NETANYAHU HAS EVERY RIGHT TO SPEAK TO CONGRESS ABOUT THE IRAN NUCLEAR BOMB AND TO ATTACK NETANYAHU IS PURE ANTISEMITISM

MUST DEFEND NETANYAHU TOTALLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY AGAINST ANTISEMITES OVER CONGRESS SPEECH

you would think that all people would be defending Israel and Netanyahu against the Fascist Mullahs of Iran (seen above is pictures of Gays recently hung under the new “moderate” regime)…But no way and that can only be explained by total Antisemitism

Felix Quigley says…The reason that people attack Netanyahu for speaking to Congress about the danger from the Iranian Nuclear Bomb threat is all due to Antisemitism in the world.

This paragraph is worth repeating:

“Rather, he said, his purpose in addressing Congress was “to speak up about a potential deal with Iran that could threaten the survival of Israel.” Pointing to a map that he had arranged to have projected on the wall, Netanyahu described the terrorist operations that Iran was coordinating around the world. “As Prime Minister of Israel, I have a moral obligation to speak up in the fact of these dangers while there is still time to avert them,” saying Jews could never be passive again. – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/03/my-thoughts-on-netanyahus-aipac-speech.html/#sthash.VI5oLS9i.dpu”

Bibi Netanyahu must carry on and must not be put off by lies against him. I am a socialist and from Ireland and I see the struggle of the Jews against the Iranian bomb as being connected with all of our survival also.

This is the central issue.

There are many people who are attacking Netanyahu. I see this as pure Antisemitism. And in the ways of Antisemitism facts do not matter, that is facts about anything.

First of all there is a tradition for American Congress to invite people in to speak on issues that concerns Congress. The Congress elected Leader asked Netanyahu. He was within his rights.

But here is the kicker. If it was Congress who invited Netanyahu then why attack Netanyahu? That is where Antisemitism in the world comes in.

Netanyahu was asked and he agreed and that should have been that. Antisemitism does not allow that.

This issue of the Iran Bomb, the Mulahs, Obama, Netanyahu and a thousand other things in our life today is ALL about Antisemitism

Hatred of the Jew pure and simple.

It takes so many different forms. The crude form you can see plainly. It is the polite and “civilized” form that is most lethal.

Finally Netanyahu correctly told AIPAC that he has no personal problem with Obama. Or the Democrats. He was right to say that. The hatred is coming totally from the other direction.

He thus made my point: It is ALL about Antisemitisdm.

IT IS NECESSARY FOR SOCIALISTS TO DEFEND NETANYAHU UNCONDITIONALLY IN CONGRESS SPEECH

Soon now Obama will be standing in front of Congress of the great United States with all of its history in the air and will be fighting against Iran in its intention to destroy Israel and thus complete the Holocuast in our time.

On 4international.me which is the seeds of the future Trotskyist movement we send our best wishes to Netanyahu and we pledge to fight against Left Fascist Pro-Jihad Antisemitism.

Obama we now recognise and many people also realise has joined in an Alliance with above all Iran against Israel and against all of us freedom lovers, and also in an Alliance with especially Turkey, Morsi, Qatar, Fatah and Hamas, and with in short all reaction.

This just did not appear in the last few weeks. It has been brewing for some time.

Sharon who was in the leadership of Israel in 2003 took a correct position to the war on Saddam. Sharon was wise in many ways and he opposed this war because he felt that the main enemy was Iran and I think he sensed correctly that removing Saddam would strengthen Iran.

Netanyahu and Caroline Glick were far less savvy on this which is a great shame. To some extent they have learned from that experience – a hard lesson to learn.

With Saddam removed Iran was greatly strengthened.

Then with the arrival of Obama began the actions of removing really secular type leaders like Mubarak and Gadhafi. This was the work of Obama but remember the initial step to Obama was the Bush war on Saddam.

It is a thought that I have. One of the methods of rule by a US in severe crisis is CHAOS. That is also what the Iranian leaders in their Twelfth Iman aims seek also – CHAOS in the world.

It is the form that the historical crisis in this world capitalist system is taking.

4international stands behind Netanyahu in his Congress speech. It is absolutely historical. Netanyahu deserves credit.

JIHADI JOHN ISSUE…IRISH AND BRITISH WORKERS MUST INVESTIGATE THIS JIHAD GROUP “CAGE PRISONERS”

This issue going to tear the British Imperialists and Ruling Class apart. Already the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust is highly implicated in Jihadi John apologists “Cage” and has given these Jihadists of “cage” up to half a million. British workers must urgently waken up.

The working class is asleep both in Britain and in Ireland. The trade unions in their down the line support including financial for Jihadist movemernts (who seek the destruction of Israel and a new Shoah) lull the workers to sleep and encourage indifference.

Surely it is time for conscious workers to take a close look at this dangerous group Cage Prisoners. How do you see this group? Any comments are helpful here if you have information share it NOW.

Campaign group Cage (short for Cage Prisoners) described Jihadi John as ‘beautiful’ person
-Lord Carlile, a former reviewer of anti-terror legislation said there are ‘serious concerns’ surrounding the group
-Added that he would never advise donating money to organisation
-Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust has given £305,000 to Cage

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2972757/Fury-charities-fund-ISIS-Jihadi-John-apologists.html#ixzz3T0UKGtL5

PS I am not a fan of the Mail but check is this factual and if it is it demands action.

First step therefore is to investigate this “Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust”

I would also ask that conscious workers in Ireland begin an investigation into Adams and Sinn Fein in their role in the promotion of Antisemitism and Jihad against Israel and their telling lies to the Irish people over the nature and role of Hamas and Fatah alike

Einstein 1929…Arab mobs” in Palestine, October 1929 Letter to the Manchester Guardian

Arab mobs” in Palestine, October 1929 Letter to the Manchester Guardian

Felix Quigley says:

There is pathos here … Reading in a desperate plea the last paragraph of this letter by Einstein. It is following the 1929 massacre of Jews in Hebrón by Arabs of Palestine led by Hajj Amin el Husseini. It is a reserved appeal to Britain to come up to the plate and do the right thing by the Jews. It is a dignified letter but also a sad one because Britain was to do the very opposite and the monster Arab Palestininian Hajj Amin el Husseini was to go on and play a central role in the Nazi Holocaust of the Jews. Britain was to make that possible for the Nazis by passing the White Paper of 1939 which blocked Jews from coming to Palestine. Thus Britain cornered the Jews for the Nazi killers. No escape.

Later in 1948 Einstein attacked Israel over the Dir Yassin issue but he did so on the basis of very faulty information!

 
 
Traducir el mensaje al español Traduciendo… Traducido por Google – inglés ≫ español – Ver original  
 
 
The cover of the French paper Le Petit Journal, September 8, 1929
Letter to the Editor Manchester Guardian 12th October 1929 It was with a wonderful enthusiasm and a deep sense of gratitude that the Jews, afflicted more than any other people by the chaos and horror of the war, obtained from Great Britain a pledge
Letter to the Editor Manchester Guardian 12th October 1929 It was with a wonderful enthusiasm and a deep sense of gratitude that the Jews, afflicted more than any other people by the chaos and horror of the war, obtained from Great Britain a pledge to support the re- etablishment of the Jewish national home in Palestine. The Jewish people, beset with a thousand physical wrongs and moral degradations, saw in the British promise the sure rock on which it could re-create a Jewish national life in Palestine, which, by its very existence as well as by its material and intellectual achievements, would give the Jewish masses, dispersed all over the world, a new sense of hope, dignity, and pride. Jews of all lands gave of their best in man-power and in material wealth in order to fund the inspiration that had kept the race alive through a martyrdom of centuries. Within a brief decade some £10,000,000 were raised by voluntary contributions, and 100,000 hand- picked Jews entered Palestine to redeem by their physical labour the almost derelict land. Deserts were irrigated, forests planted, swamps drained, and their crippling diseases subdued. A work of peace was created which, although still perhaps small in size, compelled the admiration of every observer. Has the rock on which we have built begun to shake? A considerable section of the British press now meets our aspirations with lack of understanding, with coldness, and with disfavour. What has happened? Arab mobs, organised and fanaticised by political intriguers working on the religious fury of the ignorant, attacked scattered Jewish settlements and murdered and plundered wherever no resistance was offered. In Hebron, the inmates of a rabbinical college, innocent youths who had never handled weapons in their lives, were butchered in cold blood; in Safed the same fate befell aged rabbis and their wives and children. Recently some Arabs raided a Jewish orphan settlement where the pathetic remnants of the great Russian pogroms had found a haven of refuge. Is it not then amazing that an orgy of such primitive brutality upon a peaceful population has been utilised by a certain scion of the British press for a campaign of propaganda directed, not against the authors and instigators of these brutalities, but against their victims? No less disappointing is the amazing degree of ignorance of the character and the achievement of Jewish re- construction in Palestine displayed in many organs of the press. A decade has elapsed since the policy of the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine was officially endorsed by the British Government with the almost unanimous support of the entire British press and of the leaders of all political parties. On the basis of that official recognition, which was approved by almost every civilised Government, and which found its legal embodiment in the Palestine Mandate, Jews have sent their sons and daughters and have given their voluntary offerings for this great work of peaceful reconstruction. I think it may be stated without fear of exaggeration that, except for the war efforts of the European nations, our generation has seen no national effort of such spiritual intensity and such heroic devotion as that which the Jews have shown during the last ten years in favour of a work of peace in Palestine. When one travels through the country, as I had the good fortune to do a few years ago, and sees young pioneers, men and women of magnificent intellectual and moral calibre, breaking stones and building roads under the blazing rays of the Palestinian sun; when one sees flourishing agricultural settlements shooting up from the long deserted soil under the intensive efforts of the Jewish settlers; when one sees the development of water power and the beginnings of an industry adapted to the needs and possibilities of the country, and, above all, the growth of an educational sysem, ranging from the kindergarten to the university, in the language of the Bible – what observer, whatever his origin or faith, can fail to be sezied by the magic of such amazing achievement and of such almost superhuman devotion? Is it not bewildering that, after all this, brutal massacres by a fanaticised mob can destroy all appreciation of the Jewish effort in Palestine and lead to a demand for the repeal of the solemn pledges of official support and protection? Zionism has a two-fold basis. It arose on the one hand from the fact of Jewish suffering. It is not my intention to paint here a picture of the Jewish martyrdom through-out the ages, which has arisen from the homelessness of the Jew. Even to day there is an intensity of Jewish suffering throughout the world of which the public opinion of the civilised West never obtains a comprehensive view. In the whole of Eastern Europe the danger of physical attack against the individual Jew is constantly present. The degrading disabilities of old have been transformed into restrictions of an economic character, while restrictive measures in the educational sphere, such as the “numerus clausus” at the universities, seek to suppress the Jew in the world of intellectual life. There is, I am sure, no need to stress at this time of day that there is a Jewish problem in the Wetern world also. How many non-Jews have any insight into the spiritual suffering and distortion, the degradation and moral dis-integration engendered by the mere fact of the homelessness of a gifted and sensitive people? What under-lies all these phenomena is the basic fact, which the first Zionists recognised with profound intuition, that the Jewish problem cannot be solved by the assimilation of the individual Jew to his environment. Jewish individuality is too strong to be effaced by such assimilation, and too conscious to be ready for such self effacement. It is, of course, clear that it will never be possible to transplant to Palestine anything more than a minority of the Jewish people, but it has for a long time been the deep conviction of enlightened students of the problem, Jews and non-Jews alike, that the establishment of a National Home for the Jewish people in Palestine would raise the status and the dignity of those who would remain in their native countries, and would thereby materially assist in improving the relations between non-Jews and Jews in general. But Zionism springs from an even deeper motive than Jewish suffering. It is rooted in a Jewish spiritual tradition, whose maintenance and development are for Jews the raison d’etre of their continued existence as a community. In the re-establishment of the Jewish nation in the ancient home of the race, where Jewish spiritual values could again be developed in a Jewish atmosphere, the most enlightened representatives of Jewish individuality see the essential preliminary to the regeneration of the race and the setting free of its spiritual creativeness. It is by these tendencies and aspirations that the Jewish reconstruction in Palestine is informed. Zionism is not a movement inspired by chauvinism or by a sacro egoismo. I am convinced that the great majority of the Jews would refuse to support a movement of that kind. Nor does Zionism aspire to divest anyone in Palestine of any rights or possessions he may enjoy. On the contrary, we are convinced that we shall be able to establish a friendly and constructive co- operation with the kindred Arab race which will be a blessing to both sections of the population materially and spiritually. During the whole of the work of Jewish colonisation not a single Arab has been dispossessed; every acre of land acquired by the Jews has been bought at a price fixed by buyer and seller. Indeed, every visitor has testified to the enormous improvement in the economic and sanitary standard of the Arab population resulting from the Jewish colonisation. Friendly personal relations between the Jewish settlements and the neighbouring Arab villages have been formed throughout the country. Jewish and Arab workers have associated in the trade unions of the Palestine railways, and the standard of living of the Arabs has been raised. Arab scholars can be found working in the great library of the Hebrew University, while the study of the Arabic language and civilisation forms one of the chief subjects of study at this University. Arab workmen have participated in the evening courses conducted at the Jewish Technical Institute at Haifa. The native population has come to realise in an ever growing measure the benefits, economic, sanitary and intellectual, which the Jewish work of reconstruction has bestowed on the whole country and an its inhabitants. Indeed, one of the most comforting features in the present crisis has been the reports of personal protection afforded by Arabs to their Jewish fellow-citizens against the attacks of the fanaticised mob. I submit, therefore, that the Zionist movement is entitled, in the name of its higher objectives and on the strength of the support which has been promised to it most solemnly by the civilised world, to demand that its unprecedented reconstructive effort – carried out in a country which still largely lies fallow, and in which, by methods of intensive cultivation such as the Jews have applied, room can be found for hundreds of thousands of new settlers without detriment to the native population – shall not be defeated by a small clique of agitators, even if they wear the garb of ministers of the Islamic religion. Does public opinion in Great Britain realise that the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who is the centre of an the trouble, and speaks so loudly in the name of all the Moslems, is a young political adventurer of not much more, I understand, than thirty years of age, who in 1920 was sentenced to several years’ imprisonment for his complicity in the riots of that year, but was pardoned under the terms of an amnesty? The mentality of this man may be gauged from a recent statement he gave to an interviewer accusing me, of all men, of having demanded the rebuilding of the Temple on the site of the Mosque of Omar. Is it tolerable that, in a country where ignorant fanaticism can so easily be incited to rapine and murder by interested agitators, so utterly irresponsible and unscrupulous a politician should be enabled to continue to exercise his evil influence, garbed in an the spiritual sanity of religion, and invested with all the temporal powers that this involves in an Eastern country? The realisation of the great aims embodied in the Mandate for Palestine depends to a very large degree on the public opinion of Great Britain, on its press, and on its statesmen. The Jewish people is entitled to expect that its work of peace shall receive the active and benevolent support of the Mandatory Power. It is entitled to demand that those found guilty in the recent riots shall be adequately punished, and that the men in whose hands is laid the responsible task of the adminisration of a country of such a unique past and such unique potentialities for the future shall be so instgrued as to ensure that this great trust bestowed by the civilised world on the Mandatory Power, is carried out with vision and courage in the daily tasks of routine administration. Jews do not wish to live in the land of their fathers under the protection of British bayonets: they come as friends of the kindred Arab nation. What they expect of Great Britain is that it shall promote the growth of friendly relations between Jews and Arabs, that it shall not tolerate poisonous propaganda, and that it shall create such organs of security in the country as will aford adequate protection to life and peaceful labour. The Jews will never abandon the work of reconstruction which they have undertaken. The reaction of all Jews, Zionist and non-Zionist alike, to the events of the last few weeks has shown this clearly enough. But it lies in the hands of the Mandatory Power materially to further or materially to hamper the progress of the work. It is of fundamental importance that British public opinion and the Governments of Great Britain and of Palestine shall feel themselves responsible for this great trust, not because Great Britain once undertook this responsibility in legal form, but because they are deeply convinced of the significance and importance of the task, and believe that its realisation will tend to promote the progress and the peace of mankind, and to right a great historic wrong. I cannot believe that the greatest colonial Power in the world will fail when it is faced with the task of placing its unique colonising experience at the service of the reconstruction of the ancient home of the People of the Bible. The task may not be an easy one for the Mandatory Power, but for the success it will attain it is assured of the undying gratitude not only of the Jews but of all that is noblest in mankind. {signed} Albert Einstein - Albert Einstein, About Zionism , pp 54-62

PROOF BY THOMAS WICTOR THAT BURNING OF JORDAN PILOT WAS STAGED…PILOT MADE TO BELIEVE HE WOULD LIVE SO HE COOPERATED

Head bowed in submission. Later he was on his knees in submission. Before he had been marched around under direction of a “Director”. Theme of Islamic State in this film production is SUBMISSION…submission to the on high! Most simple explanation is that he was promised he would live if he cooperated. He was shot in the head and flames were added by technology (this technology is really simple and according to Thomas Wictor in this case crudely applied) This explanation is OPPOSITE of conspiracy thought. It offers the SIMPLEST explanation! I fight Holocaust Denial conspiracists like David Icke by seeking the simplest explanation for phenomena.

FELIX QUIGLEY SAYS…This is the only explanation that makes sense about the burning of the Jordan pilot. The whole thing was staged by the Islamic State director (film director…or somebody with some knowledge of same). The question is why he did not fight back fiercely if he knew he was going to be burned alive. He was a military man. He was an Arab man. So why cooperate. That has never been explained until now…so give this a read.

I am very opposed to conspiracy theory. I seek always the simplest solution. And this is the simplest solution as to why the pilot ( brave man by very nature of his profession) did not fight for all he was worth

An extract “The terrorists had a Muslim pilot. They could make a statement about their own fearsomeness, the vulnerability of the aircraft they hate, and the danger of “betraying Islam.” It could be the greatest recruiting tool of all time—as long as the pilot were controlled. A military man, Lieutenant al-Kasasbeh would almost certainly fight if he were told he was going to be burned alive. What would he gain by cooperating?

His life. I believe he cooperated and mimed being burned to death because he was told that he would be spared and kept prisoner. Someone else suggested that he cooperated in exchange for a more merciful death by gunshot. I don’t think that would guarantee his cooperation.

Italian security contractor Fabrizio Quattrocchi was kidnapped in Iraq by al Qaeda. When they took him out on April 14, 2004, to murder him for a propaganda film, he fought, he tried to tear off his hood, and he shouted, “I’ll show you how an Italian dies!” before being shot.

Fabrizio_Quattrocchi

The video of the murder was useless for propaganda purposes.

More recently, a defector from the Islamic State explained why he left the group.

He said he found the courage to attempt an escape after seeing a Kurdish fighter beheaded.

“I decided to risk my life to escape after I witnessed a wounded, captured Kurdish YPG fighter publicly beheaded. He was about my age, but unlike me he was extremely brave,” said Omer.

“He spat on every jihadist around him. He shouted slogans about Kurdish freedom and Abdullah Ocalan. I had never seen anyone so brave in my life. His fingers were cut yet he shouted insults against the jihadists. He was finally beheaded from behind to suffer, and salt was put on his half-cut neck to make him die in agony, but he did not give up until he painfully died,” he said.

Imagine if Lieutenant al-Kasasbeh had fought every attempt to put him in the cage. What if he’d spat and shouted insults? This couldn’t be risked, given that the Islamic State is not likely going to get another pilot anytime soon. Islamic State fighters are sadistic barbarians, but their leaders have rational, long-term plans. That’s why they staged the burning. It was the only way they could be assured that Lieutenant al-Kasasbeh would cooperate.

They wanted him to look penitent as he burned, holding his head in his hands, and they wanted him to sink to his knees in defeat, begging Allah for forgiveness. If they’d drugged him, he wouldn’t have been able to follow the director’s instructions. He had to be motivated, which means they promised him that he would live. Also, if he’d actually been burned alive, he may have toppled the cage in his involuntary death throes. Since they were going to use CGI flames, they needed to have the cage perfectly stationary.”
http://www.thomaswictor.com/why-would-the-islamic-state-fake-the-video/

THE MASSIVE DANGER OF IRAN TO CIVILIZATION MEANS THAT WE SUPPORT TOTALLY NETANYAHU SPEAKING TO CONGRESS ON MARCH 3

The crucifixion of William of Norwich depicted on a rood screen in Holy Trinity church, Loddon, Norfolk (picture from Wikipedia)

The attacks on Netanyahu by the Fascist “Left” today are not simply Antisemitism in a general sense. Rather they are the descent into the hell of the Middle Ages as the story below gives a glimpse into…

In England in 1144 Jews of Norwich were accused of ritual murder after a boy, William of Norwich, was found dead with stab wounds in the woods. William’s hagiographer, Thomas of Monmouth, claimed that every year there is an international council of Jews at which they choose the country in which a child will be killed during Easter, because, he claimed, of a Jewish prophecy that states that the killing of a Christian child each year will ensure that the Jews will be restored to the Holy Land. In 1144 England was chosen, and the leaders of the Jewish community delegated the Jews of Norwich to perform the killing. They then abducted and crucified William.[18] The legend was turned into a cult, with William acquiring the status of martyr and pilgrims bringing offerings to the local church.[19]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_libel

Mr Netanyahu took a noticeably hard-line on Iran on Monday at a ceremony ushering in General Gadi Eisenkot as the new army chief-of-staff, in place of the outgoing Benny Gantz, who is retiring.

“I promise you Gadi – you will not have a single day of grace,” he said. “The Middle East is disintegrating. States are collapsing. An empire is charging into this vacuum – Iran. It aspires to acquire nuclear weapons. It is trying to encircle us with four murderous armies.

“It vows openly to destroy the state of Israel in one way or another. We will require every tool, every person, because there’s no mercy for the weak in the Middle East. Only the strong ones survive.”

 

We Trotskyists on 4international were openly critical of Netanyahu in the past in particular of his allowing Jihadist scum of Hamas and Islamic Jihad to hit Sderot in Israel with rockets over a period of not weeks but many years. That was our criticism from the Trotskyist and Patriotic pro-Jewish side of a leadership which sadly too often fails the Jews.

 

BUT…The decision of Netanyahu to speak to the US Congress on March 3 2015 is different and very different. Completely different. To the nth degree of difference!

 

In this case we urge Netanyahu to do just this – to go to America and to explain to members of Congress (and through them to the great American people including  American working class people) what is the GREAT DANGER OF IRAN and the great danger of a NUCLEAR ARMED Iran. First to Jews and Israel…Second to the whole of civilization.

 

This position of ours is so unusual on the present day “left” that we need to give a little note of explanation. We cannot do this fully here as books would need to be written to thoroughly explain but some will and can understand … just as the history of Israel has been lied and distorted so has the history of Trotskyism been lied and distorted. We will of course come back to this.

 

We will be covering this visit closely over the next 2 weeks and I wish to here reaffirm the words of Netanyahu as reproduced above by The Telegraph

 

The Middle East is disintegrating. States are collapsing. An empire is charging into this vacuum – Iran.

 

This will be the central content of our articles

I CALL ON ALL OF IRELAND AND ISRAEL TO ALSO SUPPORT TOTALLY EL SISI

El Sisi is different. Unlike Netanyahu he is not simply a talker. I will never and can never forgive Netanyahu because he watched Hamas and Islamic Jihad bombs rain down on Sderot for 7 years without acting thus sacificing Jews. El Sisi acted the next morning after the horrific murder of poor Egyptian Copts in Libya by Islamic State savages.

I support el Sisi and call on all of Ireland and Israel to also support el Sisi.

I wrote 3 days ago the following:

“Libya was a relatively settled and prosperous country with many improvements made on the basis of its oil development market by Colonel Gadhafi, who also to his credit had a strong line in assistance to the impoverished Africa and Africans south of Libya
That all came to a shuddering end when NATO, America and leaders like William Hague attacked Libya placing Jihadists in power. The above and much more is the result.
We as a Trotskyist organization said at the time that leaders like Gadhafi had to be defended against the Jihad. There is no if and but. To block the deadly Jihad it is necessary to defend all secular leaders against the Jihad.
This certainly applied to Milosevic, but also much wider, namely the Shah against Khomeini, Gaghbo in Ivory Coast, Ben Ali in Tunisia, Mubarak and now el Sisi in Egypt, Assad and of course Gadhafi
Under Obama, under Cameron, under Sarkozy – we descend into a dark night.

http://4international.me/2015/02/13/libya-under-obama-we-are-descending-into-the-dark-night-of-humanity/