if you do not defend the disreputable Assad against this Fascism of “Responsibility to Protect” then you do not defend the Jews and Israel either.

 

{This is the comment}

Let us get one thing crystal clear. If anybody thinks that Romney as a Republican President would not support “responsibility to protect” then please think on, and keep on thinking.

Heck even the editor of Israpundit Ted Belman backed up a bloodthirsty call of a noted Jewish American organization on this very site to bomb the living bejasus out of Gadhafi. It is true that Ted pulled back from this but it is on record that I immediately attacked this position, which is also not only the death-knell of sovereign states as under Gadhafi but also is the end of the road for the Jewish state of Israel.

Israel and its present leaders, which includes also the total leadership in the Diaspora (the leadership of the Jews has many differing strands, being traditionally a broad church, which is good and bad actually), and includes people like Ted and Gerry Gordan plus a thousand others, are sitting ducks. This is the result of political cowardice, of deep bias against new perspectives rooted in Judaism and in the conservatism of Judaism, which historically this conservatism has its good and bad aspects.

From the beginning of the crisis in Yugoslavia I recognized that THAT was “responsibility to protect” and I fought for the independence of the Serb people to fight to hold together their unified state of Yugoslavia, while people like Gerry Gordon did not lift a finger to defend Yugoslavia, but rationalised its break-up.

Ted was shaky on this at the beginning but a chap called Bill from Canada, a lawyer, disgraced Jews forever by sitting on the fence, while Yamit82 disgraced the memory of Yamit 1982 by launching the most vicious slanders against the Serbs, culled from disreputes like Hoare.

Came to Egypt Yamit82 and others found every reason under the sun NOT TO defend Mubarak from the Muslim Brotherhood and US Imperialism cum EU cum UN cum NATO.

Ben Ali was no different, Gaghbo no different, Gadhafi no different, and now Assad.

Funny that! Not talking about THAT, eh!

There is no point at all in moaning about Power and “responsibility to protect” if you do not actively defend Assad against just this very same thing.

The thing about Ted, the “weaselie” yamit82, Gordon, Mr Barry Rubin and a thousand other Jews, (I say Jews but remember that each and every one of these speaks only for themselves) is that they can always find the words to be utterly hypocritical.

So the opposition to Obama/Powers on Syria fell to the Stalinists of China and Russia and that is an unstable foundation, because the Stalinists are reactionary to the core. They always end up supporting Imperialism because Stalinism is a creation of Imperialism, and are not Marxists, are in opposition to Marxism.

Ayers was a creation of the CIA and Jared Israel has detailed how he and his girl friend split a promising student movement in the 60s which was seeking to link the students with the American workers.

So please do not refer to Ayers as a Marxist unless you are either intellectually challenged or wilfully dishonest.

Same applies also to our friend Obama. Obama a Marxist ha ha ha!

All the evidence points to the murky hand of the CIA behind Obama also. Do not forget that the CIA protected Eichmann in South America until the Jews busted the CIA post 45 racket and caught that piece of filth.

And just remember that if you cannot defend Assad from Annan then you had best shut up about this “responsibility to protect”, and when the NATO descends on the Jews in Israel as they did on the Christians in Kosovo keep your hypocritical mouths firmly shut there also.

You have to be consistent to be believed.

http://www.israpundit.com/archives/45393/comment-page-1#comment-157592

BREIVIK TOTALLY DISORIENTATED AND MAD ABOUT METHODS

by

0

HE REPRESENTS THE MADNESS OF INDIVIDUALISM

 

AND THIS DOES OFTEN LEAD TO MADNESS

 

JIHADWATCH HAS HAD THIS TRANSLATED FOR THEIR BLOG:

 

Breivik rejects Fjordman as inspiration: “It is ridiculous to conduct a witch hunt against Fjordman. He is against violence and for democracy”

Recent JihadWatch posts on Breivik: “Main source for Norway mass murderer Breivik’s twisted worldview: Wikipedia“, “Norway mass murderer Breivik reveals his true inspiration: ‘We have drawn from al-Qaida and militant Islamists’“

Translated from Norwegian by Nicolai Sennels, Nyhetene April 18: “Breivik rejects Fjordman as inspiration“:

It was a more confrontational atmosphere in court Wednesday, when Anders Behring Breivik continued his explanation. Breivik was grilled about his trip to Liberia and London in 2002, but said repeatedly that he did not want to answer questions about these trips. Lawyers asked Breivik whom he felt inspired by, and Breivik denied that he was inspired by the blogger Fjordman.“It is ridiculous to conduct a witch hunt on Fjordman. He is against violence and for democracy,” Breivik said in court.

Breivik also testified that concerning his methods he was inspired by Al-Qaeda. Breivik was also asked about his opinion on Adolf Hitler. Breivik explained that he himself was an anti-Nazi.

Breivik clarified his views on immigration.

“A national socialist wants all non-Norwegians thrown out of the country. I am much more liberal. I can accept a small percentage of immigrants, but not that Norwegians will be a minority. I have a duty to prevent my ethnic group from being destroyed. This belongs to the human rights,” said Breivik.

 

Posted by Nicolai Sennels on April 20, 2012
 
 
 

 

 

UNDER LIVINGSTONE AND THE FASCIST LEFT THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY HEADS TO BECOME FASCISTS

by

0

Lucy Lips, April 20th 2012, 8:56 am

The East London Advertiser reports:

Mayor Lutfur Rahman’s nominated independent candidate Gulam Robbani took the seat with 1,030 votes.

Robbani, one of the Mayor’s former aides who had been contracted to advise him on social care before quitting in February, beat Labour’s Ala Uddin into second place by just 47 votes out of a total 2,315 cast.

Labour had pinned its hopes on former council deputy leader Uddin to retake the seat it lost when Cllr Shelina Akhtar, who won it for them in 2010, defected last year to Mayor Rahman’s independent administration.

The by-election was caused by Akhtar being jailed in January for council benefit fraud.

The Mayor was out campaigning himself in the week, door-knocking with Robbani who is now almost certain to be offered a place in his cabinet.

Conservatives came third and Greens fourth, pushing Lib Dems into fifth place.

The results:

Gulam Robbani (independent) – 1,030 [elected]

Ala Uddin (Labour) – 987

Matthew Smith (Conservative) – 140

Kirsty Blake (Green) – 99

Richard Macmillan (Liberal Democrat) – 39

The turn-our was 31 per cent.

If Ken Livingstone wins, the case he will make – forcefully – within the Labour Party, is that the party should adopt a “Bradford Spring” strategy, in order to win seats such as these.

LT. COL. EISNER HAS THE SUPPORT OF 4INTERNATIONAL ALSO

by

0

 

WE ADD OUR VOICE TO THIS COMMENT BY NORMAN ON ISRAPUDIT

 

I’ll sign it when its posted and spread the word.

A patriot and a good man deserved far better than to be railroaded and not even being allowed to present a defense.

Lt. Col Eisner deserves every one’s support

 

WE THEREFORE BACK UP THIS PETITION PUT FORWARD BY ISRAPUNDIT EDITOR TED BELMAN:

 

We demand that the Prime Minster Netanyahu reinstate Lt. Col. Shalom Eisner immediately to his former position and rank.

 

Lt Col Eisner should be commended for executing his difficult mission rather than be dismissed.

We demand that the IDF should be more concerned with creating deterrance rather than projecting a nice image.

We demand that the IDF be more concerned with protecting the lives of its soldiers rather then the lives of Arab civilians.

We demand that the IDF support its officers and soldiers when they make decisions in the field rather than undermine them so that they are reluctant to make choices

PAMELA GELLER PROVES THAT THE FASCIST LEFT IS COVERING FOR ISLAM FASCISM…AND OBAMA

by

0

The line-up is very clear. There is www.4international.me which is a true socialist and Trotskyist movement.

 

Then there are the Fascist Lefts, just as there were Fascist Lefts in Hitler and Mussolini organizations.

 

Geller is fighting in defence of Israel, in defence of free speech against the Media which hides the real antisemitism of Obama. For that and that only she is attacked by the Fascist Left.

 

This extract from her blog makes interesting reading:

 

PAMELA WRITES: It is well known that I am speaking at BlogCon (which is utterly amazing — the world won’t know what hit ‘em), which Occupiers tried to crash a few months back and were made fools of. They are not here today, because they know they would be ridiculed and not taken seriously, but they descend on college and university campuses because those are their incubation labs. The fascists have successfully seized control of the campuses. Any rational speaker can’t get within twenty feet of them, because they capture the youth and train them (like Hitler) to be their army.

‘Racist Hatemongers?‘ Occupy to Protest ’Islamic Apartheid Conference’ The Blaze April 20

Occupy to Protest of Islamic Apartheid Conference: Fight Back Against These Racist Hatemongers

Occupy demonstrators at Temple University in Philadelphia are planning to protest an “Islamic Apartheid Conference” on Monday featuring activist Pamela Geller and sponsored by the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

The conference, billed as a “universal symbol of support and encouragement” for “women, gays [and] religious minorities, including Muslims themselves, who are figuratively and physically imprisoned by Shariah and Islam,” will feature Geller, Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch and activist Nonie Darwish as speakers. The event comes on the heels of an “Israeli Apartheid Week” hosted at the university last month.

To counter it, Occupy Temple is joining with the International Socialist Organization, Students for Justice in Palestine and the Party for Socialism and Liberation for a “multi-racial fightback against these racist hatemongers.”

“Geller is known to her fans and critics alike as ‘Queen of the Muslim Bashers,’” the Facebook page for the protest states. “Her views are by no means within the boundaries of reasonable debate.”

It further describes the David Horowitz Freedom Center as “another anti-Muslim group which uses McCarthyist tactics to attack academic freedom around the country.”

The Council on American Islamic Relations has also added its voice to the situation, with the Philadelphia chapter issuing a statement stating in part: “Hate speech should be relegated to the fringes of our society, not given a platform at a prestigious university.”

For her part, Geller on her blog Atlas Shrugs denounced the protesters as “the army of haters — stormtroopers and brownshirts instructed to disrupt and shut down these meetings of freedom’s defenders and human rights activists.”

“This is what we have come to expect from the fascists at America’s colleges and universities,” Geller wrote. “Subversives (like Bill Ayers) and jihadists (like CAIR and Reza Aslan) are welcomed and paid handsomely, but voices for freedom and human rights activists are hunted down and silenced like…dissidents.”

Islamic Apartheid Conference Under Attack by Robert Spencer FrontPage April 20

Leftist and Islamic supremacist thugs are planning to protest the Islamic Apartheid Conference that the David Horowitz Freedom Center is sponsoring at Temple University Monday. Hosted by Students for Intellectual Freedom, the Conference will feature Pamela Geller, Nonie Darwish, Simon Deng and me. In reporting on the coming protests, however, the Philadelphia City Paper noted only that “two of America’s most high-profile anti-Muslim bigots” will be speaking – Geller and me – and doesn’t mention Darwish or Deng even once. The omission was telling, revealing the hypocrisy of the protests as a whole.

Nonie Darwish is an ex-Muslim who grew up learning hatred for Infidels in a Muslim school in Gaza. Simon Deng is a South Sudanese Christian who was held as a slave by Muslim captors for several years. Both of them know Islamic apartheid firsthand, and have been its victims. The Leftists at the City Paper therefore could do nothing but omit them from their story attacking the Conference, for to include them would in itself have been to reveal the reality of what they’re denying: Islamic apartheid.

The City Paper’s story focuses on Pamela Geller, retailing hard-Left talking points against her consisting entirely of distortions, misrepresentations, and outright falsehoods about things she has said and positions she has taken. Its objection to the Conference appears to be that Geller, and apparently therefore also the Conference as a whole, is “anti-Muslim.”

The irony is thick: organizing the protests are Occupy Temple, the International Socialist Organization, Students for Justice in Palestine, the Party for Socialism and Liberation, and other hard-Left community and student organizations, none of which have ever raised the slightest objection to Temple’s Israeli Apartheid Week. Nor would any of them characterize the very idea of Israeli Apartheid Week as anti-Semitic, although anti-Semitism is rife at such events (and our event will not actually be “anti-Muslim” at all). The chief difference, however, between Israeli Apartheid Week and our Islamic Apartheid Conference is simply that there really is Islamic apartheid, but there is no Israeli apartheid.

In Israel, Arab citizens are represented in Knesset and enjoy full legal equality. The very idea of “Israeli Apartheid”  is an attempt to stigmatize, and ultimately destroy, Israel’s efforts to defend itself. Islamic Apartheid, however, is a very different matter. Is it “anti-Muslim” to point out that Islamic law mandates institutionalized discrimination against women? Muslim women are the first victims of Islamic law’s denial of basic rights for women; is it “anti-Muslim” to speak out for them and say that as human beings they deserve better?

OBAMA REPRESENTING THE US IS IN ALLIANCE WITH IRAN AGAINST ISRAEL

by

0

 

The US in alliance with Iran

Obama style of politics represents the US and Obama drags the majority of Americans behind him, is that not a fact! Obama may win re-election!

This article by debka clearly shows the danger of the US to Israel. The Fascist Left is lying! The US is in an alliance with Iran and Islam.

That after all is why Obama the great friend to Islam and Iranian fascism is in power.

The Israeli leaders by keeping Jews tied to US Imperialism throw the Jews into great, great danger of liquidation by Nazi fascist Nuclear technology.

Meanwhile the Fascist Left keep on attacking Israel as if they were the culprit…pure antisemitism of the Fascist Left

My feeling and the feeling of www.4international.me is that Israeli leaders by dallying with US Imperialism are betraying, are hopelessly inadequate, meaning not up to the job in hand, despite the great heroism of the IAF, and that all Jews in Europe and the rest of the Diaspora have sold their souls to capitalist comforts.

I have direct experience of these kinds of Jews from where I live in Spain, also Irish Jews, and it is all bad. THEY ARE NOT FIGHTING FOR ISRAEL. SOME ARE ISRAEL HATERS.

{START DEBKA REPORT HERE}

Notwithstanding the hugs and personal friendship, Israel’s Defense Minister Ehud Barak arrived in Washington Thursday April 19 to tax his host, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, with tough questions about the administration’s dialogue with Iran. They followed the lines of, “What’s going on? Is there a deal? Don’t tell me what you have settled with the Iranians, just your minimal demands, your bottom line.”
The questions reflected Israel’s concern at being kept in the dark about US-Iranian back-track negotiations and American concessions, including President Barak Obama’s willingness to yield on full transparency and international nuclear watchdog inspections at Iran’s nuclear sites.
debkafile reports: The Israeli minister had come to ask for the truth from Panetta’s own lips on the urgent instructions of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who himself had just received worried phone calls from French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British Prime Minister David Cameron. They wanted to find out how far Washington had gone in concessions to Iran. You Israelis have more clout in Washington than us, they said. You have to try and stop the downhill decline. Concern was also registered from Berlin.
The two defense chiefs talked for more than an hour, joined for some of their conversation by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey.

According to our sources, they focused on the fresh intelligence reaching the US and the International Atomic Energy Agency that Iran had begun moving military nuclear facilities to secret locations not covered in the confidential deal evolving between the Obama administration and Tehran.  Our military sources say that this Iranian action indicates on the one hand that a deal wit the US is within sight but, on the other, that Tehran is already taking advantage of the US concession on oversight and transparency – for concealment.
Shortly after their conversation, Panetta and Barak spoke in separate media interviews. The US Secretary said that plans for a military operation against Iran were in place and he is sure that in the event of a clash, the American military would prevail.

Barak stated that the Israeli and U.S. intelligence findings regarding the objectives of the Iranian nuclear program are aligned, the comment he makes routinely after talking to American officials. The inference is that the two governments are aligned on intelligence but not on how to translate it into action for Iran.


He added that Iran was “clearly heading towards the objective” of building a nuclear weapon.


The Pentagon bulletin reported the Panetta-Barak meeting “to discuss the close US-Israel defense relationship including Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge, Iran, Syria and the Arab Awakening’s effect on the region. Secretary Panetta was honored to be joined by Minister Barak at the Department of Defense’s Commemoration of Holocaust Remembrance Day where they each lit a candle to commemorate the memories of the victims of the Holocaust.”

The meeting took place in the middle of a crisis hitting the White House, the Pentagon and the State Department over the president’s far-reaching concessions to Iran in another dispute, the one over three Persian Gulf islands close to the strategic Strait of Hormuz which the UAE accuses Iran of grabbing.  
The UAE backed by the GCC is up in arms over the visit Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad paid to Revolutionary Guards bases on Abu Musa island on April 11 at the same time as Saudi Defense Minister Prince Salman was talking to the US president at the White House.

The UAE called the Ahmadinejad’s visit a violation of its sovereignty, while the Gulf bloc saw it as a cocky signal to the region that Tehran calls the shots these days – not America.
Yet, instead of backing its Gulf allies, the State Department on April 19, issued a mild statement urging Iran “to respond positively to the UAE’s initiative to resolve the issue through direct negotiations, the International Court of Justice or another appropriate international forum.”
The Gulf governments had expected Washington to respond to Iranian threats to use Abu Musa for attacks on the Strait of Hormuz and their oil terminals. They are deeply concerned by what they regard as the extreme lengths to which the Obama administration is willing to go to appease Iran, even to the point of giving ground on America’s own standing in the region